Rules of Procedure for UPC

Similar documents
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court

The Unified Patent Court explained in detail. Managing Intellectual Property European Patent Reform Forum 19 September 2013 Munich

Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/ 45. DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004

The Unitary Patent Unified Patent Court. Taylor Wessing LLP

European Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court

Course of patent infringement proceedings before the Unified Patent Court

The Unitary Patent Package State of Play

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

European Patent with Unitary Effect and

The Unitary Patent and UPC is coming soon?

Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court. Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs. I. Proposal for

Plan. 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law. C. Belgian Code of Economic Law

THE COURTS ACT. Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act

BERMUDA COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL RULES 2014 BR 11 / 2014

the UPC will have jurisdiction over certain European patents (see box The unitary patent and the UPC: a recap ).

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal

ACT No 486/2013 Coll. of 29 November 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. First public draft online user consultation. 1 February 2018

Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (trademarks and designs) 1

Official Journal of the European Union L 251/3

GUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS 1. Article 1

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

Presumption Of Patent Validity In Patent Litigations The New Trends

Patent Infringement Proceedings

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Brinkhof. Defendant s Objection to the Application for Provisional Measures. Merva. Pentapharm

ADGM COURTS PRACTICE DIRECTION 4

EUROPEAN GENERIC MEDICINES ASSOCIATION

Civil Provisional Remedies Act

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

CONSOLIDATED TEXT REFLECTS CHANGES MADE DURING THE SEPTEMBER 2010 TOKYO ROUND. Consolidated Text. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

Law on Inventive Activity*

2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES

Financial Services Tribunal Rules 2015 (as amended 2017 and 2018)

Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration King Fahad Branch Rd, Al Mutamarat, Riyadh, KSA PO Box 3758, Riyadh Tel:

2010 No. 791 COPYRIGHT

Rules for the Conduct of an administered Arbitration

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court. Guide to Key Features & Perspectives

PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES. 22 November 2001 No IX 618 (As last amended by 26 April 2012 No XI-1994) Vilnius

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

No. 30 of Patents and Industrial Designs Act Certified on: 19/1/2001.

Unified Patent Court & Rules of Procedure Where do we stand

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION)

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

KOREA COMPANY REORGANIZATION ACT

Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Bill

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

The Consolidate Utility Models Act 1)

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTION NO. 2008/6. The Special Representative of the Secretary-General,

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Statutes of the Bodies Working for the Settlement of Sports-Related Disputes *

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Consolidated version of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 25 September Table of Contents

American Chamber of Commerce in the Czech Republic. Position Paper. Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe. Answering.

THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION

CHAPTER TEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

European Patent Litigation: An overview

17229/09 LK/mg 1 DG C I

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Assertion of Patents in Germany. Dr. Roland Kehrwald Wildanger Kehrwald Graf v. Schwerin & Partner mbb

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)

THE SCOTTISH GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION ("SGA") CONDUCT IN SPORT CODE

Key to the European Patent Convention Edition Part VI

Korean Intellectual Property Office

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 (as amended)

WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules and Clauses. Alternative Dispute Resolution

LEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER. No. 5 September, 2011

DIFC COURT LAW. DIFC LAW No.10 of 2004

LAWS OF MALAYSIA RENEWABLE ENERGY ACT Act 725 ONLINE VERSION OF UPDATED TEXT OF REPRINT

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

Act of 17 June 2005 no. 90 relating to mediation and procedure in civil disputes (The Dispute Act)

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

ETHIOPIA Trademarks Law Trademark Registration and Protection Proclamation No. 501/2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 7, 2006

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 8 March /13 PI 38 COUR 28

PART 1 SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION...

Arbitration Act B.E. 2545

CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

Non-Suit Civil Case Procedural Law of the Kingdom of Cambodia

Criminal Procedure Code No. 301/2005 Coll.

