NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF DRAM (DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY) CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

Similar documents
Nature of the Lawsuits

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARINGS IN THE SRAM CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS

BEARINGS OR PRODUCTS EQUIPPED WITH SMALL-SIZE BALL BEARINGS BETWEEN JUNE 1ST, 2003 AND OCTOBER 31ST, 2011.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE CANADIAN LITHIUM BATTERY CLASS ACTION

for the Samsung Defendants; Warren Milman, counsel for the Hynix Defendants; Kevin

(the "Plaintiffs") (the "Settling Defendants")

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE LAWN MOWERS CLASS ACTION

situated against the above-named Defendants and, demanding a trial by jury, complain and I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NOTICE OF A CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED BY THE QUÉBEC SUPERIOR COURT

Hitachi, Ltd. - Cooperation and Non-Prosecution Agreement

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of March / f, Between

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 1, Between

CANADIAN POLYURETHANE FOAM CLASS ACTIONs FXI SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of September 2, Between

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Are you a Sixties Scoop survivor? A proposed settlement may affect you. Please read this notice carefully.

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE REPLY

Fleet Phospho-Soda Class Action

CPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1)

NOTICE OF THE CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA ACCORD AND 2009 ACURA TSX CLASS ACTION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2104 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 50

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF mstice

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1292 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

SINO-FOREST SECURITIES LITIGATION

Proceeding Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992

In the Supreme Court ofbritish Colu SARA RAMSAY

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION, OBJECTION PROCESS AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING LONG FORM NOTICE

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Anita Endean, as representative plaintiff Plaintiff and

PLEA AGREEMENT RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 7, Between

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of November 3, Between

Case 3:07-cv PJH Document 9-2 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 10

Class Action Certification and Proposed Settlement for Travelers to Riu Resorts* in the Dominican Republic

UNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION. FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION

Legal Constraints On Corporate Participation In Standards Setting Do s and Don ts By Eric D. Kirsch 1

LITIGATION PLAN BERG V. CANADIAN HOCKEY LEAGUE ET AL. AS AT JUNE 15, 2016

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1714 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

CANADIAN AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of November 11, Between

Patent Litigation and Licensing

STUDENT LOANS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION and PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS PROCEEDING

Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

CITY OF TORONTO ACT COMPLAINT VACANT UNIT REBATE

No. S Vancouver Registry NEIL GODFREY. Plaintiffs. and

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) of 'fiio.«-'", ONTARIO. - and -

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Competition Law Roundtable

IF YOU OWN, OWNED, LEASE, OR LEASED ONE OF THESE VEHICLES, A CLASS ACTION MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

(Class action) SUPERIOR COURT SOCIÉTÉ QUÉBÉCOISE DE GESTION DES DROITS DE REPRODUCTION (COPIBEC) SECOND REPRESENTATIVE AND JEAN FRÉDÉRIC MESSIER

NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPOSE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS PROCEEDING HEATHER ROBERTSON V. THOMSON AND OTHERS

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia DAMON GREEN TECUMSEH PRODUCTS OF CANADA LIMITED; TECUMSEH PRODUCTS CO.; TECUMSEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

Plaintiffs. Defendants. Petitioner. Designated Person. Respondents. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs.

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

POSEIDON CONCEPTS CORP., POSEIDON CONCEPTS LTD., POSEIDON CONCEPTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND POSEIDON CONCEPTS INC.

Between. (the "Plaintiffs") and

Case 3:07-cv JST Document 5169 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:10-md RS Document 1758 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 19

Indexed As: Sun-Rype Products Ltd. et al. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. et al.

, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. 645 F.3d 1336; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9728; 98 U.S.P.Q.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.

Instructions for filing a Municipal Act, 2001 complaint with the Assessment Review Board

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.

Uniform Class Proceedings Act

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

IF YOU RENTED PUBLIC HOUSING OWNED BY THE VANCOUVER HOUSING AUTHORITY, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

GAELEN PATRICK CONDON REBECCA WALKER ANGELA PIGGOTT. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

DID YOU PAY INTERNATIONAL DATA ROAMING FEES AT A RATE HIGHER THAN $5.00 PER MEGABYTE TO FIDO, ROGERS, BELL MOBILITY OR TELUS AFTER JANUARY 8, 2010?

Case4:02-md PJH Document2134 Filed01/08/13 Page1 of 196. Exhibit 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE AND WHY WAS IT SENT TO ME?

