INDICTMENT. "Vof' and "the sorority" (collectively, "DOS). In leading the Pyramid Organizations, SUPERSEDING

Similar documents
I l'_ r: MKM::MKP/TH F. #2017R01840

Case 1:18-cr NGG Document 14 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 61. COUNT ONE (Sex Trafficking - Jane Does 1 and 2)

2:18-cr DCN Date Filed 11/14/18 Entry Number 3 Page 1 of 7

United States v. Raniere, et al. Criminal Docket No (NGG) (S-1)

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment, The Enterprise. 1. The members and associates of the Bonanno

(Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization) 1. On or about and between May 15, 2014 and January 12, 2015, both dates

- -X - - -X. COUNT ONE (Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization)

Case 1:19-cr RBK Document 1 Filed 03/13/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

1 HB By Representatives Williams (JD), Coleman, Hall and Boyd. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18. Page 0

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 18 u.s.c. 981, 982, 1001, 1014 I 1028A, 1343, 1503 I 1519, 1957 and 2; 28 u. s.c.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. Crim. No. I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

CRIMINAL NO. j(j)cr }03>l^D

Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2016 (202) TTY (866)

By Representatives Williams (J), Coleman, Todd, Hilliard, McClurkin, Ison, Gipson, England, Ball, Allen, Hubbard, Love,

THE GOVERNMENT S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS PRETRIAL MOTIONS

) ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1349

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:18-cr NGG-VMS Document 198 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1420

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

At all times relevant to this indictment, unless otherwise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

(T. 21, U.S.C., 848(a), ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, 848(b), 848(c), 853 (p), IGNACIO CORONEL VILLAREAL, 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) and 963;

Case 1:18-cr PLM ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _

Case 1:18-cr NGG-VMS Document 308 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 3048

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

COUNT ONE (Racketeering Conspiracy) The Enterprise. 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment, DANIEL

Appendix II States with Forced Labor mentioned in other Statutes By: Sandy Pineda, Bebe Anver. Alina Husain, and Leslye Orloff October 14, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

QUICK REFERENCE CONTENTS:

Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030

Case 4:14-cr HLM-WEJ Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7

Mail and Wire Fraud: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN NO. 21 U.S.C. 846

v. CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS: (i")

3. \5"'- C (-- ~ '3-1JJ-t\ 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(l)(C) 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(2) 18 U.S.C U.S.C. 2461

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IOWA

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 11 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: X - - -X

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

Appendix V States with Involuntary Servitude Mentioned in Other Statutes

Case 1:16-cr GPG Document 1 Filed 03/11/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Obstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws

Case 1:15-cr DPW Document 1 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 8

THE GOVERNMENT S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS PRETRIAL MOTIONS AS TO THE SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Trafficking People and Involuntary Servitude

RACKETEERING CHARGES

Human Trafficking A Local Law Enforcement Perspective

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

..'[ ~se~...j 'it ~..',::/ ~. _,- ':",'- /~.:-::' l _,. :.,', UNITEJ5~.vSTATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:05-cr PAS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 8 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

CRIMINAL NO. 2:17cr 3^

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

Case 1:13-cr RP-RAW Document 2 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF row A

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARIZONA

Appendix I States with Forced Labor Statutes By: Sandy Pineda, Bebe Anver. Alina Husain, and Leslye Orloff October 14, 2016

Case 8:18-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD

PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING ACT (No. 45 of 2014)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

2015 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NORTH DAKOTA

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WISCONSIN

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

Assembly Bill No. 67 Committee on Judiciary

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case3:14-cr SI Document1 Filed03/18/14 Page1 of 21. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA r/. " y - V VENUE: SAN FRANCISCO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

2014 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DELAWARE

Arkansas Sentencing Commission

United States v. Keith Raniere, et al. Criminal Docket No (NGG) (S-1)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXTRA SESSION 1994 H 1 HOUSE BILL 144. February 14, 1994

-v.- : SEALED INDICTMENT

2016 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOUTH DAKOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI DALLAS DIVISION 5 CR NO. 3:02-CR-052-R INTRODUCTION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

As used in this chapter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

Case 1:15-cr JCC Document 1 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

Case 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149

22 Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury and continuing up. 23 to and including October 15, 2014, within the Southern District of

:nue.&..crimes and Criminal Procedure Sections 2_314 and 2315

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

2016 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENTUCKY

Case 1:17-cr NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 102

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:

F. #2017R01840 Brooklyn, New York 11201

CRS Report for Congress

Transcription:

