[NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-14793; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: Art Collection and Galleries, Sweet Briar

Similar documents
[NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-25290; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison, WI

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Regulations, Future Applicability

APPENDIX A Summaries of Law and Regulations

Native American Graves Protection and. Repatriation Act

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

REPATRIATION POLICY February 2014

Policy and Procedures on Curation and Repatriation of Human Remains and Cultural Items

POLICY ON REPATRIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CULTURALLY SENSITIVE MATERIALS

(Pub. L , title I, 104, Oct. 30, 1990, 104 Stat )

SAMPLE DOCUMENT USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

THE REPATRIATION OF ANCESTRAL HUMAN REMAINS AND FUNERARY OBJECTS

PROVIDING FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES AND THE REPATRIATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN REMAINS AND CULTURAL PATRIMONY

1 of 7 12/10/2018, 12:45 PM

TITLE 20 EDUCATION. 80q. communities which are determined to provide an appropriate resting place for their ancestors;

3-14 ABOUT THE... NATIONAL NAGPRA PROGRAM

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY

APPENDIX F Federal Agency NAGPRA Statistics, 2006*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN

U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Oversight Hearing on Finding Our Way Home: Achieving the Policy Goals of NAGPRA June 16, 2011

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS. A. General Themes

SUMMARY; The National Park Service announces two telephonic government-to-government

FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA ORDINANCE #03/14 PRESERVATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES

HISTORIC PRESERVATION CODE

In the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Short title Findings and purpose Definitions.

WHEREAS, the Projects lie within the States of South Carolina and Georgia; and,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No NAVAJO NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Has Oregon Tightened the Perceived Loopholes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act?--Bonnichsen v.

Case 3:12-cv H-BLM Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 11

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Office of Federal Agency Programs

III. RESEARCH FINDINGS

Programmatic Agreement on Protection of Historic Properties During Emergency Response Under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution

CONFLICTS AND MISCONCEPTIONS OF THE REPATRIATION PROCESS. A Thesis by. Michael Jason Ables. Bachelor of Arts, Wichita State University, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- vs. DANIEL TAYLOR, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. NO. SCWC-28904

Lands & Natural Resources. (Amended as of 11/16/12) CHICKASAW NATION CODE TITLE 15 "15. LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES"

ANNUAL REPORT 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. Nomination to the World Heritage List: Hopewell Ceremonial Earthworks. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

Protecting the Past: A Comparative Study of the Antiquities Laws in the Mid-South. Doug Reed Ouchita Baptist University

NC General Statutes - Chapter 70 1

County of Riverside Public Safety Enterprise Communication Project Final EIR

Public Law th Congress An Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHPO Guidelines for Tribal Government Consultations in National Historic Preservation Act Decision Making Processes

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress

Sec. 470a. Historic preservation program

The Spirit of NAGPRA: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and the Regulation of Culturally Unidentifiable Remains

CONVENTION ON CULTURAL PROPERTY IMPLEMENTATION ACT

NOTE: TIPPING NAGPRA S BALANCING ACT: THE INEQUITABLE DISPOSITION OF CULTURALLY UNIDENTIFIED HUMAN REMAINS UNDER NAGPRA S NEW PROVISION

Kumeyaay.com» Dwelling on Sacred Ground. By Yelena Akopian, Senior Staff Writer

Case 2:12-cv MHT-CSC Document 100 Filed 03/22/13 Page 1 of 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

S To amend title 18, United States Code, to enhance protections of Native American cultural objects, and for other purposes.

P.O. Box 65 Hancock, Michigan USA fax

Offenses Concerning Dead Bodies and Graves Injuring or removing tomb or monument; disturbing contents of grave or tomb; penalties.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

PROCEDURES FOR THE HANDLING OF HUMAN REMAINS Contact officer: Vice President, Research & International

Getting Ready in Indian Country: Emergency Preparedness and Response for Native American Cultural Resources

Historic Preservation Law in a Nutshell (2d ed.)

The Protection of Cultural Property and the Circulation of Cultural Objects National Report The United States

National Historic Landmarks Committee of the National Park System Advisory Board

Case 1:14-cv RGS Document 24 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMMENT BETTER LATE THAN NEVER? THE EFFECT OF THE NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION ACT S 2010 REGULATIONS

THE RIGHT TO CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS SELF-DETERMINATION: LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF NATIVE AMERICANS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives On The Intent, Impact, And Future Of The Native American Graves Protection And Repatriation Act (First Peoples)

Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470) 1

APPENDIX M Draft Cultural Programmatic Agreement

C.A. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. TIMOTHY WHITE, ROBERT L. BETTINGER, and MARGARET SCHOENINGER,

MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE PROJECT Plan for Unanticipated Historic Properties and Human Remains West Virginia and Virginia

Case 3:12-cv H-BLM Document 5-1 Filed 05/11/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NATIVE AMERICAN REQUIREMENTS UNDER

Plan of Development Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. APPENDIX O Plan for Unanticipated Historic Properties and Human Remains

PRESERVATION ACT CALIFORNIA BILL NUMBER: SB 1816 CHAPTERED

2013 Federal Docs Offers List #1 from Missouri Southern State University

Perceptions of Repatriation in Anthropological Literature. Suzanne Kroeger Anthropology Degree, from University of Victoria, 2017

Cultural Resources Management: Tribal Rights, Roles, Consultation, and Other Interests (A Developer s Perspective) 1

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable

Georgia Cemetery Law (Code Section 36-72) Enacted 1997

NAGPRA Revisited: A Twenty-Year Review of Repatriation Efforts

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior is submitting a nomination to the World Heritage

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA THE NAVAJO NATION, No. CV PCT-PGR. Plaintiff, vs.