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT

Transcription:

Rules of Procedure for UPC Interim/Oral procedure Evidence Provisional measures Final remedies Enforcement Appeal 22 April 2013 Ben Hall Interim Procedure: Rules 101-110 The JR must make all necessary preparations for the oral hearing, and may hold interim conferences with the parties (Rule 101.1). JR may order the parties to (Rule 103): Provide further clarification on specific points Answer specific questions Produce evidence Lodge specific documents including each party s summary of the orders sought at the interim conference 2 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Aims of interim conference: Rule 104 A. identify main issues and facts in dispute B. clarify parties position as regards those issues and facts C. establish schedule for further progress of proceedings D. explore possibility of settlement E. where appropriate, issue orders regarding production of further pleadings, documents, experts, experiments, inspections, further written evidence, matters to be subject of oral evidence, scope of questions to be put to witnesses. F. where appropriate, hold preparatory discussions with witnesses and experts to prepare for oral hearing. G. make any other decision or order as JR deems necessary for preparation for oral hearing. 3 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Interim Procedure: Rules 101-110 An Interim Conference can be heard in court, or by telephone and will be heard in public and recorded unless requested otherwise (Rule 106) Without prejudice to the order of proportionality, the JR shall complete the interim procedure within three months of the closure of the written procedure (Rule 101.3). Oral procedure starts immediately after interim procedure closed. PJ, in consultation with JR, shall take over management of the case (Rule 110.3). 4 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Oral procedure Starts immediately after the interim procedure is closed (Rule 110.3) Consists of (Rule 112.2): The hearing of the parties oral submissions The hearing of witnesses and experts, if ordered during the interim procedure PJ and Panel may put questions to the experts/witnesses Parties may put questions to the experts/witnesses under the control of the PJ Duration of 1 day (Rule 113) Separate hearing of witnesses and experts possible (Rule 104 (g)) 5 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Evidence: Rules 170-181 There is a duty to produce evidence that is available to a party that goes to contested facts and the Court may make an order for its production at any time. The Court will take any failure to produce into account (Rule 172) Rule 170: Means of Evidence and Obtaining Evidence: Means of Evidence (a) written evidence, whether printed, hand-written or drawn, in particular documents, written witness statements, plans, drawings, photographs; (b) expert reports and reports on experiments carried out for the purpose of the proceedings; (c) physical objects, in particular devices, products, embodiments, exhibits, models; (d) electronic files and audio / video recordings. Means of Obtaining Evidence (a) hearing of the parties; (b) summoning, hearing and questioning of witnesses; (c) appointing and hearing of experts; (d) ordering a party or a third party to produce evidence; (e) ordering inspection of a place or a physical object; (f) ordering measures to preserve evidence. 6 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Witnesses: Rules 175-181 Lodge witness statement, signed, with statement of truth and indication of language in which the witness will give oral evidence (Rule 175) Can apply to hear witness in person when not possible to obtain written witness statement (Rule 176) Witnesses can be summoned by the Court of its own motion, when his statement is challenged by the other party, or on an application for hearing of witness in person (Rule 177) PJ and Panel can put questions to witnesses. Parties can put questions under control of PJ (Rule 178) A party may provide any expert evidence that it considers necessary. Rules 175 to 180 apply. (Rule 181) 7 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Court Experts: Rules 185-188 Where the Court must resolve a specific technical question, it may of its own motion (and after hearing the parties) appoint a court expert (Rule 185.1) The parties may make suggestions regarding the identity of the court expert, his technical background and the questions to be put to him (Rule 185.1). Expert paid a fee, which could be reduced if written report is late (Rules 185.4, 185.7, 186.1) Court will invite the parties to comment on expert reports either in writing or during the oral hearing (Rule 187) Court expert will attend oral hearing and be open to questions from the Court and the parties (Rule 186.6) 8 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Orders Order to produce evidence (Rule 190) Order to communicate information (Rule 191) Order to preserve evidence (saisie) (Rules 192-198) Inspection order (Rule 199) Freezing order (Rule 200) Order to carry out experiments (Rule 201) 9 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Article 62(1): Provisional measures The Court may grant injunctions against an alleged infringer or against an intermediary whose services are used by the alleged infringer Concept imported from Enforcement Directive to prohibit, subject, where appropriate, to a recurring penalty payment, the continuation of the alleged infringement The recurring penalty is new to UK. What level of penalties are currently ordered in other jurisdictions? or to make such continuation subject to the lodging of guarantees intended to ensure the compensation of the right holder. 