RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and

Similar documents
RULE 250. MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL AND JUDICIAL EDUCATION

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

Indiana Rules of Court Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

Proposed Rule Change to Kan. Sup. R Registration of Attorneys.

People v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014.

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Report of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee

People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney

RULE CHANGE 2011(4) COLORADO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RULES 1.15, 1.16A, 3.6 AND 3.8. Rule 1.15 Safekeeping Property

People v. Allyn. 10PDJ068. February 7, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn B. Allyn (Attorney Registration

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Sanction Imposed: Two Year and Three Month Suspension

BYLAWS OF THE WYOMING STATE BAR

People v. David William Beale. 16PDJ066. February 9, 2017.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina

Monday 2nd August, 2004

RULE CHANGE 2019(06) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

People v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017.

Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Daniel A. Vigil and Mickey W. Smith, both members of the bar.

1. Admission to the Bar. A lawyer is qualified for admission to the bar of the district if the lawyer meets the following requirements:

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS. Rule 1A:5. Virginia Corporate Counsel & Corporate Counsel Registrants.

People v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney

People v. Romo-Vejar, 05PDJ057. March 31, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION JUDGE ADVOCATE PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26

People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.

People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding

Rules 1.9, 1.9A (New Rule), and 2.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

NASHVILLE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE PLAN

RULE CHANGE 2017(06) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 52. Findings by the Court COMMENT

LEGAL PROFESSION ACT

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

NORTH CAROLINA APPELLATE PRO BONO PROGRAM

People v. William F. Levings. 16PDJ082. April 17, 2017.

Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board Members Helen R. Stone and Paul Willumstad, both members of the bar.

AMEMDMENTS TO COMMENTS 5 AND 13 OF RULE 5.5 PROPOSED BY VIRGINIA STATE BAR S MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE TASK FORCE ON MAY 21, 2013

RULE CHANGE 2016(11) COLORADO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

LOCAL RULES OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Rule Change #2000(20)

People v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017.

People v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent

People v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory

Steven M. Mezrow, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1989 SESSION CHAPTER 823 HOUSE BILL 992

Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an

What You Need to Know, But Do Not Know About USPTO Discipline. Cameron Weiffenbach AIPLA Spring Meeting May 3, 2013

The court will accept comment on the proposed rule changes until 5 p.m. Monday, August 17, Comment may be made to

People v. Bigley. 10PDJ100. May 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Michael F.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING REINSTATEMENT

M.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows.

Rule 1A:8. Military Spouse Provisional Admission.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:

em" oj fjlicfummd on fjuday, tfre 30tli day, oj (9clolkJt, 2015.

LICENSED ATTORNEYS AND THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW Practical Tips to Avoid the Unauthorized Practice of Law by Yourself and Others

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

TEXAS MCLE REGULATIONS. 1.1 The definitions set forth in Article XII, State Bar Rules, Section 2, shall apply to these Texas MCLE Regulations.

LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT RULE XVII ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA

People v. Varen Craig Belair. 17PDJ060. February 12, 2018.

Part 3 Rules for Providing Legal Representation in Non- Capital Criminal Appeals and Non-Criminal Appeals

ALABAMA STATE BAR RULES FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

PROPOSED NEW RULE OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ALLOWING LIMITED ADMISSION OF MILITARY-SPOUSE ATTORNEYS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1-1. NAME. The name of the body regulated by these rules shall be THE FLORIDA BAR.

RULE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW

SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. Atlanta June 11, The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed:

11/03/11 CHAPTER 122C - Article 5 - Part 7 Page 1

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. Division of Professions and Occupations. Office of Naturopathic Doctors COLORADO REGULATIONS (CCR) 749-1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND. IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES, PART 6, IV, PARAGRAPH 3(e) ORGANIZATION & GOVERNMENT OF THE VSB

RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)

People v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018.

MODEL FEDERAL RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT

Part 3 Authority to Practise Law

Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Annita M. Menogan and Laird T. Milburn, both members of the bar.

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION

People v. Kevin D. Heupel. 17PDJ005. July 11, 2017.

RULES OF OPERATION OF THE WYOMING STATE BAR LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE [EFFECTIVE UNTIL OCTOBER 1, 2017.]

CHAPTER 82. CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION A. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY B. CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD REGULATIONS... 1

People v. Kem W. Swarts. 17PDJ038. March 1, 2018.

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

Rule 16. Appointed Counsel

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Ohio State Bar Association. Elder Law. Attorney Information and Standards

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

ACUPUNCTURE LICENSURE RULES AND REGULATIONS

Military Spouse Provisional Admission.

CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

Working Draft of Proposed Rules (Redline Version)

THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1571

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 05-BG Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar No.

People v. Lindsey Scott Topper. 16PDJ004. July 27, 2016.

