State Politics & Policy Quarterly. Online Appendix for:

Similar documents
Elections Performance Index

Massachusetts Frequently Asked Questions

MINUTES OF BOARD OF HARVEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CANVASS OF NOVEMBER 8 GENERAL ELECTION. November 14, 2016

Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting

MICHIGAN S CONSTITUTION

Online Appendix: Robustness Tests and Migration. Means

Michigan Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alabama Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Information and Identification: A Field Experiment on Virginia's Photo Identification Requirements. July 16, 2018

CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A

Table A.1: Experiment Sample Distribution and National Demographic Benchmarks Latino Decisions Sample, Study 1 (%)

Maryland State Board of Elections Comprehensive Audit Guidelines Revised: February 2018

Oregon. Voter Participation. Support local pilot. Support in my state. N/A Yes N/A. Election Day registration No X

Voter turnout in today's California presidential primary election will likely set a record for the lowest ever recorded in the modern era.

Connecticut Frequently Asked Questions

Jon Husted Ohio Secretary of State. Voter Access Guide For Voters with Disabilities. ADA Coordinator s Office. Local: (614)

BOARD OF ELECTIONS: REGISTRATION

New Mexico Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Assessing the 2014 Election Updated index includes 2014 data. Overview. A brief from Aug 2016

Study Background. Part I. Voter Experience with Ballots, Precincts, and Poll Workers

Voting for Parties or for Candidates: Do Electoral Institutions Make a Difference?

Nevada Republican Party

Mexico s Evolving Democracy. A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections. Edited by Jorge I. Domínguez. Kenneth F. Greene.

REPORT ON POLITICAL ATTITUDES & ENGAGEMENT

New Hampshire Frequently Asked Questions

Basic Election Admin Facts Need for Data By Kimball Brace, President Election Data Services, Inc. Denver June, 2014

LESSEN THE LINE. on Election Day. Michele L. White, Prince William County Director of Elections.

Report on Citizen Opinions about Voting & Elections

Sonoma County Statement of Votes Special Election - 04/08/2014

Turnout Effects from Vote by Mail Elections

FREE THE VOTE. A Progressive Agenda to Protect and Expand the Right to Vote. presented at the 2013 Progressive Mass Policy Conference.

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Florida Senate (PROPOSED BILL) SPB FOR CONSIDERATION By the Committee on Ethics and Elections

Who Votes Without Identification? Using Affidavits from Michigan to Learn About the Potential Impact of Strict Photo Voter Identification Laws

COMMISSION CHECKLIST FOR NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTIONS (Effective May 18, 2004; Revised July 15, 2015)

Early Voting Methods and the Impact on Voter Turnout

Washington, D.C. 2016

Political Beliefs and Behaviors

Arizona Frequently Asked Questions

CRS Report for Congress

2016 Presidential Primary FAQs

The 2014 Ohio Judicial Elections Survey. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron. Executive Summary

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3131 SUMMARY

MAINTAIN HIGH LEVEL OF INTEGRITY IN THE ELECTION PROCESS SEE THAT EVERY POLLING PLACE IS ACCESSIBLE

Tennessee Am I registered to vote?

Supplementary Materials for Strategic Abstention in Proportional Representation Systems (Evidence from Multiple Countries)

Telephone Survey of Mill Valley Voters Municipal Services Tax Measure Survey Report June 2016

Mississippi Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Connecticut Frequently Asked Questions

FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures. OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar

Legislative Process and Behavior

OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar. FY 2016 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Second Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

ABSENTEE VOTING, MOBILIZATION, AND PARTICIPATION

1. Am I registered to vote?

Building a Redistricting Database. By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc.

Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

PENNSYLVANIA: SMALL LEAD FOR SACCONE IN CD18

Millions to the Polls

OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar. FY 2020 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

The Youth Vote 2004 With a Historical Look at Youth Voting Patterns,

TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES COMMISSION

How Incivility in Partisan Media (De-)Polarizes. the Electorate

Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections

Porter County Poll Worker Training. Office of the Porter County Circuit Court Clerk

Appendix A: Additional background and theoretical information

Elections. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $1,583,167. General Government Expenditure Budget: $69,278,846

Georg Lutz, Nicolas Pekari, Marina Shkapina. CSES Module 5 pre-test report, Switzerland

The Effect of Ballot Order: Evidence from the Spanish Senate

Party Polarization, Revisited: Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Party Preference

2016 Presidential Election Calendar

IC Chapter 7. Municipal Elections in Small Towns Located Outside Marion County

2019 Election Calendar

ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE

2019 Election Calendar

Helping America Vote? Election Administration, Partisanship, and Provisional Voting in the 2004 Election

CITY OF NORTHFIELD, MN CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APPROVING CANVASS OF VOTES CAST AT THE AUGUST 9, 2016 CITY PRIMARY ELECTION

VOTE It s Your Right!

