Case No. 2:12-CV GHK(MRW) [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER. Hon. George H. King CASE NO. 2:12-CV GHK (MRW)

Similar documents
United States District Court Central District of California

Case 2:12-cv ODW-MRW Document 306 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:14387

Case No. 2:12-CV GHK(MRW) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT. Hon. George H. King STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 2:12-CV GHK (MRW)

Case 2:12-cv GHK-MRW Document 275 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:13111

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 1:17-cv JPO Document 47 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 117 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 12

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case 2:12-cv ODW-MRW Document Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 27 Page ID #:13581

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:12-cv GHK-MRW Document 179 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:8130

Case: 1:06-cv Document #: 771 Filed: 03/15/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:28511

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Plaintiffs, Docket No. L SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Zgl3 GCT I b l\ 10: 23

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:11-cv WJM-MF Document 88-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 71 PageID: Exhibit A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv BMC-GRB Document 317 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15114

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv DLC-MHD Document 540 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

EXHIBIT A

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 88-1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:14-cv PAC Document 94 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

Case 1:14-cv PAC Document 95 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:08-cv R-E Document 179 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:3675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EXHIBIT 1

Case 5:14-cv EGS Document 75 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 3:11-cv JAH-WMC Document 38 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv KJM-DB Document 1 Filed 09/21/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 00) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 1) Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. ) 0 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- E-Mail: scott@bursor.com ltfisher@bursor.com apersinger@bursor.com Co-Lead Class Counsel NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP Jeffrey Margulies, State Bar No. 0 Spencer Persson, State Bar No. 0 Stephanie Stroup, State Bar No. 01 Jade Jurdi, State Bar No.01 South Flower Street Forty-First Floor Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: (1) -00 E-Mail: jeff.margulies@nortonrosefulbright.com spencer.persson@nortonrosefulbright.com stephanie.stroup@nortonrosefulbright.com jade.jurdi@nortonrosefulbright.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENZO FORCELLATI and LISA ROEMMICH, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. HYLAND S, INC., STANDARD HOMEOPATHIC LABORATORIES, INC., and STANDARD HOMEOPATHIC COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. :1-CV-0 GHK(MRW) [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER Hon. George H. King CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW)

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 The parties in the above captioned action, including Plaintiffs Enzo Forcellati and Lisa Roemmich on the one hand, and Defendants Hyland s, Inc., Standard Homeopathic Laboratories Inc., and Standard Homeopathic Company on the other, have reached a Settlement Agreement that is set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement filed with this Court. Pending before the Court is the parties Motion for Preliminary Approval. Having carefully reviewed the Stipulation of Settlement, including the exhibits attached thereto and all papers, pleadings, records, and prior proceedings to date in this Consolidated Action, the Court GRANTS Preliminary Approval and FINDS and ORDERS as follows: 1. As an initial matter, for purposes of this Preliminary Approval Order, except as otherwise indicated herein, the Court adopts and incorporates the definitions contained in the Stipulation of Settlement.. The Settlement Agreement set forth in the parties Stipulation of Settlement is within the range of reasonableness and possible final approval in that it appears fair, reasonable, and adequate. The parties Agreement was reached as a result of extensive arm s length negotiations between the parties and their counsel. This included five full day mediation sessions, the first two with Robert A. Meyer of Loeb & Loeb LLP, and the final three with the Hon. Jay C. Gandhi, United States Magistrate Judge. Additionally, before entering into the Agreement, this Action was on the eve of trial. Thus, Plaintiffs and their counsel had sufficient information to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the case and to conduct informed settlement discussions.. The Court provisionally certifies, for settlement purposes only, a class defined as: All persons in the United States who purchased the following Hyland s products on or after March, 00: (i) Cold n Cough Kids, (ii) Cough Syrup with 0% Natural Honey, (iii) Sniffles n Sneezes Kids, (iv) Cold Relief Strips Kids CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW) 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 with Zinc, (v) Nighttime Cold n Cough Kids, (vi) Complete Flu Care Kids, (vii) Baby Teething Gel, (viii) Baby Cough Syrup, (ix) Baby Gas Drops, (x) Baby Infant Earache Drops, and (xi) Baby Nighttime Tiny Cold Syrup. Excluded from the Class are: (a) Hyland s employees, officers and directors, (b) persons or entities who purchased the Products for the purpose of re-sale, (c) retailers or re-sellers of the Products, (d) governmental entities, (e) persons who timely and properly exclude themselves from the Class as provided herein, and (f) the Court, the Court s immediate family, and Court staff.. The requirements for certification of the Settlement Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. (a), and (b)() have been satisfied for settlement purposes. The Court finds, for settlement purposes, that: (a) the Settlement Class is defined by objective criteria and ascertainable; (b) the numerosity requirement is satisfied; (c) there are questions of law and fact that are common to the Settlement Class, and those questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting any individual Settlement Class Member; (d) the claims of the Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class they seek to represent for purposes of settlement; (e) a class action is superior to other available means of adjudicating this dispute; (f) and Plaintiffs and Class Counsel are adequate representatives of the Class. See Forcellati v. Hyland s Inc., 01 WL 1 (C.D. Cal. Apr., 01).. The Court provisionally appoints Plaintiffs Enzo Forcellati and Lisa Roemmich as Class Representatives of the Settlement Class.. The Court provisionally appoints Bursor & Fisher, P.A., Vozzolo LLC, and Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and their counsel as Class Counsel.. Since the Settlement Agreement set forth in the parties Stipulation of Settlement is within the range of reasonableness and possible Final Approval, Class CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW)

