UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/28/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 5:07-cv CLS Document 72 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) IQ BIOMETRIX, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) PERFECT WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ) PERFECT WORLD CO, LTD., AND ) WAGWARE SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) Jury Trial Demanded IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff IQ Biometrix, Inc. ( IQ Biometrix ), for its complaint against Defendants Perfect World Ent., Inc. ( Perfect World Ent. ), Perfect World Co., Ltd. ( Perfect World Co. ) (Perfect World Ent. and Perfect World Co. referred to collectively as Perfect World ) and Wagware Systems, Inc. ( Wagware ) (Perfect World and Wagware referred to collectively as Defendants ), hereby demands a jury trial and alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

PARTIES 2. Plaintiff IQ Biometrix, owner of the patents identified below, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 1525 Lakeville Drive, Suite 200, Kingwood, Texas 77339. IQ Biometrix provides facial image composite software marketed under the name FACES. The FACES software is used by thousands of law enforcement agencies worldwide, including the CIA and the FBI, as well as the U.S. Military. The FACES software has received numerous awards, including the Crime Stoppers International President s Award and the National Parenting Center Seal of Approval Award. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Perfect World Ent. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 2200 Bridge Parkway, Suite 201, Redwood City, California 94065. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Perfect World Co. is a company organized and existing under the laws of the People s Republic of China, with its principal place of business at 8th Floor, Huakong Building, No. 1 Shangdi East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, People s Republic of China. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Wagware is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Alabama, with its principal place of business at 218 Sarasista Circle, Harvest, Alabama 35749. 2

JURISDICTION AND VENUE Code. 6. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States 7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 8. Upon information and belief, Perfect World Ent. has done substantial business in the State of Illinois and has committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in this judicial district. 9. Upon information and belief, Perfect World Co. has done substantial business in the State of Illinois and has committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in this judicial district. 10. Upon information and belief, Wagware has done substantial business in the State of Illinois and has committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in this judicial district. 11. Upon information and belief, this Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because each has at least minimum contacts with this forum as a result of business regularly conducted within the State of Illinois and this judicial district. Such jurisdiction exists generally as well as specifically as a result of, at least, the Defendants offering to sell and/or selling products in this judicial district that are claimed to infringe claims of one or more of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,731,302 and 7,289,647. Each Defendant s conduct and connections with this judicial district are and have been such that it reasonably should have anticipated being brought into court in this judicial district. 3

12. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,731,302 13. On May 4, 2004, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,731,302 ( the 302 patent ), entitled Method and Apparatus for Creating Facial Images. IQ Biometrix has been assigned sole title to the 302 patent and has the right to sue and recover for infringement. A copy of the 302 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 14. Upon information and belief, Perfect World and its products, including, at least, the Perfect World online game, have been and are infringing one or more claims of the 302 patent directly, contributorily and/or by inducement, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 15. IQ Biometrix has been damaged by Defendants infringement of the 302 patent. INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,289,647 16. On October 30, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 7,289,647 ( the 647 patent ), entitled System and Method for Creating and Displaying a Composite Facial Image. IQ Biometrix has been assigned sole title to the 647 patent and has the right to sue and recover for infringement. A copy of the 647 patent is attached as Exhibit B to this Complaint. 17. Upon information and belief, Perfect World and its products, including, at least, the Perfect World online game, have been and are infringing one or more claims of the 647 patent directly, contributorily and/or by inducement, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 4

18. Upon information and belief, Defendant Wagware and its products, including at least the MakeFaces computer game, have been and are infringing one or more claims of the 647 patent directly, contributorily and/or by inducement, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 19. IQ Biometrix has been damaged by Defendants infringement of the 647 patent. JURY DEMAND 20. Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IQ Biometrix hereby respectfully requests a jury trial on all issues and claims so triable. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, IQ Biometrix prays for judgment as follows: (A) That Perfect World has infringed the 302 and 647 patents; (B) That Wagware has infringed the 647 patent; (C) That Perfect World and its officers, agents and employees, successors and assigns and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them be permanently enjoined from direct and indirect infringement of the 302 and 647 patents; (D) That Wagware, its officers, agents and employees, successors and assigns and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them be permanently enjoined from direct and indirect infringement of the 647 patent; 5

(E) That an accounting be had for the damages to IQ Biometrix arising out of Defendants infringing activities together with prejudgment interest and costs, and that such damages be awarded to IQ Biometrix; (F) That this case be deemed exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285, and that reasonable attorney fees, expenses and costs incurred in this action be awarded to IQ Biometrix; and and proper. (G) That IQ Biometrix be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just Dated: May 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP By: /s/ Barry F. Irwin, P.C. Barry F. Irwin, P.C. (# 6211213) Margaret M. Dolan (# 6292715) 300 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862-2000 barry.irwin@kirkland.com meg.dolan@kirkland.com Counsel for Plaintiff IQ Biometrix, Inc. 6