10 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Article 62(2)-(3): Provisional measures Art 62(2) The Court shall have discretion to weigh up the interests of the parties and in particular to take into account the potential harm for either of the parties resulting from the granting or the refusal of the injunction. Appears similar to UK s balance of convenience in American Cyanamid. discretion applies to weighing up the parties interests, not to whether to grant the injunction (which is already discretionary see may at start of Article 62(1)) Art 62(3) If the applicant demonstrates circumstances likely to endanger the recovery of damages, the Court may order the precautionary seizure of the movable and immovable property of the alleged infringer, including the blocking of the bank accounts and of other assets (see Article 9 Enforcement Directive) 11 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Rule 206: Application for provisional measures Rule 206.2: The Application must include: (c) the reasons why provisional measures are necessary (d) the facts and evidence including the matters referred to in Rule 211.2 i.e. includes satisfying the court that the patent in question is valid (e) a concise description of the action Rule 206.3: ex parte injunctions must be read with Rule 212 (a) reasons having regard to Rule 197 (i.e. ex parte orders to preserve evidence) (b) information about any prior correspondence between the parties concerning the alleged infringement (c) applicant shall be under a duty to disclose any material fact known to it which might influence the Court Rule 207: Protective letter. 12 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Rule 208: Dealing with the Application for provisional measures PJ may decide that an Application is to be decided by a single judge in urgent cases The Application will be decided under Rules 209-13 with a reduced timetable Registry to check whether any relevant Protective letter has been filed. 13 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Rule 209: Examining the Application for provisional measures Rule 209.1: the Court shall have the discretion to (a) inform the defendant about the Application and invite him to lodge, within a time period to be specified, an Objection which shall contain (i) the reasons why the Application shall fail, (ii) the facts and evidence relied on, in particular any challenge to the facts and evidence relied on by the applicant; (iii) where main proceedings have not yet been started, the reasons why the action which will be started shall fail and the facts and evidence relied on in support, (b) summon the parties to an oral hearing, (c) summon the applicant to an oral hearing without the presence of the defendant. 14 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Rule 209: Examining the Application for provisional measures Rule 209.2: In exercising its discretion, the Court shall in particular take into account (a) whether the patent has been upheld in an opposition procedure before the [EPO] or has been the subject of proceedings in any other court, (b) the urgency of the case, (c) whether the applicant has requested provisional measures without hearing the defendant and whether the reasons for not hearing the defendant appear well-founded, (d) any Protective letter filed by the defendant; the Court shall in particular consider summoning parties to an oral hearing if a relevant Protective letter has been filed by the defendant. Rule 209.3: In cases of extreme urgency the standing judge appointed in accordance with Rule 194 may decide immediately on the Application for provisional measures and the procedure to be followed on the Application. No definition of extreme urgency, so standing judge presumably has complete discretion on procedure and, potentially, outcome of application Seems to apply to on notice as well as ex parte Applications 15 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Rule 210: Oral hearing or Application for provisional measures Rule 210.1: Where the Court decides to summon the parties to an oral hearing, the date for the oral hearing shall be set as soon as possible Rule 210.2: The Court may order the parties to provide further information, documents and other evidence before or during the oral hearing, Rule 210.4: The decision of the Court shall be given in writing as soon as possible... If the Court deems appropriate, its decision may be given orally to the parties at the end of the oral hearing. 16 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Rule 211: Decision on the Application for provisional measures Rule 211.1: The Court may in particular order injunctions, seizure / delivery up of allegedly infringing goods, precautionary seizure of property (see Article 62) Rule 211.2: the Court shall be satisfied with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is entitled to commence proceedings, that the patent in question is valid and that his right is being infringed, or that such infringement is imminent. Rule 211.3: In taking its decision the Court shall have the discretion to weigh up the interests of the parties. (see also Article 62(2)) 17 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Rule 211: Decision on the Application for provisional measures Rule 211.4: The Court may order the applicant to provide adequate security for appropriate compensation for any injury likely to be caused to the defendant which the applicant may be liable to bear in the event that the Court revokes the order for provisional measures. The Court shall do so where interim measures are ordered without the defendant having been heard. 18 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Rule 212: Decision on provisional measures without hearing defendant Rule 212.1: The Court may only order provisional measures without the defendant having been heard in cases where any delay is likely to cause irreparable harm to the applicant Rule 212.2: the defendant shall be given notice of the provisional measures without delay and at the latest immediately at the time of execution... 