Political public opinion of Montenegro

Similar documents
JAVNO MNJENJE CRNE GORE

National Democratic Institute for International Affairs Montenegro. Key Findings of Public Opinion Poll November 2008

INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION Montenegro Early Parliamentary Elections, 14 October 2012

Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights MONTENEGRO EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 14 OCTOBER 2012

INTERIM REPORT 8 28 September September 2016

INTERIM REPORT 7 26 March March 2018

Public Opinion in Montenegro. October 6-12, 2017

Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights MONTENEGRO. EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 14 October 2012

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS

Montenegro. by Daliborka Uljarević and Stevo Muk. Capital: Podgorica Population: 0.6 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$13,110

ODIHR ELECTION OBSERVATION

Montenegro Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Publisher: Centre for Civic Education (CCE) Library: Democracy. Editor: Daliborka Uljarević. Authors: Damir Nikočević Svetlana Pešić

BTI 2016 Montenegro Country Report

Montenegro Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Civic Monitoring of the Parliamentary and Local Elections Montenegro. Final Report

REPORT ON THE SEEMO PRESS FREEDOM MISSION TO MONTENEGRO 8-10 November 2011

Ministry for Human and Minority Rights. Department for Gender Equality

Montenegro. Migration Profile EXTENDED VERSION. Country perspective. 1. Resident foreign population by gender, age cohorts and citizenship

II. THE BACKGROUND: GAMBLES

Monitoring of Judicial Reform. March Citizens view of the judicial system in Montenegro. Telephone survey

Background briefing November. Montenegro: Issues and Questions Brussels, 26 November 1999

INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Republic of Serbia (Serbia and Montenegro) Presidential Election Second Round, 27 June 2004

CASE STUDY POLITICAL PARTIES AND MONEY - FROM PUBLIC TO SECRET

Developing a Minority Policy in Montenegro. First Roundtable. Przno, Montenegro October 21-22, 2005

Bojana Minic September 2018

MONTENEGRO PHARMACEUTICAL CHAMBER OF MONTENEGRO

Podgorica/Brussels, 30 November 2000

Armenian National Study

IUSY MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION FORM

DRAFT MONTENEGRO THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL WELFARE

Minorities in Montenegro Legislation and Practice

During the previous period, the Central Election

METHODOLOGY. ! Sample size: 2014 n=1040, 2013 n=1060. ! Data collection method: Face-to-face at the respondent's houshold

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES

THE MEDIA POLICY IN MONTENEGRO: FROM 1993 TO 2013

Radicalizing Electoral System Effects on Support for Nationalist Hardliners in Serbia Daniel Bochsler Supplementary material, 16 December 2010

Media Pluralism Monitor 2016 Monitoring Risks for Media Pluralism in the EU and Beyond

MONTENEGRO: SETTLING FOR INDEPENDENCE?

AMENDMENTS I TO XVI TO THE CONSTITUTION OF MONTENEGRO

Latvia s Political Survey 2014 All waves (July - November) Summary Report

INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION. Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions

COUNTRY INFORMATION BULLETIN

COMBATING HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Campaigning in the Eastern European Borderlands

Overview of the Structure of National and Entity Government

ctüä tåxçà Éy `ÉÇàxÇxzÜÉ CONTENTS IN FOCUS The 24th Annual Session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly held in Helsinki

Georgian National Study

Montenegro. by Daliborka Uljarević and Stevo Muk. Capital: Podgorica Population: 0.6 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$13,700

STATEMENT BY DR. NEBOJSA COVIC DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL Vienna February 7, 2002

The EU & the Western Balkans

POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS

Improving democracy in spite of political rhetoric

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 29 September and 13 October and

FOURTH WORK REPORT OF THE ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE OF THE PARLIAMENT OF MONTENEGRO. December 2012 February 2016

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS KOSOVO NEWS INTEREST INDEX FINAL TOPLINE April 15-18, 1999 N=1,000

Georgian National Study

Kazakhstan National Opinion Poll

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA S 2014 ELECTIONS POST-ELECTION ANALYSIS

Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe. Final Country Report. Montenegro

15/07/13 Observation of the conduct of the referendum on state status of the Republic of Montenegro (Serbia and Montenegro) on 21 may 2006

Survey. Board: GD.i.R. Dkfm.Dr. Heinz KIENZL (Acting president) Univ.-Prof.Dr. Rudolf RICHTER (Science director) Author: Mag.

PROTECTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE POSITION OF ROMA IN MONTENEGRO 1. GENERAL NOTES

CRS Report for Congress

REPORT THE CITIZENS OPINION OF THE POLICE FORCE. The Results of a Public Opinion Survey Conducted in Serbia.

When the Soviet Union breaks up after more than 40 years of controlling Eastern Europe, it brings both East and West new challenges and opportunities.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

European pulse. Are Montenegrins regaining trust in the electoral process? Focus. President of the Board of Queer Montenegro, Danijel Kalezić

Public Opinion Poll Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) August 2010

Development of Intra-Party Democracy in Montenegro

Section 3. The Collapse of the Soviet Union

Illegal construction in Montenegro

GCE AS 2 Student Guidance Government & Politics. Course Companion Unit AS 2: The British Political System. For first teaching from September 2008

REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA EARLY MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS FOR MAYORS AND COUNCILLORS IN BUJANOVAC, MEDVEDJA AND PRESEVO 28 JULY 2002

Georgian National Study

COUNCIL OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FOR CROATS OUTSIDE THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Conditions on U.S. Aid to Serbia

The Determinants of Party Consensus on European Integration in Montenegro

S L O V E N I A SMALL STATE INFLUENCE IN EUROPEAN UNION AND IN THE WORLD. Miro Haček, PhD

The OSCE Mission to Serbia and Montenegro

Armenian National Study

CRS Report for Congress

Public Opinion in Slovakia. March 8-12, 2017

Standard Eurobarometer EUROBAROMETER 65 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION SPRING 2006 NATIONAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CROATIA

A Study. Investigating Trends within the Jordanian Society regarding Political Parties and the Parliament

ALBANIA CITIZEN ATTITUDES ABOUT ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ISSUES

APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER IN MONTENEGRO. 2nd monitoring cycle. A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Charter

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS MARCH 1999 NEWS INTEREST INDEX FINAL TOPLINE March 24-30, 1999 N=1,786

Public Funds and Office in the Election Campaign

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

On October 28-29, 2006, Serbia held a two-day referendum that ratified a new constitution to replace the Milosevic-era constitution.

Republic of Kenya Election Day Poll. December 27, 2007 International Republican Institute Strategic Public Relations and Research

CHALLENGES TO RECONSTITUTING CONFLICT-SENSITIVE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE CASE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER IN MONTENEGRO

Media Literacy and Divisions in Montenegro

THE PROBLEM OF ISLAMIST EXTREMISM IN SERBIA: WHAT ARE THE DRIVERS AND HOW TO ADDRESS THEM

COUNTRY BASELINE UNDER THE ILO DECLARATION ANNUAL REVIEW MONTENEGRO (2017) THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF FORCED OR COMPULSORY LABOUR

LAW ON REGISTERS OF ELECTORS

PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey on Campaign Ethics

Transcription:

Department For Empiric Researches Political public opinion of Montenegro Project supported by February 2007. Foundation Open Society Institute Montenegrin Office www.cedem.cg.yu 1

SAMPLE Research conducted in period 09 18th February 2007. Standard CEDEM s twofold stratified sample with random selection of testees in final units applied. Projected sample: 1000 testees Implemented sample: 994 testees from 9 municipalities (Pljevlja, Berane, Bijelo Polje, Podgorica, Nikšic, Cetinje, HercegNovi, Bar and Ulcinj) Standard sample error in respect to demographic structure is 11.5. 2

BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE Gender structure of teestes Age structure of teestes Men 50.8 18 34 years 37.5 Women 49.2 35 54 years 40.4 TOTAL 100.0 Over 55 years 21.6 No answer 0.5 TOTAL 100.0 3

BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE Religion of interviewees Nationality of the interviewees Orthodox 74.4 Montenegrins 46.2 Islamic 18.5 Serbs 34.2 Catholics 3.2 Bosnians 3.5 Atheist 3.9 Albanians 4.8 TOTAL 100.0 Muslims 8.9 Croats 1.2 Others 1.3 TOTAL 100.0 4

CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS Positions of the entire group of testees expressed by coefficients (K) Rank / Institution N K SD 1 Serbian Orthodox Church 806 3,29 1.667 2 Montenegrin Parliament 979 2,96 2.124 3 President of Montenegro 919 2,69 1.439 4 Montenegrin Government 923 2,56 1.384 5 Montenegrin Police 927 2,47 1.335 6 Montenegrin Orthodox Church 733 2,35 1.518 7 Montenegrin Judiciary 898 2,26 1.245 8 Political parties in Montenegro 894 2,16 1.126 N number of tesees who expressed their position; K Confidence coefficient; SD standard deviation; 5

CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS Ruling parties supporters Rank / Institution N K SD President of Montenegro 277 3,98 1,099 Montenegrin Government 279 3,79 1,181 Montenegrin Parliament 284 3,67 1,540 Montenegrin Orthodox Church 206 3,44 1,440 Montenegrin Police 277 3,41 1,268 Montenegrin Judiciary 261 3,06 1,323 Political parties in Montenegro 259 2,88 1,189 Serbian Orthodox Church 202 2,53 1,552 N number of tesees who expressed their position; K Confidence coefficient; SD standard deviation; 6

CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS Opposition parties supporters Rank / Institution N K SD Serbian Orthodox Church 343 3,86 1,486 Montenegrin Parliament 375 2,49 2,110 Montenegrin Police 361 2,02 1,109 President of Montenegro 357 2,01 1,128 Montenegrin Government 356 1,92 1,041 Montenegrin Judiciary 346 1,92 1,022 Political parties in Montenegro 352 1,90 0,934 Montenegrin Orthodox Church 308 1,80 1,276 N number of tesees who expressed their position; K Confidence coefficient; SD standard deviation; 7

CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS Swing voters and abstainers Rank / Institution N K SD Serbian Orthodox Church 261 3,13 1,716 Montenegrin Parliament 320 2,88 2,407 President of Montenegro 285 2,31 1,256 Montenegrin Police 289 2,15 1,204 Montenegrin Government 287 2,14 1,143 Montenegrin Orthodox Church 219 2,08 1,365 Montenegrin Judiciary 291 1,94 1,077 Political parties in Montenegro 283 1,81 0,974 N number of tesees who expressed their position; K Confidence coefficient; SD standard deviation; 8

CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS Trend June 06. August 06. February 07. 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Serbian Orthodox Church M ontenegrin Parliament President of M ontenegro M ontenegrin Government M ontenegrin Police M ontenegrin Orthodox Church M ontenegrin Judiciary Political parties in M ontenegro 9

EVALUATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES PERFORMANCES IN THE PARLIAMENT Rank N K SD PZP / Movement for Change 869 2.68 1.357 DPS / Democratic Party of Socialists 894 2.58 1.579 SDP / Socialdemocratic Party 876 2.30 1.447 SNS / Serbian People s Party 854 2.19 1.433 Serbian Radicals 829 1.96 1.404 NS / People s Party 855 1.93 1.192 SNP / Socialist People s Party 851 1.92 1.214 LPCG / Liberal Party of Montenegro 831 1.90 1.165 DSS / Democratic Serbian Party 842 1.83 1.153 NSS / People s Socialist Party 816 1.68 1.031 DSJ / Party of Democratic Unity 798 1.62 0.982 Bosnians Party 805 1.55 0.971 DUA / Democratic Union of Albanians DSCG / Democratic Union in Montenegro HGI / Croatian Civic Initiative "Albanian Alternative" 794 780 775 783 1.52 1.51 1.46 1.41 0.990 0.914 0.900 0.882 N number of tesees who expressed their position K Confidence coefficient SD standard deviation 10

EVALUATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES PERFORMANCES IN THE PARLIAMENT Ruling parties supporters Rank N K SD DPS 281 4,26 1,064 SDP 271 3,65 1,264 PZP 265 2,45 1,233 LPCG 253 2,37 1,187 DUA 238 1,84 1,134 Bosnians Party 248 1,78 1,070 HGI 232 1,76 1,047 DSCG 230 1,75 0,975 "Albanian Alternative" 233 1,65 0,982 SNP 259 1,46 0,807 SNS 254 1,39 0,801 NS 259 1,39 0,746 DSJ 244 1,33 0,664 NSS 251 1,31 0,671 DSS 253 1,29 0,655 Serbian Radicals 248 1,26 0,704 11

EVALUATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES PERFORMANCES IN THE PARLIAMENT Opposition parties supporters Rank N K SD PZP 349 3,09 1,399 SNS 355 2,93 1,524 Serbian Radicals 342 2,61 1,616 NS 347 2,44 1,318 SNP 347 2,42 1,383 DSS 344 2,31 1,303 NSS 326 2,06 1,221 DSJ 324 1,94 1,169 LPCG 338 1,73 1,184 DPS 351 1,70 1,056 SDP 347 1,61 1,053 Bosnians Party 327 1,50,979 DSCG 324 1,40,846 DUA 330 1,39,894 HGI 323 1,39,872 "Albanian Alternative" 330 1,34,862 12

EVALUATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES PERFORMANCES IN THE PARLIAMENT Swing voters and abstainers Rank N K SD PZP 255 2,36 1,281 DPS 262 1,96 1,169 SNS 246 1,94 1,272 SDP 257 1,81 1,074 NS 249 1,77 1,096 Serbian Radicals 239 1,74 1,202 SNP 246 1,72 1,060 DSS 245 1,71 1,056 LPCG 240 1,63 0,949 NSS 239 1,55 0,882 DSJ 229 1,47 0,837 DSCG 226 1,43 0,904 DUA 226 1,37 0,880 Bosnians Party 230 1,36 0,788 "Albanian Alternative" 220 1,27 0,742 HGI 220 1,26 0,665 13

SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO Very dissatisfied 17.6 Mostly dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Mostly satisfied 15.1 17.9 44.2 Very satisfied 5.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 14

SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO Satisfaction with the Government Electoral preference Very dissatisfied Mostly dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Mostly satisfied Very satisfied Ruling parties supporters 3.8 9.8 36.7 35.3 14.3 Opposition parties supporters 26.1 24.0 40.3 8.3 1.3 Swing voters and abstainers 20.1 17.8 55.7 5.1 1.3 X 2 = 256,106; p<0.01 15

SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO Trend 50.0 June 06. September 06. February 07. 45.0 44.2 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 30.9 23.5 23.2 23.7 22.0 19.8 20.1 17.9 17.6 17.1 15.1 10.7 9.1 5.1 0.0 Very dissatisfied Mostly dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Mostly satisfied Very satisfied 16

MINISTRIES REFORM CAPACITIES REGARDING EU INTEGRATIONS Ministry No capacities at all Little bit Positions Significant capacities Full capacity MINISTRY OF JUSTICE 35.3 38.8 18.2 7.7 MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR 30.9 35.9 22.4 10.7 MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 33.3 33.5 21.8 11.4 MINISTRY OF FINANCE 30.4 34.8 22.6 12.2 FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTRY 29.1 28.1 25.9 17.0 MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 32.3 30.8 22.5 14.4 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE 28.1 35.4 22.5 14.0 MINISTRY OF MARITIME AND TRANSPORT 29.4 36.9 22.9 10.8 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE 28.9 32.1 24.3 14.7 MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 26.3 29.9 26.2 17.6 MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 37.8 32.0 18.5 11.8 MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SPORT, AND MEDIA 27.0 30.2 27.8 15.0 MINISTRY FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN AND MINORITIES RIGHTS 35.7 28.7 21.5 14.0 17

