Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose

Similar documents
VOCABULARY Define the following words; use a dictionary. The law terms are defined for you.

English 1301/ Angry Men Test

The Ottawa Hills Theatre Arts Department Proudly Announces

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

trial preparation packet

FACT SHEET Crown witness #1 Police Sergeant Blue

American Government Jury Duty

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 24, 2018

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of PIERCE County, Washington Cause No LESLIE EUGENE MCVAY

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Haymarket Affair Timeline

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, ARMANDO MEDRANO VALENZUELA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR and 1 CA-CR (Consolidated)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 19, 2005

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of PIERCE County, Washington Cause No

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

S12A0623. JACKSON v. THE STATE. Following a jury trial, Cecil Jackson, Jr. appeals his conviction for malice

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,650 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JOHN BALBIRNIE, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of ASOTIN County, Washington Cause No

The Trial of Mr. Charles Ingalls (author unknown)

MURDER, PASSION/PROVOCATION AND AGGRAVATED/RECKLESS MANSLAUGHTER 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3a(1) and (2); 2C:11-4a, b(1) and b(2)

8 th Amendment. Yes = it describes a cruel and unusual punishment No = if does not

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

MOCK TRIAL FACT PATTERN

v No Ingham Circuit Court I. FACTS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 2000 Session. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROSALIND MARIE JOHNSON and DONNA YVETTE McCOY

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

No. 100,654 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOE DELACRUZ, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee * On Appeal from the Third District Court of Appeals, v. * Shelby County

For a conviction to occur in a criminal case, the prosecutor must

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Document A: Albert Parsons s Testimony (Modified)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 19, 2000 Session

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT. Julie Ann Epps (MS Bar No. 504 East Peace Street Canton, MS (601) facsimile (601)

Act No. 10 of 2017 BILL

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case

The Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States

North Carolina Sheriffs Association

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Criminal Cases TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 106,119 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ST A TE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MARK DERRINGER, Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee; Terry P. Roberts of Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2010

Document A (Modified)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 4, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Dale B.

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:

The Golden Age of Television Drama

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2010

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING TRIAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

Table of Contents. Page 1---Biography, Synopsis. Page 2---Character List. Page 4---Major Themes. Page 6---Glossary of Terms. Page 8 ---Short Summary

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 6, 2013

CASE NO. 1D Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville July 26, 2005

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of WHATCOM County, Washington Cause No

Constitutional Convention

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case

Pages , Looking Back

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 April v. Guilford County Nos. 09 CRS 80644, EDEM KWAME KALEY

The Queen. - v - DYLAN JACKSON. Sentencing Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Justice Picken. 10 December 2015

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH. vs. MICHAEL S. GILL. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2008

Law 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 17. September Term, 1995 MACK TYRONE BURRELL STATE OF MARYLAND

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI EDINBURG

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 August v. Rowan County Nos. 06 CRS CRS NICHOLAS JERMAINE STEELE

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of SPOKANE County, Washington Cause No CHARLES CURTIS TATE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 115,343. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, GABINO RUIZ-ASCENCIO, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,575 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MARK ALVIS, Appellant.

KEK GALABRU THE AUTHORITIES PUSH THE FAMILY TO TAKE THE POISON, SO THEY DIE, THE MOTHER, THE FATHER, SO MANY CHIL- DREN, AT THE SAME TIME.

CASE NO. 1D Matt Shirk, Public Defender, and Chris A. Clayton, Assistant Public Defender, Yulee, for Petitioner.

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT AND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: JULY 28, 2005

File Name: 11a0861n.06 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed November 21, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, John D.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,799 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-95

Law Day 2005 Judges or Attorney Lesson: To Speak the Truth

SAMPLE. The pertinent questions are:

Principals and Accessories after Jogee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed April 8, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Ian K.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 15, 2002 Session

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,522 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JIMMY E. PALMER, Appellant.

California Bar Examination

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,595 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Transcription:

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose

Leadership What is leadership? Who makes a good leader? What are the qualities of a strong leader? Here are several points to consider when reading the play and discussing leadership: 1. the ability to speak out, take a risk, act on one s convictions 2. the ability to stand by oneself on an issue, even if there is no support 3. the ability to break from the crowd or be a role model for the crowd even if it is unpopular 4. the ability to act on, or voice, a concern on the behalf of others; being an advocate for others who may not have or feel they have a voice Add your own ideas about what makes a strong leader in the space below.