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

BSF5058 (E) Rev. 08. CANPASS Private Boats

Bond v. Cricket Communications, LLC Case No. 1:15-cv GLR

A state court in Missouri authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. SUMMARY

In The Supreme Court of British Columbia. THEODORE WILSON, Plaintiff

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Djoric v. Justin Brands, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

Class action dilemmas: the ethics of the Canadian DRAM settlement

Case 1:12-cv DLC-MHD Document 540 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Transcription:

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF DRAM (DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY) CLASS ACTION LITIGATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS Micron Technology, Inc and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. doing business as Crucial Technologies (collectively Micron ) Nanya Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA (collectively Nanya ) NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Canada Inc., Renesas Electronics Corporation and Renesas Electronics America Inc. (collectively NEC ) Hitachi, Ltd.(misnamed Hitachi Ltd.), Hitachi America, Ltd. (misnamed as Hitachi America), Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), INC. (misnamed as Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA)), Hitachi Power Systems Canada Ltd. (previously Hitachi Canada Ltd.) (collectively Hitachi ) and Renesas Electronics Canada Ltd. ( Renesas Canada ) (Micron, Nanya, NEC, Hitachi and Renesas Canada are collectively referred to as the Settling Defendants ) TO: Read this Notice Carefully as it May Affect Your Rights All persons resident in Canada at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM and products containing DRAM ( DRAM Products ) between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002, and Persons resident in the United States at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM Products in Canada between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002 to the extent that such persons have actual or potential claims as against the Defendants in respect of DRAM Products that have not been wholly or completely settled or extinguished in the U.S. Settlement or otherwise in respect of the U.S. Class Proceedings, provided that they and have not already excluded themselves from the class actions. Nature of the Lawsuits DRAM is a form of computer memory that is contained in computers and other electronic devices such as printers, computer hard disk drives, personal digital assistants (PDA), modems, mobile phones, telecommunications hubs and routers, digital cameras, video recorders and televisions, digital set top boxes, game consoles and MP3 players. DRAM devices and components include all types of EDO DRAM, fast-page mode ( FPM DRAM ), synchronous dynamic random access memory ( SDRAM ), Rambus dynamic random access memory

Page 2 of 9 ( RDRAM ), asynchronous dynamic random access memory ( ASYNC ), double data rate dynamic random access memory ( DDR ) including modules containing DRAM, EDO DRAM, FPM DRAM, RDRAM, SDRAM, ASYNC and/or DDR. Class action proceedings have been initiated in British Columbia (Court File No. L043141, Vancouver Registry) (the BC Action ), in Ontario (Court File No. 05-CV-4340) (the First Ontario Action ) and Quebec (File No. 500-06 000251-047, Montreal) (the Quebec Action ). The plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the classes, are claiming damages and restitution from the defendants for unlawfully conspiring to fix, maintain, or increase the price of DRAM. The defendants include: Infineon Technologies AG; Infineon Technologies North America Corp.; Infineon Technologies Corporation; Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Canada Inc.; Micron Technology, Inc.; Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. doing business as Crucial Technologies, Mosel Vitelic Corp.; Mosel Vitelic Inc.; Elpida Memory, Inc.; and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. A second class action has been commenced in Ontario (Court File No. CV-10-15178) (the Second Ontario Action ) (together with the BC Action, the First Ontario Action, and the Quebec Action, the DRAM Proceedings ), on behalf of the same class members as the First Ontario Action against the following additional defendants asserting the same allegations pertaining to DRAM: Hitachi Ltd.; Hitachi America Ltd.; Hitachi Electronics Devices (USA); Hitachi Canada Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corporation; Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada, Inc.; Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA Inc.; Nanya Technology Corporation; Nanya Technology Corporation USA; NEC Corporation; NEC Corporation of America; NEC Canada, Renesas Electronics Corporation formerly known as NEC Electronics Corporation; Renesas Electronics America, Inc. formerly known as NEC Electronics America, Inc.; Renesas Electronics Canada Ltd.; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronics Components Inc.; Toshiba of Canada Limited; Winbond Electronics Corporation; and Winbond Electronics Corporation America. The DRAM Proceedings allege that the defendants control the vast majority of the market for DRAM in Canada, that they engaged in an international cartel to fix prices of DRAM during the period from April 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002, and that, as a result, class members paid more for their computer purchases than they would have but for the illegal price-fixing.

