ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) Nos.28137/2018)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L)NO OF 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT. LTD & ORS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos of 2017)

ITEM NO COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).

THE INDIAN JURIST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Through : Mr.Harvinder Singh with Ms. Sonia Khurana, Advs.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J. 1. In this writ petition filed by the petitioner, the challenge is made to

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 19 th September, CM(M) 592/2016. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R.

Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society MIDDLE INCOME GROUP SCHEME DEFINITION. SCHEDULE

NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * * * * PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos of 2005 Decided On: Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judg

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY. MR. AJAY KUMAR & ORS... Defendants Through None

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LICENCE FOR OPERATING KIOSK Date of decision : February 8, 2007 W.P.(C) 480/2007

Through Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

in accordance with law.

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013

Bar and Bench (

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.169 OF Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 20 th May, Versus

TNT India Private Limited } Petitioner versus Principal Commissioner of } Customs (II) and Ors. } Respondents

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 31 st March, Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: Date of Decision: versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 901/2016 VISIBLE MEDIA THROUGH: MR. SAMEER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Date of Judgment: W.P.(C) 8432/2011

2 entered into an agreement, which is called a Conducting Agreement, with the respondent on In terms of the agreement, the appellant was r

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION. W.P.(C) 1972/2011 and CMs 4189/2011, 4729/2011, 12216/2011

Through: Mr. Himansu Upadhyay, Mr. J.P. Sahrawat and Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C)NO(s).

W.P. (C) No. 8579/2007 Page 1 of 5

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CELLULAR OPERATORS ASS.O.I. & ORS. - Versus -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.194 OF 2012 HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD & ANR.

WRIT PETITION NO OF Dr. Madhav Vishwanath Dawalbhakta (Decd) through LRs. Dr. Nitin M. Dawalbhakta & Ors. Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

SURAJ BHAN THR GPA HOLDER & ORS... Appellants Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Advocates

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.

901-pil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. + I.A. Nos /2007 & 5651/2009 in CS(OS) No. 829/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXPLOSIVES RULES, 2008 W.P.(C) 7020/2012 DATE OF DECISION :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN ARBITRATION ACT, Date of Decision : 3rd March 2009

SUPPLEMENTARY LIST MISCELLANEOUS HEARING PART HEARD MATTERS HIMACHAL PRADESH CRICKET ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl. M.C. No. 377/2010 & Crl. M.A. 1296/2010. Reserved on:18th May, 2011

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.9550 of 2015 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY SAVITRI MOHAN & ORS...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 29th November, 2012 MAC.APP.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Date of Decision: % RSA 417/2015 & C.M. Nos /2015. versus.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1374 OF 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009

$~4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:- 11 th April, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.85 OF 2007

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2006

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010. Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NDPS ACT. Judgment reserved on :11th November, Judgment delivered on: 06th February, 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (C) No.of 2016 (Diary No of 2016) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).11189/2016 JEANS KNIT PRIVATE LTD. BANGALORE VERSUS WITH

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) versus NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER WITH

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7093/2015. PAWAN KUMAR SEN... Petitioner Mr.Shanker Raju, Adv. with Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Adv.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010. % Date of decision: 6 th December, Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL SCHOOL & ORS.

Transcription:

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX 1 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.D23708/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-02-2016 in CA No. 221/2013 29-02-2016 in CA No. 221/2013 04-05-2017 in RP No. 3720/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) MAHARASHTRA CHAMBER OF HOUSING INDUSTRY VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.73411/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.73415/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.73414/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ) Date : 15-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kunal Vajani, Adv. Ms. Padhma Lakshmi Iyengar, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Rohtgi, Adv. Ms. Priyakshi Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Mr. Pranaya Goyal, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. J.J. Xavier, Adv. Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv. Mrs. Jayashree Wad, Adv. Ms. Sukriti Jaggi, Adv. For M/S. J S Wad And Co, AOR Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Arnav Behari, Adv.

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R These petitions have been preferred by the petitioner for seeking permission to carry on the construction which has been prohibited by the impugned judgment and order/s passed by the High Court. We make it clear that this order is not intended to set aside or modify the aforesaid impugned judgment. We have considered the matter only in order to explore the possibility of safe method of permitting certain constructions in the city of Mumbai for a limited period to pave the way for further orders that may be passed. Prima facie, we are satisfied that a total prohibition, though selective, has serious ramifications on housing sector which is of great significance in a city like Mumbai. It also has a serious impact on the financial loans which have been obtained by the developers and builders. Such a ban makes serious inroads into the rights of citizens under Article 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. Though it might be equally true that the activities and the neglect in disposing of the debris invades the rights of other citizens under Article 21 etc. That issue is left open for a proper determination. We have heard the matter on several occasions and we are of the considered view that the following order should govern the construction activities in the city of Mumbai : Primarily, the ban has been imposed by the Bombay High Court because of alarming impact of the inability of Respondent No.1 -

