COVER NOTE Tanzania Energy Development and Access Project (TEDAP) Safeguard Documents

Similar documents
SUMMARY EQUIVALENCE ASSESSMENT BY POLICY PRINCIPLE AND KEY ELEMENTS

RP622 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (FMAWR)

A. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs. B.

THE WORLD BANK OPERATIONAL MANUAL OP 4.12 December Involuntary Resettlement. Policy Objectives

Involuntary Resettlement - Overview. Transport Forum Washington, D.C. March 30, 2007

Guidance Note 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

Performance Standard 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

EBRD Performance Requirement 5

Gender Equality and Development

SECOND DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION JULY Environmental and Social Standard 5 Land Acquisition, Restrictions on Land Use and Involuntary Resettlement

Lao People s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity. Prime Minister s Office Date: 7 July, 2005

ASCO CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT MANAGERS URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNERS TRAINING

THE WORLD BANK OPERATIONAL MANUAL. Indigenous Peoples

RP297. Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) Entitlement Framework

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIAN MINISTRY OF MINES

The Resettlement Policy Framework for the Smallholder Agriculture Development Project. Papua New Guinea

Resettlement Policy Framework

FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISTION AND INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK SAFEGUARD FOR INVOLUNTARY RESETTLMENT

Annex 2: Does the Xayaburi resettlement comply with Lao law?

RESETTLEMENT FRAMEWORK. Supplementary Appendix to the Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors. on the

RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) ZAMBIA RENEWABLE ENERGY FINANCING FRAMEWORK

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, TRADE AND INDUSTRY

VOLUME 4 CHAPTER 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Ministry of Energy and Mining. Development Bank of Jamaica. Energy Security and Efficiency Enhancement Project

RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK. NATURAL GAS CONNECTION PROJECT IN 11 GOVERNORATES IN EGYPT (March 2014)

The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) of the. Russian Federation. Innovative Development of Preschool Education in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

THE WORLD BANK INSPECTION PANEL S EARLY SOLUTIONS PILOT APPROACH: THE CASE OF BADIA EAST, NIGERIA

Tenke Fungurume Mining An affiliate of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold

TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, POLICY AND POVERTY THEMATIC GROUP

Lake Turkana Wind Power Project - Kenya Resettlement Policy Framework

Work plan of Independent Agency and Implementation of IFC Performance Standards. Green Goal Ltd., 17 February 2014

SUMMARY RESETTLEMENT PLAN OF WATER SUPPLY AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TRANCHE-2 SUB PROJECT OF GANGTOK UNDER ADB ASSISTED NERCCDIP PROJECT

Environmental and Social Management Framework

Government of the Republic of Malawi MINISTRY OF FINANCE. Malawi Social Action Fund MASAF 4- Strengthening Safety Net Systems in Malawi

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

Managing Social Risks and Impacts in Geothermal Projects Turkey Geothermal Development Project

IAIA Special Symposium Resettlement and Livelihoods October Ted Pollett

Indigenous Peoples Development Planning Document. VIE: Calamity Damage Rehabilitation Project

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

Bangladesh: Urban Public and Environmental Health Sector Development Program

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

isimangaliso Resettlement Policy Framework and Process Framework April 2009

SRI: Local Government Enhancement Project

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)

RP1 93 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, YOUTH AND SPORTS (MEYS) REPUBLIC OF GHANA. (EdSeP) Public Disclosure Authorized

World Bank-financed Gansu Revitalization and Innovation Project Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF)

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (FMAWR)

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

Inter-American Development Bank. Operational Policy on Indigenous Peoples

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) ADDITIONAL FINANCING Report No.: PIDA Project Name Parent Project Name. Region Country Sector(s) Theme(s)

India: Delhi Meerut Regional Rapid Transit System Project

y Fomento Municipal (FUNDACOMUN);

Central African Backbone (CAB) Project Africa Coast to Europe (ACE) Submarine Cable

Guidance Note 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

Resettlement Policy Framework

EG-Giza North Power Project (P116194)

UNDAF Results Matrix Sri Lanka

Resettlement Policy Framework

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

Indonesia: Enhanced Water Security Investment Project

MLD - Kulhudhuffushi Harbor Expansion Project

Guidance Note UNDP Social and Environmental Standards. Standard 5: Displacement and Resettlement

SRI: Local Government Enhancement Project

Social Management Policy Framework

NIGERIAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATIONS FOR EMBEDDED GENERATION 2012

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN SHALA NEIGHBOURHOOD HADE PROJECT KOSOVO MONITORING REPORT 1

VIET NAM: MEDIUM CITES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (MCDP) PHU LY CITY SUBPROJECT HA NAM PROVINCE. (Final Draft)

IND: Mumbai Metro Rail Systems Project

The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Resettlement Policy Framework

Draft Resettlement Policy Framework

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB4547 Project Name

Ethiopia : the Gilgel Gibe Resettlement Project

An informal aid. for reading the Voluntary Guidelines. on the Responsible Governance of Tenure. of Land, Fisheries and Forests

Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards. A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Sourcebook Draft Working Document

Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

Giza North 3x750 MWe GAS-FIRED COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT

