Modified Objectives. Flight path preview. Conflict Classification (plus a little extra) Know the three categories of armed conflict

Similar documents
Dear students: This presentation is a text version of the presentation that was given in lecture # 1, since presentations with certain animations

Week # 2 Targeting Principles & Human Shields

TOWARDS CONVERGENCE. IHL, IHRL and the Convergence of Norms in Armed Conflict

RUSSIA & UKRAINE: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SELF DETERMINATION. Patrick McGuiness

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS: CHALLENGES FOR IHL?

International Humanitarian Law

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

CHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW WORKSHOP

The Syrian Conflict and International Humanitarian Law

THE LAW IN THESE PARTS. Occupation is a legal concept.

National Security Law

Geneva Convention (2015) Reevaluating the Geneva Conventions. Written By: Hanny Ramadan

LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT DESKBOOK

Non-international Armed Conflicts (NIACs) and Combatant Status. Cecilie Hellestveit NCHR/UiO

Asymmetric warfare and challenges for international humanitarian law

Internment in Armed Conflict: Basic Rules and Challenges. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Opinion Paper, November 2014

InternationalHumantarianLawIhLandtheConductofNonInternationalArmedConflictNiac

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

ACT ON THE PUNISHMENT OF CRIMES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

The Evolution of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Understanding How Morals Have Changed War

Lesson 8 Legal Frameworks for Civil-Military-Police Relations

Art. 61. Troops that give no quarter have no right to kill enemies already disabled on the ground, or prisoners captured by other troops.

International humanitarian law and the protection of war victims

Neutrality in Cyber War. Andrew Carswell Armed Forces Delegate International Committee of the Red Cross

2PRIMER: KEY CONCEPTS

1. 4. Legal Framework for United Nations Peacekeeping. L e s s o n

Q & A: What is Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions and Should the US Ratify It?

(JUS AD BELLUM ) YEMEN: INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL), INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW (IHRL) & THE USE OF FORCE BY A STATE

THE ICRC'S CLARIFICATION PROCESS ON THE NOTION OF DIRECT PARTICIPATION IN HOSTILITIES UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW NILS MELZER

Targeting People: Direct Participation in the Conduct of Hostilities DR. GENTIAN ZYBERI NORWEGIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OSLO

The legality of Targeted Killings in the War on Terror

VI. READING ASSIGNMENTS International Law (Laws ) Fall 2008

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

EU GUIDELINES on INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

entry into force 7 December 1978, in accordance with Article 23

Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict

(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda)

DOD LAW OF WAR MANUAL REVIEW WORKSHOP WORKSHOP REPORT MARCH 2016

Fiji Comments on the Discussion Paper on implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

United States, Kadic et al. v. Karadzic

2006] CUSTOMARY INT L OCCUPATIONAL LAW 51

A. Yugoslavia/Croatia, Memorandum of Understanding of November 27, 1991

International Law and the Use of Armed Force by States

HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNAL CONFLICTS: SOME ASPECTS OF THE UNITED NATIONS APPROACH*

Detention in Peace Support Operations. Dr. Tristan Ferraro Legal Adviser ICRC Geneva

COURSE CONTENTS: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SEMESTER OF 2014

THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE

Establishment of National IHL Committee by High Contracting Party under Geneva Conventions of 1949: Case of Pakistan and the Islmic outlook

PART 1 : RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ICRC PART 2 : RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTARY

Chapter 3: The Legal Framework

The University of Edinburgh. From the SelectedWorks of Ray Barquero. Ray Barquero, Mr., University of Edinburgh. Fall October, 2012

Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. Dr. Benarji Chakka Associate Professor

DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: AN OVERVIEW OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Overview of the ICRC's Expert Process ( )

Issue: Measures to ensure continued protection of civilians in war zones

Consequences under International Humanitarian Law for Civilians Who Take a Direct Part in Hostilities

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE SYRIAN CRISIS

Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. by Antoine Bouvier Legal Adviser, ICRC Geneva

Supreme Court of the United States

Nuremberg Tribunal. London Charter. Article 6

30 YEARS FROM THE ADOPTION OF ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS I AND II TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS

WAR ON TERROR. Shristhi Debuka 1

Background Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces

Refuge from Inhumanity? War Refugees at the Intersection of IHL and Refugee Law

DISCUSSION PAPER: THE LEGAL OBLIGATION TO RECORD CIVILIAN CASUALTIES OF ARMED CONFLICT Professor Susan Breau 1, Rachel Joyce 2

Attacks on Medical Units in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law

Principles of International Law

The Internet in Bello: Cyber War Law, Ethics & Policy Seminar held 18 November 2011, Berkeley Law

Global Human Rights Challenges and Solutions THE LAW OF WAR

Argument against IHL providing a legal authority for deprivation of liberty in relation to NIAC

Seeking Justice in Sri Lanka: National and International Remedies for Victims of Grave Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law

Act of 5 August 2003 on serious violations of international humanitarian law

BACKGROUND GUIDE. International Committee of the Red Cross. Time to Act, Time to Change

The protection of cultural property in Romania is ensured through an extensive and complex normative system (Annex I).