RoyalHawaiianAcademyof TraditionalArts

Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice

Refracting Rights through Material Culture: Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Robert H.

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATION ON AMERICAN INDIAN AFFAIRS. Repatriation Conference Advocating for Our Ancestors

Annual Report of Repatriation Activities. of the Smithsonian Institution

TITLE 40 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION CODE

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, THE U.S

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: The Death Knell for Scientific Study?

National Control and Management Plan for Members of the Snakehead Family

WHEREAS, NDOT administers Federal-aid projects throughout the State of Nevada as authorized by Title 23 U.S.C. 302; and

Ill-gotten gains: how many museums have stolen objects in their collections?

HISTORICAL, PREHISTORICAL, AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

NO IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OREGON, THOMAS CAPTAIN,

Deaccession and Disposition of Museum Objects and Collections Procedure

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. Records Schedules; Availability and Request for Comments

Fourth Annual Repatriation Conference Advocating for Our Ancestors

DRAFT 2012) PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, THE U.S

Transcription:

This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/05/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-02305, and on FDsys.gov 4312-50 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-14793; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: Art Collection and Galleries, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The staff of the Art Collection and Galleries of Sweet Briar College, in consultation with the appropriate Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, has determined that the cultural items listed in this notice meet the definition of unassociated funerary objects. Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request to the Art Collection and Galleries of Sweet Briar College. If no additional claimants come forward, transfer of control of the cultural items to the lineal descendants, Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request with information in support of the claim to the Art Collection and Galleries of Sweet Briar College at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Dr. Karol A. Lawson, Director, Art Collection and Galleries, Pannell 208, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA 24595, telephone (434) 381-6248, email klawson@sbc.edu. 1

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural items under the control of the Art Collection and Galleries, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA, that meet the definition of unassociated funerary objects under 25 U.S.C. 3001. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service s administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American cultural items. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. History and description of the cultural items The Art Collection and Galleries staff at Sweet Briar College have identified eight ceramic vessels in the permanent collection as being unassociated funerary objects from the archeological site known as Nodena, located in Mississippi County, AR. In addition, the staff have identified three ceramic fragments comprising a single object and one intact ceramic vessel as being unassociated funerary objects from burials in Mississippi County, AR. Therefore, there are 10 unassociated funerary objects from Mississippi County, AR, known to be at Sweet Briar College. In 1932, hundreds of cultural items were removed from the Nodena site in Mississippi County, AR, by Walter B. Jones of the Alabama Museum of Natural History, according to a published report, Nodena: An Account of 90 Years of Archaeological Investigation in Southeast Mississippi County, Arkansas (Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey, 1989, ed. Dan Morse, p. 33). Jones excavated at the site in the winter and early spring of 1932, and he and his team recovered bottles, bowls, and jars (as well as other material) and human remains. Jones designated a portion of the ceramic objects he excavated at the Nodena site as a gift to Sweet 2

Briar College, VA. This donation appears to have been initiated by Mrs. Lena Garth of Huntsville, AL, whose daughter and granddaughter both attended Sweet Briar College. According to letters in the Sweet Briar College acquisition files, Jones informed Harris. G. Hudson (Sweet Briar history department faculty) of the gift on May 31, 1932, and Sweet Briar College president, Dr. Meta Glass, informed Jones that the materials had been received on June 18, 1932. Nowhere in the extant 1932 letters and memos did Jones, Garth, Hudson, or Glass provide specific lists clearly delineating what individual artifacts, or even exactly how many, were included in the donation to Sweet Briar College. Between 1932 and the early 1990s, artifacts from this donation were displayed at various locations on Sweet Briar s campus, most notably in an academic building and then in the library. First under the care of the history department, the objects were then overseen by the library staff and the anthropology department faculty. In the early 1990s, care for the artifacts was turned over to the newly established art gallery. The Art Collection and Galleries staff at Sweet Briar College have identified 10 objects in the collection as unassociated funerary objects from this donation. Based on a telephone conversation between Karol Lawson of Sweet Briar College and Dr. Ann M. Early, Arkansas State Archaeologist, Arkansas Archaeological Survey, these ceramic objects appear to be affiliated with The Quapaw Tribe of Indians. Dr. Early explained that, though the Nodena site predates documented contact between European explorers and the Native Americans identifying themselves as Quapaw, archeologists working with this material today generally concur that The Quapaw Tribe of Indians is the modern, Federally-recognized tribe most closely affiliated with the pre-historic cultural group that occupied the Nodena site. The staff of the Sweet Briar College Art Collection and Galleries inventoried and researched the provenance of the Nodena site objects in 2012, and distributed a NAGPRA summary to The Quapaw Tribe of Indians. Carrie Wilson, NAGPRA representative of The Quapaw Tribe of Indians, contacted Sweet Briar College in the summer of 2013, and subsequently requested repatriation of the objects. 3

Determinations made by the Art Collection and Galleries of Sweet Briar College Officials of Sweet Briar College have determined that: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the 10 cultural items described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony and are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed from a specific burial site of a Native American individual. Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the unassociated funerary objects and The Quapaw Tribe of Indians. Additional Requestors and Disposition Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request with information in support of the claim to Dr. Karol A. Lawson, Director, Art Collection and Galleries, Pannell 208, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA 24595, telephone (434) 381-6248, email klawson@sbc.edu by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. After that date, if no additional claimants have come forward, transfer of control of the unassociated funerary objects to The Quapaw Tribe of Indians may proceed. The Art Collection and Galleries of Sweet Briar College is responsible for notifying The Quapaw Tribe of Indians that this notice has been published. Dated: January 9, 2014. Mariah Soriano, Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 4

[FR Doc. 2014-02305 Filed 02/04/2014 at 8:45 am; Publication Date: 02/05/2014] 5