MKM:MKP/TH/KKO F. #2017R01840 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - KEITHRANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," CLAREBRONFMAN, ALLISONMACK KATHY RUSSELL, LAUREN SALZMAN ANd NANCY SALZMAN, also known as "Prefect," SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Cr. No. 18-204 fngg) (S-l) (r. 18, u.s.c., $$ e81(a)(lxc), e82(a)(2)(b), e82(bx I ), 1 028(bX5), 1028(0, 1349, 1sel(a)(l), 1se1(a)(2), I 59 1 (bx l), 1 s94(a), I 594(c), 1 s94(d), 1962(d),1963,2and 3551 etseq.; T. 21, U.S.C., $ 8s3(p); T. 28, U.S.C., $ 2461(c)) Defendants. X THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: otherwise indicated: INTRODUCTION At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment (the "Indictment"), unless L The Enterprise The defendant KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," was the founder of several pyramid-structured organizations ('the Pyramid Organizations"), including, but not limited to, (l) Nxivm, Executive Success Progtams, Inc., Ultima and other related entities (collectively, 'Nxivm"); and (2) an organization referred to as "DOS," the "Vof' and "the sorority" (collectively, "DOS). In leading the Pyramid Organizations, RANIERE relied on certain individuals, sometimes referred to as his "inner circle," who

2 were accorded special positions of trust and privilege with RANIERE and who carried out his directives. 2. Members of RANIERE's inner circle also held high positions in one or more of the Pyramid Organizations, including serving as executives, directors and officers of Nxivm. Members of RANIERE's inner circle also, at times, served as *frst-line masters" directly under RANIERE, meaning that they comprised the second-highest level within the DOS "pyramid" and that, other than RANIERE, they wielded the most power within DOS. 3. RANIERE and his inner circle, including the defendants CLARE BRONFMAN, ALLISON MACK, KATHY RUSSELL, LAUREN SALZMAN ANdNANCY SALZMAN, also known as "Prefect," and others known and unlnown, comprised an organized criminal enterprise (the "Enterprise"). The Enterprise, including its leadership, membership and associates, constituted an "enterprise" as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(4), that is, a group ofindividuals associated in fact that was engaged in, and the activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce. The Enterprise constituted an ongoing organization whose members functioned as a continuing unit for a common purpose of achieving the objectives of the Enterprise. Pumoses. Methods and Means of the Entemrise 4. The principal purpose ofthe Enterprise was to obtain financial and personal benefrts for the members ofthe Enterprise by promoting the defendant KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," and by recruiting new members into the Pyramid Organizations. By promoting RANIERE and recruiting others into the Pytu-id Organizations, the members ofthe Enterprise expected to receive financial opportunities and increased power and status within the Enterprise.

3 5. The Enterprise operated within the Eastem District of New York, the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, including overseas. 6. Among the means and methods by which the defendants and their associates participated in the conduct ofthe affairs ofthe Enterprise were the following: (a) Promoting, enhancing and protecting the Enterprise by committing, attempting and conspiring to commit crimes, including but not limited to identity theft, harboring ofaliens for financial gatr, extortion, forced labor, sex tra{hcking, money laundering, wire fraud and obstruction ofjustice; (b) Demanding absolute commitment to RANIERE, including by exalting RANIERE's teachings and ideology, and not tolerating dissent; (c) Inducing shame and guilt in order to influence and control members and associates of the Enterprise; (d) Obtaining sensitive information about members and associates of the Enterprise in order to maintain control over them; (e) Recruiting and grooming sexual partners for RANIERE; (0 Using harassment, coercion and abusive litigation to intimidate and attack perceived enemies and critics of RAMERE; and (g) Encouraging associates and others to take expensive Nxivm courses, and incur debt to do so, as a means of exerting control over them and to obtain financial benefits for the members of the Enterprise.

4 The Defendants and Their Co-Co nsoirators 7. The defendant KEITH RANIERE, also known as 'Yanguard," founded and was the leader ofnxivm and DOS. RANIERE was also the head of the Enterprise. 8. The defendant CLARE BRONFMAN was a member ofthe Enterprise and a high-ranking member ofnxivm. From at least in or about 2009 to 2018, BRONFMAN served on Nxivm's Executive Board. 9. The defendant ALLISON MACK was a member of the Enterprise and a high-ranking member of Nxivm. At various times relevant to the Indictnent, MACK was also a firstjine master in DOS. 10. The defendant KATHY RUSSELL was a member of the Enterprise and a high-ranking member of Nxivm. From at least in or about July 2002to2014, RUSSELL served as Nxivm's bookkeeper. I 1. The defendant LAUREN SALZMAN was a member of the Enterprise and a high-ranking member of Nxivm. From at least in or about 2009 to 2018, LAUREN SALZMAN served on Nxivm's Executive Board. At various times relevant to the Indictment, LAUREN SALZMAN was also a first-line master in DOS. 12. The defendant NANCY SALZMAN, also known as '?refect," was a member of the Enterprise and the President of Nxivm. NANCY SALZMAN is LAUREN SALZMAN's mother. 13. The defendants also acted in concert with other co-conspirators, both known and unknowq who were members and associates of the Enterprise, some of whose identities are known to the Grand Jury.

