AFFDAVT to be attached to the OBAMA TREASON LTGATON Unde the penalty of pejuy We (Nicholas E Pupua and Donald R Laste J) make the follow statements unde oath and futhe states each allegation can be suppoted by iefutable documentation as set foth in Supeme Cout Petition fo Wit of Cetioai Pupua v Sebelius Case No 117275 Most significant Petitiones set foth ovewhelming evidence contained within a legal action against HR 3590 Petitiones legal challenges demonstated that agents unde the full and complete authoity of M Baak Hussein Obama alk/a Bay Soetoo acting in collusion with membes of the Depatment of Justice and Judiciay did so intentionally obstuct justice; committed pejuy; acted in concet in failing to adjudicate poven faud; epeatedly violated legal pecedent set foth by the Supeme Cout of the United States n shot they displayed a total disegad fo the Constitution of these United States On Septembe 20th 2010 Mistes Pupua and Laste instituted a Petition challenging the Constitutional validity of the Patient Potection and Affodable Cae Act HR 3590 that violates the US Constitution in no less than 19 specific instances as cited within Petitiones 15 Count Petition and at no time did any Acto named heein deny o set foth evidence to the contay concening any allegation befoe the Couts Those named Actos in the legal documents as ecoded befoe the Supeme Cout epeatedly denied Petitiones thei Civil Rights ignoed the Fedeal Rules of Pocedue and most significant the actos named in Petitiones legal action ae guilty of Civil RCO as well as cimes against the citizens of these United States The teasonous behavio of the playes named in the Petition acting in concet as agents fo M Baak Hussein Obama have made a complete mockey of the laws and the Constitution of these United States Fo the pupose of this Affidavit we will biefly list a numbe of illegal atocious (see attached document) that will demonstate that a RCO action is not only waanted but must be fothcoming if ou Republic and ule of law is to have any meaning As Ameicans We the People can no longe be subject to ciminal totalitaian entepise acting unde the colo of law that epeatedly ubbe stamp legislation that is clealy unconstitutional That being said each playe named heein violated thei oath of office and by law thei emoval is in ode as ae ciminal chages Distict Cout (Tenton) Justice Feda L Wolfson epeatedly obstucted justice acting in concet with the Justice Depatment thoughout the poceedings while adjudicating the matte of Pupua v Sibelius did so by ignoing pope judicial pocedue uled on issues not popely befoe the Cout intentionally ignoed evidence facts and law; and disegaded the poven fact that the Depatment of Justice fofeited thee consecutive times At all times having efused to allow any official ecod be ceated o allow any open poceeding to occu
Cout of Appeals 3 d Cicuit Cout Judges Joseph A Geenway and Thomas Vanaskie both appointed by M Obama openly and blatantly ignoed ules of pocedue evidence and authoed legal decisions setting foth odes void subject matte juisdiction ignoing the judicial Conduct Code and the United States Code see 28 USC Section 455 that peclude them fom taking pat in any poceeding due to thei significant financial inteest in the outcome of the poceedings U S Supeme Cout Justices Sonia Sotomayo and Elena Kagan like Judges Geenaway and Vanaskie by US statutoy law (see 28 USC 455) wee equied to ecuse themselves since they wee appointed by M Obama They efused! Thei taking pat in the decision making pocess illegally influenced the outcome of the Couts decision Please take Judicial Notice: Each allegation named above is documented and pat of the Official Recod in evey Cout in which Petitiones appeaed The complete ecod (pages 1 677) is attached to Supeme Cout Case