IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006.

Similar documents
Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals and Liquidators (Recommendation) (Second) Guidelines, 2018

ELECTION NOTIFICATION

EXTRACT THE STATES REORGANISATION ACT, 1956 (ACT NO.37 OF 1956) PART III ZONES AND ZONAL COUNCILS

National Consumer Helpline

PARTY WISE SEATS WON AND VOTES POLLED (%),LOK SABHA 2009

Table 1: Financial statement of MGNREG scheme

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ALLIED SCIENCES (IJBMAS) A Peer Reviewed International Research Journal

810-DATA. POST: Roll No. Category: tage in Of. Offered. Of Univerobtained/ Degree/ sity gate marks Diploma/ lng marks. ned (in Certificate-

Notice for Election for various posts of IAPSM /

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961


THE OMBUDSMAN SCHEME FOR NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANIES, 2018

MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948

ACT XV OF 1920 AND THE INDEX. [As amended by Act No. 22 of 1956 and the Adaptation of Laws (No.4) Order 1957 and the Act.

Lunawat & Co. Chartered Accountants Website:

Estimates of Workers Commuting from Rural to Urban and Urban to Rural India: A Note

COMPANY LAW BOARD REGULATIONS, 1991

ILA CONSTITUTION. (Effective from January 5, 1987)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

THE ADVOCATES ACT,1961 (Act no. 25 of 1961)

Perspective on Forced Migration in India: An Insight into Classed Vulnerability

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART-1 SECTION 1 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF POWER. RESOLUTION Dated 29 th November, 2005

Fact and Fiction: Governments Efforts to Combat Corruption

Law. Environmental Law Judicial Remedies in Environmental Cases

Electoral Bond Scheme Sale of Electoral Bonds at Authorised Branches of State Bank of India (SBI)

AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION

Issues related to Working Women s Hostels, Ujjwala, Swadhar Greh. Nandita Mishra EA, MoWCD

INDIA JHPIEGO, INDIA PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL, INDIA POPULATION FOUNDATION OF INDIA

SEVEN STEPS TO POLICE REFORM. 1. Introduction

THE COMPANY SECRETARIES (NOMINATION OF MEMBERS TO THE COUNCIL) RULES, 2006

THE NATIONALISED BANKS (MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) SCHEME, 1970

GENERAL ELECTIONS

RULES & REGULATONS (Modified)

SECRETARIAT OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA ORDER

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN POST REFORM INDIA

APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL ELECTION RULES For Election of Executive Committee Members

THE NATIONALISED BANKS (MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) SCHEME, 1970

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

INDIAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. IAP Election 2018 Notice Part I

THE PREVENTION OF ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1988 ACT NO. 46 OF 1988

RECENT CHANGING PATTERNS OF MIGRATION AND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF URBANIZATION IN WEST BENGAL: A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Exchange of Visits by Tribals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF Ajayinder Sangwan and Ors...

Online Appendix: Conceptualization and Measurement of Party System Nationalization in Multilevel Electoral Systems

EMPANELMENT OF WHOLESALE AGENTS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF NCERT PUBLICATIONS

Modules on WORLD. Download our App. By crackias.com At GOOGLE Play Store

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014

Prashanth Kumar Bhairappanavar Examiner of Geographical Indications Geographical Indications Registry, India

Directory of Organisations Central Social Welfare Board (State Branches)

(2) Words and expressions used herein and not defined, but defined in the Act shall have the same meaning as defined in the Act.

Notice for Election for various post of IAPSM ( )

Important Notifications

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN STATE ASSEMBLIES

Internal Migration for Education and Employment among Youth in India

CONSTITUTION (RULES & REGULATIONS) OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS 1. Definition In these articles unless the context otherwise requires:

(i) The reward scheme shall be applicable for whistleblowers in the area of drugs, cosmetics and medical devices.

Illiteracy Flagging India

Bar & Bench ( ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W/XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

DEPARTMENT RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE FORTY NINTH REPORT

THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 ACT NO. 66 OF 1984

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.]

An Analysis of Impact of Gross Domestic Product on Literacy and Poverty of India during the Eleventh Plan

Policy for Regional Development. V. J. Ravishankar Indian Institute of Public Administration 7 th December, 2006

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5850 OF 2011 DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF & ORS...

Chapter II PROSECUTOR/PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

Published online: 07 Jun 2013.