The Election Process From a Data Prospective. By Kimball Brace, President Election Data Services, Inc. 2017

Sample Examination One Answers RUBRIC FREE RESPO SE QUESTIO S. 1. Political participation in the United States can take place in various forms.

While viewing this PBS Documentary video answer the following questions. 3. Is voting a Right or a Privilege? (Circle the answer)

DIRECTIVE November 20, All County Boards of Elections Directors, Deputy Directors, and Board Members. Post-Election Audits SUMMARY

Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections

Precincts which subtracted Machines N n % n % n % Democratic Plurality Precincts Republican Plurality Precincts. Precincts which added Machines

May 6, 2017 School Board Election Law Calendar

Who Voted for Trump in 2016?

&&$' ( )*&$ ++ % $ +./0+/-1 ( )*&$2 34) "'55***)3)

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

A Candidate s Guide to the 2014 Statewide Primary and General Election Period. Important Dates

8, DAYS PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL SCHOOL ELECTION

Sincerely, Jon Husted Ohio Secretary of State

PENNSYLVANIA: CD01 INCUMBENT POPULAR, BUT RACE IS CLOSE

Unsuccessful Provisional Voting in the 2008 General Election David C. Kimball and Edward B. Foley

Virginia Photo Voter Identification: Q &A

14.11: Experiments in Political Science

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

Assembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections

JUNE 7, 2016 PRESIDENTAL PRIMARY ELECTION - CALENDAR OF EVENTS. Dates and events exclusive to candidate filing are posted in blue.

Local elections. Referendum on the voting system used to elect MPs to the House of Commons

Vermont Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transcription:

State Politics & Policy Quarterly Online Appendix for: Comparing Two Measures of Electoral Integrity in the American States Patrick Flavin, Baylor University, Patrick_J_Flavin@baylor.edu Gregory Shufeldt, Butler University, gshufeld@butler.edu Table 1A: The Relationship between Principal Components and Citizens Attitudes About Whether They Think Politicians are Trustworthy EIP Component 1 -.0055168 (.0222993) EIP Component 2.0385569 (.0300714) Pew Component 1.0120433 (.0089933) Pew Component 2 -.0042225 (.0135363) Pew Component 3.0009495 (.0234339) Pew Component 4 -.0313376 (.0183533) Pew Component 5.0179676 (.0211103) Pew Component 6.0283249* (.0118035) ANES respondent s belief that politicians are trustworthy (1=Disagree strongly, 2=Disagree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree somewhat, 5=Agree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported below in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 1

Table 1B: The Relationship between Individual Indicators and Citizens Attitudes About Whether They Think Politicians are Trustworthy EIP Electoral Laws Indicator.000539 (.0015192) EIP Electoral Procedures Indicator.0019776 (.0025097) EIP Boundaries Indicator 0.0022065 (0.001764) EIP Voter Registration Indicator -.003678 (.0031396) EIP Party Registration Indicator.003998 (.0029789) EIP Campaign Media Indicator.0041495 (.0028813) EIP Campaign Finance Indicator.0054556 (.003756) EIP Voting Process Indicator -.0008993 (.004518) EIP Vote Count Indicator -.0051534 (0.0054503) EIP Post-Election Indicator -.0012682 (.0036126) EIP Electoral Authorities Indicator -.0006633 (.0024541) Pew Registration Status Website Lookup Indicator.0595388 (.0856414) Pew Precinct Ballot Website Lookup Indicator.0291779 (.0560726) Pew Absentee Status Website Lookup Indicator.0303786 (.0544859) Pew Provisional Ballot Status Website Lookup Indicator.0418374 (.0672008) Pew Registrations Rejected Indicator.2518464 (.7896009) Pew Provisional Ballots Cast Indicator 2.471735 (1.445236) Pew Percentage of Provisional Ballots Rejected Indicator 35.62376* (8.052781) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Rejected Indicator 12.17105 (6.895157) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Unreturned Indicator.0796126 (.1935623) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Rejected Indicator.8597311 (.5834538) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.0481158 (.1230785) Pew Data Completeness Indicator.3773662 (.6805828) Pew Post-Election Audit Requirement Indicator -.0037898 (.0481132) Pew Disability or Illness Related Voting Problems Indicator -1.138158 (.8052061) Pew Registration or Absentee Problems Indicator -.1460582 (1.136857) Pew Availability of Online Registration Indicator.0250347 (.0555781) Pew Voting Wait Time Indicator -.0011605 (.0090552) Pew Voter Registration Rate Indicator -1.002311* (.4828347) Pew Voter Turnout Rate Indicator -.3166119 (.3322453) ANES respondent s belief that politicians are trustworthy (1=Disagree strongly, 2=Disagree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree somewhat, 5=Agree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported to the right in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 2