19 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Rule 213: Revocation of provisional measures Rule 213.1: The Court shall ensure that provisional measures are revoked or otherwise cease to have effect, upon request of the defendant, without prejudice to the damages which may be claimed, if, within a time period provided for in the Court s order not exceeding 31 days from the date of the Court s order, the applicant does not start proceedings on the merits of the case before the Court Rule 213.1: Where provisional measures are revoked, or where they lapse due to any act or omission by the applicant, or where it is subsequently found that there has been no infringement or threat of infringement of the patent, the Court shall order the applicant, upon request of the defendant or any third party, to provide the defendant or such third party appropriate compensation for any injury caused by those measures. 20 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Final remedies (1) Rule 118 (Decision on the merits): in addition to the orders and measures referred to in Articles 63, 64, 66, 67 and 80 of the Agreement the Court may, if requested, order the payment of damages and compensation the Court may also subject any order or measure to a security to be given by the successful party to the unsuccessful party as determined by the Court Article 63: Permanent injunctions (1) Where a decision is taken finding an infringement of a patent, the Court may grant an injunction against the infringer The Court may also grant such injunction against an intermediary whose services are being used by a third party to infringe a patent. (2) Where appropriate, non-compliance with the injunction shall be subject to a recurring penalty payment payable to the Court. Article 64: Corrective measures in infringement proceedings (1) Without prejudice to any damages, and without compensation, the Court may order, at the request of the applicant, that appropriate measures be taken with regard to [infringing] products and, in appropriate cases, with regard to materials and implements principally used in the creation or manufacture of those products. 21 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Final remedies (2) Article 64: Corrective measures in infringement proceedings (cont.) (2) Such measures shall include: (a) a declaration of infringement; (b) recalling the products from the channels of commerce; (c) depriving the product of its infringing property; (d) definitively removing the products from the channels of commerce; or (e) the destruction of the products and/or of the materials and implements concerned. (3) The Court shall order that those measures be carried out at the expense of the infringer, unless particular reasons are invoked for not doing so. (4) the Court shall take into account the need for proportionality between the seriousness of the infringement and the remedies, the willingness of the infringer to convert the materials into a non-infringing state, as well as the interests of third parties 22 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Final remedies (3) Article 67: Power to order the communication of information (1) The Court may, in response to a justified and proportionate request of the applicant order an infringer to inform the applicant of: (a) the origin and distribution channels of the infringing products or processes; (b) the quantities produced, manufactured, delivered, received or ordered, as well as the price obtained for the infringing products; and (c) the identity of any third person involved in the production or distribution of the infringing products or in the use of the infringing process. Article 80: Dissemination The Court may order, at the request of the applicant and at the expense of the infringer, appropriate measures for the dissemination of information concerning the Court's decision, including displaying the decision and publishing it in full or in part in public media. What about dissemination of findings of non-infringement by patentee? 23 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Final remedies (4) Procedure for determination of damages, compensation and costs May be the subject of separate proceedings Rules 125 157 No later than one year from final decision on merits (Rule 126) 24 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Rule 345: Enforcement Rule 345.1: In general decisions and orders of the Court shall be directly enforceable from their date of delivery in each Contracting Member State in accordance with the enforcement procedures and conditions governed by the law of the particular Contracting Member State where enforcement takes place. Rule 345.2 and.3: In non-contracting Member States, enforce under (new) Brussels Regulation, Lugarno Convention or (if not parties to those) local law Rule 345.4: If a decision/order is revoked, a party against which it has been enforced may request that the Court order compensation for any injury Rule 345.5: orders may provide for periodic penalty payments payable to the Court in the event that a party fails to comply with the terms of the order or an earlier order. The value of such payments shall be set by the Court having regard to the importance of the order in question. 25 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 What is Appealable? Rule 220.1 (no leave to appeal required) Final decisions of CFI. Decisions terminating proceedings as regards one of the parties. Appeals in relation to law and fact (Art. 73(3)) Decisions / Orders under: Article 49(5) (language of proceedings in language of patent). Article 59 (order to produce evidence). Article 60 (order to preserve evidence & inspect premises). Article 61 (freezing orders). Article 62 (provisional & protective measures). Article 67 (order to communicate information). Appeals of a revocation decision and EPO decisions under Art. 9 Unitary Patent Regulation (e.g. renewal fees) have automatic suspensive effect (Art. 74(2)) For all other decisions, no suspensive effect unless CoA decides otherwise at party s request (Art. 74(1) & Rule 223) Appeals not to prevent continuation of main proceedings (Article 74(3)) 26 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