Transcription:

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and 260.6. Rule 205.3. Pro Hac Vice Authority Before State Courts Out-of-State Attorney (1) through (6) [NO CHANGE] (7) Discipline and Disability Jurisdiction. Any attorney authorized to appear under this rule shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, except for the provisions of Colo. RPC 1. 15A through 1.15E that require an attorney to have a business account and a trust account in a financial institution doing business in Colorado; and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, except C.R.C.P. 227 (general registration fees) and C.R.C.P. 260 (mandatory continuing legal education). (1) through (6) ]NO CHANGE] Rule 205.5. Pro Hac Vice Authority - Foreign Attorney (7) Discipline and Disability Jurisdiction. Any foreign attorney authorized to appear under this rule shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, except for the provisions of Colo. RPC 1. 15A through 1.15E that require an attorney to have a business account and a trust account in a financial institution doing business in Colorado; and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, except C.R.C.P. 227 (general registration fees) and C.R.C.P. 260 (mandatory continuing legal education). (1) through (4) [NO CHANGE] Rule 205.6. Practice Pending Admission (5) Discipline and Disability Jurisdiction. Any attorney practicing under this rule shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, except for the provisions of Colo. RPC 1. 15A through 1.15E that require an attorney to have a business account and a trust account in a financial institution doing business in Colorado; and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, except C.R.C.P. 227 (general registration fees) and C.R.C.P. 260 (mandatory continuing legal education). (6) through (8) [NO CHANGE] 1

Rule 224. Provision of Legal Services Following Determination of a Major Disaster (1) [NO CHANGE] (2) Temporary Practice in Colorado Following a Major Disaster in Colorado. Following the determination of an emergency in Colorado pursuant to paragraph (1) of this rule, an out-of-state attorney who meets the conditions of C.R.C.P. 205.1(a) and (b) C.R.C.P. 220 (1)(a) and (b) may be allowed to establish a place for the temporary practice of law from which the attorney may provide legal services not otherwise authorized by Rule 205.1 Rule 220. The terms and conditions of such temporary practice will be set forth in the Supreme Court's emergency order, and will depend upon the nature and extent of the emergency affecting the justice system, and the needs for legal services resulting from such emergency. (3) Temporary Practice in Colorado Following a Major Disaster in Another Jurisdiction. Following the determination of a major disaster in another jurisdiction in the United States, pursuant to paragraph (1) of this rule, an out-of-state attorney who meets the conditions of C.R.C.P. 205.1(a) and (b) C.R.C.P. 220(1) (a) and (b) may establish a place for the temporary practice of law in Colorado not otherwise authorized by C.R.C.P. 205.1 C.R.C.P. 220, from which such attorney may provide legal services related to that attorney's practice of law in the licensing jurisdiction or the area of such licensing jurisdiction where the major disaster occurred. (4) [NO CHANGE] (5) Court Appearances. The authority granted by this rule does not include appearances in Colorado state courts of record or administrative tribunals, except: (a) When the out-of-state attorney files a motion for pro hac vice admission pursuant to C.R.C.P. 205.3 and 205.4C.R.C.P. 221 and 221.1, and obtains permission from the trial court for such appearance (the Supreme Court may waive pro hac vice admission fees at the time of the determination of the major disaster as described in paragraph (1) or at any time thereafter while the determination remains in effect); or (b) When the Supreme Court, in any determination made under paragraph (1), grants blanket permission to attorneys providing legal services pursuant to paragraph (2) to appear in all or designated Colorado courts or administrative tribunals, thereby suspending the pro hac vice application and fee requirements set forth in C.R.C.P. 221 and 221.1C.R.C.P. 205.3 and 205.4. 2

(6) Disciplinary Authority and Registration Requirement. Out-of-state attorneys who establish a place for the temporary practice of law in Colorado pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (3) are subject to this Supreme Court's disciplinary authority and the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct as provided in C.R.C.P. 205.1(3) C.R.C.P. 220(3) and Colo. RPC 8.5. Prior to opening such place for the temporary practice of law in Colorado, these out-of-state attorneys shall file a registration statement with the Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Registration. The registration statement shall be in a form prescribed by the Supreme Court. Any out-of-state attorney who provides legal services pursuant to this rule shall not be considered to be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Colorado, and shall be deemed, for the purposes of Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 12, Article 5, Sections 101, 112 and 115, to have obtained a license for the limited scope of practice specified in this rule. (7) [NO CHANGE] (1) [NO CHANGE] (2) Statement. Rule 227. Registration Fee A. Registration Fee of Attorneys and Attorney Judges (a) Contents. The annual registration statement shall be on a form prescribed by the Clerk, setting forth: (1) date of admission to the Bar of the Colorado Supreme Court; (2) registration number; (3) current residence and office addresses and, if applicable, a preferred mailing address for the Colorado Courts, along with current telephone numbers and email addresses; (4) certification as to (a) whether the attorney has been ordered to pay child support and, if so, whether the attorney is in compliance with any child support order, (b) whether the attorney or the attorney's law firm has established one or more interest-bearing accounts for client funds as provided in Colo. RPC 1. 15B and if so, the name of the financial institution, account number and location of the financial institution, or, if not, the reason for the exemption, and (c) with respect to attorneys engaged in the private practice of law, whether the attorney is currently covered by professional liability insurance and, if so, whether the attorney intends to maintain insurance during the time the attorney is engaged in the private practice of law; and (5) such other information as the Clerk may from time to time direct. 3