5 COUNTONE (Racketeering Conspiracy) 14. The allegations contained in paragraphs one through 13 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 15. In or about and between 2003 and March 2018, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as..\,zanguard," CLARE BRONFMAN, ALLISON MACK, KATHY RUSSELL, LAUREN SALZMAN ANdNANCY SALZMAN, also known as "Prefect," together with others, being persons employed by and associated with the Enterprise, an enterprise that engaged in, and the activities ofwhich affected, interstate and foreign commerce, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(c), that is, to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the conduct ofthe affairs of such enterprise through a pattern ofracketeering activity, as that term is defined in Title I 8, United States Code, Sections I 96 1 ( I ) and 1961(s). 16. The pattem ofracketeering activity through which the defendants KEITH RAMERE, CLARE BRONFMAN, ALLISON MACK, KATHY RUSSELL, LAUREN SALZMAN and NANCY SALZMAN, together with others, agreed to conduct the affairs ofthe Enterprise consisted ofthe racketeering acts set forth in paragraphs 17 ro 34 below, as Racketeering Acts One through Ten. Each defendant agreed that a conspirator would commit at least two acts ofracketeering in the conduct of the affairs ofthe Enterprise.

6 RACKETEERING ACT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft and to Unla*ftlly Possess Identification of Jane Doe l) A. Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft l'7. In or about 2004, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and KATHY RUSSELL, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to transfer, possess and use, without lawfrrl authority and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, one or more means of identification of another person, to wit: Jane Doe l, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlawful activity that consituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: bringing in, transporting and harboring an alien, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 132a(a)(l)(A), contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(7), all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(fl. B. Conspiracy to Unlawfully Possess Identification Document 18. In or about December 2004, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and KATHY RUSSELL, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to possess a false identification document, to wit: a sheriff s identification card with the last name and date of birth of Jane Doe l, with the intent that such document be used to defraud the United States, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(4), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(f).

7 RACKETEERING ACT TWO (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft) A Conspiracy to Commit Identitv Theft 19. In or about and between August 2005 and November 2008, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, CLARE BRONFMAN, KATHY RUSSELL and NANCY SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to transfer, possess and use, without la*firl authority and in and affecting interstate and foreigal co[rmerce, one or more means of identification of one or more other persons, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlar*drl activity that constituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: (1) intercepting wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2511; and (2) unla*frrlly accessing wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2701, contrary to Titte 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(7), all in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Section 1028(f). B. Identiw Theft of John Doe 1 20. In or about and between January 2006 and November 2008, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and KATHY RUSSELL, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally transfer, possess and use, without lawful authority and in and affecting interstate cornmerce, one or more means ofidentification of another person, to wit: John Doe l, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlawful activity that constituted one or

8 more violations of federal law, to wit: (1) intercepting wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 251 l; and (2) unlawfirlly accessing wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2701, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028(a)(7) md2. C. Identity Theft of John Doe 2 21. In or about and between January 2006 and November 2008, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere the defendants KEITH RANIERE and CLARE BRONFMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally transfer, possess and use, without lawfirl authority and in and affecting interstate commerce, one or more means of identification of another person, to wit: John Doe 2, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlawful activity that constituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: (l) intercepting wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 251l; and (2) unlawfully accessing wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2701, all in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 1028(a)(7) and 2. RACKETEERING ACT THREE (Conspiracy to Alter Records for Use in an Official Proceeding) 22. In or about and between February 2008 and March 2018, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the District ofnew Jersey and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and NANCY SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to comrptly alter, destroy, mutilate and conceal one or more records, documents and other objects, to wit: video recordings of NANCY SALZMAN,