What is Appealable? Rule 220.2 (with leave from CFI) CFI procedural decisions or orders of CFI. Automatic appeal if these are bundled with final decision (Art.73(2)(b)(i)). Rule 221 (with leave from CoA) To be deleted (Article 73(2)(b)(ii)). 27 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Subject-matter for Appeals Rule 222 & Article 73(4) Requests, facts and evidence (not arguments) not submitted by a party during proceedings before CFI may be disregarded by CA: Could new submissions not reasonably have been made during proceedings before CFI? Are the new submissions highly relevant? Other party considerations? How much discretion will CoA have? De novo appeals? cf. Art. 73(4): may only be introduced. 28 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Statement of Appeal / Statement of Grounds of Appeal Rule 220.1 (a) & (b) decision served 2 months 2 months Statement of Appeal lodged Statement of Grounds of Appeal lodged Rule 220.1 (c) decision / order served 15 calendar days Statement of Appeal & Statement of Grounds of Appeal lodged Other orders (requiring leave) Together with the appeal against the decision; or Where leave to appeal is granted, within 15 days from notification. 29 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Statement of Appeal / Statement of Grounds of Appeal Recording in the register (Rule 230) Designation of judgerapporteur (Rule 231) Translation of file (Rule 232) Statement of Appeal & Statement of Grounds of Appeal lodged 14 days to correct deficiencies Leave to correct deficiencies within such period as judge-rapporteur shall decide Challenge to decision to reject appeal as inadmissible within one month of decision (Rule 234) Examination as to formal requirements of Statement of Appeal (Rule 229) Preliminary examination of Statement of Grounds of Appeal (Rule 233) 30 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

Statement of Response / Statement of Cross-Appeal / Reply to Statement of Cross-Appeal Statement of Grounds of Appeal served 3 Months Statement of Response (Rules 235 & 236) If statement of appeal withdrawn, cross appeal shall be deemed withdrawn (Rule 237.5) 2 Months Statement of Cross-Appeal (included in Statement of Response) (Rule 237) Reply to Statement of Cross-Appeal (Rule 238) 31 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1 Interim Procedure / Oral Procedure / Decision / Referral Back Interim Procedure (Rule 239) Rules 101 to 110 apply mutatis mutandis. Oral Procedure (Rules 240 & 241) Rules 111, 112, 115, 116, 117 and 321 apply mutatis mutandis. Decision (Rule 242 & Article 75) Appeal rejected; or Decision / order set aside totally or in part with CA substituting its own decision or order. Referral Back (Rule 243 & Article 75) Exceptional circumstances; and CFI bound on decisions of CA on points of law. 32 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1

simmons-simmons.com elexica.com 33 / Doc ID: L_LIVE_EMEA1:16576413v1