Non-state actors and Direct Participation in Hostilities. Giulio Bartolini University of Roma Tre

Tomasz Lewandowski. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland

1997 Convention on the Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction

CURRENT ISSUES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN REGULATING COUNTER-INSURGENCY AND COUNTER- TERRORISM

Reviewing the legality of new weapons, means and methods of warfare

- 1 - Implementing the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols: legal and practical implications. Patrick J Boylan, City University London, UK

DIRECT PARTICIPATION IN HOSTILITIES

The nature and development of human rights

DEBATE FORUM. TARGETED KILLING AS A MEANS OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE: A PROVOCATIVE VIEW AND INVITATION TO DEBATE Sascha Dominik Bachmann Ulf Haeussler

THE RED CROSS AND THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS 60 YEARS ON

Contemporary Issues in International Law. Syllabus Golden Gate University School of Law Spring

PROVISIONS OF THE SPANISH CRIMINAL CODE CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS.

Strengthening Legal Protection for Persons deprived of their Liberty in relation to Non-International Armed Conflict. Regional Consultations

United states has signed the convention on the Rlghts of the Child!! Amerlcan Convention now has 25 ratifications. including Brazil!!

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 ISSN

The Definition of Armed Conflict and the Additional Protocols of Andrew Clapham 1

Module 2: LEGAL FRAMEWORK

HUMAN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Draft of an Act to Introduce the Code of Crimes against International Law

History, Principles - 01 History of international law - 02 Principles

STEERING COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (CDDH) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE SYSTEM OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (DH-SYSC)

PRIVATE MILITARY AND SECURITY COMPANIES 35 th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law San Remo, 6-8 September 2012

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Transcription:

Conflict Classification (plus a little extra) IHRL ICRC Workshop Santa Clara 2012 Presented by: Maj Andy Gillman, USAF The Judge Advocate General s Legal Center & School International and Operational Law Department Map source: BBC News Modified Objectives Know the three categories of armed conflict Understand which laws apply to each category Talk intelligently, not ignorantly Flight path preview Main Point: Framework Three Conflict Categories Sources of the Law of Armed Conflict Triggers for Categories A Little Extra: Two In Flight Breaks Introduction to International Law History of LOAC 1

Three Categories of Conflict State vs. Individual: Law Enforcement (LE) State vs. Group*: Internal Armed Conflict (NIAC) * More than mere banditry organized insurgency? State vs. State: International Armed Conflict (IAC) LOAC for the Visual Learner: The Conflict Spectrum Peace Law Enforcement Armed Conflict Internal International Introduction to International Law What is International Law? International law consists of rules and principles of general application dealing with the conduct of states tt and of international ti organizations and with their relations inter se, as well as with some of their relations with persons, whether natural or juridical. Restatement 3 rd, Section 101 2

Introduction to International Law Who are the Key Players? States 1. Dfi Defined dterritory 2.Permanent Population 3. Government 4.Capacity to Conduct International Relations Unifying Themes / Principal Prongs Jus ad Bellum (Justice of War) Regulate the decision to go to war UN Charter Jus in Bello (Justice in War) Regulate the actions of a State in war Means and Methods; Targeting and Treatment Jus post Bellum (Justice after War) Post conflict resolution defining a just peace Emerging area International Law Private Law (commercial law) Public Law (intergovernmental) Law of Armed Conflict Law of Peace Conflict Management (jus ad bellum) Rules of Hostilities (jus in bello) jus post bellum U.N. Charter Arms Control Customary Law Hague Conventions (means & methods) Geneva Conv/Protocols (humanitarian) Customary Law 3

Principal Sources of LOAC International Agreements/Treaties LOAC Customary International Law Treaties Hague Tradition (Meansand and Methods) Geneva Tradition (Respect and Protect) Additional Protocols I and II Consistent state practice + sense of legal obligation (opinio juris) Don t need 100% agreement Still Binding on all states unless Persistent Objector Can t object to Jus Cogens universally accepted norms genocide, slave trade, torture The 1977 Additional Protocols to the 1949 Geneva Conventions Response to brutal civil wars Merges Hague (Means & Methods) and Geneva (Respect & Protect) Traditions Most of our allies are signatories Many provisions viewed as CIL U.S. is not a party to either (not ratified) Object to certain provisions US recognizes many provisions as CIL 1977 Additional Protocols AP I - IAC Supplements CA 2 Controversial expansion Gives other groups (those fighting colonial domination, alien occupation, racist regimes) protections as if state actors Most provisions are CIL Matheson Memo AP II - NIAC Supplements CA 3 Controversial reduction Armed group must now be under responsible command & hold territory CIL Pres. Obama Administration support 4

Other Sources of LOAC UN Charter (1945) Modern Jus ad Bellum (Jus Contra Bellum) Commentaries for 1949 Geneva Conventions Jean Pictet, Official Reporter Legislative History http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/military_law/ Geneva_conventions 1949.html U.S. Army Field Manual 27 10, The Law of Land Warfare (1956) (Change 1, 1976) Incorporates both law and policy Other Sources of LOAC Art. 38 of the International Court of Justice Charter Agreements and Custom General principles of law of civilized nations Judicial decisions/writings The ICRC CIL Study? http://www.icrc.org/customary ihl/eng/docs/home Law of Armed Conflict Evolution Greeks Romans Customary Laws start to develop to regulate going to war (jus ad bellum ) to regulate conduct in war (jus in bello) post conflict resolution (jus post bellum) Religious wars Chivalry Principle of Self-Defense Don t attack civilians JUST WAR WAR AS FACT CONTRA BELLUM POST-WWII 335 BC 1800 1918 1949 Enemy killed or enslaved Including 1625 / 1648 civilian population Grotius works / Lands Peace of destroyed Westphalia: Only nations can wage war Hague (1899 & 1907) Geneva (1864, 1906, 1929) 1949 GCI-IV 1977 Protocols 1860s Laws Codified / Treaty Development - Jean Henri Dunant (1859); ICRC (1863) - Francis Lieber (1863) Lieber Code 5

Reactive Nature of the Law of Armed Conflict US Civil War Solferino World War I World War II Indochinese Wars Guerrilla Wars 1863 Lieber Code 1864 Geneva Conv (W/S) 1925 Gas Protocol 1929 Geneva Conv (+ PW) 1949 Geneva Conv (+ C) 1954 Hague Cultural Prop 1977 Protocols GWOT / OCO????? Detention, Direct Participation in Hostilities Triggering LOAC Conflict classification Common Articles 2 and 3 (Identical in all 4 GCs) CA 2 International Armed Conflict The entire GC apply CA 3 Non-International Armed Conflict (internal armed conflict) Only CA 3 applies GC I (W&S) GC II (W/S/S at Sea) GC III (PW) GC IV (Civilians) International Armed Conflict Pictet: Armed Conflict: Any difference arising between two States and leading to the intervention of armed forces Common Article 2 State v. State Triggers full body of GC Combatants & Protected Persons get protections from all 4 GCs Most important provision? Combatant Immunity GC I (W&S) GC II (W/S/S at Sea) GC III (PW) GC IV (Civilians) 6

Non International Armed Conflict Pictet: Armed Conflict: 1) organized military force? 2) subject to some authority? 3) control territory? 4) Respect the law of war? 5) Does the State respond with regular armed forces? Common Article 3 State v. Insurgent or Non State Only CA 3 applies Not full body of GC Mini convention No Prisoners of War Domestic Law applies Non International (Internal) Armed Conflict What is Common Article 3? It is a mini convention (the 4 GCs do not apply) Requires Humane Treatment Prohibits Violence (murder, mutilation, cruel treatment, torture) Hostages Outrages on personal dignity no humiliating or degrading treatment No sentences or execution without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples What Laws Apply? LOAC CA 3 CA 2 AP II GC I-IV + AP I IHRL???????? Domestic Law Peace Law Enforcement Armed Conflict Internal International State v. State v. State Demonstrations armed Armed Rioters group LOAC = LOW = IHL Organized Armed Groups 7

Modified Objectives Know the three categories of armed conflict Understand which laws apply to each category Talk intelligently, not ignorantly Mexico Afghanistan Libya Pakistan Concluding Thoughts: Workshop this afternoon CA 2, CA 3, AP I, AP II Questions? Andrew D. Gillman, Major, USAF Associate Professor, International & Operational Law TJAGLCS, 600 Massie Road, Charlottesville VA 22901 andrew.gillman@us.af.mil 8