Request to Change Election System without an Election Election Waiver Ed. Code, 72036

Similar documents
Robert McEntire, Chief Business and Financial Officer

Sweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction

CITY OF VALLEJO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING: ACTION ITEM A. City of Vallejo Districting Criteria and Process

October 16, Whittier Union High School District Introduction to Districting

City of Placentia By-District Elections Briefing. February 6, 2018

City of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town currently elects five Council Members using an at large election system; and

City of Redlands Introduction to 2016 Districting

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Sequoia Union High School District Districting Public Forums

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017

October 17, Lompoc 2017 Districting Initial Hearings

City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum

Item 10A 1 of 37

October 30, City of Menlo Park Introduction to Election Systems

ti) CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA (916)

4/23/2018. CCAC Annual Conference April 19, a.m. 12 p.m. Break w/ Exhibitors 10 a.m. 10:30 a.m.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 1. 09

May 9, City of South San Francisco 2018 Districting Initial Hearings

The California Voting Rights Act

The California Voting Rights Act: Recent Legislation & Litigation Outcomes

Linda C. Luna, Superintendent. DISTRICT OFFICE 930 Westacre Road West Sacramento, CA 95691

Elections by Trustee Area Informational Session on Transition to Trustee Areas. June 25-26, 2018

City of LEMOORE CALIFORNIA. Staff Report

Assessing Liability Under The CVRA and Transitioning To A By-Trustee Area Election Method

RESOLUTION NO BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Implementing Trustee Area Elections: Procedural & Substantive Considerations

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

The California Voting Rights Act What To Do When Your Agency Gets a Letter

City Council Election System Changes Project. CVRA Community Input Workshop

El Monte Union High School District Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act & Districting

Marguerite Mary Leoni 2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250 San Rafael, California

Presentation to the Orange County Committee on School District Organization

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

Consideration of Transition from At-Large to District-Based City Council Electoral System

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

RESOLUTION NO

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

The Effect of North Carolina s New Electoral Reforms on Young People of Color

Note: Wards 1, 3 and 5 will hold elections on November 3, 2020; and Wards 2, 4 and 6 will hold

Special Meeting/Public Hearing Board of Trustees Coast Community College District. Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Quiet Revolution in California Local Government Gains Momentum

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

July 19, Washington Unified 2018 Districting

4/4/2017. The Foundation. What is the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA)? CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT PUTTING THE 2016 LEGISLATION INTO PRACTICE

25% Percent of General Voters 20% 15% 10%

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA (916) September 16, 2004

CIRCULATOR S AFFIDAVIT

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring Intent to Transition to District-Based Elections (10/15/20)

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk MEDIA KIT LAVote.net Nov.6,2018 General Election

PROTECTING CALIFORNIA S DEMOCRACY: ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE BILINGUAL VOTING ASSISTANCE LAWS

Ballot Measures-V Section

Guide to 2011 Redistricting

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

A New America A New Majority A New Challenge

ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

The Election Process From a Data Prospective. By Kimball Brace, President Election Data Services, Inc. 2017

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

Analyzing Absentee Ballots Cast In San Diego Mayoral Special Election

Case 2:03-cv TJW Document 323 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

California Civic Engagement Project

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY COSTA, FONTANA, STREET, BOSCOLA AND BREWSTER, JUNE 15, 2017 AN ACT

AGENDA ITEM G-1 City Attorney

Release # For Publication: Tuesday, September 19, 2017

BYLAWS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GEORGIA Approved May 22, 2004 Amended April 21, 2006 Amended July 29, 2006 Amended December 15, 2009

City of Palm Coast City Council Districts. City Council Public Hearing June 14, 2011

AGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative 2018 Gubernatorial Gerrymandering Survey

Multilingual Access to Elections 2013

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Analysis of United Student District Amendment Redistricting Plan

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS July 23, 2007

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, SCHWANK AND BOSCOLA, JANUARY 27, 2017 A JOINT RESOLUTION

California Democratic Party Guidelines for Certification, Re-Certification and Decertification of Caucuses

AGENDA ITEM E-1 City Attorney

CHAPTER II THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP

01/19/2018. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Subject: CCCT Board of Directors Election 2011

W Washington St, Suite Indianapolis, IN 46204

Running For Local Office. Provided by the Office of the City Clerk Amy Van, City Clerk

Asian American Pacific Islanders for Civic Empowerment Concept Paper. California Leads the Way Forward (and Backward)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DlVISION. Case N O. ANB INJ-BNCTIVE R-Ebl-EFi PEJil'ION - 1 -

AMIGOS DE TERCEIRA STATE OF RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER. City Services Auditor 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report

A Glance at THE LATINO VOTE IN Clarissa Martinez De Castro

AGENDA Agenda order may be adjusted by Chair for purposes of meeting flow and to be respectful of the time concerns of guests present.