Twelve Angry Men Courage four corner exercise Respond as honestly as possible to the following statements by circling your response. 1. I work to solve problems without violence. 2. I work to solve problems with intimidation and threats. 3. I frequently cave in to peer pressure. 4. I seldom cave in to peer pressure. 5. I stand up for what is right even if I stand alone. 6. I prefer to have other people standing with me. 7. I am afraid to express myself just because other people might disapprove. 8. I do not hesitate to express my opinion even if it is unpopular. 9. I never intentionally ridicule, embarrass or hurt others. 10. I sometimes engage in behavior that belittles other people.

Fun Facts About US Legal System Only one case out of seven burglaries is solved in US. Thirteen percent of all US citizens have passed at least one night in jail. The shoplifting ratio of women is higher than men. Most of the cases in the US courts are automobile cases. Every 30 second, a court case if filed in US. In north California, you are not allowed to plow your field with an elephant. It is necessary for every Kentucky citizen to take a bath. At least one must take a bath once a year or he can go to jail. No store can sell a toothbrush on Sabbath in Rhode Island. 18th amendment could never be followed by two states, Connecticut and Rhode. Shooting a rabbit from a moving trolley is banned in New York. According to riverside California, a funny rules is found in the old books, and that is no two people can kiss unless they clean their lips with rose water. In San Diego, Public schools have banned hypnotism. No building in DC is allowed to be higher than 13 floor. The reason behind this is, that you can always see the monument of the former president Washington, no matter where you are in the city. Once, it was banned to serve cherry pie with ice cream on it, in Kansas.

Define the Following Words: Acquittal Appalled Bigot Defendant Dogged Premeditated Sadism Subservient Verdict

Directions: For each character write his attitude/beliefs at the beginning of the play in the first column and the changes made to his attitude at the end of the play in the second column. Character Beginning Attitude Changes Made to Character Foreman Juror 2 Juror 3 Juror 4 Juror 5 Juror 6 Juror 7 Juror 8 Juror 9 Juror 10 Juror 11 Juror 12

Characterization 12 Angry Men Character: Personality Traits Occupation Background that influences the trial Foreman How do you view? Juror 2 Juror 3 Juror 4 Juror 5 Juror 6

Character: Personality Traits Occupation Background that influences the trial Juror 7 How do you view? Juror 8 Juror 9 Juror 10 Juror 11 Juror 12

Review Questions 1. What are the judge s specific instructions to the twelve jurors? 2. How might the jury room itself, the time, & the weather affect the jurors? 3. Before the first vote is taken, what do you learn about: The Nature of the Crime: The Defendant: 4. What was the result of the 1 st vote? 5. What reason(s) did Juror #8 give for wanting to talk awhile about the defendant & the trial? 6. According to the old man who lived on the 2 nd floor, what happened on the night of the murder?

7. What was the young man s alibi & why was it so unbelievable? 8. What did the woman across the el tracks testify about the murder? 9. What are the 4 specific charges on the 19 year old s record? 10. According to Juror #8, what details did he give about the father s treatment of his son? 11. Why was Juror #3 so bitter about his attitude towards kids? 12. What did Juror #4 say about the children who come out of slum backgrounds? 13. What is the boy s story about the knife?

14. How did Juror #8 disprove the theory that the murder weapon was so unusual? 15. At the end of Act 1, why did Juror #8 suggest a secret ballot vote be taken? 16. What is the result of the 2 nd vote? 17. According to the Juror #11, why did he come to the U.S.? 18. What evidence does Juror #8 offer first to discount the old man s testimony about hearing the boy yell at his father? 19. What is Juror #9 s description of the old man as a witness & what did Juror #9 say about the old man s testimony? 20. What was Juror #8 s point about the boy yelling I m going to kill you. 21. Why did Juror #8 want to see the diagram of the old man s apartment?

22. What did Juror #3 yell at Juror #8 when he got very excited & what was Juror #8 s response? 23. What event did Juror #3 & Juror #8 recreate at the beginning of Act 3 that changed several jurors minds? 24. What information does Juror #5 provide that discounts the testimony of the stab wound entry? 25. Why is Juror #7 in such a hurry to change his vote & is this consistent with his earlier behavior? 26. Why does Juror #11 question Juror #7 so closely about changing his vote? 27. What is the result of the 4 th vote? 28. What does Juror #10 say near the end of Act 3 that reflects his prejudice? 29. What point did Juror #8 make about the old woman who lived across the el tracks & her glasses during her witnessing of the crime?

30. As the play draws to its conclusion, which jury member stands alone in his conviction that the boy is guilty? 31. What does Juror #3 reveal about himself in changing his vote at the end? 32. Did the jury prove that the defendant was not guilty? Yes or No. Cite at least 1 reason to support your answer. 33. Who is the hero of the play? 34. Who is the villain of the play? 35. Who is the bully of the play? 36. Who is the coward of the play?