Helpdesk Research Report: Policies on Displacement and Resettlement

Resettlement and Income Restoration in Thilawa SEZ

RESTRUCTURING PAPER ON A PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING ZIMBABWE NATIONAL WATER PROJECT APPROVED ON JANUARY 29, 2016 REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE

Technical Assistance Consultant s Report. TA 7566-REG: Strengthening and Use of Country Safeguard Systems

IND: Railway Sector Investment Program

Livelihood Restoration in Practice: Key Challenges and Opportunities

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

PROJECT PAPER PROPOSAL TO RESTRUCTURE THE PUTTALAM HOUSING PROJECT IDA Credit 4261 CE (PI00390) FOR SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED EQUIVALENCE ASSESSMENT. Executive Summary

DRAFT RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R&R) Policy for Kochi Metro Rail Project March 2015

Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh s Legal Framework and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement: Indigenous Peoples

Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project- Additional Financing

Proposed Loan People s Republic of China: Hebei Elderly Care Development Project

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB5304 Project Name

Resettlement Action Plan Update for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Bukoba Airport

MINISTRY OF FINANCE CLIMATE CHANGE SECRETARIAT RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE. Sri Lanka: Puttalam Housing Project

Rights to land, fisheries and forests and Human Rights

Transcription:

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 7+(81,7('5(38%/,&2)7$1=$1,$ COVER NOTE Tanzania Energy Development and Access Project (TEDAP) Safeguard Documents This introductory page provides a brief background to the attached safeguard documents: the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) and the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for the Tanzania Energy Development and Access Project (TEDAP). Following the restructuring of the Energy Rural Transformation Project (ERTP) some of its components have been subsumed into TEDAP. TEDAP has 3 components: i) on-grid, ii) off-grid and iii) technical assistance. For the purposes of public disclosure, the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) and the Resettlement Policy and Framework (RPF) for the on-grid have already been prepared and disclosed and are hereby referred as (Part A). For the off-grid component the following safeguard documents are attached for disclosure: the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) and the Resettlement Policy and Framework (RPF) are being disclosed as (Part B). All TEDAP environment and social documents have been updated to reflect the transition from ERTP to TEDAP; including changes in project name and implementation schedule. They have been in part also re-written to reflect the more substantive institutional arrangements in the new project. The above-mentioned documents have been prepared and were reviewed with MEM and TANESCO to ensure readiness for disclosure in the Bank s info-shop, and in country in line with the safeguard policies of GoT and the World Bank. 1

Tanzania Energy Development and Access Project 7('$3 3 2IIJULGFRPSRQHQW RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK 53) 3DUW% (July 2007) 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No.s Glossary of Terms..3 A. Introduction..5. B. Principles and objectives governing resettlement preparation..8 and implementation. C. A description of the process for preparing and approving.11 Resettlement plans. D. Land acquisition and likely categories of impact...15 E. Eligibility criteria for defining various categories of project affected persons...19 F. A legal Framework reviewing the fit between the laws of Tanzania..21 and regulations and Bank policy requirements and measures to bridge any gaps proposed between them. G. Methods of valuing affected assets...25 H. Organizational procedures for the delivery of entitlements, including,..32 for projects involving private sector intermediaries, the responsibilities financial intermediary, the government, and the private developer. I. A description of the implementation process, linking resettlement implementation..34 to civil works. J. A description of the grievance redress mechanisms...35 K. A description of the arrangements for funding resettlement, including the.36 preparation and review of cost estimates, the flow of funds, and contingency arrangements. L. A description of mechanisms for consultations with, and participation of,..37 displaced persons in planning, implementation, and monitoring. M. Arrangements for monitoring by the implementation agency and,.38 if required, by independent monitors. Annex 1: ESA.41 Annex 2:Template for RAPS..42 3

Glossary of Key Terms Cut - off Date refers to a day on and beyond which any person who occupies land required for project use, will not be eligible for compensation. The date is often the day when the assessment of persons and their property in the project area commences. Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) - report is a safeguards instrument (document) which establishes a mechanism to determine and assess future potential environmental and social impacts of productive investments of project sponsors that have successfully qualified under the proposed TEDAP off-grid component, then to set out mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during design, implementation and operation of the project activities, to eliminate adverse environmental and social impacts, offset them, or reduce them to acceptable levels. This instrument has been prepared as a separate and stand alone document to be used in conjunction with the RPF. Market rate based on commercial terms according to Tanzania law for sale of land. Project Affected Persons (PAPs) are persons affected by land use or acquisition needs of the project sponsors supported activities. These person(s) are affected because they may lose shelter, denied or restricted access to economic assets, income sources or means of livelihood. These persons are affected whether or not they must move to another location. Project Sponsors Project Sponsors are the private (or commercialized public) service providers and operators in the electricity sector, such as Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), off-grid service providers, including private sector, cooperatives, NGOs. Resettlement and Compensation Plan (RAP), is also known as a Resettlement Action Plan or Resettlement Plan is a resettlement instrument (document) to be prepared when project activities are identified, that require land acquisition that leads to physical displacement of persons, and/or loss of shelter, and /or loss of livelihoods and/or loss, denial or restriction of access to economic resources. RAPs are prepared by the party impacting people and livelihoods ( in this case the project sponsors) in this manner and contains specific and legal binding requirements to be taken by that party to resettle and compensate the affected party before project activities causing this adverse impact are implemented. Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF), is also a resettlement instrument (this document) that is prepared by the borrower ( in this case by the Government of Tanzania, represented by the Ministry of Energy and Minerals) when project activities that require land acquisition that leads to physical displacement of persons, and/or loss of shelter, and /or loss of livelihoods and/or loss, denial or restriction of access to economic resources, are not identified at the project preparation stage. The RPF is therefore prepared and disclosed before the 4

proposed project is appraised setting out the resettlement and compensation principles, organizational arrangements and design criteria to be applied to meet the needs of the people who may be affected by the project, when project activities are identified. The RAP is prepared consistent with the provisions of the RPF. 5