Poverty alleviation programme in Maharashtra

India s economic liberalization program: An examination of its impact on the regional disparity problem

Urbanization Process and Recent Trends of Migration in India

Evaluation of Upliftment of Scheduled Tribes under MGNREGA

SHRI AMIT SHAH (National President, BJP) Snapshot of Work 16 Months (Aug 2014 to Jan 2016*) Tenure

Land Conflicts in India

Status of Female Employment in India

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

CRIME SCENARIO IN INDIA

WOMEN EMPOWERMENT THROUGH RURAL EMPLOYMENT IN UTTAR PRADESH

Andhra, Telangana Easiest Places to Do Business in India: World Bank...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015

OBC Reservation: Information and Certificate Template. Academic Year

(As amended by the State Bank of India General (Amendment) Regulations, 2013)

THE PATENTS ACT 1970

Women in National Parliaments: An Overview

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

Report No migration in india. (january-june 1993) nss 49th round

Revised Guidelines for Grant of Guide Licence for Regional Level Guides by Ministry of Tourism, Government of India

DBT-JRF Programme. OBC Reservation: Information and Certificate Template

THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986

MANUAL OF PATENT OFFICE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Socio-Economic Causes of Rural to Urban Migration in India

THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987

MIGRATION IN INDIA (JANUARY-JUNE JUNE 1993) NSS 49TH ROUND. National Sample Survey Organisation Department of Statistics Government of India

Tribunalisation of Justice in India Boon or Bane

Slum population in India: Extent and policy response

The turbulent rise of regional parties: A many-sided threat for Congress

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

K.C., S., Speringer, M. & Wurzer, M. IIASA Working Paper WP

Appendix

II. MPI in India: A Case Study

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006 National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents WITH Contempt Petition (C) Nos.41/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006 Contempt Petition (C) Nos.42/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006 Contempt Petition (C) Nos.43/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006 Contempt Petition (C) Nos.44/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006 O R D E R This order is in continuation to the all the previous orders passed by this Court, more particularly, the orders dated 18 th January, 2011, 15 th March, 2011, 25 th April, 2011 and 28 th November, 2011. Vide Order dated 15 th March, 2011, this Court - [1]

dealt with Contempt Petition Nos.41 44 of 2011 filed by the petitioner and passed certain directions including that the Labour Secretary of the concerned States should be present in the Court on the next date of hearing. Thereafter, vide Order dated 25 th April, 2011, the States of Nagaland, Rajasthan, Meghalaya, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Goa and Uttarakhand, Union Territories of Lakshadweep and Chandigarh and Union of India were required to comply with certain directions as well as to file affidavits of compliance. The petitioner in Contempt Petition Nos. 41 44 of 2011 had contended that most of the states have not complied with the directions issued by this Court. They had failed to discharge their statutory duties under the provisions of the Building & Other Construction Worker (Regulations of Employment & Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 (for short, the Act ) and the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (for short the Cess Act ), thus, they should be punished for violating the orders of this Court. However, after passing of the above orders, most of the states have filed affidavits, showing status of compliance with the [2]

directions issued by this Court as well as performance of their statutory duties. In view of the persistent defaults and unacceptable conduct of the officers of the concerned states, we passed the following order on 28 th November, 2011:- Since almost every State is in contempt, we have no option but to take further steps in the matter. However, in order to give opportunity to the States, the matter is being adjourned to the last week of December, 2011, to enable each defaulting State to file it's reply as to why contempt action should not be taken against the concerned officers. Still, a few States have neither filed affidavits nor have they placed on record any documentation to demonstrate that they have fully complied with the directions of this Court and have completely discharged their statutory obligations under the provisions of the Act. Keeping in view the fact that, despite our order dated 28 th November, 2011, these states have failed to show obedience to the orders of this Court, the matter was again placed before this Court on 16 th December, 2011, on which date we had reserved the contempt petitions for orders. [3]

