Background Information on Redistricting

Similar documents
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Redistricting in Michigan

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Congressional Redistricting Decisions, 2011

Judicial Selection in the States

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

The Electoral College And

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

American Government. Workbook

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

State Complaint Information

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

Subcommittee on Design Operating Guidelines

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

Committee Consideration of Bills

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

Claremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

CRS Report for Congress

Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN IS A 501(C) 3) TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Swarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws. The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association.

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

If you have questions, please or call

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

o Yes o No o Under 18 o o o o o o o o 85 or older BLW YouGov spec

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 7, Executive Summary. Suggested Routing

Components of Population Change by State

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Fiscal Year (September 30, 2018) Requests by Intake and Case Status Intake 1 Case Review 6 Period

Bylaws. of the. Notre Dame Law Association. Amended September ARTICLE I Name

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 2, Nomination Deadline: October 2, 2015.

Branches of Government

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

Chronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

8. Public Information

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

Transcription:

Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative and congressional districts for each voter. In most states, the Legislature is the entity that draws the lines. Background: Currently, the Legislative Task Force for Demographic Research and Reapportionment (LATFOR) is responsible for drawing district lines. LATFOR consists of 6 members: 2 from the Senate Majority Party; 2 from the Assembly Majority Party; 1 from the Senate Minority Party; and 1 from the Senate Minority Party. 4 of the 6 members of LATFOR are legislators. The redistricting plan must be approved by the State Legislature and the Governor. Partisan redistricting or gerrymandering is largely responsible for New York state s lack of competitive elections. New York s incumbent return rate is one of the highest in the nation, hovering close to 95%. How district lines are drawn contributes to this phenomenon. Voters are denied a real choice on Election Day as districts are manipulated to avoid electoral challenges. Under federal constitutional and statutory law, each district s population should be roughly equal, which has been interpreted to mean that the population difference between the largest and smallest state legislative districts should not be more than 10% (+/- 5%) of the average district population. Large deviations from the ideal district size allow legislators to protect their own legislative majorities by creating more districts (with smaller populations) in their power centers. Only 29 of 212 legislative districts (14 percent) are within one percent of the ideal size. While not technically illegal, New York has legislative district lines that can be dramatically different in size. A 2010 analysis of district populations found that State Assembly districts ranged in size from 121,111 people to 133,038 people, and State Senate districts ranged in size from 290,925 people to 320,851 people. The Democrats in the State Assembly and the Republicans in the State Senate have each controlled the drawing of the district lines in their respective houses. Both houses agree to the other s plans and the legislation is then sent to the Governor for his signature. By using techniques like packing, whereby lines are drawn to concentrate many supporters of political opponents into a few districts, and cracking, whereby opponents supporters are split among several districts, they dramatically increase their party s chances of incumbency for the next decade. These designer districts literally allow for legislators to choose the voters before the voters have a chance to choose them. CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 1

League History: Redistricting Reform In all of its 90+ years of history, the League has stood for fair and equitable representation for the people of our state. Recognizing the extreme partisan nature of New York s redistricting process, the League has worked since 1966 for adoption of a constitutional amendment to set specific, fair and permanent guidelines for the redistricting process. The Amendment (as it will read on the ballot): Revising State s Redistricting Procedure The proposed amendment to sections 4 and 5 and addition of new section 5-b to Article 3 of the State Constitution revises the redistricting procedure for state legislative and congressional districts. The proposed amendment establishes an independent redistricting commission every 10 years beginning in 2020, with two members appointed by each of the four legislative leaders and two members selected by the eight legislative appointees; prohibits legislators and other elected officials from serving as commissioners; establishes principles to be used in creating districts; requires the commission to hold public hearings on proposed redistricting plans; subjects the commission s redistricting plan to legislative enactment; provides that the legislature may only amend the redistricting plan according to the established principles if the commission s plan is rejected twice by the legislature; provides for expedited court review of a challenged redistricting plan; and provides for funding and bipartisan staff to work for the commission. Shall the proposed amendment be approved? CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 2