A. INTRODUCTION 1. Tanzania s low electricity access rates are serious constraints in rural areas. Despite healthy real economic growth (above 5% p.a. since 2001), low inflation and adequate foreign exchange reserves, access rates remain low: less than 10% of the overall population and only about 1% of the rural population have access electricity. These low rates are a major constraint to higher rural non-farm incomes and an improved quality of life that can be gained not just from improved household lighting,, but also from productive uses and improved service delivery in rural health, education and water facilities. 2. To address these constraints, GoT has launched an ambitious access scale-up program through an establishment of the Rural Energy Agency and the Rural Energy Fund with a target to reach 25% electrification by 2010,, using lower-cost technology and transparent, results-oriented subsidies delivered to Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), a restructured parastatal utility, as well as to other competitive service providers (private sector, cooperatives, NGOs etc.). To maximize the impact, there will be a focus on electricity provision to rural enterprises and social facilities, the latter in order to provide the benefits of increased access to a far broader cross-section of the population within ten years than is possible with just a household connection program. 3. Following the launching of Tanzania s revised National Energy Policy, formally adopted in 2003, a restructuring of the energy sector was initiated. The policy made a division between commercial and rural energy services, giving the Ministry of Energy and Minerals (MEM) the responsibility to increase government efforts to ensure that rural areas and poor households have access to modern energy services. This required a new institutional set up, and a fund for subsidising non-profitable energy provision. In 2005, a new law 1 was passed, enabling the establishment of a Rural Energy Agency (REA) and a Rural Energy Fund (REF). REA Board has been appointed and its management is being recruited. 4. As part of this strategy, the GoT has asked the World Bank to include an offgrid electrification component in the proposed Tanzania Energy Development and Access Project (TEDAP). The overall development objectives of this project are to (i) improve the quality and efficiency of the provision of electric service, and to (ii) establish a sustainable basis for access expansion. To that extent, the project will have a grid and an offgrid component. The present ESMF covers the offgrid component of TEDAP. Separate safeguard documents have been prepared and disclosed for the grid component. 5. The purpose of the offgrid component is to support an institutional set-up for the newly established Rural Energy Agency (REA) and develop and test new offgrid electrification approaches for future scale-up. The project will support this new approach to rural electricity access by funding capital subsidies, business development and 1 The Rural Energy Act, 2005 6

operational support, with technical assistance to build the capacity of sector institutions and new service providers. The project will provide IDA funds, GEF grants, and facilitate carbon finance for purchases of carbon reduction credits.. Also, the project s global objective, in line with GEF OP6, is to remove the barriers to, and reduce the implementation costs of, renewable energy technologies to help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Proposed GEF co-financing supports OP6 strategic priorities expanding productive uses of renewable energy (institutional solar PV systems for social services) and promoting power sector policy frameworks supportive of renewable energy (stand-alone grids). 6. Therefore, to achieve these objectives, the TEDAP is structured into three components as follows; (i) The grid component to focus on urgent investments in Tanzania Electric Company Supply Limited (Tanesco) transmission and distribution network, tentatively US$85 million. There are large investment needs in transmission and distribution as little investment has gone into maintaining and replacing T&D systems since the late 1980 s. Tanesco s current 5-yr investment plan focuses on capacity expansion and needs to be complemented with measures to exploit recent advances in energy efficiency and demand-side management interventions. Of a cumulative investment plan of about US$ 1.3 billion (which includes access expansion), TANESCO has identified urgent T&D investments of over US$ 100 million for key urban areas, for which bidding packages are either under preparation or can be prepared very quickly by technical consultants. The grid component would improve the capacity of existing networks, thus contributing to the financial recovery of Tanesco; improve service quality for existing clients; and allow new clients to connect to the grid in the major urban areas, which are the main growth centers. The project would apply some innovative features for improved technical and commercial performance in these areas, based on experiences in other countries (e.g. Nigeria) to maximize impact of the investments. Specifically, these investments will improve the power system performance by reducing system losses, frequent outages due to overloaded transformers and old equipment, low and fluctuating voltage conditions and poor system power factors. The investments will include adding, replacing or upgrading transmission and distribution lines and substations and medium and low voltage equipment, meters, spare parts and tools. The project will support investments that aim at improving (i) distribution networks for reliable supply (ii) commercial character, (iii) customer interface of TANESCO, and possibly (iv) limited access expansion. The main rationale of these investments is to create value in the electricity business, 7

