SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

a. Name of person served:

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff,

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Request for Publication

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

EXHIBIT A

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 0 1 ROBERT G. LOEWY (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. LOEWY, P.C. Quail Street Newport Beach, California 0 Phone: () -; Fax: () - Email: rloewy@rloewy.com STEVE MARCHBANKS (SBN ) PREMIER LEGAL CENTER, A.P.C. 0 Fifth Avenue, th Floor San Diego, California Phone: () -00; Fax: () -00 Email: steve@premierlegalcenter.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT J. WAFER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE ROBERT J. WAFER, an individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, ADVANCED CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC., et al., Defendants. CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER Case No. 0-01-00000-CU-MC-CXC ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO HON. ROBERT MOSS DEPARTMENT CX CLASS ACTION ORDER GRANTING P MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT Date: October 1, 01 Time: :0 A.M. Ctrm: Dept. CX Action filed: June, 01 Trial Date: Not Set WHEREAS, a class action is pending before this Court styled Robert J. Wafer v. Advanced Clinical Research Institute, LLC, et al., No. 0-01-00000-CU-MC- WHEREAS, the parties having made application, pursuant to Rule.(c) of the California Rules of Court, for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Litigation in accordance with an Amended Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of September, 01 (the Amended conditions for a proposed settlement of the Litigation and for entry of judgment upon the terms

1 1 1 1 0 1 and conditions set forth therein; WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered the Amended Stipulation and the exhibits annexed thereto; and WHEREAS, except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms herein have the same meanings as set forth in the Amended Stipulation, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Amended Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at a Final Approval Hearing described below.. Pursuant to Rule.(d) of the California Rules of Court, the Court hereby provisionally certifies the following class for settlement purposes: the following four studies at Advanced Clinical Research Institute: (1) the Orasure Technologies Protocol OQ-HCV- in 00; () the Braintree Pharmaceuticals Protocol BLI-0-0 in 00 and 0; () the Takeda Pharmaceuticals Protocol 01-0-TL--0 in 00; or () the Takeda Pharmaceuticals Protocol TP--. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Class Notice, Advertisement and Flyer attached to the Amended Stipulation as Exhibits A-C, respectively (collectively, the finds that plan for notice set forth in the Amended Stipulation meets the requirements of Rule.(f) of the California Rules of Court and due process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.. forth in the Notice and the Amended Stipulation and postmarked by no later than December 1, 01. Failure to meet this date will result in all defined Class members being included in the Class and being bound by the judgment in this case.. Notice and the Amended Stipulation and postmarked by no later than December 1, 01. No

1 1 1 1 0 Class member will be eligible for the free credit monitoring service if he or she fails to meet this date.. The Final Approval Hearing shall be held on December 1, 01, at :0 a.m., in Department CX of the Orange County Superior Court, Civil Complex Center, located at 1 West Santa Ana Blvd., Santa Ana, CA 01, to determine whether the proposed settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in the Amended Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class and should be approved by the Court; whether a Judgment as provided in the Amended Stipulation should be entered; to determine the amount of fees, costs and expenses that should be awarded to Plaintiff s Counsel; and to determine whether to approve a service payment to Plaintiff Robert J. Wafer.. Any Class Member may appear and show cause, if he or she has any, why the proposed settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, why a judgment should expenses should or should not be awarded to Class Counsel or why a service payment should or should not be made to Robert J. Wafer. Any written objections to the settlement must be received by the Court no later than December, 01.. All opening memoranda and documents in support of the settlement, and any on December, 01.. At or after the Final Approval Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the 1 Counsel and application for a service payment to Plaintiff Robert J. Wafer shall be approved.. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Final Approval Hearing without further notice to the Class Members, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Class.. If the Amended Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein is not approved or

1 1 1 1 0 1 consummated for any reason whatsoever, the Amended Stipulation and settlement and all proceedings had in connection therewith shall be without prejudice to the rights of the Parties status quo ante. IT IS SO ORDERED Date: October 1, 01 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Robert J. Moss Judge of the Superior Court I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of and am not a party to the within action; my business address is Quail Street, Newport Beach, CA 0. On September, I served a true and correct copy of the document(s) described as PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT on interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes as set forth below: John H. Horwitz Schaffer, Lax, McNaughton & Chen 1 S. Figueroa St., Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 001 (By U.S. Mail) for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I deposited such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States Mail at Newport Beach, California as indicated above. (By Personal Service) I delivered by hand true and correct copies of the documents on the interested parties in this action as indicated above. (By E-Service) I served a true and correct copy by e-service pursuant to CRC.0 et seq. (By Hand Delivery) I caused such document(s) to be delivered by hand to the office of the addressee(s) as indicated above. (By Express Service) I served a true and correct copy enclosed in a sealed package, for collection and for delivery marked for next day delivery in the ordinary course of business, addressed to the office of the addressee(s) as indicated above.

1 1 1 1 0 1 (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on September, 01, at Newport Beach, California. /s/ Robert Loewy Robert Loewy