Page 3 of 9 The courts in BC and Quebec previously certified or authorized the BC Action and the Quebec Action on a contested basis and appointed Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. and Option Consommateurs as representative plaintiffs. These orders remain in force as against the non-settling defendants. The Ontario Actions have not yet proceeded to contested certification hearings. In June of 2012 the British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec courts approved a settlement agreement reached by the plaintiffs with the defendants Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. ( Elpida ). I. SETTLEMENT WITH THE SETTLING DEFENDANTS Four settlements have recently been reached in the DRAM Proceedings: 1. With Micron (the Micron Settlement Agreement ), pursuant to which Micron will pay CDN $17.5 million in exchange for a full release of claims against it and its related entities relating to the DRAM Proceedings. The settlement amount is being held in an interest bearing trust account for the benefit of the Settlement Class described below. 2. With Nanya (the Nanya Settlement Agreement ), pursuant to which Nanya will pay CDN $325,000 in exchange for a full release of claims against it and its related entities relating to the DRAM Proceedings. The settlement amount is being held in an interest bearing trust account for the benefit of the Settlement Class described below. 3. With NEC (the NEC Settlement Agreement ), pursuant to which NEC will pay CDN $2.75 million in exchange for a full release of claims against it and its related entities relating to the DRAM Proceedings. The settlement amount is being held in an interest bearing trust account for the benefit of the Settlement Class described below. 4. With Hitachi and Renesas Canada (the Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreement ), pursuant to which Hitachi and Renesas Canada will pay CDN $2.75 million in exchange for a full release of claims against them and their related entities relating to the DRAM Proceedings. The settlement amount is being held in an interest bearing trust account for the benefit of the Settlement Class described below. These settlements resolve the DRAM Proceedings for the whole of the Settlement Class as against the Settling Defendants. The Settling Defendants have agreed to provide cooperation to the plaintiffs in

Page 4 of 9 pursuing the DRAM Proceedings against the remaining defendants The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and the Settling Defendants do not admit any wrongdoing or liability. The DRAM Proceedings are continuing against the defendants except for Hitachi, Renesas Canada, Micron, Nanya, NEC and Elpida. Certification or authorization of DRAM Proceedings for settlement purposes only The courts in BC, Ontario and Quebec have certified or authorized the DRAM Proceedings against the Settling Defendants for the purposes of settlement only (the Settlement Certification/Authorization ). The courts have not taken any position as to the likelihood of recovery on the part of the representative plaintiffs or other members of the class, or as to the merits of the claims or defences asserted by either side. The allegations against the defendants have not been proven. Court approval of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements is a condition of the Settlement Certification/Authorization. If the Micron, Nanya, NEC or Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements are not approved, the Settlement Certification/Authorization will be revoked. By court order, the class in the British Columbia Action includes: all persons resident in British Columbia at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM Products between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002. (the BC DRAM Settlement Class ) By court order, the class in the Quebec Action includes: All persons resident in Quebec at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM Products between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002 except any legal person established for a private interest, partnership or association which at any time between October 5, 2003 and October 5, 2004 had under its direction or control more than 50 persons bound to it by contract of employment or that is not dealing at arm's length with Option consommateurs. (the Quebec DRAM Settlement Class )

Page 5 of 9 By order of the Ontario court, the classes in the Ontario Actions include: (i) all Persons resident in Canada at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM Products between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002, except Persons who are included in the B.C. Settlement Class and the Quebec Settlement Class; and (ii) all Persons resident in the United States at the time of purchase and/or at the time of notice who purchased DRAM Products in Canada between April 1, 1999 and June 30, 2002 to the extent that such persons have actual or potential claims as against the Defendants in respect of DRAM Products that have not been wholly or completely settled or extinguished in the U.S. Settlement or otherwise in respect of the U.S. Class Proceedings. (the Rest of Canada/US DRAM Settlement Class ; together with the BC DRAM Settlement Class and the Quebec DRAM Settlement Class, the Settlement Class ) The defendants and persons related to the defendants, as well as family members of the judges who hear the DRAM Proceedings and persons who have already settled their claims with respect to DRAM in the U.S. are excluded from the Settlement Class ( Excluded Persons ). Court Approval The Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements remain subject to court approval. Motions to approve the settlement agreements will be heard by the British Columbia Court in the City of Vancouver, the Ontario Court in the City of Toronto, and the Superior Court of Quebec in the City of Montreal on January 24, 2013 at 10am Pacific time/1pm Eastern time. At these hearings the courts will determine whether the settlements are fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. Questions about the Settlements This notice contains only a summary of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements and Settlement Class members are encouraged to review the complete Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements. Copies of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements can be downloaded from the DRAM

