Case 1:16-cv RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:13-cv JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1

Case 2:18-cv JPB Document 1-1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 0:09-cv DWF-SRN Document 1 Filed 10/28/09 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET

CASE 0:17-cv WMW-LIB Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv SA-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/19/17 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

MASTER SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION. NEXUS SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No:

vehicle. The Plaintiff, Oscar Willhelm Nilsson, by undersigned counsel, states as

Case 1:16-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 1:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2018 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

allege ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, hereby 216(b) ("FLSA"). Accordingly, this Court has subject-matter

Case 1:15-cv GLR Document 1 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 26

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 05/29/17 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit 3

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 5:16-cv BKS-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 8:17-cv CEH-TBM Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:17-cv K Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

(collectively "Defendants") unpaid overtime wages, Plaintiff, CASE NO.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No.

Case 2:17-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Charlottesville Division CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Preliminary Statement

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 3:16-cv L Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Billings, Montana Telephone: (406) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Attorneys

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs.

Case 8:17-cv RAL-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : :

Case 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff, CIVIL COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:18-cv KM-CLW Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

For its Complaint against Defendant Adlife Marketing & Communications, Co.,

Case 5:18-cv HE Document 1 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 8:18-cv SCB-MAP Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

Case: 5:17-cv JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1

CASE 0:16-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Kurtis Skaar

Case 1:17-cv YK Document 1-1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROSWELL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:07-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Attorneys (If Known) 1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State

Case 2:17-cv ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE THOMAS E. PEREZ, UNITED STATES ) SECRETARY OF LABOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. ) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT Thomas E. Perez, United States Secretary of Labor ( the Secretary ) brings this action to enjoin defendant, United States Steel Corporation ( US Steel ), from violating Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended ( the Act ), 29 U.S.C. 660(c), and for an order directing defendant to pay back wage compensation, to rescind and nullify the discipline of its employees based on their exercising rights under the Act and the implementing regulations, and granting any other appropriate relief that the Court deems proper to redress defendant s employees who were or are adversely affected by US Steel s injury reporting policy. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under Section 11(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2), because the Secretary has determined after the investigation of two employee complaints against US Steel that the company s injury reporting policy and its discipline of the two employees violates Section 11(c) of the Act. 2. Venue lies in the District of Delaware under Section 11(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2), and under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because the defendant is incorporated under Delaware

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2 law and resides in this district. PARTIES 3. The Secretary is charged with enforcing the Act, and Section 11(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2), authorizes the Secretary to bring civil actions in any appropriate district court to obtain remedies and to redress and restrain violations of the anti-discrimination provision of the Act. 4. Defendant US Steel, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware with its headquarters in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, is an integrated steel producer. US Steel is now, and has been at all times relevant to the allegations in this complaint, an employer within the meaning of Section 3(5) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 652(5), because it has employees and is engaged in a business affecting commerce. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND 5. The stated purpose of the Act is to prevent workplace injuries and illnesses by, among other things, providing for appropriate procedures for the reporting and recording of workplace injuries and illnesses. See 29 U.S.C. 651(b)(12). 6. Section 8(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 657(c)(2), authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations requiring employers to maintain accurate records of, and to make periodic reports on, work-related deaths, injuries and illnesses, other than minor injuries requiring only first aid treatment and which do not involve medical treatment, loss of consciousness, restriction of work or motion, or transfer to another job. 7. The Secretary, through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ( OSHA ), promulgated final regulations requiring employers to involve employees and their representatives in the injury and illness recordkeeping system. See 66 Fed. Reg. 5916, 6132 (final rule) (Jan. 19, 2001) (codified at 29 C.F.R. 1904.35). The purpose of the agency s recordkeeping regulation is to 2