and to demonstrate its viability in a replicable manner. The component will be implemented by Tanesco. (ii) The offgrid component of US$14 million (plus US$6.5 million of GEF) would support an institutional set-up for the newly established Rural Energy Agency (REA) and develop and test new offgrid electrification approaches for future scale-up. The investments would concentrate particularly on the demonstration of sustainable solar market packages and PV market development (scaling up SIDA s ongoing operation); the implementation of several offgrid electrification mini-grids; and the testing of new service provision models (including private sector, coops, NGOs). The project would also support development of small, renewable, grid-connected projects. Consistent with the JAS growth strategy, the offgrid component will also focus primarily on those offgrid areas where provision of electricity can spur economic growth (subproject screening includes an analysis of the productive use potential). The component will be implemented initially by the Ministry of Energy and Minerals (MEM) and passed on to REA once REA s implementation capacity is established. (SIDA would support capacity building TA for REA). The component would follow a phased approach, so that the model projects can be developed in line with the growing REA capacity. (iii) The technical assistance component of US$ 6 million for a technical assistance will support preparation of the comprehensive access expansion strategy and syndication plan, new investment packages (grid and offgrid), support for legal/technical/financial advisory support for the next least cost IPP, technical studies to optimize TANESCO operations, support to independent offgrid operators, capacity building for TANESCO and REA, and monitoring and evaluation. 7. The proposed RPF will regulate environmental and social aspects of the offgrid component only. Safeguards documents for the grid component have been prepared separately. Specifically, under the offgrid component, Project Sponsors may receive financing to rehabilitate and expand their physical infrastructure to provide access to new customers. It is envisaged that some of these sub projects will involve expansion of servitudes, existing grids, new grids (interconnected or interdependent for transmission and distribution), sub stations, power stations, micro-hydro facilities. 8. Under this Component therefore, land would have to be acquired or reserved servitudes (rights of ways) used to locate these new infrastructure requirements. However, since Tanzania is such a large country, approximately 945,000 km 2, with a population size of only about 36m, representing an average population density as low as 38 persons/sq. km, and also because most of these investments would be for the extension of distribution lines, it would be possible in a majority of cases to make significant efforts to locate these physical infrastructural investments on land that deliberately avoids or minimizes impacts on people, land, property, including and especially peoples access to natural and other economic resources, as far as is possible. 8

9. Notwithstanding, land acquisition and/or land use by the project sponsors that may lead to either the physical or economic displacement of people or their loss, denial or restriction of access to economic resources and therefore ultimately to resettlement and compensation of people seems inevitable in some cases for certain types of investments. It is expected that these cases would be few and far between, and would be the exception rather than the rule. This is possible because of the uneven and varying settlement patterns and population densities across Tanzania, since significantly large portions of the country are designated as environmentally sensitive areas 2, such as the national parks and the surrounding/adjacent areas of many wetlands, lakes and rivers, etc. The areas around national parks and game reserves are generally very lightly populated and those around wetlands, river and lakes are more densely populated due to livelihood opportunities for many Tanzanians, from use of economic resources in these ecosystems. 10. When these cases occur, the World Bank Operational Policy OP4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement and certain laws of Tanzania will be triggered. 11. At this stage of preparation of the TEDAP however, the Government of the Tanzania or intended Project Sponsors are not required to prepare a Resettlement and Compensation Plan since the sub project locations have not yet been identified and therefore their land needs have also not been determined. However, the Government of the Tanzania is required by the World Bank to prepare a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) during project preparation to be publicly disclosed in Tanzania and at the info shop of the Bank, before appraisal of this project. The RPF establishes the resettlement and compensation principles, organizational arrangements and design criteria to be applied to meet the needs of the people who may be affected by the TEDAP s offgrid component. The RPF is prepared to the standards of the GoT s own policy on resettlement and the policy of the World Bank, OP4.12. 12. When the land/sites are identified, for the sites that trigger OP 4.12, resettlement/compensation plans will be closely coordinated with the planning and implementation of civil works and then subsequently prepared consistent with this policy framework by the project sponsors and will be submitted to the Bank for approval before any land acquisition, resettlement, loss, denial of, and restriction to economic resources or any other impact on livelihood occurs. 13. This RPF covers the following sections; B. Principles and objectives governing resettlement preparation and implementation. C. A description of the process for preparing and approving resettlement plans. 2 Tanzania has a much bigger land surface area devoted to resource conservation (29%) than most countries. The hierarchical protected-area system consists of national parks (12), game reserves (28), the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1), and game-controlled areas (38), comprising a total of 240,000 km2. In addition to the wildlife-protected areas, there are 540 forest reserves covering 132,000 km 2, equivalent to 15% of the total woodland and forest area in Tanzania. There is also the Mafia Island Marine Park. 9

D. Land acquisition and likely categories of impact. E. Eligibility criteria for defining various categories of project affected persons. F. A legal Framework reviewing the fit between the laws of Tanzania and regulations and Bank policy requirements and measures proposed to bridge any gaps between them. G. Methods of valuing affected assets. H. Organizational procedures for the delivery of entitlements, including, for projects involving private sector intermediaries, the responsibilities of the financial intermediary, the government, and the private developer. I. A description of the implementation process, linking resettlement implementation to civil works. J. A description of the grievance redress mechanisms. K. A description of the arrangements for funding resettlement, including the preparation and review of cost estimates, the flow of funds, and contingency arrangements. L. A description of mechanisms for consultations with, and participation of, displaced persons in planning, implementation, and monitoring. M. Arrangements for monitoring by the implementation agency and, if required, by independent monitors. 14. This RPF governs all activities funded under the TEDAP s offgrid compoennt, and is to be used in conjunction with the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) that has also been prepared for this program as a separate stand alone document, also disclosed at the Bank info shop and in Tanzania. B. PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES GOVERNING RESETTLEMENT PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION. The impacts due to involuntary resettlement from development projects, if left unmitigated, often gives rise to severe economic, social and environmental risks resulting in production systems being dismantled, people facing impoverishment when their productive skills may be less applicable and the competition for resources greater; community institutions and social networks being weakened; kin groups being dispersed; and cultural identity, traditional authority, and the potential for mutual help are diminished or lost. 10