Page 6 of 9 section of Class Actions at www.cfmlawyers.ca. Copies of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements can also be mailed to you at a cost of $25, which represents the cost of photocopying and mailing. If you would like copies of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and/or Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements or have questions that are not answered on-line, please contact the appropriate Class Counsel identified below. INQUIRIES SHOULD NOT BE DIRECTED TO THE COURTS. Interpretation This notice contains a summary of some of the terms of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this notice and the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements, including the schedules to the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements, the terms of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements shall prevail. II. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS As more fully outlined above, you are a member of the Settlement Class if you are a resident of Canada who bought DRAM Products during the period April 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002 or a resident of the United States who bought DRAM Products in Canada during the period April 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002 unless you are an Excluded Person or opted out of the DRAM Proceedings. You do not need to do anything to continue to be included as a Settlement Class member and you will be entitled to participate in the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada settlements, as well as any other settlements, and you will be legally bound by the result of the DRAM Proceedings. Settlement Class members who do not oppose the proposed settlement need not appear at the joint hearing or take any other action at this time to indicate their desire to participate in the settlements. Objecting to the Settlement(s) Settlement Class members are entitled to appear and make submissions at the joint hearing. If you wish to comment on or make an objection to the Micron, Nanya, NEC and/or Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements, you must deliver a written submission to the appropriate Class Counsel at the addresses listed below by January 22, 2013. Class Counsel will forward all such submissions to the

Page 7 of 9 appropriate court. All filed written submissions will be considered by the appropriate court. If you do not file a written submission by the deadline, you may not be entitled to participate, through oral submissions or otherwise, in the joint hearing. Opting Out The deadline for opting out (or excluding oneself) of the National DRAM Class Proceedings has passed. Settlement class members who have not validly opted out are bound by the terms of the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements (if approved by the courts). Financial Consequences If further settlements occur or if the common issues are determined in favour of the classes at the common issues trials in the DRAM Proceedings, class members may be entitled to receive financial compensation from the remaining defendants. No individual class member will be liable for costs with respect to the Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada settlements, any future settlements or the determination of the common issues in the DRAM Proceedings. Class Counsel The law firm of Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman represents the BC DRAM Settlement Class. Class Counsel at Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman can be reached at: Telephone: 604-689-7555 or 1-800-689-2322 Email: dram@cfmlawyers.ca Mail: 4th Floor, 856 Homer Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2W5 Attention: JJ. Camp, Q.C.

Page 8 of 9 The law firm of Belleau Lapointe represents the Quebec DRAM Settlement Class. Class Counsel at Belleau Lapointe can be reached at: Telephone: 514-987-6700 Email: info@belleaulapointe.com Mail: #306, Place d Youville, Suite B-10 Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 2B6 Attention: Maxime Nasr The law firms of Sutts, Strosberg LLP and Harrison Pensa LLP jointly represent the Rest of Canada/US DRAM Settlement Class. Class Counsel at Sutts Strosberg can be reached at: Telephone: 1-800-229-5323 extn 8296 (toll free) Email: dramclassaction@strosbergco.com Mail: 600 251 Goyeau Street Windsor, Ontario N9A 6V4 Attention: Heather Rumble Peterson Class Counsel Fees Class Counsel legal fees and disbursements must be approved by the Courts. Class Counsel will collectively be requesting legal fees of up to 30% of the settlement funds, plus disbursements and applicable taxes to be paid out of the settlement funds, at the settlement approval hearing. If you wish to comment on or make an objection to the Class Counsel fees, a written submission must be delivered to the appropriate Class Counsel at the addresses listed above by January 22, 2013. Class Counsel will forward all such submissions to the appropriate court. All filed written submissions will be considered by the appropriate court. If you do not file a written submission by the deadline, you may not be entitled to participate, through oral submissions or otherwise, in the hearings. III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Micron, Nanya, NEC and Hitachi and Renesas Canada Settlement Agreements, the statement of claim and other information is available at: http://www.cfmlawyers.ca/active-litigation/dram-dynamic-random-access-memory/.

Page 9 of 9 Information about the Ontario DRAM Proceedings is available at: http://www.harrisonpensa.com/legal_services/class_action/cases/d_ram_price_fixing and at http://www.dramclassaction.com/. Information about the Quebec DRAM Proceedings is available at: http://www.recourscollectif.info/en/cases/dram/. THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE FOR ONTARIO, AND THE SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC