Robbery Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Similar documents
Intimidatory Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Assault Definitive Guideline

Terrorism Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Annex C: Draft guideline

Dangerous Dog. Offences Definitive Guideline

Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons

Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE. Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline

Annex C: Draft guidelines

Drug Offences Definitive Guideline

School non attendance (Revised 2017)

Breach Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Unfit through drink or drugs (drive/ attempt to drive) (Revised 2017)

Arson and Criminal Damage Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION

Breach Offences Guideline Consultation 61. Annex C: ANNEX C. Draft guidelines. Breach of a Community Order Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Schedule 8)

A Sentencing Guideline for Theft Offences within the ECSC

Public Order Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION

Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Offences Guideline Consultation CONSULTATION

Environmental Offences Definitive Guideline

Dangerous Dog Offences Consultation CONSULTATION

& O FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY COURTS (SENTENCING GUIDELINES) PRACTICE DIRECTION, 2016

Fraud, bribery and money laundering: corporate offenders Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Imposition of Community and Custodial Sentences Definitive Guideline

MAGISTRATES COURT SENTENCING GUIDELINES. SENTENCING COUNCIL UPDATE 7 March 2012

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

Civil penalty as an alternative to prosecution under the Housing Act 2004

Overarching Principles: Domestic Abuse. Definitive Guideline

Theft Offences. Response to Consultation CONSULTATION RESPONSE

Aggravating factors APPENDIX 2. Summary

FEDERAL HIGH COURT (CORRUPTION AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES) SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND PRACTICE DIRECTION,

S G C. Dangerous Offenders. Sentencing Guidelines Council. Guide for Sentencers and Practitioners

THE CONSTITUTION (SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR COURTS OF JUDICATURE) (PRACTICE) DIRECTIONS, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF PARAGRAPHS

S G C. Sexual Offences Act Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

Sentencing Youths Overarching Principles and Offence-Specific Guidelines for Sexual Offences and Robbery Consultation

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON SENTENCING SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Guideline Consultation

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

PART H - SPECIFIC OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS. Introductory Commentary

Lewisham Youth Offending Service

Sentencing Council Consultation on the Robbery Guideline

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

Sentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

Sentencing guidelines and the Sentencing Council

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 No 90

S G C. Assault and other offences against the person. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

Guidelines on the Investigation, Cautioning and Charging of Knife Crime Offences

Guideline Judgments Case Compendium - Update 2: June 2006 CASE NAME AND REFERENCE

Appellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Consultation Stage Resource Assessment: Arson and Criminal Damage Offences

PROCEDURE Simple Cautions. Number: F 0102 Date Published: 9 September 2015

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

PUBLISHED FOR CONSULTATION ONLY. Consultation Guideline

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON ARSON AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE

Simple Cautions for Adult Offenders

Human Trafficking (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL]

Teacher misconduct - the prohibition of teachers

Assessing the impact and implementation of the Sentencing Council s Theft Offences Definitive Guideline

Overarching Principles Sentencing Youths

Quick Reference Guides to Out of Court Disposals

Law Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

Assessing the impact of the Sentencing Council s Environmental offences definitive guideline

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: FAILING TO SURRENDER TO BAIL

ENFORCEMENT POLICY PRIVATE SECTOR HOUSING

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: BLADED ARTICLES AND OFFENSIVE WEAPONS OFFENCES

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA (KZ-1) GENERAL PART. Chapter One FUNDAMENTAL PROVISIONS. Imposition of Criminal Liability Article 1

JUSTICES CLERKS SOCIETY SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF MAGISTRATE)

Section 132 report (Coroners and Justice Act 2009): Resource Impact of the Government s proposals on Suspended Sentence Orders

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED FORCE PROCEDURES. Cautioning of Adult Offenders (Simple Caution)

Offensive Weapons Bill

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: MARCH 12, 2015

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

This overview was originally prepared by the Department of Justice and Regulation and is reprinted here with its kind permission.

