Creating Political Strengthening of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad

Similar documents
Southeast Asia. Overview

ASEAN 2015: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Political Change, Youth and Democratic Citizenship in Cambodia and Malaysia

Articles Lecture. Week Three

Southeast Asia: Violence, Economic Growth, and Democratization. April 9, 2015

DOHA DECLARATION On the Occasion of the 5 th ACD Ministerial Meeting Doha, Qatar, 24 May 2006

Democracy and Participatory Regionalism in Southeast Asia

ASEAN-PAKISTAN JOINT DECLARATION FOR COOPERATION TO COMBAT TERRORISM

Introduction to East Asia

PROTOCOL TO IMPLEMENT THE TENTH PACKAGE OF COMMITMENTS ON AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES UNDER THE ASEAN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON SERVICES

SOUTHEAST ASIA E. J. PALKA

Combating Public Sector Corruption in Singapore & Hong Kong: Lessons for the Private Sector in Asian Countries

OUR SOUTHEAST ASIA POLICY

Can ASEAN Sell Its Nuclear Free Zone to the Nuclear Club?

The South-East Asian Press: its challenges, shortcomings and prospects Mr Khun Pichai Chuensuksawadi

Democratic Support among Youth in Some East Asian Countries

More engagement with ASEAN is Australia's best hedge in Asia

SINGAPORE & MALAYSIA Grade Levels: minutes LANDMARK MEDIA 1998

FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIAN NATIONS

Strategic Developments in East Asia: the East Asian Summit. Jusuf Wanandi Vice Chair, Board of Trustees, CSIS Foundation

International seminar

Crowded Waters in Southeast Asia

CLMV and the AEC 2015 :

ASEAN-REPUBLIC OF KOREA JOINT DECLARATION FOR COOPERATION TO COMBAT INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM


Chp. 2: Comparing Forms of Government

Internationalisation Indicators UNESCO Bangkok. Anthony Welch University of Sydney

IS CHINA S SOFT POWER DOMINATING SOUTHEAST ASIA? VIEWS FROM THE CITIZENS

Should Malaysia Reopen Batu Puteh?

Economic Development: Miracle, Crisis and Regionalism

The Development of Sub-Regionalism in Asia. Jin Ting 4016R330-6 Trirat Chaiburanapankul 4017R336-5

March 27, 1955 Report from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, 'Compilation of the Excerpts of the Telegrams Concerning the Asian- African Conference'

To summarize, the details of the article that is of interest to us are as follows:

THE ECONOMIES OF THE ASEAN COUNTRIES

Investor Migration Rise of the Global Citizen. Dominic Volek, CA(SA), IMCM Managing Partner and Head Southeast Asia

Thai Canal to end southern disputes

Kishore Mahbubani November 23, 2011

Mr. President, I have the pleasure to take the floor on behalf of the Delegations of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations : Brunei Darussalam, C

Poverty Profile. Executive Summary. Malaysia

South China Sea- An Insight

Partner. Published By. Malaysian-German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MGCC) Address

Part Structural Reform in ASEAN and Japan Involved Chapter 1 Japan's New Asian Policies after the Currency and Economic Crisis

Embittered Authoritarianism: Contemporary Malaysia in Comparative Perspective

Comparative Constitution Drafting Processes in the Philippines, Thailand and Burma:

Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia

JOINT DECLARATION OF THE ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS ON ENHANCING ASEAN UNITY FOR A HARMONISED AND SECURE COMMUNITY

POLITICAL SCIENCE (POLI)

Japan Imperialism, Party Government, and Fascism. February 24, 2015

Changing Role of Civil Society

By OOI KEE BENG. Introduction

Prospects for the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea after Hague decision

Competitiveness and Value Creation of Tourism Sector: In the Case of 10 ASEAN Economies

Research on the Education and Training of College Student Party Members

Prospects for future economic cooperation between China and Belt & Road countries

Japan s s foreign policy. Lecturer: Dr. Masayo Goto

New Zealand Stability and Security

Countering ISIS in Southeast Asia : ASEAN s Efforts at the Regional Level by Ibrahim Almuttaqi

Joint Communiqué THE FIFTH ASEAN MINISTERS MEETING ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY ERADICATION 31 JANUARY 2007, BANGKOK

Bangkok Declaration 2 nd Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) Summit One Asia, Diverse Strengths 9 10 October 2016, Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand

AKHILESH TRIVEDI PREPAREDNESS OF SMES TOWARDS AEC : A CASE STUDY OF TRAVEL AGENTS IN BANGKOK

ASEAN & the South China Sea Disputes

Among ASEAN countries, Thailand ranks 3 rd, followed by Singapore and Malaysia.

