Syllabus Law 641: Surveillance Law Seminar. George Mason University Law School Spring Jamil N. Jaffer

Similar documents
Syllabus Law : Surveillance Law Seminar. George Mason University Law School Fall 2015 Arlington Hall, Hazel Hall. Professor Jake Phillips

BILLS PENDING AS OF 9/11/13 THAT RELATE TO NSA SURVEILLANCE

Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act

On the Bulk Collection of Tangible Things

Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board Public Hearing on Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act March 19, 2014

January 14, Dear Chairman Graham and Ranking Member Feinstein:

Excerpt from Vol. 4, Issue 1 (Fall/Winter 2015)

JOINT STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF JAMES R. CLAPPER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Confrontation or Collaboration?

Surveillance of Foreigners Outside the United States Under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD. Recommendations Assessment Report

Overview of Constitutional Challenges to NSA Collection Activities and Recent Developments

Statement for the Record. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. Hearing on Reauthorizing the Patriot Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ARTICLE. FISA s Significant Purpose Requirement and the Government s Ability to Protect National Security

Class #10: The Extraterritorial Fourth Amendment. Professor Emily Berman Thursday, September 25, 2014

The story of John Ashcroft and James Comey s hospital-bed heroics has by now been

NSA Metadata Collection and the Fourth Amendment

No IN THE. IN RE ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Petitioner REPLY TO BRIEF OF THE UNITED STATES IN OPPOSITION

NSI Law and Policy Paper. Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act

Overview of Constitutional Challenges to NSA Collection Activities

Deutscher Bundestag. 1st Committee of Inquiry. in the 18th electoral term. Hearing of Experts. Surveillance Reform After Snowden.

CRS Report for Congress

Government Collection of Private Information: Background and Issues Related to the USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization

August 23, BY U.S. MAIL AND Freedom of Information Act Request Request for Expedited Processing

Report on the Findings by the EU Co-chairs of the. ad hoc EU-US Working Group on Data Protection. 27 November 2013

Presidents Bush, Obama and the Surveillance of Americans

The National Security Agency s Warrantless Wiretaps

\\jciprod01\productn\e\elo\2-2\elo203.txt unknown Seq: 1 16-MAR-11 10:49 STUDENT NOTES

PATRIOT ACT HEARING Senate Committee on the Judiciary Non-Patriot Act Issues

Government Collection of Private Information: Background and Issues Related to the USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization in Brief

TOP SECRET!/COMOO'//NO.i'ORN

United States District Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: A Brief Overview of Selected Issues

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

CRS Report for Congress

Notes on how to read the chart:

Report on the findings by the EU Co-chairs of the ad hoc EU-US Working Group on Data Protection

A Legal Analysis of the NSA Warrantless Surveillance Program. Morton H. Halperin and Jerry Berman 1. January 31, 2006

Dear Members of the Judiciary Committee:

THE USA PATRIOT ACT AND CANADA S ANTI-TERRORISM ACT: KEY DIFFERENCES IN LEGISLATIVE APPROACH

National Security Letters in Foreign Intelligence Investigations: A Glimpse at the Legal Background

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION

Public Workshop July 9, 2013

Issue Area Current Law S as reported by Senate Judiciary Comm. H.R as reported by House Judiciary Comm.

PRIVACY, TECHNOLOGY AND NATIONAL SECURITY: An Overview of Intelligence Collection by Robert S. Litt, ODNI General Counsel

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:07-cv VRW Document 35 Filed 07/29/2008 Page 1 of 17

Written Testimony of Marc J. Zwillinger. Founder. ZwillGen PLLC. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Hearing on

I. THE COMMITTEE S INVESTIGATION

CRS Report for Congress

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION

February 8, The Honorable Jerrold Nadler Chairman U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary 2141 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: A Sketch of Selected Issues

WHAT REALLY IS AT STAKE WITH THE FISA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008 AND IDEAS FOR FUTURE SURVEILLANCE REFORM

ADMINISTRATION WHITE PAPER BULK COLLECTION OF TELEPHONY METADATA UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT

Emerging Technology and the Fourth Amendment

DRAFT [8-4-15] TUFTS UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTAL COLLEGE FALL 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

FISA AND WARRANTLESS WIRE-TAPPING: DOES FISA CONFORM TO FOURTH AMENDMENT STANDARDS? Aric Meyer, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of

CASE COMMENT ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

A SECOND-ORDER THEORY OF COMMUNICATIONS SURVEILLANCE LAW

TOP SECRET//COMINTHNOFORN

CRS Report for Congress

Unconstitutional or Bad Idea?

Opening Statement Mr. Mike Rogers [view PDF] Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Mr. C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger [view PDF]

" HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES! UNITING AND STRENGTHENING AMERICA BY FULFILLING RIGHTS AND ENSURING EFFECTIVE DISCIPLINE OVER MONITORING ACT OF 2015

CRS Report for Congress

STATEMENT STEVEN G. BRADBURY ACTING ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

TITLE III WIRETAPS. WHO S LISTENING?