No 117275 including demands fo ecusals and investigations Fo expediency we (Nicholas E Pupua and Donald R Laste J) will pesent one example that was pat of the 19 violations pesented to each Cout demonstating faud absolute and iefutable Count 1 deals with Aticle 1 Section 7 Paagaph 1 of the United States Constitution the Oigination Clause Poven and not denied thoughout all legal poceedings the Congessional leadeship acted with faudulent intent They took an unelated House Bill (HR 3590 named the Sevice Membes Owneship Tax Act of 2009) extacted the entie contents of said legislation then eplaced the contents with the Senates oiginated bill (Ameicas Healthy Futue Act S1796 ) a pecuso to the Act They did this to give the appeaance of Constitutional legality in passage of the Act Theeafte the leadeship with faudulent intent substituted the oiginal name Sevice Membes Owneship Tax Act of 2009 (HR 3590) with Patient Potection and Affodable Cae Act to sueptitiously acquie a House Designation Numbe Constitutional law states only the House of Repesentatives has Constitutional authoity to oiginate evenue aising Bills The House accepted the Senate bill fo expediency independent of any witten House bill n fact both sides of the contovesy ask Judge Roge Vinson (US Distict Cout fo Nothen Floida) to addess the legislative histoy of the Act He found that the bill oiginated in the US Senate See Floida v Us Depatment of Health & Human Sevice F Suppp2d 2011 WL285683 (ND Fla2011) which documents that the House of Repesentatives was voting on and accepted a Senate oiginated evenue aising Bill since it was found to have been oiginated in the Senate What makes this issue ipe fo eview is that the Supeme Cout of the United States explicitly uled that the penalties wee in fact taxes So the question emains whee ae the lawsuits since it is incontovetible the bill on its face is unconstitutional Regadless even if the entie House
and Senate uled it is to become law the United States Constitutions Oigination Clause has not been evoked (see Aticle 1 Section 7 Paagaph 1) and the law is unconstitutional n Conclusion With all ights eseved to add to this Affidavit and if futhe violations (19 in all) have to be explained what this investigative body o juists must conside: do you allow this faud to be continued and become a paty to and playes in the Act? RCO is unambiguous as is case law in evey Cicuit in these United States afte being infomed of a cime and ignoing said cime you become a playe in the cime Please Special Take Judicial Notice: t is also impotant to conside in an action bought in New Jesey to emove M Obama fom the ballot it was admitted and not denied that M Baak Obama has yet to pesent any evidence that he is/was eligible to be on the ballot in the State of New Jesey t has been admitted that no documentation exists in the State of New Jesey that M Baak Hussein Obama submitted any papes attesting to his eligibility to be placed on the ballot in 2008 o 2012 Neve befoe in Ameican juispudence have we seen juists on the couts ignoe the main fact that thee was no evidence pesented in the Healthcae Petition cited above o in the heaing on whethe M Obama is qualified to be on the ballot in the state of New Jesey Defendants in connivance with the political epobates appointed to the bench in the State of New Jesey have made a mockey of the laws of ou State and Nation The fact those epesenting M Obama in New Jesey on the ecod stated that even Mickey Mouse could un without poof of eligibility demonstates the beakdown of ule of law in these United States The fact emains M Obama has yet to file a cetificate that he is qualified fo the office as demanded by law No does he intend to and thus not a single electoal vote should be ganted to Baak Hussein Obama until he pesents documentation poving he is qualified to seve as Pesident of these United States Respectfully submitted Nicholas E Pupua Donald R Laste J
l JP l l)l \ L l\( A 1 0 t Po }1 2:fO N: uyltt3ej1ettlls; : ppeal!t: a : j:( :; 1 ] J / : ;/ ;J / :! /CJliilleniiigth e P1\ta6 Jttotectiol{anll Affodable Cae Act ); \ J; : #» 1/:iF / f :: /( ; nhatis eally in}lje:law p The lga! action Pupua v Sebelius (Distict Cout Case No 3:10cv04814 Appeals Cout 112303) s the mosfcompehens{vi awsulttntheeounty conslsttag ofa 15 CounConsntutlonal based chanengecitiog ) <ee{9) Spfficltions?fthe UiSConstitution and setous ciiflic(s: th f 4)exisgls :i: Count 1: Judg Vinson in Floida conclded the Act igmatedin the US Seate ad consists f vaiety oftaxes and eveuueatslng elated povisions This is clealy a violation of AFtiell : ; Section 1 Paagaph 1 which equies evenue aisingbills to olginate in :tbjjouse of Repesentatives: < : :: :: / / : 10 & ( tt Clit 2 Ti{Act U:nc6nstitutionUy mindate you to buy a poduct i;pattidpti!tg;i:n) n activity comphes witli and is subject to the commece clase The ia flysj!tsiji ypuae / j: :ilie and ieathlng amfma:vneedmedical cae you ae equid titpuhase insuance: TRey o::: : j!illythis ugti=l Section 8 Pagaph 3:f the Fe4aGvelmt can makeyou :puchase a poductwhathse cad they odeyou to do? / 1 J i e :: t J 4 l! /:;;( Count 3: nvfolation ofaticle 1; Section 8PaagnipfiS 121415 and 16ofthe CohstftUtion;the:Aci ceates a Amy Meical C0t:P unde the Pesidents total contol with!hig to yy it unde the guise of an tdetlicalemegenc eal o othise :!i!ln tjw#9!!g1l!fesan ; : D)asionoinsuection (o aci udihiteally The Fedeal G9vennen! has lq ska:stateif t : / : wants help befoe it can lielp 11 State fo anything else (tnkl!atuaidlstes) t lsups the : :» :/ <: posslcomittitus Act: And clea yusups thei(inding appopiation poviston ofthcus : Constltution thatonly allowsfunding fo 2yeasQt;lyeas as done)nthe!act:: i J 66 / o < d Counta: The COJistitution pohibitsputting atax on you fo just fo existing in Aticle 1Setion 9 anigniph 4: Tile tact iolatthe Capitatl?D p 1si!Tiiis lw lstae speciflcallyon thepesbn topoviae sevices and poductsto othes / /! e ::Cont5:Th; Act levies taes on jnedical d;es xpoij:ed fomthe Statesinviolatiob:ofAitldt(i : :; :Section 9 Paagaph 5 and lias diffeent ules lo dlffeeut States n violitiop of f\ticlf1 1 </ Section 9 Paagaph 6 Clealy none of this sallowed by out Constitution: /) : < / Cunt6: i / : : j The lawas neve ppely signed int law ic M Obsot na;l t:n t Natual bcmcitizenship can be thoughtof as!ipod;bon in the countymothes a citizen: aha fathe sa citizen Obaas (atbeapve citizen:oqheus}he DOJ fofeited on ; tbis Count theebyacquiesced to that fact!ht Qbawa s not anatualoi Qitizen j ; : : a CO\nl7 Th la takes (phanto) income based on yo actual income in essence ceating double :;;: ;!ati en yu eal income Amendment 16 ;allows fo an iccime taf ohachi illc6m6ut :: Qs nat allpw ne to ta comethatdoes no exist / L ;: / C01int8::Youpivacy ights (lppa}as well asamendment 4a:eQuttbe windo)y The govenment can selze you ecods without waants in ode to insue you puchased the govenment mandated insuance egadless whethe you want to puchase : healthcae insuance o puchased insuancealemty: And toinsueyoushouid o shouldnot:feceive medical cfe T : c }E Count9: ;: sfod y oyou PJjatepopety and money The Govnentcan : <? : z: j! ; : / k hi;t1: ty? 24/Aug/2011 h :/ / : / seize you moiiy ani : pf()pety to insue you have the govenment mandated insuance Amendment 5!tas been :t endeedmeanlngless The Act has poyisioits thatpohibit any tudi<?ielyunde X : cicumstances n shot it endes Amendtnent13 meaningless ceating involuntayiyitud to thefedef1 G9venment YQlLhave to have t() pay fop uisuildce so that the Govenment can povide sevices to eveyone else fee ;: ; ; / J
ft l ; c i p :i!: ;:» j j s \L::;/oof1 :J; { ; : Count 10: Equal potection unde Amendment14 no longe exists; The ndividualis/notthe S1andai? ) < anym aie thegfyup is thestandad You potljtion as:aniddividti1hltsdpbeeplac witli ocialjustice:the gevenment decideswhich goupsae)obe exempt povision; : < ailllwhkh goupswilfbe givenptefeentialte1ttment : ;: c ; fom y ( /< C01inHHfyou aea MEMBERofa select eligious goup that disallows lnsuaneepyou aeexempt: ; fomthe lndivldualmandate f you ae opp9sedto it on pesqnal);eligiysgfoundsbtitnna ; membe of dne ofthese select goups (an slamic oamish sect foexmlne) soy you ae ; ( still obhgatedtohavethe insuancefheegoes aheast pat ofajnebdim!litl Tlieest wonf : befa behind in being tossed on the tash heap F e : C 12:Again say goodbye to due poct;ss and judjclal potection The :4ct endes Amendment 5 and the antitust potection meallingssl?! Jlll and void that is unless youe a A <: govenment agecy then of couse mnop:qly is9ka}i :SayheltoJo tile single paye health / caesystem a!ldj cefllypland eonon;tythink of tbt:pefupct Soviet Unions economy o YeneelllScue6tc6nomy ; ;1 Count 13: Thiscount shows howthe Act:ndes the :Anti!Tust ActAmendment 5 due pocess and Amendment 14 null and void unless youe a membe of the Fedeal Govenment selected goup The Appeal points to actual povisions in the Act citing povisions by page numbe Ofcouse the DOJfailed to pove a siqgle allegatidn wong Coun(13shows Violations of Title Vof the Civil Rights tawwhee tile vac1 gants special pivileges select goups yes mtnoltles and othe definedgoups The Act Taxescetain individuals as well as exempting othes Tile fedeal Govenment failed to eply theeby by law fofeited n an honest Cout ;: thecewoul4 be?ve( / : = h d to h : ; Count14: ThSCount goes to thel)asis of the suit itself; a t6tajdisegatd :Co theunited States: Constitution which the FedeaGovenment waunble Jo dispute : fofeiting yet again Th; ( : Repesentatives and Senatos failed to pefom thei jobspopely 01obey ti oaths and keep thei wod to epesent us andthe Statespopely 01 < s : l j;;o ;; ; : [ : oj ;{ ; J:j< i ;1: l \ Count 15: This Countshows how theact: endes AJlendD!ent 10maningless o nuli and void; S9 fa no less than J Ci}it C01}tagt)with us (petitiones) But the Act goes futhe than that: it makes ou State govenment subsevient tothe FedealGevenmentzlt dtetateswhat and what not the taxpayes o(new Jesy;as well aseyeyoth f State willhaveto aeuln ; shqi!its tx!ioi (thouf:c:pejentation wh!ch<endes States ghts:n;eangless : : Di*! the Soveeign;Stlltes of the Union ceate a limited Fedeal Govenment with only designat l!thojty and p\ve t c»» t \; :v! cos: Most Ameicans know the status quo cannot continue This Healthcae legislation hasuothing batso:eve to do with healthcae its about total contol ove the medical industy onesixth of the US Economy and futheing the total cont?lve the est Foa oe thooug eview?ue)s ofy?u and ou guaanteed Constitutional Rights potections and the totalshedding ofthe US Constitution youneedto look at this case: i/ : : j : 1 The documents on theegal suit can be found at http://wwwjeseyshoeteljpa tog/healthcae and the ;illwingthid Cjcuit Appeal documents : :; J; Petitiones Appel to the Cicuit Cout The Petitlones Reply Bief or e a; The Govenmenh Opposition The Appeal Appendix at ;t://je;se;shoeteapatyogihealthcaetpimay ppeauoeas ccess; : : f <c / icliolis KPutu; (Donald R Laste J +»; ( c t f e < ; 20f2 it i ;;1: ;1 ;/ (l h:;/ ; < Cheashyou feedom and libc;ty Let people owha:tth law eally doesandisabout: e ae always / avatlable to answe any question at the Jesey Shoe tea: Paty meeting held each month o by email if desed See http://wwwjeseyshoetpatyog/meting fo cuent meeting infomation Contact us by email at jstppo se@jeseyshoete\ e if1mation if needed l! $ s /A