BEARING IN MIND that the Protocol has not entered into force;

EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Regional Security: From TAC to ARF

MCT. When three isn t a crowd. Winners

Trade Facilitation and Better Connectivity for an Inclusive Asia and Pacific

STRENGTHENING POLICY INSTITUTES IN MYANMAR

Learning to talk through our differences

Delhi Dialogue IV India and ASEAN: Partners for Peace, Progress and Stability

The name, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, does not have a noun such. as a community, agreement nor summit to go after it.

Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University

ZiMUN 2017 General Assembly Research Report

ASSESSMENT REPORT. Does Erdogan s Victory Herald the Start of a New Era for Turkey?

Somchai Jitsuchon EDUCATION: EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:

Prospects for a Future Role for Erdogan in a New Political System

DECLARATION OF ASEAN CONCORD Adopted by the Heads of State/Government at the 1st ASEAN Summit in Bali, Indonesia on 24 February 1976

Governance and administration in a new democracy: The case of formal control of the free-to-air television in Thailand ( )

INTERIM REPORT International Fact-Finding Mission on Elections in Malaysia, April 2012

POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: THE REFLECTION OF FREEDOM IN THE WORLD INDEX BY FREEDOM HOUSE ORGANIZATION

Tun Dr. Mahathir s Leadership Communication: The Confucian Perspective

MALAYSIA S POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION BRIDGET WELSH, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

WORD CHECK UP. Remarkable. Authoritarian. Sufficient

Investor Migration Rise of the Global Citizen. Dominic Volek, CA(SA), IMCM Managing Partner and Head Southeast Asia

Business Globalization

Economic Trends Across the Asia Pacific Region. Pansy Yau Deputy Director of Research

Role of the security sector in Nepal s Democratic Transition. Bhojraj Pokharel Annual Democracy Forum August 25-26, 2016 Mongolia

Lanna Culture and Social Development:

Geography 484 Southeast Asia Jim Glassman Lecture #9b November 2, 2011

ICAPP Charter PREAMBLE

FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS AND JAPAN

Free Trade Vision for East Asia

Science and Technology Diplomacy in Asia

a. ASEAN joint efforts to fight grand corruption and regional complaints mechanism

ASEAN WHAT IS ASEAN? A regional grouping that promotes economic, political and security cooperation among its member states.

Why Malaysia? Summary Area: 330,803 km². Population: 31.7 million. Population growth rate: 1.7% change. Population density: 92.

2007/ACT/WKSP1/016 Corruption Control in Singapore Effective National Anti-Corruption Strategies: Prosecuting High-Level Corruption

TOWARDS AN ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: THE CHALLENGES AHEAD

PUBLIC OPINION AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION

The South African Constitution: Birth Certificate of a Nation

Transcription:

International Journal of Business and Management 1 (2): 94-98, 2017 e-issn: 2590-3721 RMP Publications, 2017 DOI: 10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2017.2.14 Creating Political Strengthening of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad RawikarnAmnuay PhranakhonRajabhat University,Bangkok,Thailand Abstract: The purpose of this research is to study the process of creating political strengthening of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, the former prime-minister of Malaysia. This research is a qualitative research by conducting document analysis, interview, and non-participatory observation. The essential data is gathered from both primary and secondary sources. The in-depth interview has been done on the key informants consisting of academics, Malaysian community leaders, and Malaysian citizens. According to the research, it was founded that; Dr. Mahathir Mohammad had been creating political stability by promoting nationalism by emphasizing the consolidation and the pride of Malay s race. This made him get supported by the people across the country through general election. Visibly, he had been elected and in the premier position consecutively for 22 years. In addition, being legislatively legitimated, the stability of his government had been created by imposing laws which was described as authoritarianism to effectively control and rule the country. It is also founded that his vision to make Malaysia to be a developed country by declaring the 2020 Vision had made him noted as the most high-vision leader, and he strongly got supported by the people in Malaysia. Dr. Mahathir Mohammad is one of the memorable and outstanding leaders of Malaysia and ASEAN. His political stability was not only created by implemented the authoritarian practice and making people support him via nationalism, but also his vision to make Malaysia become a great country. Key words: Political Strengthening, Mahathir Mohammad, Malaysian Politics INTRODUCTION countries with democratic or authoritarian regime, is the strong ambition to make their countries great. Picture 1 Map of Malaysia Some of the former leaders of the countries in South East Asia were either described as the nationalist, the nation builders, or the high visionary leaders. The most important characteristic of these leaders, even in the Picture 2 Malaysians are of many nationalities. To achieve such the intention, sometimes it is not easy to do so, as there are many factors, both internal and external factors, involved in the development process. Geographical factor, for instance, determines the growth of the countries: the archipelago country with diverse ethnic groups or Corresponding Author: RawikarnAmnuay, PhranakhonRajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand. E-mail: Rawikarn.3@gmail.com, Tel: 94

