CITY OF OCEAN SHORES ORDINANCE NO. 972

Similar documents
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO

Ordinance No. 544 Public Hearing to Renew the Moratorium on Single Family Residential Subdivisions That Do Not Meet Minimum Lot Sizes

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

WHEREAS, Part 10, Chapter 2, Section requires that a Special Use Permit be obtained to operate a school, private or special; and

ORDINANCE NO

Coastal Control Construction Setback Line

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City is updating its land development codes to provide

ORDINANCE NO. O

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, homelessness continues to be a local, regional and national challenge due to many social and economic faclors; and

Lake Forest Park City Council. Agenda Cover Sheet. Ordinance 1175/Extending the Conservation Cluster Housing Moratorium

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the CSA is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any conflicting State enactments; and

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Upon motion by, seconded by, the following. Ordinance was duly enacted, voting in favor of enactment, voting against enactment.

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE

ORDINANCE NO

To: Honorable City Council Date: 03/20/12 From: Richard A. Leahy, City Manager By: Thomas E. Hansen, RE., Public Works Director

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2216

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, there exists the potential for misappropriation and diversion of medical marijuana to non-medical uses; and

ORDINANCE NO R

SUBTITLE II CHAPTER GENERAL PROVISIONS

BOROUGH OF MONTVALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHELBYVILLE FOR POST DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF DEBARY AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the Governing Body agrees that there is a need for more parking in the amusement area of Ocean Avenue on the west side; and WHEREAS,

CITY OF PARKLAND FLORIDA

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY OF KENT, OHIO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS Page CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

TOWN OF SEWALL S POINT

CITY OF LOWRY CROSSING, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 262

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

I. CALL TO ORDER & FLAG SALUTE at 7:00 p.m. IV. PUBLIC COMMENT - Please keep to 3 minutes

ORDINANCE NO. Z REZONING NO

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

City of Denton Special Election PROPOSITION REGARDING THE PROHIBITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

COUNTY COURT JOURNAL BOOK' '102 PAG 865 JOSEPHIHE VELTRI COUNTY CLERK BEFORE,THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI&~I0NERS DEPUTY FOR TILLAMOOK COUNTY,

Growth Management Act, RCW A et seq., for the City of Des. the greatest extent practicable, and ORDINANCE NO. 1476

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2325

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 1.01 CODE ADOPTION

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY OF WOODLAND, WASHINGTON

ARTICLE 1 BASIC PROVISIONS SECTION BASIC PROVISIONS REGULATIONS

COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay)

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 03C-10

1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code for additional remedies for Code Enforcement violations.

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside Ordains as Follows:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

City of. Lake Lillian

Ii pjf.ij1li! GRANTP[U[ ] Lm#nrn.a Or d. I *:i &vi 3iiIii[ i u i an i TO: COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON: SNOHOMISHICOUNTY COUNCI P

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Section 9.9 of the Charter of the City of North Lauderdale requires the

ORDINANCE NO

Sponsor: Janet Venecz Councilwoman at Large ORDINANCE NO. 9332

City of Ocean Shores Regular City Council Meeting

10 & 11 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing

CITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD)

ORDINANCE NO. O

Article 1.0 General Provisions

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS:

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS - EAGLE COUNTY

AGENDA ITEM # 6.F. Requirements: Appropriation Code: Costs: $ M E M O R A N D U M. TO: Mayor Mel Jurado and Members of City Council

Tax Identification Parcel Number

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Choteau, Montana, that:

RESOLUTION # BOROUGH OF HIGH BRIDGE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON STATE OF NEW JERSEY SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

VILLAGE OF CORNWALL-ON-HUDSON. INTRODUCTORY LOCAL LAW No.2 of 2018

INC. VILLAGE OF MANORHAVEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, p.m. - AGENDA

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Section 7.01 of the Charter of the City of Daytona Beach Shores, Florida

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF BASTROP, TX EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. N.C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO CONCERNING THE MAINTENANCE SIDEWALKS

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 1858

HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016

EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1636

CITY OF LIGHTHOUSE POINT, FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM REPORT DATE OF COMMISSION MEETING September 12, 2016 AGENDA ITEM NO.

Public Hearing Published 11/16/2017 First Reading 12/07/2017 Public Hearing 12/07/2017 Adopted 12/21/2017 ORDINANCE NO.

aware by concerned citizens and organizations of concerns and issues regarding the Atlantic Ocean beaches;

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS ORDINANCE NO

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

ORDINANCE NO

SOUTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO Duly Adopted December 19, 2018)

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No Ordinance No. 018/2017, Amending MMC 14.01, Flood Hazard Area Regulations; Final Reading

Elected Officials absent: Councilmember Broadbent.

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE RETURN TO CITY OF MANTECA, 1001 W. CENTER ST. MANTECA, CA ATTENTION: JOANN TILTON, MMC CITY CLERK

JAN O S lolfhis ~f~ent PREPARED BY

Transcription:

CITY OF OCEAN SHORES ORDINANCE NO. 972 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OCEAN SHORES, GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS TO SUPPORT AN EMERGENCY MORATORIUM TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING, BY WAY OF EXAMPLE ONLY, THOSE RELATING TO THE DIVISION OF LAND OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, FOR SAID PROPERTIES, GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCK 1, DIVISION 19 AND 19A UNTIL THE CITY FINISHES THE PROCESS OF ANALYSIS AND STUDIES RELATING BEACH EROSION FOR THE AREAS SUBJECT TO THIS MORATORIUM,AND CONFIRMING THE MAINTENANCE OF THE MORATORIUM FOR SIX MONTHS AFTER INITIALIMPOSITION AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 971 provided that the City of Ocean Shores would hold a public hearing on the emergency moratorium on March 28, 2016, in order to considerthe adoption of findings justifying the moratorium; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held as scheduled and, after considering all the testimony, if any, received at the hearing, the City Council determined to adopt the findings of fact set forth in this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the potential adverse impacts on the public health, property, safety and welfare of the City justify the imposition of the Moratorium; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OCEAN SHORES, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adopting Findings of Fact. As required by state statute, RCW 36.7OA.39O and 35A.63.220, the City Council hereby adopts the following findings of fact to justify the moratorium established by Ordinance No. 971. Page 1 of5 Ordinance No. 972

On January 9, 2015, the Mayor signed an Order Proclaiming an Emergency in the City of Ocean Shores due to significant potential damage to public and private property and infrastructure, as well as the potential for bodily injury and or death to individuals caused by strong storms, high surf, and heavy soaking rains and the resulting erosion hazards, flooding and related hazards during the 2014-2015 October through April storm season. The storm season of 2015-2016 has been more severe with stronger storms, frequent higher than normal tides, very large swells, and even heavier soaking rains resulting in more severe erosion and the higher risk for damage to public and private property and infrastructure, as well as the potential for bodily injury and or death to individuals. The resulting coastal erosion has removed up to sixty feet of shoreline between the North Jetty and Beach Street, located within the area described in City plats as all of Block 1 of Sections 19 and 19A (hereinafter, the Affected Shoreline Lots ) leaving structures and individuals in potential danger, and significantly affecting the beach contours and depth of the Affected Shoreline Lots. It would be beneficial to the proper development of the Affected Shoreline Lots for the City to authorize the performance of appropriate analysis and study as to the proper development of said properties in conjunction with the current review and update of the City s Shoreline Master Plan, providing benefits to the City of Ocean Shores and its residents, including those who may now or hereafter occupy those properties, subject to this moratorium. It would be beneficial to the owners of said property and to the residents of the City for the City, in cooperation with said property owners, City residents, and other agencies working on behalf of the City, to develop a more specific plan for the development of said properties. If individual development proposals on the Affected Shoreline Lots are allowed to be filed and processed without prior shoreline master planning taking place, such filing and processing could lead to development and land uses which would neither be consistent with the goals, policies, or recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, as now existing or hereafter amended, nor facilitate the efficient, effective, integrated and optimum development potential of the land located within the City of Ocean Shores. The Affected Shoreline Lots have been identified as areas of the City of Ocean Shores that may be subject to extensive saltwater inundation in the event of the breach of the primary dune. Page 2 of 5 Ordinance No. 972

h. if the owners of individual parcels of property within the area described above are allowed to file for, and the City commenced the processing of development proposals or building permits without additional shoreline master planning first taking place and being adopted by the City, such development may have a substantially negative impact on the properties themselves, as well as remaining properties within the area and upon the economic development of the City in general. i. It is necessary for a coordinated plan for development, taking into account the continuing pattern of beach erosion and other planning elements to be developed through the joint efforts of the City and the property owners within the area described above. j. A temporary prohibition against the acceptance by the City of development applications, including, but not limited to, applications for the division of land and for building permits for said properties, will not unreasonably detrimentally affect said properties. k. Steps are currently underway to determine the environmental review of a permanent solution to sand and beach erosion with the aid of State and or Federal grants. l. Seasonal storm activity during 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 has again emphasized to the City the need for a coordinated plan for development, taking into account the continuing pattern of beach erosion and other planning elements for the area described above. m. A time period of six (6) months is an appropriate time during which updating of the Shoreline Master Plan may occur, review of zoning classifications be undertaken, further progress made on the environmental impact statement for the long-term solution to beach erosion, a master plan can be developed and proposed to the City Council for adoption, and other analysis and studies can be completed. Section 2. Duration of Moratorium. For the reasons set forth in the foregoing findings, the emergency moratorium established by Ordinance No. 971 shall remain in effect through August 22, 2016 or at the time all of the tasks described herein have been accomplished, whichever is sooner, unless earlier terminated by action of the City Council. The Council shall make the decision to terminate the moratorium by ordinance, and termination shall not otherwise be presumed to have occurred. The moratorium may also be extended as provided by law. Page 3 of 5 Ordinance No. 972

Section 3. Based on these findings of fact, the City of Ocean Shores hereby affirms the six month moratorium on all applications for division of lands, (including by way of example and not limitation, platting requests), or for land use or development (including by way of example and not limitation, rezones, conditional uses, variances, or building permits), or applications of any kind or nature that would result in any vesting of development, zoning, or similar rights, as that is provided under the laws of this State, for the Affected Shoreline Lots. Section 4. This Ordinance shall not be codified in the Ocean Shores Municipal Code. Section 5. Pursuant to Ocean Shores Municipal Code, Chapter 1.06.010 this Ordinance may be proposed and adopted upon one reading. Section 6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the City Council has held a public hearing on this moratorium on March 28, 2016, within sixty (60) days of adoption of the moratorium. Immediately after the public hearing, the Council has adopted these findings of fact on the subject of this moratorium justifying its continued imposition. Section 7. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of fact herein and affirms that an emergency exists necessitating that Ordinance 971 remain in full force and effect as provided herein, and that the same is not subject to a referendum (RCW 35A.12.130). Without the moratorium on the City's acceptance of development applications for property, such applications could become vested, leading to development that could be incompatible with the codes eventually adopted by the City. Therefore, the moratorium had to be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and to prevent the submission of a flood of applications to the City in an attempt to vest rights for an indefinite period of time. This Ordinance does not affect any existing vested rights, nor will it prohibit all development in the City, because those property owners with exempt applications or permits, those with previously obtained approvals for development or redevelopment may proceed with processing and development, as the case may be. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary consisting of the title. Page 4 of 5 Ordinance No. 972

Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth in Section 9, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by ROW 3 5A.12. l30. THlS ORDINANCE PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Ocean Shores, Washington, at a regular open public meeting on this 28th day of March 2016. V ~~ Crystal ATTEST: ;2Q\ Ma L; Dingler, Rachel D, Carl, CMC, City Clerk /RE IEWED ND APPROVED BY; érent Dille, City Attorney Page 5 of 5 Ordinance No. 972