MINISTRIES REFORM CAPACITIES REGARDING EU INTEGRATIONS RANK Rank N K SD MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 783 2.35 1.052 MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SPORT, AND MEDIA 759 2.31 1.027 FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTRY 757 2.31 1.066 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE 773 2.25 1.030 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE 797 2.22 1.009 MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 771 2.19 1.044 MINISTRY OF FINANCE 777 2.17.995 MINISTRY OF MARITIME AND TRANSPORT 767 2.15.966 MINISTRY FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN AND MINORITIES RIGHTS 755 2.14 1.056 MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR 788 2.13.973 MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 755 2.11.998 MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 772 2.04 1.016 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE 783 1.98,919 18

CONFIDENCE IN POLITICIANS Entire group of testees Rating of the politician PO SD 1 Željko ŠTURANOVIĆ 2.99 1.443 2 Nebojša MEDOJEVIĆ 2.93 1.441 3 Milo ĐUKANOVIĆ 2.86 1.700 4 Filip VUJANOVIĆ 2.82 1.485 5 Andrija MANDIĆ 2.34 1.433 6 Ranko KRIVOKAPIĆ 2.32 1.504 7 Srđan MILIĆ 2.04 1.199 8 Miodrag ŽIVKOVIĆ 1.99 1.183 9 Predrag POPOVIĆ 1.97 1.183 10 Ranko KADIĆ 1.94 1.204 11 Zoran ŽIŽIĆ 1.88 1.216 12 Emilo LABUDOVIĆ 1.87 1.274 13 Ferhat DINOŠA 1.77 1.191 14 15 16 Mehmet BARDHI Rafet HUSOVIĆ Vasilj SINIŠTAJ 1.55 1.46 1.36 0.940 0.892 0.755 AS average score SD standard deviation 19

CONFIDENCE IN POLITICIANS Ruling parties supporters Rating of the politician PO SD Milo ĐUKANOVIĆ 4,53 0,995 Filip VUJANOVIĆ 4,13 1,041 Željko ŠTURANOVIĆ 4,04 1,083 Ranko KRIVOKAPIĆ 3,74 1,303 Nebojša MEDOJEVIĆ 2,47 1,275 Miodrag ŽIVKOVIĆ 2,37 1,231 Ferhat DINOŠA 2,28 1,349 Rafet HUSOVIĆ 1,82 1,019 Mehmet BARDHI 1,76 0,997 Srđan MILIĆ 1,73 0,980 Andrija MANDIĆ 1,68 1,053 Vasilj SINIŠTAJ 1,63 0,896 Predrag POPOVIĆ 1,52 0,878 Ranko KADIĆ Zoran ŽIŽIĆ Emilo LABUDOVIĆ 1,44 1,40 1,34 0,794 0,799 0,778 AS average score SD standard deviation 20

CONFIDENCE IN POLITICIANS Opposition parties supporters Rating of the politician PO SD Nebojša MEDOJEVIĆ 3,50 1,383 Andrija MANDIĆ 3,02 1,517 Željko ŠTURANOVIĆ 2,49 1,340 Predrag POPOVIĆ 2,48 1,274 Ranko KADIĆ 2,46 1,326 Srđan MILIĆ 2,44 1,315 Zoran ŽIŽIĆ 2,39 1,388 Emilo LABUDOVIĆ 2,34 1,411 Filip VUJANOVIĆ 2,14 1,244 Milo ĐUKANOVIĆ 1,95 1,320 Miodrag ŽIVKOVIĆ 1,81 1,149 Ranko KRIVOKAPIĆ 1,55 1,038 Ferhat DINOŠA 1,53 1,023 Mehmet BARDHI Rafet HUSOVIĆ 1,51 1,32 0,923 0,775 AS average score SD standard deviation Vasilj SINIŠTAJ 1,29 0,716 21