(b) Notification of Change. Every attorney shall file a supplemental statement of change in the information previously submitted, including home and business addresses, within 28 days of such change. Such change shall include, without limitation, the lapse or termination of professional liability insurance without continuous coverage. (c) Availability of Information. The information provided by the lawyer regarding professional liability insurance shall be available to the public through the Supreme Court Office of Attorney Registration and on the Supreme Court Office of Attorney Registration website. (3) through (8) [NO CHANGE] [NO CHANGE] B. Registration Fee of Non-Attorney Judges COMMENT The Supreme Court sets the annual attorney registration fee. The annual attorney registration fee includes both attorneys on active status and attorneys on inactive status. Attorneys admitted under C.R.C.P. 204 C.R.C.P. 222 (Single-Client Certification) annually pay the active attorney fee as required by C.R.C.P. 204.1 through 204.6. The Supreme Court apportions the active attorney fee to the various attorney regulation and registration offices; the continuing legal education office; the Attorneys' Fund for Client Protection; and the Colorado Attorney Assistance Program. To cover the operating costs of the various programs the court increased the annual attorney registration fee every six to eight years. In 2006, the court increased the active attorney registration fee fifteen percent. In 1998, to fund major changes to the attorney regulation system the court increased the fee seventy percent. The infrequent increases resulted in a surplus in the attorney registration/regulation fund for a period of years. In an effort to reduce the impact of a substantial fee increase every six to eight years the court adopted a more modest and consistent way of determining attorney registration fees. The court will authorize smaller but more frequent fee increases as necessary to cover operating expenses related to the costs of the Attorneys' Fund for Client Protection, attorney regulation, unauthorized practice of law matters, and administration of this rule. 4

Rule 251.1. Discipline and Disability; Policy Jurisdiction (a) [NO CHANGE] (b) Jurisdiction. Every attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado is subject to the disciplinary and disability jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in all matters relating to the practice of law. Every attorney practicing law in this state pursuant to C.R.C.P. 204 or 205 C.R.C.P. 220, or admitted pro hac vice pursuant to C.R.C.P. 221 or 221.1, or certified to represent a singleclient pursuant to C.R.C.P. 222 is subject to the disciplinary and disability jurisdiction of the Supreme Court when practicing law pursuant to such rules. Every attorney serving as a magistrate pursuant to Colorado Rules for Magistrates, Chapter 35, vol. 12, C.R.S., is subject to the disciplinary and disability jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for conduct performed as a magistrate as provided by C.R.M. 5(h). (c) through (d) [NO CHANGE] Rule 260.2. CLE Requirements (1) through (3) [NO CHANGE] (4) This subsection 4 is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 203.2(6), 203.3(4), and 203.4(6) 201.14(3). (5) to (6) [NO CHANGE] Rule 260.6. Compliance (1) through (4) [NO CHANGE] (5) In the event a registered attorney or judge shall fail to complete the required units at the end of each applicable compliance period, the final Affidavit may be accompanied by a specific plan for making up the deficiency of units necessary within 119 days (17 weeks) after the date of final Affidavit. When filed, the plan shall be accompanied by a make-up plan filing fee, the amount of which shall be determined by the Board annually and which shall be used to cover the costs of processing the plan. Such plan shall be deemed accepted by the Board unless within 14 days after the receipt of such final affidavit the Board notifies the affiant to the contrary. Full completion of the affiant's plan shall be reported by Affidavit to the Board not later than 14 days following such 119-day period. Failure of the affiant to complete the plan within such 119-day period shall invoke the sanctions set forth in Paragraph (6). 5

(a) Section 5 does not apply to the required course on professionalism mandated by C.R.C.P. 203.2(6), 203.3(4), and 203.4(6) C.R.C.P. 201.14. (6) In the event that any registered attorney or judge shall fail to comply with these rules or Rules 203.2(6), 203.3(4), or 203.4(6) Rule 201.14 in any respect, the Board shall promptly notify such registered attorney or judge of the nature of the noncompliance by a statement of noncompliance. The statement shall advise the registered attorney or judge that within 14 days either the noncompliance must be corrected or a request for a hearing before the Board must be made, and that upon failure to do either, the statement of noncompliance shall be filed with the Supreme Court. Sections (7) through (13) [NO CHANGE] Amended and Adopted by the Court, En Banc, January 14, 2015, effective immediately. By the Court: Nathan B. Coats Justice, Colorado Supreme Court 6