Session 5 Applying European Citizenship rights

Similar documents
The Free Movement of Persons

Citizenship of the European Union

FEANTSA Toolkit. Free Movement of EU citizens! and access to social assistance! Guidance for Homeless Service Providers

Topic 5 Enforcement Actions Against Member States

MEMO/08/778. A. Conclusions of the report. Brussels, 10 December 2008

Free Movement of Workers and the European Citizenship

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 2 October 2003 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2015 *

FOLLOW-UP OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Ad-Hoc Query on Sovereignty Clause in Dublin procedure. Requested by FI EMN NCP on 11 th February Compilation produced on 14 th November 2014

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOT delivered on 30 May 2017 (1) Case C 165/16. Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 July and. The Norwegian Government, represented by the Immigration Appeals Board THE COURT,

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Danielle Roux v. The State (Belgium) (Case C-363/89) Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (3rd Chamber) ECJ (3rd Chamber)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*)

ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION TRANSPOSING DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC ON FREE MOVEMENT OF UNION CITIZENS

Read Barnard, 3 rd edition, Chs 8 and 9 Treaty of Maastricht 1993 created the status of Union Citizenship Arts TFEU Treaty

TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 6 March 2003 *

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 8 IMMIGRATION LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2017

Reports of Cases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON 1. delivered on 12 December Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O. v S.

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

Brexit: UK nationals in the EU and EU nationals in the UK

Euro-Bonds The Ruiz Zambrano judgment or the Real Invention of EU Citizenship

Irregular Migration in Ireland Philip J O Connell

Ad-Hoc Query on the age limit for capacity to perform legal acts for the purpose of administrative expulsion and detention

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Zhu and Chen, Case C-200/02 (19 October 2004)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (sitting as a full Court ) 19 October 2004 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 November 2017 *

Session 6 Freedom of establishment & freedom to provide and receive services

IMMIGRATION AND SOCIAL SECURITY CO-ORDINATION (EU WITHDRAWAL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

EEA migrants rights, Roma rights and recent changes. Part 2. Practitioners training 16 th October 2014, Luton

Committee on Petitions NOTICE TO MEMBERS. Petition 1098/2010 by Bernhard Bökeler (German), on discrimination of EU citizens by the Swedish authorities

THE AIRE CENTRE Advice on Individual Rights in Europe

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS

Background information:

Ad-Hoc Query on family reunification with prisoners who are nationals of a Member State. Requested by LT EMN NCP on 15 th October 2009

Bachelor Thesis EU citizenship and the right to family reunification Dario Vaccaro Supervisor

RESTRICTED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY S GOVERNMENT CABINET MINISTERIAL WORKING GROUP ON ASYLUM AND MIGRATION

Freedom of Movement in the EU: A Look Behind the Curtain

Ad-Hoc Query on parallel legal statuses of residence in other Member States. Requested by CZ EMN NCP on 10 th May 2010

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Working Paper IE Law School WPLS

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL WATHELET delivered on 11 January 2018 (1) Case C 673/16

THE COURT (Grand Chamber),

Glossary of the Main Legal Words and Expressions Used In the Context of Asylum and Immigration

Migration and Nationality-based Discrimination. Migration and Nationalitybased Discrimination. Olivier De Schutter

Personal scope MEMO. Who will be covered by the Withdrawal Agreement? EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 12 December 2017

EMN Ad-Hoc Query on immediate family members applying for asylum at the same time

European Commission, Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU.

Free movement of EU citizens within the EU and equal treatment for social benefits: solidarity or benefit tourism?

The Right of Residence under Directive 2004/38 of the. Spouse of a Union Citizen. in the absence of a Valid Passport. March 2015

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOT delivered on 3 October 2013 (1) Case C-378/12. Nnamdi Onuekwere v Secretary of State for the Home Department

RESOLUTION of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. of 13 April 2016

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 September 2003 *

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a) and (b) of Article 79(2) thereof,

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 23 March Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

MAH (dual nationality permanent residence) Canada [2010] UKUT 445 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before

The 'Right to Reside' and Social Security Entitlements

RETURN COUNSELLING SUPPORTING INFORMED DECISION-MAKING THROUGH IMPARTIAL, INDEPENDENT AND NON-DIRECTIVE COUNSELLING

EU Treaties & Legislation

L 375/12 Official Journal of the European Union

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 16 January 2014 (*)

European Immigration and Asylum Law

Requested by GR EMN NCP on 2 nd September Compilation produced on 14 th November 2015

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of establishing the list of supporting documents to be presented by visa applicants in Ireland

The Migration Observatory Understanding Immigration Poll September 2011 TOPLINE RESULTS

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Law school. European Law MARKET FREEDOMS II. Smaragda Rigakou

European Commission, Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU.

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

4 Sources of EU law A. Introduction

Public access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling

The EU as an actor in International Law. Lund, 7 September 2017 Eduardo Gill-Pedro

Civic citizenship and immigrant inclusion

Follow-up of case law of the Court of Justice

Social assistance and the right to reside at the European Court of Justice Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig

Ad-Hoc Query on the Palestinian s characterization as stateless. Requested by GR EMN NCP on 13 th March 2015

Factsheet on rights for nationals of European states and those with an enforceable Community right

Asylum Support for dependants

Enforcement against Member States

List of topics for papers

Fees Assessment Questionnaire

Official Journal of the European Union L 94/375

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 September 2001 *

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Sharpston delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-456/12. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O

For a real European Citizenship

EEA Nationals not subject to immigration control Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Do you want to work in another EU Member State? Find out about your rights!