The World Bank Safeguard policy OP 4.12, in most cases, is triggered because the project activity causes land acquisition, whereby a physical piece of land is needed and people may be affected because they are cultivating on that land, they may have buildings on the land, they may use the land for water and grazing of animals or they may otherwise access the land economically, spiritually or any other way which may not be possible during and after the project is implemented. Therefore, people are in most cases need to be compensated for their loss (of land, property or access) either in kind or in cash of which the former is preferred. Actual physical displacement of people under the TEDAP offgrid component is unlikely. Therefore, the objectives of this policy are the following; (i) Involuntary resettlement and land acquisition should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternatives. (ii) Where involuntary resettlement and land acquisition is unavoidable, resettlement and compensation activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to give the persons economically or physically displaced by the project the opportunity to share in the project benefits. Displaced and compensated persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. (iii) Displaced (economically or physically) and compensated persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher. Affected people, according to the Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12, refers to people who are directly affected socially and economically by the bank assisted investment projects, caused by: or (a) the involuntary taking of land and other assets resulting in: a. relocation or loss of shelter b. loss of assets or access to assets c. loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must move to another location; (b) the involuntary restriction or access to legally designated parks and protected areas results in adverse impacts on the livelihood of the economically or physically displaced persons. The Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12 applies to all components under the program, whether or not they are directly funded in whole or in part by the Bank. 11

The policy applies to all (economically or physically) displaced persons regardless of the total number affected, the severity of impact and whether or not they have legal title to the land. Particular attention should be paid to the needs of vulnerable groups among those (economically or physically) displaced especially those below the poverty line; the land less, the elderly, women and children, indigenous groups and ethnic minorities or other (economically or physically) displaced persons who may not be protected through the GoT s Land compensation legislation. In particular for the TEDAP, the policy also requires that the implementation of individual resettlement plans are a prerequisite for the implementation of the project sponsors activities requiring land acquisition/land use, to ensure that displacement(economic or physical) or restriction to access does not occur before necessary measures for resettlement and compensation are in place. It is further required that these measures include provision of compensation and of other assistance required for relocation, prior to (economical or physical) displacement, and preparation and provision of resettlement sites with adequate facilities, where required. In particular, the taking of land and related assets may take place only after compensation has been paid and where applicable, resettlement sites, new homes, related infrastructure, public services and moving allowances have been provided to economically or physically displaced persons. Furthermore, where relocation or loss of shelter occurs, the policy further requires that measures to assist the displaced persons are implemented in accordance with the resettlement plan of action. In this program, implementation of the project sponsors subprojects are expected to have overall positive social impacts, simply because increased access to affordable and reliable power in peri rural areas, and in health and education facilities and in agriculture, and employment creation opportunities, will thereby significantly increase the standard of living of peri-urban and rural residents. Notwithstanding, there are considerable risks to the success of the project as a whole if the negative social impacts on some of the targeted beneficiaries (i.e. the rural poor) are left unmitigated. These negative social impacts include denial, restriction or loss of access to the economic resources in the areas that may be required by the project sponsors in pursuance of their activities. When this happens, people will be impacted and resettlement and compensation cannot be avoided and the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12 will be triggered even though they may not have to physically move to another location. Offering Project Affected People the opportunity to continue to participate in the planning process that would lead to the preparation of Resettlement Plans is mandatory and Section L of this RPF deals with this requirement. Moreover, offering Project Affected People the opportunity for employment in project activities or to be providers of services during construction of the civil works, e.g. for supply of construction materials (e.g. gravel, sand etc.), will provide additional income generating opportunities to a significant number of impacted persons who may potentially have to be resettled. Furthermore, it is worthy to note that rush migration to selected land sites may occur by those wishing to take advantage of the rules of eligibility in Section B of this RPF. Were 12

this to happen it would bring to bear additional pressures on the whole planning process, compensation budgets and increase the tendency for conflict among users. This has major considerations therefore when establishing the cut-off dates. The establishment of cut of dates is discussed in Section E. A major object of this RPF is to ensure that project affected persons are meaningfully consulted, have participated in the planning process, are adequately compensated to ensure that their livelihood has been restored or improved and that the process has been a fair and transparent one. C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS FOR PREPARING AND APPROVING RESETTLEMENT PLANS. The RPF has been prepared since the location of the sub-projects to be financed under TEDAP offgrid component is not known at the time of the preparation of the project. Once the individual sub-projects are identified and if OP 4.12 is triggered individual Resettlement Plans must be prepared, consistent with this RPF. To address the impacts under this policy, resettlement plans must include measures to ensure that the project affected persons are; (a) (b) (c) (d) informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement. consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives. provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses of assets and access attributable to the project. enabled to restore and preferably improve their living standards compared to pre-project ones. Therefore, the first stage in the process of preparing the individual resettlement plans is the screening process to identify the land acquisition and land use needs that will cause resettlement. The resettlement and compensation plans will contain the analysis of alternative sites undertaken during the land screening process. The targeted project sponsors will be the service providers and operators in the electricity sector, including Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO) and other project sponsors, such as private sector companies, cooperatives, NGOs in the offgrid areas and on the renewable energy side -- solar PV technology, Micro-hydro power, wind, biomass, etc. The land screening process presented here below is designed to take advantage of and to build upon the existing planning structures that the project sponsors have in place and have successfully been using in the past to plan for extension and new services. 13

The Land Selection Screening Process This process would lead to the identification, selection and acquisition of Land consistent with the provisions of OP 4.12 that would be required for use by the project sponsors for their planned activities. In planning for expansion and/or provision of access to new areas, as is current practice, the first step in this process would be for the project sponsors to acquire expert assistance (technical teams) to carryout the required technical work. The technical teams will carry out a fairly comprehensive land survey in the areas where the work is being planned to enable engineering drawings to be prepared that would provide precise and comprehensive detailed information for planning, costing and designing. On these drawings also, will be information on the exact location and land site parameters that the planned sub project will need. This is the modus operandi of the project sponsors at the moment. During the land surveying exercises, the technical teams will meet with the District administration to carry out a preliminary assessment to determine whether there may be potentially affected people on the sites they have identified on the drawings that may trigger the provisions of OP4.12 as detailed in Section. If there are resettlement and compensation issues, at this stage, the technical teams will use their discretion based on their acquired skills, to determine the impact of these issues and whether they would be fairly large and too costly to mitigate according to the provisions of this RPF. Based on the decision of the technical teams a further decision would be made to identify alternative sites/routes that have little or no resettlement and compensation issues. If no resettlement and compensation issues are involved or if there are no alternative routes/sites possible, then the original proposed route will be maintained. The reason for this is to arm the decision makers of the project sponsors with good information and choices from the field. Once these drawings are ready and information on the site location and land use requirements are available, before a final decision by the project sponsors is made to go ahead with the project, for cases where resettlement and compensation issues arise, the consultative and participatory process with local communities must begin at this stage by sensitizing the respective local/traditional administration and leaders about the tentative land needs of the sub project. The respective local/traditional leaders will meet consistent with their local practices, with all the respective leaders of the homesteads/villages involved. It is at this first meeting of the local traditional leaders and administration and homesteads/villages that the cut off- date 3 is to be decided for each affected land/area and communicated to all the homesteads/villages in the potentially affected areas. 3 The significance in establishing a cut of date is discussed in Section E. 14

A representative of the Project Sponsor would have to be present at these meetings to report back to the Project Sponsors on when to start the socio-economic studies and census on the land/areas required by the sub projects resulting in loss, denial, restriction of access to economic resources. Therefore, for the situations where OP4.12 apply, for each land site (whether existing or new) that has potential PAPs, each project sponsor will commission the carrying out of a socio- economic study and a census to identify the potential PAPs on the individual, household and vulnerable groups level, as the first step in the preparation of the RAPs. The purpose of the socio-economic study is also to collect base line data within the chosen/targeted sites/areas/homesteads/villages thereby enabling the social impact assessment of potentially affected populations/communities/homesteads/villages. The socio-economic study would focus on the identification of stakeholders (demographic data), the participation process, identification of affected people (including owners and users of land) and impact on their property and their production systems, the institutional analysis and the system for monitoring and evaluation. Detailed calculation of individual and household economies and identification of all impacts will be undertaken as part of the socio-economic study and be the determinant in the potential compensation process. Standard characteristics of the affected households, including a description of production systems, labor, and household organization, and baseline information on livelihoods (including production levels and incomes derived from both formal and informal economic activities) and standards of living and health status of the PAPs. Under this study a comprehensive base line census would be carried out to identify potentially affected people on the individual and household levels, vulnerable groups (women, children, the elderly, female headed households, affected internally displaced people, affected internally displaced households, etc.) and to discourage inflow of people ineligible for assistance. The socio-economic study and baseline census will be carried out on behalf of the project sponsors..the socio-economci study and baseline census data and studies are best carried out by qualified consultants in the field of social sciences and experienced relevant national university departments. On completion of the socio- economic study and the baseline census the project sponsor will prepare a resettlement and compensation plan (RAP) for each site that is affected by resettlement and compensation. The approval of the respective District Executive Director and the World Bank through the Department of Energy, for the process of land selection and screening will be sought by the project sponsors. Where the impacts on the entire displaced population are minor (i.e. if affected people are not physically displaced and less than 10% of their productive assets are lost) or fewer than 200 people are displaced (economically or physically) per project sponsor, the bank may approve the preparation of an Abbreviated Resettlement Plan (ARAP). The contents of the ARAP are to be: 15

(a) a census survey of displaced (economically or physically) persons and valuation of assets. (b) Description of compensation and other resettlement assistance to be provided. (c) Consultations with displaced people about acceptable alternatives. (d) Institutional responsibility for implementation and procedures for grievance redress (e) Arrangements for monitoring and implementation, and (f) A timetable and budget. For impacts that are not considered minor, the preparation of a Resettlement Plan (RAP) is required for each site. World bank OP 4.12 article 25 sets the requirements of the RAP to include; (a) Description of the project; (b) Potential Impacts; (c) Objectives; (d) Socioeconomic Studies; (e) Legal Framework; (f) Institutional Framework; (g) Eligibility; (h) Valuation of and compensation for losses; (i) Resettlement measures; (j) Site selection, site preparation, and relocation; (k) Housing, infrastructure, and social services; (l) Environmental protection and management; (m) Community participation; (n) Integration with host populations (o) Grievance procedures; (p) Organizational responsibilities; (q) Implementation schedule; (r) Cost and budget (s) Monitoring and evaluation. The resettlement and compensation plans would then be forwarded for screening and approval to the respective District Executive Director in compliance with the program institutional and administrative requirements. All approved productive investments that trigger OP4.12 and their resettlement and compensation plans would be subject to the final approval of the World Bank to ensure compliance with bank safeguards. Thus ensuring that before land is actually acquired or access to resources is lost, denied or restricted, that the individual resettlement and compensation plans are in line with the directive of OP 4.12. For the World Bank to approve funding for any project sponsor that needs to acquire land to support proposed investments under this program, the project sponsor must first secure legal title to land that is acquired, consistent with the 16

provisions of this RPF. For investments on land that is already owned by the project sponsor, the World Bank will only approve funding for the project sponsors sub projects once it is satisfied that the provisions of this RPF were met in cases where OP 4.12 apply. In cases where the land was acquired and there were no resettlement and compensation issues the project sponsors would have to also seek the confirmation of the World Bank that provisions of OP 4.12 do not apply before funding will be approved and must secure the site and also choose a cut-of date for that site so that opportunistic migration by camp followers can be avoided. The above screening process should be used by the project sponsors in their preparation of their productive investments to enhance their likelihood for approval. Furthermore, the respective District Executive Directors (DEDs) should as a guideline consider the cumulative factor and not approve multiple sites that have individual high impact intensity. For example, where land acquisition is required to such an extent that it would require more than 20% of a community s/village or individual s/homestead s total land under use or when the mitigation measures are so cumbersome that their efficacy cannot be predetermine or they cost more than 15% of the investment budget. Before the decision to approve a site is taken, the DEDs would need to approve or disapprove the resettlement and compensation plans of the project sponsors proposed investments in totality with the overall environmental and social screening process that has been applied for each of their proposed investments and to also approve or disapprove of the proposed mitigation measures, if any. The proposed investments are expected to be significantly large (in terms of geographical coverage) and in the context of Tanzania s long and strong cultural practices governing rural life, the cumulative effect of even minimal resettlement in this program, on the entire country s way of life must be made and reviewed at the level of the DEDs on the possible impact these mitigation measures would have on future land reform and residential planning. Capacity will be built at the level of the project sponsors and their technical team and at the offices of the DEDs, by providing technical assistance to allow the project sponsors themselves to screen their proposed productive investments for environmental and social concerns. This training will also include the capacity to develop mitigation measures to meet environmental and social impacts and to prepare implementation of such measures. This would build capacity at the level of the project sponsors with regards to environmental and social safeguards issues, which is crucial for success of this program. D. LAND ACQUISITION AND LIKELY CATEGORIES OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS AND DISAGGREGATION OF PAPS Until the exact project location sites are determined, it will not be possible to estimate the likely number of people who may be affected since the technical details of the proposed productive investments by the project sponsors have not yet been developed and are unknown. 17

However, the likely displaced (economically or physically) persons can be categorized into these 3 groups, namely; (i) Affected Individual An individual who suffers loss of assets or investments, land and property and/or access to natural and/or economical resources as a result of the program activities and to whom compensation is due. For example, an affected individual is a person who farms a land or works and lives on a farm, pastoralists whose routes have been altered, or a person who has built a structure on land that has been demarcated and is now required by the project sponsor. This will include affected individuals who have economic activity on road reserves, rights of way and other servitudes and on customary land. (ii) Affected Household a household is affected if one or more of its members is affected by the program activities, either by loss of property, land, loss of access or otherwise affected in any way by program activities. This provides for: (a) any members in the households, men, women, children, dependent relatives and friends, tenants (b) vulnerable individuals who may be too old or ill to farm along with the others (c) members of households who cannot reside together because of cultural rules, but who depend on one another for their daily existence (d) members of households who may not eat together but provide housekeeping, or reproductive services critical to the family s maintenance, and (e) other vulnerable people who cannot participate for physical or cultural reasons in production, consumption, or co-residence. In the local cultures, members of production, consumption, and co-resident groups form overlapping, often incongruent sets of people who may exchange domestic or farming services on a regular basis even though living separately. Compensation will not be limited to people who live together in a co-resident group, since this might leave out people whose labor contributions are critical to the functioning of the household. For example, among polygamous settings, each wife has their own home. (iii) Vulnerable Households in Tanzania vulnerable households may have different land needs from most households or needs unrelated to the amount of land available to them. They may already be undergoing some form of rehabilitation including training to acquire vocational skills in purpose built centers and or other forms of special care. This provides for; a) Unmarried women may be dependent on sons, brothers, or others for support. Since an affected individual is able to name the person with whom s/he is linked in dependency as part of the household, resettlement will never sever this link. 18

b) Elderly elderly people farm or work as long as they are able. Their economic viability may depend on how much land they farm or how much they produce because, by producing even small amounts of food to exchange with others, they can subsist on cooked food and generous return gifts of cereal from people such as their kith and kin and neighbors. Losing land will affect their economic viability. What would damage their economic viability even more than losing land is resettlement that separates them from the person or household on whom they depend for their support. The definition of household by including dependents avoids this. c) AIDS afflicted persons a relatively high percentage of the poor and total population are living with HIV or are terminally ill with AIDS. Many are beneficiaries of numerous health programs from government (central and local), international organizations and the NGO community. d) Orphans due to the impacts of the AIDS crisis that plagues Tanzania today, there are a considerable number of orphaned children, whose parents have died from aids. These children today fall into three categories of care; (i) those being looked after by an uncle, aunt, grandparents or other close relative, (ii) those being looked after by the government, local authorities or ngos and (iii) those living alone and providing for themselves and other siblings. These children are more vulnerable since they are often voiceless because they have no parents to defend or stand up for them and also because they are considered too young to be heard. Orphaned children engage in any form of economic activity to provide for themselves and their siblings, by engaging in activities such as paraffin selling, artisanal mining, water selling, exploitative employment etc. e) Despite the laws of Tanzania and the International Labor Organization (ILO) prohibiting the exploitation of children, it is a reality that street children are either in paid employment or are on the streets in some areas in Tanzania. They tend to live in close proximity to large towns and cities. Children in d) and e) above should they become impacted by this project in a way that means they have to be physically relocated, their compensation cannot be in cash. They would have to be put in a Unicef program or registered with one of the many children s charities that are operating in Tanzania today. Their compensation would take the form of paying for their rehabilitation and training to acquire useful vocational skills. 19

f) Women headed households may depend on husbands, sons, brothers or others for support. However, in other cases too, women are the main breadwinner in their household even where the men have remained with the family. Women therefore need relatively easy access to health service facilities, as mothers and wives. For example, where the land being acquired is used by a woman with no formal rights to it or a woman who is dependent on a man other than her husband for her primary income. These women should not be resettled in a way that separates them from their households as the very survival of their households may depend on them. Their compensation must take into account all these factors. g) Small-scale female farmers- are also vulnerable because they may not have men available within the household to carry out male specific land preparation tasks such as ringing trees, clearing or ploughing land. Either male relatives in other households help them voluntarily, or they hire men for cash, beer (locally brewed) or food. Land compensation specifically includes the labor costs of preparing a new land, so these women are provided for by the compensation plan. h) Non-farming females- these earn income from other sources and/or depend on relatives for exchanges of staple foods. Since they do not farm they will not be affected by the sub-projects need for agricultural land. If a building of theirs lies on land needed by a subproject, they will receive replacement cost compensation. If someone on whom they depend is resettled, they are protected because the resettler can name them as part of the household. These household types are not mutually exclusive, so that a female heading a household may also be a small-scale farmer or on orphan may be an aids afflicted person. These groups are being identified as particularly vulnerable so that special attention would be paid to them by identifying their needs from the socio-economic and baseline study so that (i) they are individually consulted and given the opportunity (i.e. not left out) to participate in the project activities, ( ii) that their resettlement and compensation is designed to improve their pre-project livelihood (iii) special attention is paid to monitor them to ensure that their pre-project livelihood is indeed improved upon (iv) they are given technical and financial assistance if they wish to make use of the grievance mechanisms of the project and (v) decisions concerning them are made in the shortest possible time. 20

E. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR DEFINING VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS The Bank s OP4.12 suggests the following three criterion for eligibility; a) Those who have formal rights to land (including customary/village land, traditional and religious rights, recognized under Tanzanian Law). b) Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets provided that such claims are recognized under the national and local laws of Tanzania or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan. c) Those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying, using or getting their livelihood from. Those covered under a) and b) above are to be provided compensation for the land they lose, and other assistance in accordance with the policy. Persons covered under c) above are to be provided with resettlement assistance in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance, as necessary, to achieve the objectives set out in this policy, if they occupy the project area prior to a cut-off date established by the local traditional leaders in close consultation with the potential PAPs, local community leaders and the respective Village Administration and the District Administration and acceptable to the Bank. Persons who encroach on the area after the cut-off date are not entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance. All persons included in a), b) or c) above are to be provided with compensation for loss of assets other than land. Therefore, it is clear that all project affected persons irrespective of their status or whether they have formal titles, legal rights or not, squatters or otherwise encroaching illegally on land, are eligible for some kind of assistance if they occupied the land before the entitlement cut-off date. Persons who encroach the area after the socio-economic study (census and valuation) are not eligible for compensation or any form of resettlement assistance. Eligibility for Community Compensation Communities (districts, towns, wards and villages) permanently losing land and/or access to assets and or resources under customary rights will be eligible for compensation. Example of community compensation could be for public toilets, market place, taxi parks, schools and health posts. The rationale for this is to ensure that the pre-project socio-economic status of communities where adversely impacted, is also restored. Method to Determine the Cut Off Dates 21