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3 remove all barriers that may exist to the reporting of work-related injuries and illnesses. See 66 Fed. Reg. at 6052. 8. Under OSHA s regulations, an employer must record each recordable injury or illness within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness has occurred. See 29 C.F.R. 1904.29(b)(3). 9. Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1), prohibits any person from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or other others of any right afforded by the Act. OSHA has interpreted this statutory provision to prohibit discriminating against an employee for reporting a work-related fatality, injury or illness. 29 C.F.R. 1904.36. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 10. At all times relevant to the allegations in this complaint, US Steel published and enforced, and continues to publish and enforce, a general safety and plant conduct rule requiring all employees to report immediately all injuries to a supervisor ( immediate reporting policy ). 11. The company s general safety and plant conduct rule does not define the term injury. The company s general safety and plant conduct rule does not define the term immediately. 12. On or about August 5, 2014, US Steel hired John Armstrong ( Armstrong ) as an employee of the company. At all times relevant to the allegations in this complaint, Armstrong was employed by US Steel as a full-time bander at US Steel s Irvin Plant in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. 13. On February 15, 2014, while employed by US Steel at the Irvin Plant, Armstrong slightly bumped his head on a low-hanging beam while wearing a protective hard hat. Armstrong did not feel any pain or notice any discomfort at the time and was able to complete his shift without further incident. At the time of the event, Armstrong did not report it to his supervisor. 3

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 4 14. On February 19, 2014, after experiencing stiffness through his right shoulder, Armstrong visited a doctor. 15. On February 19, 2014, following Armstrong s visit to the doctor, Armstrong s collective bargaining representative reported to US Steel that Armstrong had bumped his hard hat on a lowhanging beam. 16. On February 21, 2014, US Steel suspended Armstrong for five days without pay because Armstrong failed to comply with the company s immediate reporting policy. Alternatively, on February 21, 2014, US Steel suspended Armstrong for five days without pay for reporting a workplace injury. 17. Armstrong subsequently filed a complaint with OSHA under Section 11(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2), alleging that US Steel had suspended him without pay in retaliation for reporting a workplace injury. 18. OSHA investigated Armstrong s complaint and determined that US Steel violated Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1), by suspending Armstrong without pay because he engaged in the protected activity of reporting a workplace injury when he realized he was injured, or, alternatively, because Armstrong reported a workplace injury. 19. To date, US Steel has failed to rescind its discipline of Armstrong and has refused to compensate him for lost wages and other damages suffered as a result of the company s improper discipline, in continuing violation of Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1). 20. On or about March 7, 1994, US Steel hired Jeff Walters ( Walters ) as an employee of the company. At all times relevant to the allegations in this complaint, Walters was employed by US Steel as a full-time utility technician at US Steel s Clairton Plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania. 21. On February 12, 2014, while employed by US Steel at the Clairton Plant, Walters 4

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 5 noticed a small splinter in his thumb. Walters removed the splinter and immediately returned to work. Walters subsequently completed his shift. At the time of the event, Walters did not report it to his supervisor. 22. On February 14, 2014, after experiencing swelling in his thumb, Walters visited a doctor and received treatment. 23. Immediately after visiting the doctor, Walters verbally informed his supervisor that he received treatment for an injury arising from a splinter. 24. On February 21, 2014, US Steel suspended Walters for five days without pay because Walters failed to comply with the company s immediate reporting policy. Alternatively, on February 21, 2014, US Steel suspended Walters for five days without pay for reporting a workplace injury. The company later reduced Walters suspension to two days without pay. 25. Walters subsequently filed a complaint with OSHA under Section 11(c)(2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2), alleging that US Steel had suspended him without pay in retaliation for reporting a workplace injury. 26. OSHA investigated Walters complaint and determined that US Steel violated Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1), by suspending Walters without pay because he engaged in the protected activity of reporting a workplace injury when he realized he was injured, or, alternatively, because Walters reported a workplace injury. 27. To date, US Steel has failed to rescind its discipline of Walters and has refused to compensate him for lost wages and other damages suffered as a result of the company s improper discipline, in continuing violation of Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1). 28. Upon information and belief, based on the company s immediate reporting policy, US Steel has disciplined and continues to discipline employees in addition to Walters and Armstrong for 5

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 6 reporting workplace injuries when the employees become aware that they sustain workplace injuries after the event or incident causing the later-known injury. 29. US Steel s stringent temporal reporting requirement under its immediate reporting policy makes it impossible or impracticable in many instances for employees to comply with the policy because there are necessarily many situations where an employee will be unaware at the time of an incident that he or she sustained an injury, especially where the nature of the work at issue involves physically strenuous activity. 30. US Steel s immediate reporting policy discourages reasonable employees from reporting injuries as soon as they realize they have been injured because they must risk violating the company s temporally stringent requirement under its immediate reporting policy. US Steel s immediate reporting policy violates the governing regulations establishing a recordkeeping system for recording workplace injuries and illnesses by creating a barrier for reasonable employees to report workplace injuries and illnesses. CAUSES OF ACTION Count I 31. The Secretary incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one through thirty. 32. US Steel disciplined Armstrong for reporting a workplace injury in violation of Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1). Count II 33. The Secretary incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one through thirtytwo. 34. US Steel disciplined Walters for reporting a workplace injury in violation of Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1). 6

