DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Similar documents
DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

PINELLAS DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY

Pinellas County Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2016 Work Plan

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

SPARTANBURG ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

Juvenile Detention Center Statistics Quarter 1, 2010 Report (period includes January March 31, 2010)

BECCA PETITIONS AND THE USE OF DETENTION IN WASHINGTON STATE. Amanda B. Gilman, PhD Rachael Sanford

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

New Jersey Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2010 Annual Data Report

Juvenile Justice Referrals in Alaska,

DETENTION SERVICES. Detention Services. detention facilities with 1,302. beds in operation in the State. of Florida.

Youth Justice Statistics 2014/15. England and Wales. Youth Justice Board / Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin

DETENTION SERVICES Detention Services. Julia Strange Assistant Secretary for Detention Services (850)

Correctional Population Forecasts

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1552

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. Civil Citation. Part of the Community, Part of the Solution

Seventy-three percent of people facing

Jail: Who is in on bail?

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015

Prison Rape Elimination Act Annual Report Fiscal Year Stop Sexual Violence

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Offences Against the Administration of Justice Statistical Report Summary Report 1 ISBN

Baseline Measures for Illinois. The MacArthur Foundation s Juvenile Justice Initiative

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

Prison Rape Elimination Act Annual Report Fiscal Year Stop Sexual Violence

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

2014 Kansas Statutes

FLORIDADEPARTMENTOF CORRECTIONS

Jail Population Trend Report April - June 2016

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

FLORIDA DETENTION RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Examining the Trends and Use of Iowa s Juvenile Detention Centers

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

Disproportionate Representation of Minorities in the Alaska Juvenile Justice System. Phase I Report

M E M O R A N D U M. Bill Smith, Esquire Attorney for John Doe. Meredith Patti, Esquire Mary Cate Rush, Chief Statistician. DATE: August 5, 2014

Identifying Chronic Offenders

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

RAMSEY COUNTY JDAI / DMC QUARTERLY STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETING JANUARY 19, 2011

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

Juvenile Drug Arrests in CY2011- Disproportionate Minority Contact

Prepared by: Meghan Ogle, M.S.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma. Detailed Analysis. October 17, Council of State Governments Justice Center

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared for the Broward Sheriff s Office Department of Community Control. September Prepared by:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Analysis of Senate Bill

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Idaho Prisons. Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy Brief. October 2018

Select Strategies and Outcomes from DMC Action Network and Replication Sites

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

The Conscious Chicagoan s Guide to Youth Detention and Incarceration

REALIZING POTENTIAL & CHANGING FUTURES

TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN JUSTICE REFORM

HALIFAX COUNTY PRETRIAL RELEASE RISK ASSESSMENT PILOT PROJECT

Juveniles Charged as Adults and Held in Adult Detention Facilities: Trend Analysis and Population Projections

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

(122nd General Assembly) (Substitute House Bill Number 37) AN ACT

JUVENILE JUSTICE & DISPROPORTIONALITY: Patterns of Minority Over-Representation in Washington's Juvenile Justice System*

Economic and Social Council

Court Support Agencies Organization Department Summary

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

Scotts Bluff County Juvenile Justice Data 2012

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Local Justice Reinvestment: The Challenge of Jail Population Projection

Criminal Justice Reforms

New Jersey JDAI: Site Results Report Prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation September, 2006

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

SCHOOLS AND PRISONS: FIFTY YEARS AFTER BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION

bulletin 139 Youth justice in Australia Summary Bulletin 139 MArch 2017

Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

Work Group to Re-envision the Jail Replacement Project Report Release & Next Steps. Board of Supervisors June 13, 2017

MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

Sanction Certainty: An Evaluation of Erie County s Adult Probation Sanctioning System

Report to the Governor and the Legislature

Juvenile Justice Process. Overview of Nevada

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Transcription:

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE 2015 Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Rick Scott, Governor Christina K. Daly, Secretary

SOME NOTES TO KEEP IN MIND For comparison purposes, a January 2010-June 2011 eighteen-month comparison period was created. This group is referred to as the 2010-2011 comparison group throughout this study. Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding. All slides use data referring to youth whose home county of residence was Pinellas at the time of their offense, regardless of where they were served, admitted, etc.

The youth population (age 10-17) in Pinellas County decreased by 6% over the past 5 fiscal years, from 77,193 in FY2009-2010 to 72,471 in FY2013-2014. N=77,193 N=76,080 N=74,761 N=73,877 N=72,471

The number of arrests continued to trend downward in Pinellas County over the past 5 fiscal years. However, there was a 4% increase in arrests since last fiscal year. 6,580 Arrests 5,708 Arrests 5,146 Arrests 4,705 Arrests 4,899 Arrests There was an 11% increase in felony arrests since last fiscal year There was a 10% reduction in felony arrests from FY2009-2010 to FY2013-2014.

The arrest rates of White, Hispanic, and Other youth have decreased over the past 5 fiscal years, while the arrest rate of Black youth has increased. The arrest rate of Black youth relative to the population increased by 40 arrests per 1,000 Black youth over the past fiscal year. During the same time period, the arrest rate of White youth decreased by 4 arrests per 1,000 White youth and the arrest rate of Hispanic youth decreased by 1 arrest per 1,000 Hispanic youth

Annual racial and ethnic disparities in arrest rates have been on an overall increase over the past 5 years in Pinellas County Disparities in arrest rates between Black youth and Hispanic youth and between White youth and Black youth have been increasing over the past 5 years In the past fiscal year, the disparity in arrest rates between Black youth and White youth increased by 44 arrests per 1,000 youth

Annual admissions to secure detention in Pinellas County have been on an overall decline over the past 15 fiscal years, with an upward slope in the most recent year. Admissions to secure detention increased by 7% since last fiscal year. During the same period, felony arrests increased by 21%

There has been an increase in the percent of Black youth from Pinellas County admitted to secure detention over the past 3 fiscal years and a decrease in the percent of White youth. 63% of youth admitted to secure detention in Pinellas County in FY2013-14 were Black while only 32% were White. There was a 9 percentage point increase in percent Black youth admitted to secure detention from the previous fiscal year and a 5 percentage point decrease in percent White youth admitted to secure detention. *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Sixty-two percent of Pinellas County youth admitted to secure detention during fiscal year 2013-2014 were Black Black youth are overrepresented in arrests and secure detention admissions relative to the percent of Black youth in the population The percent of Black youth admitted to secure detention in FY2013-2014 was 62% while the percent of Black youth arrested was 59% and the percent of Black youth (age 10-17) in the population was only 17% *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Gender of Pinellas County Youth Admitted to Secure Detention During Fiscal Year 2013-2014 N=788

Approximately three quarters (73%) of Pinellas County youth admitted to secure detention in fiscal year 2013-2014 were between the ages of 15 and 17.

56% of admissions to secure detention in Pinellas County were related to new charges while almost half (44%) of admissions to secure detention were related to court orders. There were 540 less admissions to secure detention in the current study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. A smaller proportion of admissions to secure detention (5 percentage points less) were related to court orders in the present 18- month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. *N = number of admissions. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period

Of youth screened and remanded to secure detention in Pinellas County, 6% of youth were DRAI screened on the basis of an underlying charge. There was a 2 percentage point increase in youth screened on an underlying charge and sent to secure detention between this 18-month period and the comparable 2010-2011 study period *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Distribution of most serious current offense for youth detained in Pinellas County There was a 7 percentage point increase in the proportion of youth detained whose most serious current offense scored 7 (Dealing in Stolen Property, etc.) on Section III of the DRAI and a 9 percentage point decrease in the proportion of youth detained whose most serious offense scored 12 (Other Felony 1, etc.) on Section III of the DRAI since the 2010-2011 comparison period. This suggests detention is being used more often for less serious offenses. *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Approximately one-third (35%) of Pinellas County youth admitted to secure detention have never been in secure detention before. The distribution of prior detention stays has remained stable in Pinellas County compared to the 2010-2011 study period. *N=First admission to secure detention within the 18-month study period for each youth

Approximately one-third (34%) of youth in secure detention in Pinellas County are only detained for 2 days or less. Both the percent of youth in secure detention for longer than 22 days and the percent of youth in secure detention for less than 24 hours have remained stable since the comparable 2010-2011 study period. *N= number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period.

The overall average length of stay as well as each categorical average length of stay is shorter in Pinellas County than the statewide average. Statewide Average LOS: 12 days Pinellas Average LOS: 10 days The average length of stay in secure detention is 2 days shorter in Pinellas County than the statewide average. *N = number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Decision for Pinellas County Youth Actual Outcome The proportion of screened Pinellas youth sent to secure detention is 5 percentage points less than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. The proportion of screened Pinellas youth sent to home detention is 4 percentage points more than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. *This figure refers to all youth administered a DRAI screening. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: C. Prior History Pinellas County Youth Distribution (January 2013-June 2014) The proportion of Pinellas youth with a non-zero DRAI score sent to secure detention with no priors is 22 percentage points less than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. The proportion of Pinellas youth with a non-zero DRAI score sent to secure detention with 3 prior felonies is 9 percentage points more than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. This suggests secure detention is being used for more chronic offenders. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: D. Legal Status Pinellas County Youth Distribution (January 2013-June 2014) The proportion of Pinellas youth with a non-zero DRAI score and no current DJJ status sent to secure detention is 26 percentage points less than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. The proportion of Pinellas youth with a non-zero DRAI score and committed or detention status sent to secure detention is 8 percentage points more than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period. This suggests secure detention is being used for more chronic offenders.

Pinellas County Detention Overview: Strengths, Concerns, and Serious Concerns Strengths Concerns Serious Concerns Fewer youth with no priors detained The proportion of Pinellas youth with a non-zero DRAI score sent to secure detention with no priors is 22 percentage points less than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. Fewer screenings result in detention The proportion of screened Pinellas youth sent to secure detention is 5 percentage points less than it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. Fewer detainments due to court orders and technical violations A smaller proportion of admissions to secure detention (5 percentage points less) were related to court orders and technical violations in the present 18- month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. Over 1/3 of youth new to detention 35% of youth sent to secure detention have never been to secure detention before More detention admissions Between FY2012-2013 and FY2013-2014, there was a 7% increase in detention admissions. Nearly half of admissions due to court orders or technical violations 44% of detention admissions are due to court orders or technical violations Almost half of all screenings result in detention 48% of youth screened go to secure detention as opposed to release, home, or respite