IP Impact: Design Patents. Mike Trenholm Ali Razai Terry Tullis

Similar documents
Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

U.S. Design Patent Protection. Finnish Patent Office April 10, 2018

US Design Patents for Graphical User Interfaces in the US. Margaret Polson Polson Intellectual Property Law, PC

Economic Damages in IP Litigation

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa: Revising The Test

Design Patent Judicial Decisions. A Year In Review. ~ USPTO Design Day 2012 ~ Alan N. Herda Haynes and Boone, LLP

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Patents Ownership. Inventor default owner of patent right

Frequently Asked Questions. Trade/service marks: What is a trade/service mark?

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:177

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit HIGH POINT DESIGN LLC v. BUYERS DIRECT, INC. Decided July 30, 2015

Infringement pt. 3; Design Patents; ST: Patent Opinions

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

Designing an Enforcement Strategy in the Wake of Samsung v. Apple

196:163. Executive summary for clients regarding US patent law and practice. Client Executive Summary on U.S. Patent Law and Practice

IP Strategies for Software Tech Companies

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Civil Action No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Climbing Onto Multiple Branches of IP Protection (for Product Design Trade Dress) Will Leave You Hanging Without Constitutional Support!

BASIC CONSIDERATIONS IN AN INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS FOR U.S. DESIGN PATENT By David M. Pitcher

Speaker and Panelists 7/17/2013. The Honorable James L. Robart. Featured Speaker: Panelists: Moderator:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. America Online, Inc. and Netscape Communications Corp.

A Guide To Filing A Design Patent Application. Prepared by I.N. Tansel from pac/design/toc.

Intersection of Automotive, Aerospace, & Transportation: Practical Strategies for Resolving IP Conflicts in Multi-Supplier Sourcing

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

DESIGN PATENT CASE ALERT: Parker v. Kimberly- Clark, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2565 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 10, 2012)

Overview of Developments in Telecoms Patent Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Now What? Samsung v. Apple and Design Patent Damages. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Theodore Brown, Senior Counsel

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Michelle Urie

Recognized Group Thailand Report

LexisNexis Expert Commentaries David Heckadon on the Differences Between US and Canadian Patent Prosecution

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1901 Filed08/21/12 Page1 of 109

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

International Arbitration of Patent Disputes. M. Scott Donahey Arbitrator and Mediator Palo Alto

High-Tech Patent Issues

The Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

Case 2:13-cv DDP-RZ Document 46 Filed 11/05/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:994

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

The Supreme Court is Set to Decide the Scope of Business Method Patent Protection

Information and Guidelines Concerning the Patent and Copyright Process at East Tennessee State University

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules

America Invents Act H.R (Became Law: September 16, 2011) Michael K. Mutter Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch October 11-12, 2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Federal Circuit

Commentary: Faux Amis in Design Law

PATENT CASE LAW UPDATE

Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership Impact on IPR Practice and District Court Practice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Trade Dress Rights Enforcement: Prosecuting Infringement Claims

The Halo Effect on Patent Infringement Risk: Should You Revisit Your Corporate Strategy for Mitigating Risk? March 23, 2017 Cleveland, OH

Spansion v. Apple The Intersection of the Bankruptcy Code and Intellectual Property AIPLA Spring Meeting May 2, 2013

New Law Creates a Patent Infringement Defense and Restructures the Patent and Trademark Office Pat Costello

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

What Merchants Need to Know About How the Key Players in the Mobile Payments Services Ecosystem Relate to Each Other. Patent Infringement Disputes

Patent Prosecution Update

alg Doc 40 Filed 01/19/12 Entered 01/19/12 15:07:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Overview of the Patenting Process

A Rebalancing Act: Early Patent Litigation Strategies in Light of Recent Federal Circuit Cases ACC Litigation Committee Meeting

Case 2:14-cv RCJ-PAL Document 18 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) )

TEN TIPS FOR MAXIMIZING PROVISIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION

America Invents Act (AIA) The Patent Reform Law of 2011 Initial Summary

Case 1:09-cv REB-CBS Document 35 Filed 06/15/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

APLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Prathiba M. Singh President, APAA (Indian Group)

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department

Key Developments in U.S. Patent Law

The table below presents the data as entered.

ORDER. Plaintiffs, ZOHO CORPORATION, Defendant. VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC AND VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., CAUSE NO.: A-13-CA SS.

APAA Country Report KOREA APAA Council Meeting Penang 2014

OLIVE & OLIVE, P.A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

IDEAS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

US Inventor, Inc Paul Morinville Highland, Indiana President

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY

Report from the Front Line: U.S. District Courts

QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PATENT SYSTEM IN EUROPE. 1.1 Do you agree that these are the basic features required of the patent system?