the land-locked countries seem to be less successful than those countries which are located in the mainland with proper maritime routes. Moreover, the big countries with large amount of population may need more effective management skill to rule the country, in comparison with the smaller countries which may find less difficulty in administration. The countries, being colonized for a long time and the influence of controlling countries still exists, are facing with the problem in country s consolidation and unity; these caused by the influence of the cultures and norms of the dominant countries. Nevertheless, one of the successful countries among those that able to build their nation to be the front tier of ASEAN is Malaysia. RESEARCH PROPOSAL To study the process for creating political stability of Mahathir Mohamad. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK of the country is ThTunDato' Seri Dr. Mahathir bin Mohammad, the 4th prime minister of Malaysia, who had stayed in the position consecutively for 22 years (1981 2003) considering as the longest serving in premier position of Malaysia. He joined UMNO party (The United Malays National Organization), the largest and influential political party of Malaysia and dominated Malaysian politics since gaining independence from Britain. He joined the party in 1946 A.D when the party was initially formed up. During he had been in the post for 2 decades, he had effectively managed to consolidate the country and make Malaysia become high potential country in Southeast Asia [2]. According to the research, it was founded that Mahathir Mohammad had established his political stability in three mains aspects: Promoting the role of nationalist and effective politician, law imposing and implementation, and establishing political stability through effective governmental administration. 1. Creating political strengthening through election RESEARCH METHEDOLOGY This research is a qualitative research by studying relating documents such as books, articles, researches, and electronic medias, conducting indepth interview the key informants, and nonparticipatory to gather the relevant data from the people living in Malaysia. RESEARCH RESULTS Picture 4 Mahathir Mohamad Creating political strengthening through election In term of promoting the role of nationalist and effective politician, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad entered to politics and was initially elected to be a member of the house of the representative under UMNO party [3] and later he was elected to be a member of the house of the representative for 14 year.afterwards, he had the position of a senator and minister of education which subsequently he was elected to be the 4 th prime minister of Malaysia using racial ideology as the key concept to gain support from Malaysians by using being Malay to be the symbol of the states and nation and offering the privileges to Malay-born people [4]. Picture 3 Mahathir Mohamad is the 4th prime minister of Malaysia Malaysia gained independence from United Kingdom in 1957 A.D. [1]. The remarkable leader 95

Picture 5 Malaysia Prime Minister from UMNO s party Picture 7 Mahathir Mohamad used laws Internal Security Act to be country security s tool Picture 6 Mahathir Mohamad stayed in the position of the prime minister as long as 22 years In addition, Mahathir used network and mechanism of patronage to support party members to win elections which help him to win elections continually and stayed in the position of the prime minister as long as 22 years. Having won the 5 general election in the role [5], it made Dr. Mahathir Mohammad secure him his position. The political legitimacy through election made him confidence to decisively administrate the country; this led to the domination of power over other branch of nation power. It indicates that the outcome of the general election had advocated Dr. Mahathir Mohammad s political stability in which he could claim for political legitimacy to be in the position and can lead the country in the way he desired[6]. The election process had been taken advantage of allowing the prime-minister to be authoritarian leader without social resistance; this was due to the lack of power the opposition side also. 2.Creating political strengthening through laws implementation In the aspect of law imposing and implementation, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad used laws to create righteousness for the government by announcing the use of laws in a way that promote authoritarianism [4]. For an example, he used internal security act as a crucial tool for the Malaysian government to maintain peace in the country for a long time by which this law gave a prominent level of authority to the government and the security officers. The officers can arrest a person suspecting to be harmful for the stability of the government immediately and can imprison the person without time limitation without the need for the person to be investigated publicly and without a prove for the charge whether it is a violation according to the accusation. Later, the government of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad also made changes to some sections of the constitution to increase the power for the government and reduced the role and power of the judiciary and the monarch [3]. From his mentioned work, Mahathir then could maintain power in UMNO party and stayed in the leader position of the country consequentially. In addition Dr. Mahathir Mohammad s government had imposed Internal Security Act to detain activists, nonmainstream religious figures, and political opposition side including the Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. According to the legislation profits taken advantage by the government of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, it conveys that he strengthened his political stability by utilizing law to eliminate the opposition people or groups, as well as, to control the situation and society in the way he wanted. This totally advocated himpolitical strength; even there was strong critics from international community, especially western countries, but it did not affect to the way of his administration. 3. Creating the political strengthening through governmental administration. Picture 8 The Mahathir Mohamad s working 96