JUDGMENT. R v Smith (Appellant)

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Commencement No 4 and Saving Provisions) Order 2012

Assessing the impact of the Sentencing Council s Burglary offences definitive guideline

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, AD 2014 (Criminal Jurisdiction) INDICTMENT NO C82/05

Consultation Stage Resource Assessment: Manslaughter 1 INTRODUCTION

Final Stage Resource Assessment: Summary offences in the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG)

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

ISSUES. Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing. Prepared by: Andrew Mason

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

Sentencing Council Annual Report 2017/18

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Sergeants Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Criminal Damage Arson Contamination or Interference

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL]

Subject: Offences Committed Against Peace Officers Date: October 2015

Law Society response to the Sentencing Council Consultation on a Draft Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons Guideline

Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill

New guidelines for sentencing of Health & Safety offences and Corporate Manslaughter

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 27, 2006

Pleading guilty. The Law in Victoria. The Court Process. Your guide to. Sentencing. in a criminal matter. defence lawyers

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Transcription:

Robbery Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Contents Applicability of guideline 2 Robbery street and less sophisticated commercial 3 Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) Robbery professionally planned commercial 9 Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) Robbery dwelling 15 Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

2 Robbery Definitive Guideline Applicability of guideline In accordance with section 120 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, the Sentencing Council issues this definitive guideline. It applies to all offenders aged 18 and older, who are sentenced on or after 1 April 2016, regardless of the date of the offence. Section 125(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 provides that when sentencing offences committed after 6 April 2010: Every court (a) must, in sentencing an offender, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender s case, and (b) must, in exercising any other function relating to the sentencing of offenders, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the exercise of the function, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so. Structure, ranges and starting points For the purposes of section 125(3) (4) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, the guideline specifies offence ranges the range of sentences appropriate for each type of offence. Within each offence, the Council has specified a number of categories which reflect varying degrees of seriousness. The offence range is split into category ranges sentences appropriate for each level of seriousness. The Council has also identified a starting point within each category. s define the position within a category range from which to start calculating the provisional sentence. The court should consider further features of the offence or the offender that warrant adjustment of the sentence within the range, including the aggravating and mitigating factors set out at step two. s and ranges apply to all offenders, whether they have pleaded guilty or been convicted after trial. Credit for a guilty plea is taken into consideration only at step four in the decision making process, after the appropriate sentence has been identified. This guideline applies only to offenders aged 18 and older.

Robbery Definitive Guideline 3 Robbery street and less sophisticated commercial Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) This is a serious specified offence for the purposes of section 224 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Triable only on indictment Maximum: Life imprisonment Offence range: Community order 12 years custody ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL This guideline applies only to offenders aged 18 and older. Street/less sophisticated commercial robbery refers to robberies committed in public places, including those committed in taxis or on public transport. It also refers to unsophisticated robberies within commercial premises or targeting commercial goods or money. There is relevant guidance for sentencing young offenders within both the Sentencing Guidelines Council s Robbery Definitive Guideline, and the Overarching Principles Sentencing Youths Definitive Guideline. These guidelines will continue to be in force until they are replaced by the Sentencing Council s new and updated guidance.

4 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL STEP ONE Determining the offence category The court should determine the offence category with reference only to the factors listed in the tables below. In order to determine the category the court should assess culpability and harm. The court should weigh all the factors set out below in determining the offender s culpability. Where there are characteristics present which fall under different levels of culpability, the court should balance these characteristics to reach a fair assessment of the offender s culpability. Culpability demonstrated by one or more of the following: A High culpability B Medium culpability C Lesser culpability Use of a weapon to inflict violence Production of a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Use of very significant force in the commission of the offence Offence motivated by, or demonstrating hostility based on any of the following characteristics or presumed characteristics of the victim: religion, race, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity Production of a weapon other than a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Threat of violence by any weapon (but which is not produced) Other cases where characteristics for categories A or C are not present Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Threat or use of minimal force Mental disability or learning disability where linked to the commission of the offence Harm The court should consider the factors set out below to determine the level of harm that has been caused or was intended to be caused to the victim. Category 1 Serious physical and/or psychological harm caused to the victim Serious detrimental effect on the business Category 2 Other cases where characteristics for categories 1 or 3 are not present Category 3 No/minimal physical or psychological harm caused to the victim No/minimal detrimental effect on the business

Robbery Definitive Guideline 5 STEP TWO and category range Having determined the category at step one, the court should use the corresponding starting point to reach a sentence within the category range below. The starting point applies to all offenders irrespective of plea or previous convictions. A case of particular gravity, reflected by multiple features of culpability or harm in step one, could merit upward adjustment from the starting point before further adjustment for aggravating or mitigating features, set out on the next page. Consecutive sentences for multiple offences may be appropriate please refer to the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. Culpability Harm A B C Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 8 years custody 7 12 years custody 5 years custody 4 8 years custody 4 years custody 3 6 years custody 5 years custody 4 8 years custody 4 years custody 3 6 years custody 2 years custody 1 4 years custody 4 years custody 3 6 years custody 2 years custody 1 4 years custody 1 year s custody High level community order 3 years custody ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL The table on the next page contains a non-exhaustive list of additional factual elements providing the context of the offence and factors relating to the offender. Identify whether any combination of these, or other relevant factors, should result in an upward or downward adjustment from the sentence arrived at so far. In particular, relevant recent convictions are likely to result in an upward adjustment. In some cases, having considered these factors, it may be appropriate to move outside the identified category range.