9 with the intent to impair such objects' integrity and availability for use in an official proceeding, to wit: NXIVM Corp.. et al. v. Ross Institute. et al., 06 CV 1051 (D.N.J.), contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(1), all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(k). RACKETEERINGACT FOUR (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft - Jane Doe 2) 23. In or about November 2008, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant KEITH RANIERE, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to transfer, possess and use, without lawful authority and in and affecting interstate commerce, one or more means of identification of another person, to wit: Jane Doe 2, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlawful activity that constituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: (l) intercepting wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 251 1; and (2) unlawfirlly accessing wire and electronic communications, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2701, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(7), all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(f). RACKETEERINGACT FIVF, (Encouraging and Inducing Illegal Entry and Money Laundering Jane Doe 3) A Encourasing and Inducins lllesal Entrv 24. In or about March 2009, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant CLARE BRONFMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally encourage and induce an alien, to wit: Jane Doe 3, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, to come to, enter and reside in the United States, knowing and in

l0 reckless disregard ofthe fact that such coming to, entry and residence was and would be in violation of law, for the purpose offinancial gain, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Sections 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), 132a(a)(1)(B)(i) and 1324(a)(l)(AXv)(Il). B. Money Larmderinq 25. In or about March 2009, within the Northern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant CLARE BRONFMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally transport, tmnsmit and transfer monetary instruments and funds, to wit: wire transfers, from one or more places in the United States to and through one or more places outside the United States and to one or more places in the United States from and through one or more places outside the United States, with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawfill activity, to wit: bringing in and harboring an alien for financial gain, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(aX2XA) and 2. RACKETEE G ACT SIX (Trafiicking and Document Servitude - Jane Doe 4) A Traffickins of Jane Doe 4 for Labor and Services 26. In or about and between March 2010 and April 2012, within the Northern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and LAIJREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally recruit, harbor, transport, provide and obtain a person, to wit: Jane Doe 4, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, for labor and services in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Cl lpter 77,to wit: (1) document servitude, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,

1l Section 1592; and (2) forced labor, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1589, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1590 and 2 B of Jane Doe 4 27. In and about and between March 2010 and April 2012, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conceal, remove, confiscate and possess one or more immigration documents and actual govemment identification documents of a person, to wit: Jane Doe 4, in the course of, and with intent to commit, one or more violations of Title I 8, United States Code, Sections 1589 and 1590, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1592 ond 2. RACKETEERING ACT SEVEN (State Law Extortion) 28. In or about and between September 2015 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, ALLISON MACK and LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally steal property by extortion, in that RANIERE, MACK, LAUREN SALZMAN and others obtained property, to wit: personal property and other things of value, by compelling and inducing one or more persons, to wit: lower-ranking DOS members, to deliver such property by instilling in them a fear that, if the property were not so delivered, RAMERE, MACK, LAUREN SALZMAN and others would (l) expose a secret and publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject one or more persons to hatred, contempt and ridicule; and (2) perform an act which would not in itself

t2 materially benefit RANIERE, MACK, LAUREN SALZMAN and others, but which was calculated to harm one or more persons materially with respect to their health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation and personal relationships, in violation ofnew York Penal Law Sections 155.30(6), 155.05(2)(e)(v), 155.05(2xexix) and 20_00. RACKETEERING ACT EIGHT (Sex Trafficking, Forced Labor and State Law Extortion - Jane Doe 5) A. Sex Trafficki ofjane Doe 5 29. In or about and between February 2016 and Jtme 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, maintain, patronize and solicit a person, to wit: Jane Doe 5, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and did benefit, financially and by receiving anlthing of value, from participation in a venture that engaged in such acts, knowing and in reckless disregard ofthe fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause Jane Doe 5 to engage in one or more commercial sex acts, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1), 1591(a)(2) and 2. B, Forced Labor of Jane Doe 5 30. In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly

13 and intentionally provide and obtain the labor and services ofa person, to wit: Jane Doe 5, by means of(a) force, physical restraint and threats ofphysical restraint to her and one or more other persons, (b) serious harm and threats of serious harm to her and one or more other persons, (c) one or more schemes, plans and patterns intended to cause her to believe that, if she did not perform such labor and services, she and one or more other persons would suffer serious harm, and a combination of such means, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1589(a) and 2. C State Law Extortion ofjane Doe 5 31. In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant AILISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally steal property by extortion, in that MACK and others obtained property, to wit: credit card authorizations, jewelry and sexually explicit photographs and videos, by compelling and inducing Jane Doe 5 to deliver such property by instilliag in her a fear that, ifthe property were not so delivered, MACK and others would (1) expose a secret and publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject one or more persons to hatred, contempt and ridicute; and (2) perform an act which would not in itself materially benefit MACK, but which was calculated to harm one or more persons materially with respect to their health, safety, business, calling, cmeer, financial condition, reputation and personal relationships, in violation ofnew York Penal Law Sections 155.30(6), 155.05(2)(e)(v), 155.05(2)(e)(ix) and 20.00.