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Impact of the Patent Reform Bill

Transcription:

IP Impact: Design Patents Mike Trenholm Ali Razai Terry Tullis Palo Alto November 6, 2014

Part I: Design Patent Overview 2012 2014 Knobbe Knobbe, Martens, Martens, Olson & Olson Bear, LLP & all Bear, rights LLP reserved. all rights reserved. 2

Apple vs. Samsung 3

Apple vs. Samsung 4

What is a Design Patent? 35 U.S.C. 171: An Ornamental Design for an Article of Manufacture For example: Configuration, Shape, Surface Ornamentation Only the Appearance, Not Structural or Utilitarian Features Original/Non-obvious 5

Differences Between Utility and Design Patents Patent Term 14 years from Grant of Design Patent HAGUE adoption to 15 years No Maintenance Fees Single Claim No Application Publication Foreign Filing within 6 months (vs 12 months for Utility) 6

Ins and Outs of the Specification FEATURE DESCRIPTION 7

Drawings 7 views Perspective Front Back Right Left Top Bottom Side Side 8

Example Subject Matter 9

Benefits & Weaknesses of Design Applications Cost Relatively inexpensive compared to utility applications No maintenance fees Speed to issuance 50% issue within 12 months Some as soon as 7 months Expedited as fast as 2-4 months Higher allowance rate than utility applications 10

Benefits & Weaknesses of Design Applications Patent Coverage Deter wholesale copying & knock-offs Overlapping protection with utility patents Largest Holders include: Sony, Samsung, Nike, Goodyear, Motorola, P&G, Cannon, Black & Decker, Honda, Kohler 11

Benefits & Weaknesses of Design Applications Litigation Infringement - Ordinary Observer test Egyptian Goddess (Fed. Cir. 2008). With knowledge of the prior art No need for written claim construction Obviousness Ordinary Designer test Invalidity for Functional Limitations Overall appearance dictated by utilitarian purpose of the article 12

Benefits & Weaknesses of Design Applications Damages Reasonable Royalty, attorneys fees; or Infringer s profits (35 U.S.C 289) Can be multiple parties profits Not available to utility patents 13

Part II: Design Patent Strategies 2012 2014 Knobbe Knobbe, Martens, Martens, Olson & Olson Bear, LLP & all Bear, rights LLP reserved. all rights reserved. 14

What your Attorney Needs from You Timing U.S. v. Foreign Drawings or Actual Device Knowledge of key features of design Knowledge of features most likely to be copied/changed Your Careful Review of Application Prior to Filing 15

I have a product, now what? 16

I have a product, now what? Evaluate all areas of IP Utility Patent Trademark Trade Secret Copyright Design Patent 17

Design Patent Strategy 18

Design Patent Strategy 19

Webpage - D599,372 The single view is a front view of a graphical user interface for a display screen of a communications terminal. 20

Webpage 21

Webpage 22

Moving Image D670,713 23

Contrast & Color - D652,165 24

Overall Design & Parts 25

Medical Devices 26

Medical Devices 27

Part III: Design Patent Litigation 2012 2014 Knobbe Knobbe, Martens, Martens, Olson & Olson Bear, LLP & all Bear, rights LLP reserved. all rights reserved. 28

Types of Patents Patent: prevent others from making, using or selling invention. Utility Patent Design Patent 29

The Infusion Pump The Accused Device The Patented Product 30

Utility Patent Claim 31

The Bed Extender 32

Competitor s Product 33

Utility Patent Claim 34

Design Patent 35

Design Patent Claim 36

Ordinary Observer Test If in the eye of an ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs are substantially the same... the resemblance is such as to deceive such an observer, inducing him to purchase one supposing it to be the other. 37

Utility Patent Infringement 38

Design Patent Infringement 39

Comparison Utility Patent Expensive to get Claim Construction Complicated Local Patent Rules Summary Judgment Difficult to Prove Damages Design Patent Cheap to get Often No Claim Construction Usually No Local Patent Rules Summary Judgment More Difficult Disgorgement of Profits even if you re an NPE Easier to design around 40

Damages for Patent Infringement Lost profits Disgorgement of profits (only design patents) Reasonable royalty Treble Damages 41

Damages for Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 284 damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court. the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed 42

Additional Remedy Available for Design Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 289 shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit, but not less than $250. Disgorgement of total profits under Section 289 cannot be trebled 43

Attorneys Fees For Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 285 The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. 44

Oakley Example Accused Product U.S. Pat. No. D564,571 45

Thank You! Mike.Trenholm@knobbe.com Ali.Razai@knobbe.com Terry.Tullis@knobbe.com