The Relevance of Relevance: Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and the NSA Metadata Collection Program

Recent Privacy Developments in the United States, Particularly with Respect to Travelers Using Air Transport

National Security Letters in Foreign Intelligence Investigations: A Glimpse of the Legal Background and Recent Amendments

The administration defended the surveillance program, saying that it is lawful and is a critical tool to protect national security.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Statement of James X. Dempsey Policy Director Center for Democracy & Technology * before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

tinitrd~tat s~fnatf WASHINGTON, DC 20510

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 111th Cong., 1st Sess. S. 1692

CRS Report for Congress

Office of Legislative Affairs. April 28, 2006 SECRET

Striking the Balance: National Security vs. Civil Liberties

STATEMENT ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY S DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

Reviving Telecommunications Surveillance Law

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004: Lone Wolf Amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

Washington, DC Washington, DC The Hon. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. The Hon. John Conyers. Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Excerpt from Vol. 3, Issue 2 (Spring/Summer 2015)

The FISA Court and Article III

BACKGROUNDER. Maintaining America s Ability to Collect Foreign Intelligence: The Section 702 Program

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 479 Filed 10/16/2008 Page 1 of 15

OFFICE OF BOB BARR Member of Congress,

Title: BUSINESS RECORDS ORDERS UNDER 50 U.S.C. 1861

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

In the Supreme Court of the United States

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MOHAMED OSMAN MOHAMUD,

Transcription:

Brief Course Description: Syllabus Law 641: Surveillance Law Seminar George Mason University Law School Spring 2014 Jamil N. Jaffer This seminar course will expose students to laws and policies relating to government surveillance, from traditional criminal wiretaps to high technology surveillance conducted as part of the global war on terrorism. The course will involve a survey of the Fourth Amendment s search and seizure caselaw and the application of that body of law to government surveillance efforts. Issues discussed will include: wiretaps in drug and organized crime cases; warrantless surveillance programs in the 60s and 70s; legislative efforts to constrain surveillance; the expansion of government surveillance following the attacks of 9/11; and the implications of new surveillance technologies in an increasingly cyber- and technology-oriented world. In addition, the class will include an extensive discussion of the now-declassified bulk metadata and foreign content collections conducted by the National Security Agency, including a discussion of the legal analysis supporting these programs and the policy questions raised by them. Class Format: Seminar of 10-20 students; two credits; one two-hour class per week. Active participation in class discussions is required and students are expected to be fully prepared for each class session. Grading: Substantive grades will be based on class participation (15%) and student s successful completion of a 15-30 page paper on surveillance law (85%); writing grades will be based on the paper alone. Office Hours: By appointment. Faculty Contact Information: Email: jjaffer@gmu.edu Phone: 202-247-8390 1

Course Materials: The bulk of the course materials are cases or articles available on Westlaw or Lexis-Nexis or materials posted on TWEN. Materials posted on TWEN are indicated below. The only book required for purchase is James Bamford s THE PUZZLE PALACE: INSIDE AMERICA S MOST SECRET INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION. Please purchase this book as soon as possible as it will be needed for Week 5. ** Given the new declassification decisions that are regularly being made by the government regarding surveillance programs, it is highly likely that the syllabus and readings will be updated starting in week 7; therefore, please regularly check your email and TWEN for updates to the syllabus and readings. ** Course Assignments: Week One Introduction to Government Surveillance Under the Fourth Amendment 1. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928) 2. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) 3. Unclassified Report on the President s Surveillance Program, Report of the Inspectors General of DOD, DOJ, CIA, NSA, and ODNI, July 2009 (TWEN) 4. Declassified TOP SECRET/COMINT/NOFORN Letters and Report on NSA s Bulk Collection Programs for USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization, July 2011 (TWEN) 5. Unclassified ODNI Fact Sheet on the Collection of Intelligence Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, June 2013 (TWEN) Week Two Introduction to Criminal Wiretaps and Bugs 1. Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129 (1942) 2. On Lee v. United States, 343 U.S. 747 (1952) 3. Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505 (1961) Week Three Criminal Wiretaps and Bugs Under Title III: The Wire in Practice Part I 1. Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967) (only read thru 118) 2. Lee v. Florida, 392 U.S. 378 (1968) 3. Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128 (1978) 4. Dalia v. United States, 441 U.S. 238 (1979) Week Four Non-Content Surveillance Under Title III: Pen Registers and Tracking Devices 1. Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) 2. United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983) 3. United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984) 2