14 RACKETEERING ACT NINE (Forced Labor and State Law Extortion - Jane Doe 6) A. Forced Labor ofjane Doe 6 32. In or about and between February 2017 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally obtain the labor and services ofa person, to wit: Jane Doe 6, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, by means of(a) force, physical restraint and threats ofphysical restraint to her and one or more other persons, (b) serious harm and threats of serious harm to her and one or more other persons, (c) one or more schemes, plans and pattems intended to cause her to believe that, if she did not perform such labor and services, she and one or more other persons would suffer serious harm, and a combination of such means, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1589(a) and 2. B. State Law Extortion ofjane Doe 6 33. In or about and between February 2017 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendant LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally steal prop rty by extortion, in that LAUREN SALZMAN and others obtained property, to wit: bank account authorizations and sexually explicit photographs and videos, by compelling and inducing Jane Doe 6 to deliver such property by instilling in her a fear that, ifthe property were not so delivered, LAIIREN SALZMAN and others would (1) expose a secret and publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject one or more persons to hatred, contempt and ridicule; and (2) perform an act which would not in itself materially

15 benefit LAUREN SALZMAN, but which was calculated to harm one or more persons materially with respect to their health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation and personal relationships, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections I 55.30(6), 1 ss.0s(2)(e)(v), 1 ss.05(2xe)(ix) and 20.00. RA G ACT TEN (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft - Jane Doe 7) 34. In or about and between November 2016 and March 2018, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE and CLARE BRONFMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to transfer, possess and use, without la*firl authority and in and affecting interstate and foreign cornmerce, one or more means of identification of another person, to wit: Jane Doe 7, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unla*fti activity that constituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: tax evasion, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(7), all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(f). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1962(d),1963 and 3551 et scq.) COUNTTW o (Forced Labor Conspiracy) 35. In or about and between September 2015 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," ALLISON MACK and LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to provide and obtain the labor and services of one or more persons, to wit: lower-ranking DOS members,

16 by means of(a) force, physical restraint and threats ofphysical restraint to them and one or more other persons, (b) serious harm and threats of serious harm to them and one or more other persons, (c) one or more schemes, plans and pattems intended to cause them to believe that, if they did not perform such labor and services, they and one or more other persons would suffer serious harm, and a combination of such means, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1589(a). (Title 1 8, United States Code, Sections 1594(c) and 3551 et g9g.) CO1JNT THREE (Wire Fraud Conspiracy) 36- In or about and between September 2015 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants K-EITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," ALLISON MACK and LAUREN SALZMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud one or more persons, to wit: lower-ranking DOS members, and to obtain money and property, including rights to assets, credit card authorizations and seiually explicit photographs and videos, Iiom them by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and for the purpose of executing zuch scheme and artifice, to tmnsmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate and foreign commerce writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds, to wit: electronic messages, telephone text messages and Telegram messages, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 3551 et 59q.)

t7 COUNT FOUI: (Sex Traffi cking Conspiracy) 37. In or about and between February 20 I 6 and June 20 1 7, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, maintain, patronize and solicit one or more persons, to wit: one or more lower-ranking DOS members, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and to benefit, financially and by receiving anything ofvalue, Iiom participation in a venture that engaged in such acts, knowing and in reckless disregard ofthe fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination ofsuch means, would be used to cause such persons to engage in one or more commercial sex acts, which offense was effected by force, fraud, coercion and a combination of such means, contrary to Title 1 8, United States Code, Sections l59l(a)(l) and l59l(a)(2). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1594(c),1591(bXl) and 3551 et rcg.) COUNT FIVE (Sex Trafficking - Jane Doe 5) 38. In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally recruit, entice, harbor, tzulsport' provide, obtain, maintain, patronize and solicit a person, to wit: Jane Doe 5, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and did benefit, financially and by receiving anylhing ofvalue, from participation in a venture that engaged in such acts, knowing and in reckless disregard of the

l8 fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination ofsuch means, would be used to cause Jane Doe 5 to engage in one or more commercial sex acts, which offense was effected by force, fraud, coercion and a combination of such means. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(l), 1591(a)(2), 1591(bX1),2 and 3551 et seq.) COTINT SIX (Attempted Sex Trafficking - Jane Doe 8) 39. In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as "Vanguard," and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally attempt to recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, maintain, patronize and solicit one or more persons, to wit: Jane Doe 8, an individual whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and to benefit, financially and by receiving anlthing ofvalue, from participation in a venture that engaged in such acs, knowing and in reckless disregard ofthe fact that means offorce, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause such person to engage in one or more commercial sex acts, which offense was effected by force, fiaud, coercion and a combination of such means, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section l59l(a)(l) and 1591(a)(2). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1594(a), 1591(bxl),2 and 3551 et ses.)