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 7 Count III 35. The Secretary incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one through thirtyfour. 36. US Steel s immediate reporting policy facially and as applied violates OSHA s workplace injury and illness reporting and recordkeeping regulations. 37. US Steel s immediate reporting policy facially and as applied violates the anti-retaliation provision, Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1), by discouraging or interfering with reasonable employees exercise of their right to report workplace injuries and illnesses. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Secretary prays that this Court enter an Order: A. Permanently enjoining the defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons acting or claiming to act on its behalf and in its interest from violating Section 11(c)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1); B. Directing and compelling the defendant to rescind and nullify its immediate reporting policy; C. Permanently enjoining the defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons acting or claiming to act on its behalf and in its interest from adopting, publishing, applying, or enforcing any injury or illness reporting policy that requires employees to report their workplace injuries or illnesses earlier than seven (7) calendar days after the injured or ill employee becomes aware of his or her injury or illness; D. Rescinding the discipline and sanction of Armstrong and Walters; E. Compelling and directing the defendant to compensate Armstrong and Walters for any and all lost wages and benefits, including interest thereon, compensatory damages, including 7

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 8 damages for emotional distress, interest on compensatory damages for pecuniary losses, consequential damages, including attorney s fees, and punitive damages to deter such conduct by US Steel in the future; F. Compelling and directing the defendant to post in prominent places at all of its worksites for 60 (sixty) consecutive days notices stating that US Steel will not in any manner discriminate or retaliate against employees because of their engagement, whether real or perceived, in activities protected by Section 11(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c); G. Granting the Secretary compensation for costs incurred in this civil action; and H. Granting such other and further relief as may be necessary and appropriate. Dated: February 17, 2016 M. PATRICIA SMITH Solicitor of Labor OSCAR L. HAMPTON III Regional Solicitor s/ Geoffrey Forney GEOFFREY FORNEY Trial Attorney United States Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor 170 South Independence Mall West Suite 630E, The Curtis Center Philadelphia, PA 19106-3306 215-861-5137/ forney.geoffrey@dol.gov 8

Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1-1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 9 JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Thomas E. Perez, United States Secretary of Labor United States Steel Corporation (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) County of Residence of First Listed Defendant (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known) Geoffrey Forney, Department of Labor - Solicitor of Labor's Office 170 S. Independence Mall West, Curtis Center, Ste. 630E Philadelphia, PA 19106 (forney.geoffrey@dol.gov) 215-861-5137 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant) 1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4 of Business In This State 2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5 Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6 Foreign Country IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only) CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act 120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 400 State Reapportionment 130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 410 Antitrust 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 430 Banks and Banking 150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 450 Commerce & Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 460 Deportation 151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers Product Liability 830 Patent 470 Racketeer Influenced and 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 480 Consumer Credit (Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 490 Cable/Sat TV 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 850 Securities/Commodities/ of Veteran s Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange 160 Stockholders Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Actions 190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI 891 Agricultural Acts 195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 893 Environmental Matters 196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 895 Freedom of Information 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act Act Medical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 896 Arbitration REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS 899 Administrative Procedure 210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appeal of 220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRS Third Party 950 Constitutionality of 240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General 290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application 446 Amer. w/disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration Other 550 Civil Rights Actions 448 Education 555 Prison Condition 560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only) 1 Original 2 Removed from Proceeding State Court VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY DATE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 3 Remanded from Appellate Court 4 Reinstated or Reopened 5 Transferred from Another District (specify) Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 6 Multidistrict Litigation 29 U.S.C. 660(c) Brief description of cause: Discrimination or retaliation against employees for reporting workplace injuries CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. JURY DEMAND: Yes No (See instructions): JUDGE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD 02/17/2016 s/ Geoffrey Forney DOCKET NUMBER RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12) Case 1:16-cv-00092-RGA Document 1-1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 10 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I.(a) (b) (c) II. III. IV. Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment)". Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.) Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suit, select the most definitive. V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes. Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above. VI. VII. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.