RULE TO SHOW CAUSE. CONSIDERING THE FOREGOING Motion for Summary Judgment filed by

Similar documents
SHOWS, CALI, & WALSH, LLP 628 St. Louis Street (70802) Post Office Drawer 4425 Baton Rouge, LA October 24, 2013

19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT EXCEPTION OF PRESCRIPTION AND, ALTERNATIVELY, EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION

STATE OF LOUISIANA DR. BARBARA FERGUSON AND CHARLES J. HATFIELD VS. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

19 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Considering the request for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff,

EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OR RIGHT OF ACTION, SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.

Case MDL No Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. No. 5:07-HC-2020-BR

SUPREME COURT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. CIVIL PROCEEDING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CLEARFIELD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER

Case Document 1218 Filed in TXSB on 12/21/18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 359 Filed 09/26/12 Page 1 of 4 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

WAIVER OF APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM. I,, the Respondent in. give up my right to have this Court appoint a Guardian Ad Litem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT

STATE OF LOUISIANA J.A.H. ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A HENDERSON AUCTIONS VERSUS CHARLES R. EASLER, II

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMSHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS F-5. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER]

PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON [Pursuant to Penal Code and ]

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE JUVENILE COURT OF HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER AND RECALL SUMMONS

Honorable Janice Clark, Judge Presiding

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO

NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS

Case 2:13-cv NJB-DEK Document Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON OBJECTION TO CLAIM AND NOTICE OF HEARING

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioner, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

What does it mean to domesticate a foreign judgment?

BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) )

WARDEN LYNN COOPER MS TONIA RACHAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS

Vs. C : PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS JACOB COLBY PERRY : STATE OF LOUISIANA FILED: : DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 374 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 9 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

Petition, there is. staff for this form. the other party s

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

PARRO GUIDRY AND HUGHES JJ

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case Document 16 Filed in TXSB on 10/17/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

NO CA-0232 RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT THOMAS H.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 2013-IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862

FRANK RIDEAU DOCKET NO. 623,918 SEC th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 152 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT ARTHUR MONROE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 0938 VALERIA ANN PRICE AND WALTER KRODSEL III VERSUS

Case 3:17-cv TJC-JBT Document 85 Filed 11/11/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2256

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. A JUDGE NO No.: SC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, SECTION R

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF AVOYELLES STATE OF LOUISIANA. Versus. State of Louisiana MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF MISDEMEANOR RECORD

***************************

LED. the right to request a proceeding in accordance with sections and , Florida. Docketed by

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

EXPUNGEMENT AND SEALING OF JUVENILE RECORDS LA.CH.C. Art. 901 and 903 INFORMATION SHEET

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

Appealed from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District 5 In and for the State of Louisiana Docket Number

EX PARTE MOTION FOR PUBLICATION OF CITATION TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE FOR MINOR GUARDIANSHIP G-7

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

MOTION TO SET ASIDE CONVICTION AND DISMISS PROSECUTION

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JULIE ANN FUSILIER NUMBER: 14-DB-052 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA. v. Division

Mandatory Electronic Filing Starting on October 18th, 2018

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No M-1543-SCT

NO. Defendants. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF'S WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES. To:, Defendant, by and through its attorney of record,,

FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA 2018 CA 274 THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PLAINTIFF / APPELLANT VS.

STATE OF LOUISIANA 2007 CA 0078

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:16-cv CWR-FKB Document 79 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 4

OPPOSITION TO GENERAL MOTION A-3

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO ENFORCE AND/OR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING CONTEMPT

Transcription:

ROBERT BURNS, LOUISIANA AUCTIONEER'S LICENSING BAORD. JAMES M SIMS. GREGORY L. "GREG" BORDELON, NUMBER 619707 DOCKET: 27 19 1 H JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT RULE TO SHOW CAUSE CONSIDERING THE FOREGOING Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs, in proper person: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, Louisiana Auctioneer's Licensing Board, James M. Sims, Gregory L. "Greg" Bordelon, and Tessa Steinkamp appear and show cause, if any they may have, on the day of, 2014, at o'clock,.:.!:!m~., why the motion should not be granted. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this day of, 2014 RVE: Larry S. ankston, Attorney for Defendants 8708 Jefferson Highway, Smte A Baton Rouge LA 70809 JUDGE

ROBERT BURNS. NUMBER 619707 DOCKET: 27! 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT LOUISIANA AUCTIONEER' S LICENSING BAORD. JAMES M SIMS. GREGORY L. "GREG" BORDELON. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOW UNTO COURT comes Plaintiffs. Robert Edwin Burns and Rev. Freddie Lee Phillips, in proper person, who pursuant to Article 966 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure and for reasons expanded upon in the attached memorandum, move this Honorable Court for a Summary Judgment, granting Plaintiffs a Judgment against each named individual Defendant, JAMES M. SIMS,, and GREGORY L. "GREG" BORDELON, in the amount of $100 in Civil Penalties to each Plaintiff ($200 total against each Defendant) pursuant tolar. S. 42:28 along with each Board Member being assessed a 33.33% (one-third) share of Plaintiffs' comt costs in initiating this Petition as provided for under LA R. S. 42:26(C). Respectfully submitted: 4155 Essen Lane, Apt. 228 Baton Rouge, LA 70809-2152 Telephone No.: (225) 235-4346 Email: Robert@auctionsellsfast.com Wk 8055 Hanks Drive Baton Rouge. LA 70812-41 22 Telephone No.: (225) 229-3341 Email: Freddie@auctiosellsfast.com ~ ~ - ~~ Certificate of Service: We hereby certify, on this 12th day of May, 2014, that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon counsel for all parties to this proceeding by submitting a copy of same via electronic mail, facsimile, or First Class United Stat s Mail, properly addressed and postage prepaid.