t9 COUNT SEVEN (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft - Jane Doe 7) 40. In or about and between November 2016 and March 2018, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Northem District of New York, the defendants KEITH RANIER-E, also known as "Vanguard," and CLARE BRONFMAN, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to transfer, possess and use, without lawfrl authority and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, one or more means of identification of another person, to wit: Jane Doe 7, with the intent to commit, and to aid and abet, and in connection with, unlawfi-rl activity that constituted one or more violations of federal law, to wit: tax evasion, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201, contrary to Title I 8, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(7). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028(0 and 3551 et qeq.) CRIMINAL FORFEITT'RE ALLEGATION AS TO COLIN 41. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Count One that, upon their conviction of such offense, the govemment will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963(a), which requires any person convicted ofsuch offense to forfeit: (a) any interest the person acquired or maintained in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962; (b) any interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over any enterprise which the person has established, operated, confiolled, conducted or participated in the conduct of, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962; and (c) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds which the person obtained, directly or

20 indirectly, fiom racketeering activity in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Section 1962. 42. If any ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission ofthe defendants: divided without difficulty; (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction ofthe court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Tifle 18, United States Code, Section 1963(m), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendants up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963) CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COLINTS TWO. FOUR FIVE AND SIX 43. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Counts Two, Four, Five and Six that, upon their conviction of any such offense, the govemment will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(d), of(a) any property, real or personal, that was involved in, used, or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such offenses, and any property traceable to such property; and (b) any property, real or personal, constituting, or derived from,

2t proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result ofsuch offenses, or any property traceable to such property. 44. If any of the above-described forfeitable properfy. as a result ofany act or omission of the defendants: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; O) divided without difiiculty; has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond thejurisdiction ofthe court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property ofthe defendants up to the value ofthe forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation. Section 853(p)) (Title 18, United States Code, Section 159a(0; Title 21, United States Code, CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COLTNT THREE 45. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Count Tkee that, upon their conviction of such offense, the govemment will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States code, Section 981(a)(l)(c) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), which require any person convicted of such offense to forfeit any property, real or personal, constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offense.

22 46. Ifany ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants: divided without diffi culty; (a) carmot be located upon the exercise ofdue diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction ofthe court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property urhich cannot be it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property ofthe defendants up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegatioo. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C); Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c)) CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COUNT SEVEN 47. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Count Seven that, upon their conviction of such offense, the government will seek forfeiture in accordance with: (a) Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(B), which requires any person convicted ofsuch offense to forfeit any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result ofsuch offense; and (b) Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(b)(5), which requires any person convicted ofsuch offense to forfeit any personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense.

23 48. Ifany ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result ofany act or omission ofthe defendants: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise ofdue diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond thejurisdiction ofthe court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without diffi culty; it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(bXl), to seek forfeiture ofany other prop rty ofthe defendants up to the value ofthe forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a[2[B), 982(b)(1) and 1028(b)(5); Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p)) ATRUEBILL ( /n.l-"-9 O b..&.- RrcHARD P. DONOGHUU/ UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PERSON

F. 20t7R01E40 FORM DBD.34 JUN,85 No. l8-cr-204 (NGc) (S-l ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN District o/'new YORK CRIMINAL DIVISION THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA KEITH RANIERE, also known as " I/anguard, " et al., SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Defendants. (r. I8, u.s.c., $$ e81(a)(i)(c), e82(a)(2xb), e82(b)(i), 1028(bX5)' I 028(f), I 349, 1 se I (a)( I ), I s9 I (a)(2), I s91 (bx I ), 1 se4(a), I se4(c), ls94(d), 1962(d), 1963,2and 3551 etxs.; T.21, U.S.C., $ 853(p); T. 28, U.S.C., $ 2461(c)),4 lrue hill. Filed in open courl lhis,1r),,,1.d.20 (-lerk Bail, $ Moira Kim Penxa/Tanya Hajjor, Assista t U.S. Attorney (718) 254-7000