Questions and Answers the rights of EU and UK citizens, as outlined in the Withdrawal Agreement

The Impact of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights University of Kent 7 December 2017

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 July 2017 (OR. en)

UK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en)

ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION TRANSPOSING DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC ON FREE MOVEMENT OF UNION CITIZENS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 SUMMARY DATASHEET...

with regard to the admission and residence of displaced persons on a temporary basis ( 6 ).

Ihemedu (OFMs meaning) Nigeria [2011] UKUT 00340(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before SENIOR IMMIGRATION JUDGE STOREY. Between

Transcription:

Click icon to add picture Session 5 Applying European Citizenship rights So, you are a European Citizen! So, what?

Outline From Workers to Citizens What is EU Citizenship? And Who is a EU citizen? Scope of citizenship rights Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality & EU citizenship Case-law : citizens, students, job-seekers... Dir.2004/38 general right of entry and residence 3 rd country nationals. Conclusion

What is EU Citizenship? And who is a EU citizen? Citizenship of the EU is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. EU citizenship shall complement and not replace national citizenship. Article 20 TFEU See full article in notespage.

The essence of the rules on EU Citizenship. European citizenship (established 1992) is a specific expression of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality (in the Treaty since 1957).

Free movement & EU Citizenship Every citizen of the Union shall enjoy the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down by the Treaty and by the measures adopted to give it effect. (Art. 21 TFEU; full text in notespage).

Freedom of movement Presumption of a right to move freely & to reside in another member-states than one s own. The citizen has a right to do so. No permission needed from host state. Host state may restrict free movement (deny entry or deport ) on grounds of public policy, public security public health. (Art. 45 para.3 TFEU & Dir. 2004/38).

Directive 2004/38/EC provides details on (a) the conditions governing the exercise of the right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States by Union citizens and their family members; (b) the right of permanent residence in the territory of the Member States for Union citizens and their family members (who may not be EU citizens themselves). (c) the limits placed on the rights set out in (a) and (b) on grounds of public policy, public security or public health.

Right of Union citizens to permanent residence depends on being at work or being self-employed or have sufficient means to support themselves and their families or are students AND have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State. See further details in notes page

What happens when there are disputes about the exercise of citizenship rights? Citizens can bring a case in the national courts against the authorities. National courts may refer to the European Court of Justice for an interpretation. National courts ultimately responsible to adjudicate.

Let us look at some examples Students Job-seekers 3 rd country nationals

Students Case of Grzelyck v Centre Public d Aide sociale Can a French student studying in Belgium claim a social security benefit available to Belgian students? Court stated that EU citizenship is destined to become the fundamental status of nationals of the member states. EU citizenship means equal treatment of EU citizen with nationals in the same circumstances, subject to exceptions expressly provided for.

Job-seeker s right to social security benefits Ioannidis, a Greek national, graduated from university in Belgium, worked in France and returned to look for work in Belgium. Could he claim an allowance in Belgium available to Belgians seeking work? Belgian law required that claimants have completed their secondary education in Belgium. Court ruled: A Member State cannot refuse to grant a allowance to a national of another Member State seeking his first employment on the sole ground that he completed his secondary education in another Member State.

Can a difference in treatment be justified? objective considerations independent of the nationality of the persons concerned proportionate to the aim legitimately pursued by the national law. a single condition concerning the place where the diploma of completion of secondary education was obtained is too general and exclusive in nature and goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective pursued. (extract from judgment in notespage)

European citizenship & 3 rd country-nationals Blaise Baheten Metock and Others v Minister for Justice (Ireland) Mr. Metoc, a Cameroon national, arrives in Ireland to be with his long-term partner and their children. His partner is a British citizen, Cameroonian by birth, working in Ireland. Mr Metoc applied for asylum is refused. His stay in Ireland becomes illegal. Mr. Metoc married his long-term partner. He then applied for residence permit, as spouse of an EU citizen. See more details of the facts of the case in notespage

Can Mr Metoc rely on EU law? The Directive on the free movement applies to all Union citizens who move to or reside in a Member State other than that of which they are a national, and to their family members who accompany or join them.

European Court of Justice ruled a national of a non-member country who is the spouse of a Union citizen residing in a Member State other than their own benefits from the provisions of that directive, irrespective of when and where their marriage took place and of how the national of a non-member country entered the host state. See longer extract in notespage.

Dir. 2004/38: a directive too far? Does its application Offer the ECJ scope for interpreting it widely? Open the door to welfare migration? & benefit shopping? Break down the distinction between workers and non-workers? between EU and non-eu citizens? Limit member-states sovereignty regarding immigration?

But consider that: The Directive was adopted by the member-states and the European Parliament. Member-states have a decisive role in adopting legislation. The Directive takes into serious consideration the family rights of the EU citizen.

A Directive too far? Critique by think tank Open Europe Free movement of workers has been a major success particularly in the UK. But undermining member states rights to control the movements of criminals, their borders, and the access of economically inactive people to benefits is a mistake not just because these changes are problematic in themselves, but because in the long run this will undermine public support for free movement of workers.

Applying EU law on free movement of citizens: Consider the following situation Elisabeth, a Sierra Leone national, arrived in Portugal illegally. To support herself she found work in a restaurant as a waitress. Helmut is a German national, who resides in Portugal where he owns a holiday house. He lives on royalties from his novels which are best-sellers across Europe, although he no longer writes. He eats regularly at the restaurant where Elisabeth works. Elisabeth and Helmut started seeing each other and after a while Elisabeth moved in with Helmut. When Elisabeth became pregnant, they married in September. Following the birth of their child Elisabeth and Helmut applied to the Portuguese authorities for a residence permit for Elisabeth. However, the Portuguese authorities started proceedings under Portuguese law to deport her as an illegal immigrant. Consider the following questions: What rights do you think Helmut and Elisabeth have under EU law? How can they pursue these rights?