Table 2A: The Relationship between Principal Components and Citizens Trust in the Federal Government EIP Component 1.0319916 (.0198687) EIP Component 2.0063601 (.0235937) Pew Component 1 -.0101284 (.0111764) Pew Component 2.0126783 (.0077678) Pew Component 3.0148698 (.0231825) Pew Component 4 -.0361984 (.0260608) Pew Component 5.0058949 (.0295869) Pew Component 6.0039556 (.0145514) ANES respondent s belief that they can trust the federal government to do what is right (1=Never, 2=Some of the time, 3=About half of the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported below in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 3

Table 2B: The Relationship between Individual Indicators and Citizens Trust in the Federal Government EIP Electoral Laws Indicator.0023228 (.0013127) EIP Electoral Procedures Indicator.0039877 (.002057) EIP Boundaries Indicator -.0005183 (.0011937) EIP Voter Registration Indicator.0039168 (.0031112) EIP Party Registration Indicator.0051064* (.0017276) EIP Campaign Media Indicator.0037414 (.0024902) EIP Campaign Finance Indicator.0008775 (.0026012) EIP Voting Process Indicator.0043911 (.003334) EIP Vote Count Indicator.0036847 (.0031175) EIP Post-Election Indicator -.0010891 (.0030252) EIP Electoral Authorities Indicator.0018653 (.0018044) Pew Registration Status Website Lookup Indicator.030202 (.0576043) Pew Precinct Ballot Website Lookup Indicator -.0074553 (.0400455) Pew Absentee Status Website Lookup Indicator.0183786 (.0361066) Pew Provisional Ballot Status Website Lookup Indicator.0684651 (.035539) Pew Registrations Rejected Indicator -.5792198 (.6149946) Pew Provisional Ballots Cast Indicator 1.391266 (1.538186) Pew Percentage of Provisional Ballots Rejected Indicator -4.97147 (8.549326) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Rejected Indicator.6126169 (7.395037) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.1348576 (.158093) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Rejected Indicator.1622031 (.4682066) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.2052632* (.1020029) Pew Data Completeness Indicator.3492406 (.3162302) Pew Post-Election Audit Requirement Indicator.0279885 (.0483772) Pew Disability or Illness Related Voting Problems Indicator -1.015382 (.7146297) Pew Registration or Absentee Problems Indicator -1.06849 (1.671317) Pew Availability of Online Registration Indicator.0096605 (.0383877) Pew Voting Wait Time Indicator -.0086634 (.0063507) Pew Voter Registration Rate Indicator.2647267 (.3842558) Pew Voter Turnout Rate Indicator.0599611 (.2266926) ANES respondent s belief that they can trust the federal government to do what is right (1=Never, 2=Some of the time, 3=About half of the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported to the right in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 4

Table 3A: The Relationship between Principal Components and Citizens Attitudes About Whether They Believe Public Officials Care What People Like Them Think EIP Component 1.0187354 (.0175993) EIP Component 2 -.0367985 (.0205536) Pew Component 1 -.0095583 (.0104082) Pew Component 2.006475 (.0100484) Pew Component 3 -.0081552 (.0283022) Pew Component 4 -.023206 (.03027) Pew Component 5 -.0213385 (.0196736) Pew Component 6 0.197625 (.016515) ANES respondent s belief that public officials don t care much about what people like them think (1=Agree strongly, 2=Agree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Disagree somewhat, 5=Disagree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported below in parentheses).all models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a twotailed test. 5