These are the findings from the latest statewide Field Poll completed among 1,003 registered voters in early January.

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Application to Serve as Temporary Judge SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CALLING AN ELECTION OR PLACING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Transcription:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95811-6549 (916) 445-8752 HTTP://WWW.CCCCO.EDU Request to Change Election System without an Election Election Waiver Ed. Code, 72036 Community College District: GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Address: NIELSEN MERKSAMER, ET AL. 2350 KERNER BLVD., SUITE 250 Date of request: JUNE 17, 2015 Contact s name and title: CHRISTOPHER SKINNELL, SPECIAL COUNSEL City: SAN RAFAEL State: CA Email: CSKINNELL@NMGOVLAW.COM Zip: 94901 Phone: 415/389-6800 Local board approval date: (Required) JUNE 16, 2014 (SEE RESOLUTION 24-2014-2015, ATTACHMENT A) Legal criteria 1. Specify which change in election system the district is proposing (check one): to move from an at-large election system to a by trustee area election system to adopt a top-two primary system in conjunction with a change, or as an addition to a previous change, from an at-large election system to a by trustee area election system to increase the number of trustees and trustee areas to five or more or decrease them nine or fewer in conjunction with a change, or as an addition to a previous change, from an at-large election system to a by trustee area election system to both adopt a top-two primary system and to increase the number of trustees and trustee areas to five or more or decrease them to nine or fewer, and both in conjunction with a change, or as an addition to a prior change, from an at-large election system to a by trustee area election system 2. Reason for changing election systems: AVOID POSSIBLE LITIGATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT. SEE ATTACHMENT B 3. Number of trustees and trustee areas under the newly proposed election system: 5 TRUSTEES (NO CHANGE); 5 TRUSTEE AREAS 4. Explain how ALL of the Education Code section 72036(c) requirements have been met. N/A. THE GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES DOES NOT ANTICIPATE CHANGING THE NUMBER OF TRUSTEES AT THIS TIME. THE ONLY CHANGE FOR WHICH THE DISTRICT SEEKS APPROVAL FROM THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS IS A CHANGE FROM AT-LARGE ELECTIONS TO TRUSTEE AREA ELECTIONS PURSUANT TO EDUCATION CODE 72036(a). District or County Certification I hereby certify that the information provided on this application is accurate and complete. Authorized Signature: Name and Title: CHRISTOPHER SKINNELL, SPECIAL COUNSEL Date: JUNE 17, 2015 EW-1 (Rev. 09-14)

Election Waiver Request Form Page 2 California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office Please note that additional pages can be attached, if needed. Send Original plus one copy to: California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office 1102 Q Street Sacramento, CA 95811-6549 ATTN: Legal Affairs Election Waiver Request Or Email the completed form and back-up material to: legalaffairs@cccco.edu EW-1 (Rev. 09-14)

Election Waiver Request Form California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office Attachment A ATTACHMENT A Resolution No. 24-2014-2015 of the Board of Trustees of the Glendale Community College District (June 16, 2015) EW-1 (Rev. 09-14)

NDC Draft 5-E North Glendale 1 La Crescenta 210 Montrose 2 Verdugo Woodlands Northwest 3 Chevy Chase Canyon Rossmoyne Mountain Grandview 5 Rancho 2 Pelanconi 134 Woodbury City Center Vineyard-Moorpark 5 Scholl Canyon Citrus Grove Mariposa Pacific-Edison Somerset 4 2 Tropico Adams Hill National Demographics Corporation, April 2, 2015 240