Redistricting in the U.S.: In most states, the process of redistricting is done entirely by the legislature. Five states - Iowa, Maine, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont have advisory commissions to help advise the legislature, but in most cases, the legislature can ignore their recommendations. 7 states have special back up procedures to draw state district lines if the legislature fails to do so. In MD, the Governor s proposal becomes the default plan; in OR, the job falls to the Secretary of State. Each of the other five states forms a backup commission. i Only 6 states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana and Washington) have independent commissions, as defined by the Brennan Center, in which no individual drawing the lines can be a legislator or public official. However, even in these states, legislators or elected officials are involved in selecting commission members. California is the only state where legislators or elected officials are not involved in selecting commission members. Under redistricting reform in New York, legislators or elected officials - including, spouses, lobbyists and party leaders - are prohibited from serving on the independent commission. Moreover, the legislature would have to adhere to new criteria to draw the lines set forth by the amendment and would only be able to amend a Commission s plan, not create an entirely new plan. See the chart below for an overview of state legislative redistricting in the U.S. Alabama Alaska State State Legislature Draws Lines State Legislative Districts Commission Commission Membership Final Line Approval Governor appoints 2 President of Senate appoints 1 Speaker of the House appoints 1 Supreme Court Chief Justice appoints 1 Commission Legislature Voters CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 3

Arizona Commission on appellate court appointees creates a pool of 25 nominees; 10 from each of the two largest parties and 5 not from either of the two largest parties. Of these: Highest ranking officer of the house appoints 1 Minority leader of the house appoints 1 Highest ranking office of the senate appoints 1 Minority leader of the senate appoints 1 These 4 appoint a fifth from the pool, not a member of any party already represented on the commission, as chair Arkansas 3 Commission Members: Governor Secretary of State Attorney General California 14 Commission Members: 5 Democrats 5 Republicans 4 members from neither party Government auditors are to select 60 registered voters from an applicant pool; the auditors then are to pick 8 commission members by lottery, and those commissioners pick 6 additional members Colorado 11 Commission Members: Legislature selects 4 (Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority & Minority Leaders, or their delegates) Governor selects 3 Judiciary selects 4 CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 4

Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii 9 Commission Members: Legislative Majority and Minority Leaders each select 2 Those 8 commissioners then select 1 9 Commission Members: each select 2 6 of those 8 commissions must agree on 1 tiebreaker - If legislature is unable to obtain 2/3 vote - 2/3 Vote Idaho 6 Commission Members: each select 1 State Chairs of Major Parties each select 1 Illinois 8 Commission Members (9 in case of tie): Legislative majority & minority leader each select 1 legislator and 1 nonlegislator Tiebreaker chosen - If legislature fails to draw the lines by the deadline, it defaults to the commission - Lawmakers have first opportunity to draw the lines. Indiana Iowa Legislative Services Agency Kansas Kentucky Louisiana CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 5

Maine 1 Senate Majority & Minority Leaders each select 2 House Majority & Minority Leaders each select 2 State chairs of major parties each select 1 The groups of 6 commissioners from each major party each select 1 commissioner from the public The two "public commissioner" selects 1 tiebreaker Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri For House Districts, 18 Members: Each Major party selects 2 nominees per Congressional district Governor chooses 1 of the nominees per party per Congressional district Each major party selects 10 nominees (Governor choose 5 of the nominees from each party) Montana 5 Members: each select 1 Those 4 commissioners select 1 tiebreaker Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 6

New Jersey 10 Commission Members: Major parties each choose 5 Tiebreaker chosen by Chief Justice, if necessary New Mexico New York 6 Commission Members: each select 1 legislator and 1 non- legislator Legislative Minority leaders each select 1 North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Governor State Auditor Secretary of State Legislative leaders of Majority party select 1 Legislative leaders of Minority party select 1 Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania each select 1 Those 4 commissioners select a tiebreaker If no plan is adopted by legislature within first 90 days of session, a backup Commission draws the lines Rhode Island CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 7

South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Lieutenant Governor Attorney General Comptroller of Public Accounts Commissioner of the General Land Office House Majority Leader Governor selects 2 (1 from each major party) Each major party selects 1 Chief Justice Selects 1 each select 1 Those 4 commissioners select 1 nonvoting chair West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming *Most of the information contained in this document was obtained from: Brennan Center for Justice. (2010). A 50 State Guide to Redistricting. http://www.brennancenter.org/publication/50-state-guide-redistricting National Conference on State Legislatures. (2008). 2009 Redistricting Commissions Table. http://www.ncsl.org/research/redistricting/2009-redistricting-commissions-table.aspx - Commission is only formed if state legislature fails to create a plan i Brennan Center for Justice. (2010). National Overview of Redistricting: Who draws the lines? http://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/national-overview-redistricting-who-drawslines CU/LWVNYS Background on Redistricting page 8