ROBERT BURNS, LOUISIANA AUCTIONEER'S LICENSING BAORD, JAMES M SIMS. GREGORY L. "GREG" BORDELON, NUMBER 619707 DOCKET: 27 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MAY IT PLEAE THE COURT: Plaintiffs, Robert Edwin Burns and Rev. Freddie Lee Phillips, move for Summary Judgment on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact, thus entitling Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law. In support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs submit this Memorandum to this Honorable Court. I. FACTUALBACKGROUND Defendants, Tessa Steinkamp, James Sims, and Greg Bordelon, serving in their official capacities as Members of the Louisiana Auctioneer's Licensing Board (LALB), participated in a regularly-scheduled meeting on January 8, 2013. At the outset of that meeting, public comment on agenda items was scheduled to transpire (see Exhibit P-1). Petitioner Phillips sought to speak on Item III on the agenda, approval of minutes ofnovember 5, 2012. He desired to express his request that the roll-call responses of Defendants Sims and Bordelon be recorded verbatim as "I' s here," and "I' s here, too," respectively. Board Member Darlene Jacobs-Levy stated on the record that she had "no objection" to either Petitioner speaking. Similarly, Board Member Charles "Hal" McMillin has repeatedly voiced his opposition to the Board's "public comment policy," and even voted against the public comment policy. Accordingly, Ms. Jacobs-Levy and Mr. McMillan are not named as Defendants in this Petition. The named Defendants, acting through legal counsel Larry S. Bankston, were emphatic that Petitioner Phillips would not be permitted to discuss anything regarding the content of the prior meeting of November 5, 2012. Furthermore, they were equally adamant that Petitioner Burns would not be permitted to discuss Board Per Diem payments for September 17, 201 2

notwithstanding the fact that those payments directly affected the financial statements which the Board would approve as Item Vl (see Exhibit P-1), "approval offinancials." Through their adamant stands that Petitioners would not be permitted to address agenda items which directly reflect upon the integrity and professionalism of Members of the Defendant LALB, Petitioners Phillips and Bums have been harmed through direct suppression of their First Amendment rights afforded under the Constitution of the United States of America. Further, Petitioners assert that, through such actions, the named Defendants are sending a message that essentially says, "You will be permitted to question us and voice statements on our conduct and motives if and only if we give you permission to do so." Petitioners assert that such actions and implicit statements constitute knowing and wilful violation of LA R. S. 42:14(D), which states: "Except school boards, which shall be subject to the notice requirements of LA R. S. 42:15, each public body conducting a meeting which is subject to the notice requirements of LA R. S. 42:19(A) shall allow a public comment period at any point in the meeting prior to action on an agenda item upon which a vote is to be taken. The governing body may adopt reasonable rules and restrictions regarding such comment period." Petitioners further contend that, through such actions and implicit communication of dictatorial suppression of free speech and scrutiny, the named Defendants have, by their knowing and willful violations of LA R. S. 42:14(D) and pursuant tolar. S. 42:28, made themselves each personally liable unto Petitioners for the amount of $100 each to each Plaintiff, or $200 total from each named LALB defendant. Further, Pursuant to LA R. S. 42:26(C), upon successful awarding of a Judgment of this Honorable Court in which such $100 civil penalty is assessed against each Member and awarded to each Petitioner, Petitioners are also entitled to reasonable attorney fees and the costs of this Petition. II MATTERS OF UNCONTESTED FACTS 1. An LALB meeting was conducted on January 8, 2013. 2. Petitioners sought to address two items placed on the agenda of that meeting, both of which required votes on the part of the LALB Membership. 3. Petitioners were both told individually that they would not be permitted to speak on the issues which they sought to address.

4. Petitioner Burns was informed that he would not be permitted to address the issue of September 17, 2012 per diem payments notwithstanding the fact that Defense Counsel Larry S. Bankston provided written assurance that Petitioner Burns would be permitted to address his concerns via an email sent to Petitioner Bums dated December 21, 2012 (see Exhibit P-8). 5. Board Members Darlene Jacobs-Levy and Charles "Hal" McMillin demonstrated behaviors indicating both their willingness and desire for Petitioners to speak on the topics of concern to them and are thus appropriately not named as Defendants. CONCLUS][ON Petitioners are entitled to a Judgment as a matter of law because there are no genuine issues of material fact to dispute that Defendants knowingly and wilfully violated LA R. S. 42:14(D) in denying Petitioners the right to address items specifically itemized on the agenda for the LALB meeting of January 8, 2013 for which votes were required. Therefore, Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs is appropriate as a matter of law. That Judgment, as provided by LA R. S. 42:28, should be comprised of an award of $100 in Civil Penalties from each Defendant to each Plaintiff (total of $200 from each Defendant). Each Board Member, as provided for under LA R. S. 42:26(C), should additionally be assessed a 33.33% (one-third) share of Plaintiffs' court costs in initiating this Petition. Respectfully submitted: 4155 Essen Lane, Apt. 228 Baton Rouge, LA 70809-2152 Telephone No.: (225) 235-4346 Email: Robert@auctionsellsfast.com ~~ 8055 Hanks Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70812-4122 Telephone No.: (225) 229-3341 Email: Freddie@auctiosellsfast.com ~. ;k/~;-&~ Certificate of Service: We hereby certify, on this 12th day of May, 2014, that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon counsel for all parties to this proceeding by submitting a copy of same via electronic mail, facsimile, or First Class United States Mail, properly addressed and poma:2d~ ~~ k.~d...~