In the area of establishing political stability through effective governmental administration, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad s had created the political stability through governmental administration by implementing effective economic policies to make the country to be higher tier of development. The effectiveness of his administration advocated more supports from people and this attributed his political stability. Serving as the prime minister of Malaysia, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad s government had faced with the international trend in development and modernization [7]. By his far-vision to make Malaysia to be the great in Southeast Asia, he initiated a number of policies to make economic sustainably growth by investing in construction infrastructures projects which made him projected as the talent nation developer. He declared the 2020 vision as the road map to Malaysia to be in the first world country[2]. Mahathir adhered to a policy to focus on the east as a key policy by focusing Japan as a model for the development of the country referencing to the Asian values to solve problems by selfreliance rather than asking for support from other countries. This becomes the model for the development and he also used a strategy to take Malaysia to the world stage leaving the image of a rubber seller away from Malaysia. The administration of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad gained a lot of supports from Malay people which advocated a strong leader political stability. Picture 9 Main Policy in Malaysia Reform and Development DISCUSSION Picture 10 Mahathir Mohamad, the great political leader who lay foundation and builds the futyre for Malaysia Having been governing the country for 2 decades, Mahathir Mohammad had accumulated and strengthen his political stability by projecting himself as the talented politician in order to gain supports from the people, as a result; he and his political party members had been elected and able to totally control the parliament. Having been promoted nationalism my highlighting the status of ordinary Malays (Bumiputra) [1], he managed to consolidate Malaysian society to cooperate in build up the country. Moreover, Mahathir Mohammad had utilized the patronage connections which are clearly seen in Malaysia society to extend his popularity and gain his party s members the supports from people. In the aspect of law imposing and implementation, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad had established political legitimacy by imposing authoritarian law to legally empower him and his government. Since he was able to decisively control the parliament, the laws were easily passed, these even more stabilized his position. In addition, he had promoted the Asian democracy which is different from what western society perceived: this was to legitimize him as the appropriate leader for Asian society and not easily to be dominated by other countries. The more he could liberate from the west and showed his assertiveness, the more he gained supports from his people. After having been colonized by western countries for centuries before gaining independence after World War II, the reason why he was necessary to be assertive was due to the need to effectively unite the country which formally there are a number of sub-ethnic groups and sultan states. The government administration was managed by using modern economic policy [2], vision declaration 2020, and a policy that focused on the East as a key policy by focusing to Japan as a model for the development of the country together with referencing to the Asian values. The policy also laid foundation emphasizing on selfreliance reducing support from other countries which it gained a lot of popularity for Mahathir even if it had characteristic of dictatorial concept but it turned Malaysia from an agricultural country to an industrial country for the future causing Malaysia to be an example of a developing country. By the concept of Machiavelli which there is no limit for gaining the power, maintaining the power, and stepping out from the power even if it may not come from a rightful way, Machiavelli had the concept that a leader should have a characteristic combining that of a lion and a fox which is to have power and intellect. In an important situation or event, a leader may have to use force to eliminate people who create the disturbance which this is deemed to be rightful [8]. C.Wright Mills [9]presented an idea of popular leader by which he saw that general people do not have the true power to determine policies but there are only 3 groups of people controlling the power and they have the power to determine policies. These groups are high ranking soldiers, wealthy businessmen, and prime minister, ministers and government officers in high positions which this can be found mostly in developing country. 97

Plato suggested that leaders in each society should come from the selection by people in that society and the leaders should have distinctive characteristics of intellect, honesty, nationalist, and decisiveness (in some cases, the leader may use decisive authority for existence) [10]. CONCLUSION Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, a prominent and outstanding leader of Malaysia, who had created the political stability through election process by using racial ideology, being Malay. He also made use of laws in a way that promote authoritarianism as a crucial tool to suppress the opposition groups and to effectively control the country. His administration of the government used modern economic policy in which attributing the effective and high proficient leader to make Malaysia great advocated political stability to him. By his strong personality, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad was recorded as the tough leader of Southeast Asia who was not easily dominated by westerns countries. REFERENCES [1] Church, Peter., 2009, A Short History of South-East Asia.(5th Edition).Singapore: John Wiley&Son (Asia) Pte Ltd. [2] Dhillon, KarminderSingh,2009, Malaysian Foreign Policy in the Mahathir Era 1981 2003: Dilemmas of Development. NUS Press. [3] Milne, R. S.; Mauzy, Diane K,1999, Malaysian Politics under Mahathir. Routledge. [4] Stewart, Ian (2003). The Mahathir Legacy: a Nation Divided, a Region at Risk. Allen &Unwin. [5] Sankaran, Ramanathan; MohdHamdanAdnan,1988,. Malaysia's 1986 General Election: the Urban-Rural Dichotomy. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. [6] LikitDeravekin.,2004, Political Development Theory. Bangkok: Thammasat University [7] SridaSonsri,2005, Leader in Southeast Asia: study in Indonesia Philippines Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. Bangkok: Thammasart University. [8] SombatChanwong, 2004, THE PRINCE.4thEdition.Bangkok: Kobfai project. [9] C.Wright Mills, 1956, The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press. [10] PrichaChangkwanyuen, 1972,The Republic. Bangkok: Chulalongkron University. 98