Week Five Introduction to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 1. United States v. United States District Court (Keith), 407 U.S. 297 (1972) 2. United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir. 1974) (en banc) (only read thru 608) 3. United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, 629 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980) (only read thru 917) Week Six The FBI and NSA in the 1960s and 1970s: COINTELPRO and SHAMROCK 1. Excerpts from S. Rep. 95-604, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1977 (TWEN) 2. Excerpts from James Bamford, THE PUZZLE PALACE, 302-90 (Purchase) 3. Excerpts from James E. Baker, IN THE COMMON DEFENSE, 71-78 (TWEN) Week Seven Introduction to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 1. Excerpts from James E. Baker, IN THE COMMON DEFENSE, 78-86 (TWEN) 2. Excerpts from Dycus, et al., NATIONAL SECURITY LAW 4TH, 512-32 (TWEN) 3. Declassified TOP SECRET//SI//NF Primary Order from the FISA Court for the Telephony Metadata Collection, April 2013 (TWEN) 4. NSA Fact Sheets on the Telephony Metadata (Section 215) and PRISM (Section 702) Programs, June 2013 (TWEN). Week Eight Foreign Intelligence Surveillance After FISA 1. Excerpts from James Bamford, THE PUZZLE PALACE, pp. 458-477 (Purchase) 2. Excerpts from James Bamford, BODY OF SECRETS, pp. 370-473 (focus on 428-473) (ebook through library catalog) 3. United States v. Cavanaugh, 807 F.2d 787 (9th Cir. 1987) (Kennedy, J.) 4. United States v. Bin Laden, 126 F. Supp. 2d 264 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) Week Nine Surveillance in the Post-9/11 Era: The PATRIOT Act, NSLs, and the Legality of Modern NSA Surveillance NOTE: PROPOSED PAPER TOPICS DUE THIS WEEK 1. Congressional Research Service, USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005: A Legal Analysis, pp. 1-24 (Dec. 21, 2006) (TWEN) 2. Excerpts from U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, A Review of the Federal Bureau if Investigation s Use of Exigent Letters and Other Informal Requests for Telephone Records (Jan. 2010) (TWEN) 3. Bob Litt, ODNI General Counsel, Speech: Privacy, Technology and National Security: An Overview of Intelligence Collection, July 2013 (TWEN) Week Ten Post 9/11 Surveillance: Information Sharing, The Wall, and the FISA Court of Review 3

1. Excerpts from Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States ( The 9/11 Commission Report ), pp. 266-277 (2004) (TWEN) 2. Excerpts from 9/11 Commission Staff Statement No. 9 (2004) (TWEN) 3. U.S. Department of Justice, Instructions on Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations (Mar. 1995) ( Gorelick Memo ) (TWEN) 4. In re Sealed Case, 310 F.3d 717 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2002) 5. Excerpts from James E. Baker, IN THE COMMON DEFENSE, 84-86 (TWEN) 6. Excerpts from the Report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction ( WMD Commission Report ) (Mar. 31, 2005) (TWEN) Week Eleven Post 9/11 Surveillance: The Terrorist Surveillance Program NOTE: FINAL PAPER TOPICS DUE THIS WEEK 1. U.S. Department of Justice, Legal Authorities Supporting the Activities of the National Security Agency Described by the President (Jan. 19, 2006) ( DOJ White Paper ) (TWEN) 2. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Remarks by General Michael Hayden at the National Press Club (Jan. 23, 2006) (TWEN) 3. U.S. Department of Justice, Prepared Remarks of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales at the Georgetown University Law Center (Jan. 24, 2006) (TWEN) 4. Excerpts from James E. Baker, IN THE COMMON DEFENSE, 87-98 (TWEN) 5. U.S. Department of Justice, Letter of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to Chairman Patrick Leahy and Senator Arlen Specter (Jan. 17, 2007) (TWEN) Week Twelve Post 9/11 Surveillance: FISA Modernization and the FISA Court of Review II 1. Excerpts from U.S. Department of Justice, Assistant Attorney General Kenneth L. Wainstein - Testimony on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (May 1, 2007) (TWEN) 2. Excerpts from U.S. Department of Justice, Assistant Attorney General Kenneth L. Wainstein - Testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence concerning the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Sept. 20, 2007) (TWEN) 3. Excerpts from S. Rep. 110-209, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Report on S. 2248, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2007 (Oct. 26, 2007) (TWEN) 4. In re: Directives [redacted] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 551 F.3d 1004 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2008) (TWEN) Week Thirteen The New National Security Agency Classified Metadata and Foreign Content Collections Revealed 4

1. Letter from Sens. Ron Wyden and Mark Udall to NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander Regarding Surveillance Programs, June 2013 (TWEN) 2. Response to Sens. Wyden and Udall from Gen. Alexander Regarding Surveillance Programs, June 2013 (TWEN) 3. Letter from 26 Senators to Director of National Intelligence Gen. Clapper Regarding Surveillance Programs, June 2013 (TWEN) 4. Response from Director of National Intelligence Gen. Clapper to 26 Senators, July 2013 (TWEN) 5

Week Fourteen Critiquing and Defending the Law Behind the NSA Metadata and Foreign Content Programs 1. Prepared Testimony of ACLU Foundation Deputy Director Jameel Jaffer before the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 2013 (TWEN) 2. Prepared Testimony of Center for National Security Studies Director Kate Martin before the House Judiciary Committee, July 2013 (TWEN) 3. Prepared Testimony of former DOJ OLC Assistant Attorney General Steven Bradbury before the House Judiciary Committee, July 2013 (TWEN) 4. Prepared Testimony of former NSA General Counsel Stewart Baker before the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 2013 (TWEN) 6