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Notice Should be provided to the Settlement Class pursuant to the Stipulation of Settlement, as follows: a. On or before, the Settlement Administrator shall cause a copy of the Short Form notice to be sent by email to all class members for whom email addresses are identified. b. On or before, the Settlement Administrator shall cause a Postcard Notice to be sent by regular mail to all class members for whom the parties do not have a valid email address but do have a mailing address. c. On or before, Class Counsel shall cause a copy of the Long Form Notice, in both English and Spanish, to be posted on a dedicated website together with links to important case documents, such as the Preliminary Approval Order, this Stipulation of Settlement, the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, Defendants Answer to Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, and any Second Amended Class Action Complaint; d. Class Counsel shall register www.hylandslawsuit.com for notice purposes, along with several additional domains that will mirror and/or link to that website, including www.hylandsclassaction.com. Class members will be directed to the website by hyperlinks embedded in the email version of the Short Form Notice and by references in both the Short Form and Postcard Notices. www.hylandslawsuit.com website will allow Class Members to submit Claim Forms online and will contain information relevant to Class Members, including but not limited to the Long Form Notice, all applicable deadlines, the Stipulation of Settlement, Class Notice, a downloadable Claim Form, all papers filed by the parties in support of the proposed Settlement Agreement (including Plaintiffs anticipated motion for a Fee and Expense Award), orders of the Court pertaining to the Stipulation of Settlement, and contact information for the Settlement Administrator for a toll-free telephone number, e-mail, and U.S. mail. CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW) The

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 e. On or before, the Settlement Administrator shall undertake Publication Notice, which means publication of the Short Form Notice in the National Edition of USA Today once a week for four consecutive weeks, and a Facebook campaign targeting people who have expressed an interest in or like pages related to Hyland s, homeopathy, homeopathic medicine, and wellness as well as those people who have expressed an interest in or like pages related to parenting. f. The Notice Period shall run from to.. The Court approves the Class Notice forms, including the Long Form Notice, the Short Form Notice, and the Postcard Notice, which are substantially in the form attached to the Stipulation of Settlement.. The Court determines that the Notice of the Settlement Agreement and of the Fairness Hearing, as set forth in the parties Stipulation of Settlement, complies with all legal requirements, including but not limited to the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Thus, the Court directs that Class Notice shall be given to the Class as provided herein and in Section V of the parties Stipulation of Settlement.. Settlement Class Members will have until the Claim Deadline, on, to submit a Claim Form.. If a Settlement Class Member wishes to exclude himself or herself from the Settlement Agreement, that Settlement Class Member will have until the Opt-Out Date, on, to submit a valid Request for Exclusion in the manner set forth in Section VI of the Stipulation of Settlement. All Settlement Class Members who do not timely submit a valid Request for Exclusion will be bound by the Final Order and Final Judgment, and enjoined from bringing or prosecuting any action relating to the Released Claims. CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW)

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1. The Court appoints KCC Class Action Services, LLC, a well-qualified and experienced claims administrator, as the Settlement Administrator. 1. The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing on at to determine whether the Settlement Agreement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and to determine whether a Final Order and Final Judgment should be entered. The Fairness Hearing will be held at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse, East Temple Street, Courtroom 0, Los Angeles, California 001-, in Court Room 0. 1. The deadline for the parties to file and serve papers in support of their application for final approval of the Settlement Agreement, as well as Class Counsel s motion for fees, costs, and incentive awards, shall be on. Class Counsel will also include contemporaneous time records sufficient to enable the court to do a lodestar analysis. 1. At least seven calendar days prior to the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel shall prepare or cause the Settlement Administrator to prepare a list of the persons who have excluded themselves in a valid and timely manner from the Settlement Class, and Class Counsel shall file that list with the Court. 1. Any objections by any Settlement Class Member to the certification of the Settlement Class or to the approval of the proposed Settlement Agreement set forth in the parties Stipulation of Settlement shall be heard and any papers submitted in support of said objections shall be considered by the Court at the Fairness Hearing only if, on or before the Objection Deadline, on, such objector files with the Court a written objection and notice of the objector s intention to appear, and otherwise complies with the requirements set for in Section VI of the Stipulation of Settlement. CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW)

1 1 1 1 1 1. The deadline for the parties to file and serve any response to any timely objections shall be on.. The parties shall, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement, take all necessary and appropriate steps to establish the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement and this Preliminary Approval Order.. Pending the Fairness Hearing, all proceedings, other than the proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order in the Consolidated Action are stayed, and Class Members are enjoined from bringing or prosecuting any action relating to the Released Claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: By: Hon. George H. King United States District Judge 1 0 1 CASE NO. :1-CV-0 GHK (MRW)