Table 3B: The Relationship between Individual Indicators and Citizens Attitudes About Whether They Believe Public Officials Care What People Like Them Think EIP Electoral Laws Indicator -.0003411 (.0012022) EIP Electoral Procedures Indicator.0013595 (.0023209) EIP Boundaries Indicator -.000264 (.0011566) EIP Voter Registration Indicator.0031413 (.0027263) EIP Party Registration Indicator -.0034544 (.002254) EIP Campaign Media Indicator -.0012951 (.0031482) EIP Campaign Finance Indicator -.0031308 (.0021499) EIP Voting Process Indicator.0016084 (.0034178) EIP Vote Count Indicator.0013624 (.0034279) EIP Post-Election Indicator -.0005991 (.0029104) EIP Electoral Authorities Indicator.0019655 (.0018096) Pew Registration Status Website Lookup Indicator.1149746* (.0519267) Pew Precinct Ballot Website Lookup Indicator.0041218 (.0444033) Pew Absentee Status Website Lookup Indicator.0121986 (.0321637) Pew Provisional Ballot Status Website Lookup Indicator -.0512876 (.0299724) Pew Registrations Rejected Indicator -.0896823 (.6273094) Pew Provisional Ballots Cast Indicator -.2285372 (1.611802) Pew Percentage of Provisional Ballots Rejected Indicator -12.33746 (7.498816) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Rejected Indicator 3.117426 (9.525169) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.0908017 (.2026689) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Rejected Indicator -.870587 (.4488974) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.0443512 (.1157857) Pew Data Completeness Indicator.0799259 (.2260801) Pew Post-Election Audit Requirement Indicator.0263467 (.0381359) Pew Disability or Illness Related Voting Problems Indicator -.8813179 (.9754859) Pew Registration or Absentee Problems Indicator 1.987511* (.8149162) Pew Availability of Online Registration Indicator -.0221532 (.0279421) Pew Voting Wait Time Indicator -.0093469 (.006156) Pew Voter Registration Rate Indicator.3517698 (.4012894) Pew Voter Turnout Rate Indicator.1122698 (.238197) ANES respondent s belief that public officials don t care much about what people like them think (1=Agree strongly, 2=Agree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Disagree somewhat, 5=Disagree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported to the right in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a twotailed test. 6

Table 4A: The Relationship between Principal Components and Citizens Attitudes About Whether People Like Them Have a Say in What Government Does EIP Component 1 -.0342656 (.0246941) EIP Component 2 -.031086 (.0356701) Pew Component 1 -.0038974 (.0134151) Pew Component 2.0112315 (.0139395) Pew Component 3.0375714 (.0352456) Pew Component 4 -.0385143 (.0427953) Pew Component 5 -.0320537 (.0306506) Pew Component 6 -.0067549 (.0280345) ANES respondent s belief that people like them don t have a say in what government does (1=Agree strongly, 2=Agree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Disagree somewhat, 5=Disagree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported below in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 7

Table 4B: The Relationship between Individual Indicators and Citizens Attitudes About Whether People Like Them Have a Say in What Government Does EIP Electoral Laws Indicator -.0019749 (.0017049) EIP Electoral Procedures Indicator -.0045824 (.0031644) EIP Boundaries Indicator -.0006454 (.0017021) EIP Voter Registration Indicator -.0037627 (.004346) EIP Party Registration Indicator -.0049455 (.0041063) EIP Campaign Media Indicator -.0055236 (.0039192) EIP Campaign Finance Indicator -.0054564 (.0041081) EIP Voting Process Indicator -.0032484 (.004504) EIP Vote Count Indicator -.0021747 (.0054873) EIP Post-Election Indicator -.0019261 (.0045129) EIP Electoral Authorities Indicator -.0042972 (.0023931) Pew Registration Status Website Lookup Indicator.024208 (.0926578) Pew Precinct Ballot Website Lookup Indicator -.0336893 (.044957) Pew Absentee Status Website Lookup Indicator.0401013 (.0420492) Pew Provisional Ballot Status Website Lookup Indicator -.0352449 (.0446684) Pew Registrations Rejected Indicator -.3811234 (1.081892) Pew Provisional Ballots Cast Indicator 3.78083 (2.024426) Pew Percentage of Provisional Ballots Rejected Indicator 4.056294 (13.9994) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Rejected Indicator -.6563248 (7.056044) Pew Percentage of Mail Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.07034 (.2809308) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Rejected Indicator -.71094 (.4214321) Pew Percentage of Military and Overseas Ballots Unreturned Indicator -.2789751 (.1396201) Pew Data Completeness Indicator.4169597 (.3437148) Pew Post-Election Audit Requirement Indicator.0162801 (.0485262) Pew Disability or Illness Related Voting Problems Indicator -.4201492 (.9541274) Pew Registration or Absentee Problems Indicator 1.459589 (1.216785) Pew Availability of Online Registration Indicator -.045135 (.0420779) Pew Voting Wait Time Indicator -.0040624 (.0071791) Pew Voter Registration Rate Indicator -.1508005 (.5063255) Pew Voter Turnout Rate Indicator -.1553786 (.313053) ANES respondent s belief that people like them don t have a say in what government does (1=Agree strongly, 2=Agree somewhat, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Disagree somewhat, 5=Disagree strongly). Cell entries are the OLS regression coefficient for the indicated independent variable (with standard errors clustered by state reported to the right in parentheses). All models control for intensity of partisanship, attention to politics, education, income, gender, age, race, and the % non-white, % foreign born, and closeness of the 2016 presidential election in a respondent s state. * denotes p<.05 using a two-tailed test. 8