6 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL Factors increasing seriousness Statutory aggravating factors: Previous convictions, having regard to a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction Offence committed whilst on bail Other aggravating factors: High value goods or sums targeted or obtained (whether economic, personal or sentimental) Victim is targeted due to a vulnerability (or a perceived vulnerability) Significant planning Steps taken to prevent the victim reporting or obtaining assistance and/or from assisting or supporting the prosecution Prolonged nature of event Restraint, detention or additional degradation of the victim A leading role where offending is part of a group activity Involvement of others through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Location of the offence (including cases where the location of the offence is the victim s residence) Timing of the offence Attempt to conceal identity (for example, wearing a balaclava or hood) Commission of offence whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs Attempts to conceal/dispose of evidence Established evidence of community/wider impact Failure to comply with current court orders Offence committed on licence Offences taken into consideration Failure to respond to warnings about behaviour Factors reducing seriousness or reflecting personal mitigation No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions Remorse, particularly where evidenced by voluntary reparation to the victim Good character and/or exemplary conduct Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment Age and/or lack of maturity where it affects the responsibility of the offender Mental disorder or learning disability (where not linked to the commission of the offence) Little or no planning Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives Determination and/or demonstration of steps having been taken to address addiction or offending behaviour

Robbery Definitive Guideline 7 STEP THREE Consider any factors which indicate a reduction for assistance to the prosecution The court should take into account sections 73 and 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (assistance by defendants: reduction or review of sentence) and any other rule of law by virtue of which an offender may receive a discounted sentence in consequence of assistance given (or offered) to the prosecutor or investigator. STEP FOUR Reduction for guilty pleas The court should take account of any potential reduction for a guilty plea in accordance with section 144 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the Guilty Plea guideline. STEP FIVE Dangerousness The court should consider whether having regard to the criteria contained in Chapter 5 of Part 12 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 it would be appropriate to impose a life sentence (section 224A or section 225) or an extended sentence (section 226A). When sentencing offenders to a life sentence under these provisions, the notional determinate sentence should be used as the basis for the setting of a minimum term. STEP SIX Totality principle If sentencing an offender for more than one offence, or where the offender is already serving a sentence, consider whether the total sentence is just and proportionate to the overall offending behaviour in accordance with the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL STEP SEVEN Compensation and ancillary orders In all cases the court should consider whether to make compensation and/or other ancillary orders. Where the offence involves a firearm, an imitation firearm or an offensive weapon the court may consider the criteria in section 19 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 for the imposition of a Serious Crime Prevention Order. STEP EIGHT Reasons Section 174 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 imposes a duty to give reasons for, and explain the effect of, the sentence. STEP NINE Consideration for time spent on bail The court must consider whether to give credit for time spent on bail in accordance with section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

8 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY STREET AND LESS SOPHISTICATED COMMERCIAL Blank page

Robbery Definitive Guideline 9 Robbery professionally planned commercial Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) This is a serious specified offence for the purposes of section 224 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Triable only on indictment Maximum: Life imprisonment Offence range: 18 months 20 years custody ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL This guideline applies only to offenders aged 18 and older. Professionally planned commercial robbery refers to robberies involving a significant degree of planning, sophistication or organisation.

10 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL STEP ONE Determining the offence category The court should determine the offence category with reference only to the factors listed in the tables below. In order to determine the category the court should assess culpability and harm. The court should weigh all the factors set out below in determining the offender s culpability. Where there are characteristics present which fall under different levels of culpability, the court should balance these characteristics to reach a fair assessment of the offender s culpability. Culpability demonstrated by one or more of the following: A High culpability B Medium culpability C Lesser culpability Use of a weapon to inflict violence Production of a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Use of very significant force in the commission of the offence A leading role where offending is part of a group activity Offence motivated by, or demonstrating hostility based on any of the following characteristics or presumed characteristics of the victim: religion, race, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity Abuse of position Production of a weapon other than a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Threat of violence by any weapon (but which is not produced) A significant role where offending is part of a group activity Other cases where characteristics for categories A or C are not present Performed limited function under direction Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Threat or use of minimal force Mental disability or learning disability where linked to the commission of the offence Harm The level of harm is determined by weighing up all the factors of the case to determine the harm that has been caused or was intended to be caused to the victim. The victim relates both to the commercial organisation that has been robbed and any individual(s) who has suffered the use or threat of force during the commission of the offence. Category 1 Serious physical and/or psychological harm caused to the victim Serious detrimental effect on the business Very high value goods or sums targeted or obtained (whether economic, personal or sentimental) Category 2 Other cases where characteristics for categories 1 or 3 are not present Category 3 No/minimal physical or psychological harm caused to the victim No/minimal detrimental effect on the business Low value goods or sums targeted or obtained (whether economic, personal or sentimental)