3 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (for short, the 'Municipal Corporation') to deal with and safely dispose of the solid waste and construction debris that is generated by the activities of construction of buildings. It was however argued before us that this construction debris can be safely disposed of at designated sites, whoever they belong to, provided the same are available for receiving and storing this debris. This, no doubt, assumes that construction activity will go on and that itself has deleterious effect on the population because of the waste particles which are dispersed in the air. We therefore direct that any construction that is permitted hereafter for the purpose of this order shall be only after adequate safeguards are employed by the builders for preventing dispersal of particles through the air. This shall be incorporated in the IOD, unless it is already so incorporated. According to the Municipal Corporation, ten sites have been located and inspected along with the representative/s of the Monitoring Committee. The land owners have given the consent or 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) for bringing such debris onto specified locations which require to be filled with earth. In another words, these sites require land filling which will be done by this debris. The Municipal Corporation shall permit a builder or developer to carry on construction on their sites by imposing the conditions in the IOD or any such permission, that the construction debris generated from this particular site, shall be transported and deposited in specific site inspected and approved by the Municipal

4 Corporation. The Municipal Corporation shall specify such a site meant for deposit of construction debris in the building permission or IOD. It shall also ensure compliance by regular inspection of both, the construction site and the landfill site. Any breach will entail the cancellation of the building permission or IOD and the work will be liable to be stopped immediately. The landfill site shall be governed by the Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016, which came into force with effect from 29.3.2016. In particular, the landfill sites shall be the Sanitary landfill sites as defined in the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016. The Municipal Corporation shall ensure that the criteria for development of facilities at the sanitary land-fills shall be applied to the landfill sites as specified in paragraph (B) of Schedule I to the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016. These Rules will apply to the extent they are relevant and necessary in relation to the landfill sites which are permitted to be used for disposal of construction debris under this order. The Municipal Corporation shall not permit any construction whether in respect of pre-existing IOD or fresh IOD unless it has first located a landfill site and has obtained 'No Objection Certification' or consent of the land owner that such debris may be deposited on that particular site. The Municipal Corporation shall incorporate in the IOD the condition that the construction is being permitted only if such construction debris is deposited. In so far as the 'small generators' of Construction and Demolition [ C&D ] Waste are concerned, the C&D Waste shall be

5 disposed of in accordance with the 'Debris On-Call Scheme' initiated by Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation, whereunder the agencies appointed by the Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation shall through its authorised appointed agencies pick up and collect the C&D Waste which shall be transported to/unloaded at the designated disposal sites and used for creating infrastructure facility of dumping grounds, covering of Municipal Solid Waste and preparation of internal roads/loops within the dumping ground premises as well as in accordance with the provisions of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016. In so far as the 'large generators' of C&D Waste are concerned, the C&D Waste shall be disposed of as per the Waste/Debris Management Plan submitted by the owner/developer at the time of applying for an IOD and as approved by the Solid Waste Management department of Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation, wherein neither Deonar nor Mulund dumping sites shall be included as designated disposal sites as well as in accordance with the provisions of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016. In the event for any reason whatsoever the consent given by the disposal site owner/authority is revoked and/or in the event the time limit during which the disposal site was available has expired, the relevant construction activity will be stopped after issuance of a Show Cause Notice and till such the Waste Management Plan/Debris Management Plan has been appropriately amended to provide a new disposal site for dumping of C&D Waste and is approved by Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation.

6 The applicant for development permissions shall give the Bank Guarantee to the tune of Rs.5 lacs to Rs.50 lacs depending upon the size project and mode of development, which bank guarantee shall remain in force solely for the purpose of ensuing compliance of the Waste Management Plan/Debris Management Plan approved by Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation from time to time, till the grant/issuance of the Occupation Certificate. The Monitoring Committee shall be entitled to inspect the record of the Municipal Corporation for pertaining to the grant of IODs and shall also be entitled to visit and inspect the landfill sites. The Monitoring Committee shall be entitled to bring to the notice of the Municipal Corporation any breach in the permission or in the conditions of IOD of building permission. The Municipal Corporation shall pass a speaking order on such objections within a period of one month. In view of the above, the Municipal Corporation shall submit a detailed report to this Court after the expiry of six months. This order shall remain in force for a period of six months from today. It is made clear that no construction debris will be carried for disposal to the Deonar and Mulund dumping sites. List the matter after six months along with the report of Respondent No.1 Municipal Corporation. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) COURT MASTER (SH) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) ASST.REGISTRAR