Category I - Under Category-I, we will be dealing with the States of Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Punjab and Tamil Nadu. All these states had filed their respective affidavits in the years 2010 and 2009 respectively. Thereafter, they have not even cared to file further affidavits as directed by the orders of this Court. Though, all the above States have constituted Welfare Boards, have registered workers and establishments in accordance with the provisions of the Act, notified the prescribed authorities for collection and disbursement of cess under the Cess Act and have collected some cess, however, they have not collected the required quantum of cess and have also not distributed the amount to the registered applicants in furtherance to implementation of the scheme framed. The petitioner has also placed on record material to show that these states are defaulting in this regard. Before we take any action against the officers responsible for enforcing the schemes and proper collection and disbursement of cess, we would grant a last and final opportunity to these states to file affidavits of compliance within four weeks from today, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- [4]

each, as costs. The cost shall be payable to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Category II Under Category-II, we would pass directions in relation to the states which have constituted Welfare Boards, notified the statutory authorities responsible and have even collected the cess, however, they have not disbursed the cess amounts to the registered applicants for the reason that the competent authority in the State Government has not approved the welfare schemes or the welfare fund has not been constituted. Another reason for such nondisbursal of cess amount is that no applicants have approached the Welfare Board/notified authority, for payment under the provisions of the Act and the Cess Act. The States of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab, Sikkim and Tamil Nadu and Union Territories of Andaman and Nicobar, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep fall under this category. [5]

Having perused the affidavits of these states/union territories and the records before us, we issue the following directions:- a) The governments of the above-referred states/union territories are hereby directed to ensure that the welfare fund is created and welfare schemes are formulated and notified in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Cess Act within four weeks from today. b) The welfare schemes framed by the respective states/union territories shall be given due publicity and be brought to the notice of the concerned workmen and eligible applicants by the District Authority/Sub- Committee responsible. We may clarify that there are certain schemes where the workmen are entitled to disbursement of the amounts across-the-board, like education schemes, etc. Every effort should be made to implement these schemes without any further delay. c) Affidavit shall be filed by the Secretary (Labour) of the respective states/union territories within six weeks from today reporting to this Court the complete compliance [6]

with these directions. The affidavit shall also give the up-to-date status - d) of collection of cess, disbursement of amounts and implementation of schemes. Category-III The States of Kerala, Punjab, Nagaland and Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep are the states/union territory which have not given any details of the schemes framed, reasons for its non-implementation and consequent nondisbursement of the cess amounts. It is a statutory obligation upon these states/union territory and the authorities in-charge of the concerned departments that they ensure implementation of the schemes and disbursement of the cess amounts. Let now the schemes be publicized and cess amounts be disbursed to the eligible applicants in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Cess Act within a period of six weeks from today and affidavit of compliance of the Secretary (Labour) of the states/union territory be filed within two weeks thereafter. General Directions [7]

It is clear from the affidavits filed on behalf of most of the states and union territories that they are not holding meetings of the Welfare Board as required, i.e., at least once in two months, to discharge their statutory functions. Further, it is also apparent that audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has not been conducted of the funds placed at the disposal of the concerned authority. We may also notice that large funds are lying with the said Welfare Boards/authorities, but have not been disbursed. The possibility of these amounts being diverted by the state authority for other heads of expenditure in the respective states/union territories cannot be ruled out. Resultantly, while reiterating our earlier orders, we also issue the following directions for their immediate compliance: a) All the State Welfare Boards shall be subjected to audit by the CAG within two months from today. All the States, Union Territories and the State Boards to initiate the process and ensure its completion under the provisions of Section 27 of the Act. [8]

b) Every Welfare Board shall, without fail, hold its meetings at least once in two months and submit its Minutes, as well as the action taken and progress reports in regard to the framing and implementation of the schemes and disbursement of funds to the eligible applicants, to the Secretary (Labour) of that Government quarterly. c) The funds available with the Welfare Boards which have not been disbursed or are not likely to be disbursed within a short period should be properly invested with the nationalized banks only. Funds available with the Welfare Boards shall not be utilized by the State for any other head of expenditure of the State Government, etc. d) Union of India has filed an affidavit. It is stated in the affidavit that they have taken various steps, including steps for amendment of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder. Union of India is directed to expedite this process. We also direct the Union of India to discharge its various statutory functions under the Act with [9]

particular reference to Sections 24 to 27. It shall also issue appropriate directions under Section 60 of the Act to all the State Governments to fully implement the provisions of the Act as well as the Cess Act. The above directions should be complied with by all concerned without fail and within the time afore-stipulated. We make it clear that in the event of any default committed by any officer/official/authority, we will be compelled to take action against the officer/official/authority concerned under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 without any further notice. With these directions, we dispose of these four contempt petitions & I.A.6, but make it clear that in the event of default, the petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh contempt petitions before this Court, in view of the above order. Let a copy of this order be sent to each Chief Secretary and Secretary (Labour) of the respective states or union territories.....cji. (S.H. Kapadia) [10]

....J. (A.K. Patnaik) New Delhi; February 7, 2012.......J. (Swatanter Kumar) [11]