Robbery Definitive Guideline 11 STEP TWO and category range Having determined the category at step one, the court should use the corresponding starting point to reach a sentence within the category range below. The starting point applies to all offenders irrespective of plea or previous convictions. A case of particular gravity, reflected by multiple features of high culpability or harm in step one, could merit upward adjustment from the starting point before further adjustment for aggravating or mitigating features, set out on the next page. Consecutive sentences for multiple offences may be appropriate particularly where exceptionally high levels of harm have been caused, please refer to the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. Where multiple offences or a single conspiracy to commit multiple offences of particular severity have taken place sentences in excess of 20 years may be appropriate. Culpability Harm A B C Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 16 years custody 12 20 years custody 9 years custody 7 14 years custody 5 years custody 4 8 years custody 9 years custody 7 14 years custody 5 years custody 4 8 years custody 3 years custody 2 5 years custody 5 years custody 4 8 years custody 3 years custody 2 5 years custody 2 years custody 18 months 4 years custody ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL The table on the next page contains a non-exhaustive list of additional factual elements providing the context of the offence and factors relating to the offender. Identify whether any combination of these, or other relevant factors, should result in an upward or downward adjustment from the sentence arrived at so far. In particular, relevant recent convictions are likely to result in an upward adjustment. In some cases, having considered these factors, it may be appropriate to move outside the identified category range.

12 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL Factors increasing seriousness Statutory aggravating factors: Previous convictions, having regard to a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction Offence committed whilst on bail Other aggravating factors: Victim is targeted due to a vulnerability (or a perceived vulnerability) Steps taken to prevent the victim reporting or obtaining assistance and/or from assisting or supporting the prosecution Prolonged nature of attack Restraint, detention or additional degradation of the victim Involvement of others through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Location of the offence (including cases where the location of the offence is the victim s residence) Timing of the offence Attempt to conceal identity (for example, wearing a balaclava or hood) Commission of offence whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs Attempts to conceal/dispose of evidence Established evidence of community/wider impact Failure to comply with current court orders Offence committed on licence Offences taken into consideration Failure to respond to warnings about behaviour Factors reducing seriousness or reflecting personal mitigation No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions Remorse, particularly where evidenced by voluntary reparation to the victim Good character and/or exemplary conduct Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment Age and/or lack of maturity where it affects the responsibility of the offender Mental disorder or learning disability (where not linked to the commission of the offence) Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives Determination and/or demonstration of steps having been taken to address addiction or offending behaviour

Robbery Definitive Guideline 13 STEP THREE Consider any factors which indicate a reduction for assistance to the prosecution The court should take into account sections 73 and 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (assistance by defendants: reduction or review of sentence) and any other rule of law by virtue of which an offender may receive a discounted sentence in consequence of assistance given (or offered) to the prosecutor or investigator. STEP FOUR Reduction for guilty pleas The court should take account of any potential reduction for a guilty plea in accordance with section 144 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the Guilty Plea guideline. STEP FIVE Dangerousness The court should consider whether having regard to the criteria contained in Chapter 5 of Part 12 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 it would be appropriate to impose a life sentence (section 224A or section 225) or an extended sentence (section 226A). When sentencing offenders to a life sentence under these provisions, the notional determinate sentence should be used as the basis for the setting of a minimum term. STEP SIX Totality principle If sentencing an offender for more than one offence, or where the offender is already serving a sentence, consider whether the total sentence is just and proportionate to the overall offending behaviour in accordance with the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL STEP SEVEN Compensation and ancillary orders In all cases the court should consider whether to make compensation and/or other ancillary orders. Where the offence involves a firearm, an imitation firearm or an offensive weapon the court may consider the criteria in section 19 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 for the imposition of a Serious Crime Prevention Order. STEP EIGHT Reasons Section 174 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 imposes a duty to give reasons for, and explain the effect of, the sentence. STEP NINE Consideration for time spent on bail The court must consider whether to give credit for time spent on bail in accordance with section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

14 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED COMMERCIAL Blank page

Robbery Definitive Guideline 15 Robbery dwelling Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) This is a serious specified offence for the purposes of section 224 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ROBBERY DWELLING Triable only on indictment Maximum: Life imprisonment Offence range: 1 year s custody 16 years custody This guideline applies only to offenders aged 18 and older.