District 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Pop 43,115 42,496 42,970 42,592 42,705 213,878 Deviation from ideal 339-280 194-184 -71 619 % Deviation 0.79% -0.65% 0.45% -0.43% -0.17% 1.45% % Hisp 11% 12% 14% 30% 17% 17% Total Pop Voting Age Pop Citizen Voting Age Pop (CVAP) Voter Registration (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Registration (current) Turnout (2011 election) Turnout (2013 election) Age Glendale GCCD - NDC Draft 5 - E % NH White 59% 66% 70% 51% 60% 61% % NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% % Asian-American 20% 15% 12% 14% 16% 15% % Hisp 10% 11% 13% 27% 16% 15% % NH White 62% 68% 71% 53% 62% 63% % NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% % Asian-American 26% 19% 14% 17% 19% 19% Total CVAP 28,823 29,855 27,749 21,835 24,992 133,254 % Hisp 10% 13% 11% 26% 14% 14% % NH White 66% 70% 74% 55% 65% 66% % NH Black 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% % Asian-American 21% 14% 12% 16% 17% 16% Total Reg. 25,042 25,570 21,486 16,070 17,881 106,049 % Latino 10% 12% 14% 29% 19% 16% % Asian-Surnamed 11% 8% 5% 4% 5% 7% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 4% 3% 2% Total Turnout 17,708 17,127 13,030 7,795 9,734 65,394 % Latino 9% 11% 15% 31% 23% 15% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 5% 4% 5% 6% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 5% 3% 2% Total Registration 25,939 26,303 22,659 17,524 19,303 111,728 Latino 9% 10% 12% 23% 16% 13% Armenian 13% 27% 39% 35% 42% 30% Total 2011 Turnout 4,778 6,344 4,927 2,870 3,431 22,350 Latino 6% 6% 7% 10% 8% 7% Armenian 14% 30% 48% 60% 66% 40% Total 2013 Turnout 3,878 6,461 5,247 3,274 3,753 22,613 Latino 6% 6% 6% 9% 6% 6% Armenian 17% 33% 47% 59% 67% 43% age0-19 26% 22% 20% 22% 19% 22% age20-60 56% 55% 58% 60% 59% 57% age60plus 17% 24% 22% 19% 22% 21% Immigration immigrants 36% 42% 58% 63% 66% 53% vacant 5% 6% 4% 4% 6% 5% occupied 95% 94% 96% 96% 94% 95% Housing Stats Language spoken at home rented 34% 41% 57% 82% 77% 58% owned 66% 59% 43% 18% 23% 42% singlefamily 74% 59% 49% 25% 17% 45% multifamily 26% 41% 51% 75% 83% 55% english 54% 43% 29% 18% 20% 33% spanish 7% 9% 11% 26% 14% 13% asian-lang 22% 12% 10% 12% 15% 14% other lang 17% 37% 50% 44% 52% 40% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database, Nov. 2012 data. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-year data. Total, Armenian and Latino voter registration and turnout numbers for 2013 and 2011 from Political Data Inc. 241

Election Waiver Request Form California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office Attachment B ATTACHMENT B Statement of Reasons for Change EW-1 (Rev. 09-14)

Election Waiver Request Form California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office Attachment B Members of the Board of Trustees of the Glendale Community College District ( Glendale CCD or District ) are currently elected in at-large elections, i.e., elections in which each member of the governing board [is] elected by the registered voters of the entire district..., Cal. Educ. Code 5030(a). At-large electoral systems such as the District s are subject to challenge under the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, codified at sections 14025 14032 of the California Elections Code ( CVRA ). In mid-2012, the District received a letter alleging that the District s at-large method of voting violated the CVRA, and demanding that it move to trustee area elections. The District promptly engaged experienced voting rights consultants and counsel and concluded that, in light of a history of successful minority candidacies and a lack of clear evidence of racially-polarized voting in District elections, the District was not violating the CVRA. On August 15, 2012, a suit was filed against the District alleging a violation of the CVRA. The District vigorously contested that suit, and it was ultimately dismissed. In 2014, the District received a new demand letter, from a different attorney representing different clients. Though understandably confident that its electoral system does not violate the law, the Glendale CCD Board of Trustees nevertheless determined that the high cost of repeated lawsuits even when successful was not the best use of District resources. 1 Therefore, on September 9, 2014, the Board voted to initiate the process of moving to trustee area elections. It adopted a series of traditional districting criteria and retained experienced consultants and counsel to guide it through the process. The District then engaged in a thorough public process, designed to solicit public input. The District initially published seven draft trustee area maps in December of 2014, which the demographic consultant then presented to the Board and the public at the Board of Trustees meeting in January 2014. Four of those maps included five trustee areas; and three maps incorporated seven trustee areas, so the Board could consider the option, available to it under Education Code 72036, of expanding the size of the Board. The Board then conducted three duly-noticed public hearings (in February, March and April of 2014), as required by law. (Elec. Code 10100.) As part of the process, and in response to public questions and comments, the demographic consultant prepared an additional five-member trustee area map that was a variation of existing maps, bringing the total to eight. Throughout the process, the District displayed on its website: each of the maps with accompanying demographic data; a tentatively-adopted timeline; a description of the districting process; public notices of the various hearings; copies of the presentations given by the consultant and counsel; and other pertinent information. (See http://www.glendale.edu/index.aspx?page=6564.) A link to that page was prominently displayed on the District s homepage as well. Public notices were translated into Spanish and posted in several local newspapers in advance of each public hearing. On June 16, 2015, after thorough consideration of the merits of each plan, the Board unanimously voted to adopt Plan 5E. There was no opposition from the public. If the Board of Governors approves the District s proposal to change its electoral system, the new trustee areas would be implemented for the first time in April 2017. 1 The Glendale Unified School District, which is nearly coterminous with the Glendale CCD, was recently sued under the CVRA by the same attorney that sent the demand letter to the Glendale CCD. EW-1 (Rev. 09-14)