CONFIDENCE IN POLITICIANS Swing voters and abstainers Rating of the politician PO SD Nebojša MEDOJEVIĆ 2,63 1,423 Željko ŠTURANOVIĆ 2,58 1,337 Filip VUJANOVIĆ 2,37 1,295 Milo ĐUKANOVIĆ 2,35 1,465 Andrija MANDIĆ 2,05 1,233 Ranko KRIVOKAPIĆ 1,88 1,173 Miodrag ŽIVKOVIĆ 1,84 1,089 Srđan MILIĆ 1,77 1,057 Emilo LABUDOVIĆ 1,74 1,236 Ranko KADIĆ 1,72 1,090 Predrag POPOVIĆ 1,72 1,054 Zoran ŽIŽIĆ 1,65 1,040 Ferhat DINOŠA 1,58 1,078 Mehmet BARDHI Rafet HUSOVIĆ Vasilj SINIŠTAJ 1,41 1,30 1,18 0,869 0,798 0,547 AS average score SD standard deviation 22

WILL PARLIAMENTARY PARTIES REACH AN AGREEMENT ON NEW MONTENEGRIN CONSTITUTION? No, I m sure they won t 14.7 Yes, I m sure they will 16.0 I don t believe 18.3 I believe they will 51.0 23

WILL PARLIAMENTARY PARTIES REACH AN AGREEMENT ON NEW MONTENEGRIN CONSTITUTION? Position () Electoral preference Yes, I m sure they will I believe they will I don t believe No, I m sure they won t Ruling parties supporters 32.5 56.0 5.2 6.3 Opposition parties supporters 7.3 48.9 26.8 17.0 Swing voters and abstainers 16.0 51.1 18.2 14.6 X 2 = 125.371; p<0.01 24

ELECTORAL PREFERENCE DPS 24.0 SDP 3.1 PzP 15.8 SNS 7.5 SNP Serbian Radicals 4.0 2.8 Other parties Swing voters and abstainers 10.2 32.6 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 25

CONFIDENCE IN TVs TV CG 26.3 TV ELMAG 10.8 TV MONTENA 3.6 TV MBC 2.3 TV PINK 16.2 TV IN 27.0 RTS 1.4 Other TV's 12.5 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 26

CONFIDENCE IN TVs TREND TV stations Jan. 05. May 05. Sept. 05. Dec. 05. Jun 06. Sept. 06. Feb 07. TV CG 27.4 26.4 27.4 25.6 29.0 28.5 26.3 TV ELMAG 10.2 13.2 12.9 9.8 13.7 16.0 10.8 TV MONTENA 5.7 5.7 7.9 6.0 4.7 3.5 3.6 TV MBC 3.6 3.9 2.8 2.6 2.1 2.8 2.3 TV PINK 26.3 19.4 21.0 21.8 13.3 13.6 16.2 TV IN 19.3 22.4 22.5 22.7 28.7 23.8 27.0 ATLAS TV 2.3 RTS 6.5 1.5 1.9 2.7 1.6 2.0 1.4 Other TV s 1.0 7.5 3.7 8.9 4.7 9.9 12.5 N = 722 N = 765 N = 698 N = 737 N = 701 N = 745 N = 779 27

CONFIDENCE IN TVs IN PODGORICA TREND TV stations Jan. 05. May 05. Sept. 05. Dec. 05. Jun 06. Sept. 06. Feb. 07. TV CG 26.6 26.0 29.5 24.2 24.2 29.8 24.5 TV ELMAG 11.8 17.2 11.4 13.0 15.8 13.5 11.4 TV MONTENA 13.9 11.0 16.4 12.4 7.4 7.7 7.3 TV MBC 2.5 4.0 3.0 1.8 2.1 4.3 1.1 TV PINK 18.1 16.3 17.7 22.5 11.1 11.5 16.7 TV IN 18.6 17.4 20.5 22.4 35.8 27.4 32.2 ATLAS TV 2.6 RTS 7.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 Other TV s 0.8 7.5 1.5 3.2 1.1 5.8 6.1 N = 237 N = 249 N = 222 N = 229 N = 190 N = 208 N = 220 28

CONFIDENCE IN RADIO TREND Radio stations Jan. 05. May 05. Sept. 05. Dec. 05. Jun 06. Sept. 06. Feb. 07. Radio Crne Gore 24.4 24.5 30.5 28.6 30.3 28.8 22.2 Radio Elmag 23.7 23.5 25.2 22.8 23.4 25.1 20.3 Radio D 7.6 6.0 5.4 8.4 8.6 4.9 11.0 Antena M 4.3 5.3 6.2 3.6 6.3 5.1 5.5 Radio Montena 4.5 4.1 4.9 2.5 2.0 4.2 2.6 Radio Svetigora 3.6 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.4 2.2 2.1 Radio Free Europe 2.8 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.5 1.9 Local radio stations 23.1 30.3 17.2 22.9 19.3 17.0 25.8 Other radio stations 5.9 3.2 8.3 8.9 8.2 12.1 8.6 N = 577 N = 571 N = 542 N = 580 N = 512 N = 546 N = 581 29

CONFIDENCE IN RADIO PODGORICA TREND Radio stations Jan. 05. May 05. Sept. 05. Dec. 05. June 06. Sept. 06. Feb. 07. Radio Crne Gore 27.4 23.6 33.8 31.1 30.5 32.0 23.4 Radio Elmag 18.8 18.3 18.6 19.5 17.9 21.1 12.6 Radio D 20.4 17.8 16.0 20.7 22.5 17.0 27.9 Antena M 9.7 12.0 10.8 7.0 13.2 10.9 8.7 Radio Montena 6.5 5.2 7.0 6.6 2.0 7.5 3.4 Radio Svetigora 2.2 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.5 Radio Free Europe 1.6 2.1 0.9 2.2 Local radio stations 6.5 14.7 0.5 11.6 4.0 2.7 9.8 Other radio stations 7.0 5.2 12.8 2.2 9.9 8.2 11.5 N = 186 N = 191 N = 168 N = 178 N = 151 N = 147 N = 161 30

CONFIDENCE IN DAILY NEWSPAPERS TREND Dailies Jan. 05. May 05. Sept. 05. Dec. 05. June 06. Sept. 06. Feb. 07. POBJEDA 14.2 12.6 15.3 15.6 13.0 12.6 14.1 VIJESTI 41.8 41.3 41.5 43.9 46.7 47.9 44.0 DAN 31.9 33.4 34.1 27.8 31.9 33.0 35.1 REPUBLIKA 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.4 1.6 1.4 0.7 POLITIKA 1.4 0.9 0.4 2.5 0.9 1.0 0.7 VEČERNJE NOVOSTI 5.8 6.8 5.6 7.0 5.3 3.3 2.2 BLIC 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.1 OTHER DAILIES 3.4 2.9 1.1 2.2 0.6 0.7 3.0 N = 656 N = 704 N = 677 N = 666 N = 640 N = 693 N = 689 31

MEMBERSHIP IN EUROPEAN UNION YES 74.0 Doesn t have opinion on that 17.6 NO 8.4 32

MEMBERSHIP IN NATO Doesn t have opinion on that 28.8 NO 34.6 YES 36.6 33

COOPERATION WITH THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL YES 45.3 Doesn t have opinion on that 22.1 NO 32.6 34

MONTENEGRIN ALLIES IN AREA OF FOREIGN POLICY Positions Absolutely not Little bit Yes, significantly Absolutely EU 16.5 21.3 35.2 27.1 USA 42.0 27.5 18.9 11.6 RUSSIA 30.6 36.6 16.2 16.6 SERBIA 29.2 20.9 13.5 36.4 NOTICE: 20.5 of interviewees thinks that Montenegro shouldn t rely on nobody especially in area of foreign politics 35