16 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY DWELLING STEP ONE Determining the offence category The court should determine the offence category with reference only to the factors listed in the tables below. In order to determine the category the court should assess culpability and harm. The court should weigh all the factors set out below in determining the offender s culpability. Where there are characteristics present which fall under different levels of culpability, the court should balance these characteristics to reach a fair assessment of the offender s culpability. Culpability demonstrated by one or more of the following: A High culpability B Medium culpability C Lesser culpability Use of a weapon to inflict violence Production of a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Use of very significant force in the commission of the offence Sophisticated organised nature of offence A leading role where offending is part of a group activity Offence motivated by, or demonstrating hostility based on any of the following characteristics or presumed characteristics of the victim: religion, race, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity Abuse of position Production of a weapon other than a bladed article or firearm or imitation firearm to threaten violence Threat of violence by any weapon (but which is not produced) A significant role where offending is part of a group activity Other cases where characteristics for categories A or C are not present Performed limited function under direction Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Threat or use of minimal force Very little or no planning Mental disability or learning disability where linked to the commission of the offence Harm The court should weigh up all the factors set out below to determine the harm that has been caused or was intended to be caused to the victim. Category 1 Serious physical and/or psychological harm caused to the victim Very high value goods or sums targeted or obtained (whether economic, sentimental or personal) Soiling, ransacking or vandalism of property Category 2 Category 3 Other cases where characteristics for categories 1 or 3 are not present No/minimal physical or psychological harm caused to the victim Low value goods or sums targeted or obtained (whether economic, personal or sentimental) Limited damage or disturbance to property

Robbery Definitive Guideline 17 STEP TWO and category range Having determined the category at step one, the court should use the corresponding starting point to reach a sentence within the category range below. The starting point applies to all offenders irrespective of plea or previous convictions. A case of particular gravity, reflected by multiple features of culpability or harm in step one, could merit upward adjustment from the starting point before further adjustment for aggravating or mitigating features, set out on the next page. Consecutive sentences for multiple offences may be appropriate particularly where exceptionally high levels of harm have been caused please refer to the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. ROBBERY DWELLING In a case of particular gravity, reflected by extremely serious violence, a sentence in excess of 163 years may be appropriate. Culpability Harm A B C Category 1 13 years custody 8 years custody 5 years custody 10 16 years custody 6 10 years custody 4 8 years custody Category 2 8 years custody 5 years custody 3 years custody 6 10 years custody 4 8 years custody 2 5 years custody Category 3 5 years custody 3 years custody 18 months custody 4 8 years custody 2 5 years custody 1 3 years custody The table on the next page contains a non-exhaustive list of additional factual elements providing the context of the offence and factors relating to the offender. Identify whether any combination of these, or other relevant factors, should result in an upward or downward adjustment from the sentence arrived at so far. In particular, relevant recent convictions are likely to result in an upward adjustment. In some cases, having considered these factors, it may be appropriate to move outside the identified category range.

18 Robbery Definitive Guideline ROBBERY DWELLING Factors increasing seriousness Statutory aggravating factors: Previous convictions, having regard to a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction Offence committed whilst on bail Other aggravating factors: Victim is targeted due to a vulnerability (or a perceived vulnerability) Steps taken to prevent the victim reporting or obtaining assistance and/or from assisting or supporting the prosecution Prolonged nature of event Restraint, detention or additional degradation of the victim Involvement of others through coercion, intimidation or exploitation Timing of the offence Attempt to conceal identity (for example, wearing a balaclava or hood) Commission of offence whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs Attempts to conceal/dispose of evidence Child or vulnerable person at home (or returns home) when offence committed Victim compelled to leave their home Established evidence of community/wider impact Failure to comply with current court orders Offence committed on licence Offences taken into consideration Failure to respond to warnings about behaviour Factors reducing seriousness or reflecting personal mitigation No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions Remorse, particularly where evidenced by voluntary reparation to the victim Good character and/or exemplary conduct Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment Age and/or lack of maturity where it affects the responsibility of the offender Mental disorder or learning disability (where not linked to the commission of the offence) Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives Determination and/or demonstration of steps having been taken to address addiction or offending behaviour

Robbery Definitive Guideline 19 STEP THREE Consider any factors which indicate a reduction for assistance to the prosecution The court should take into account sections 73 and 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (assistance by defendants: reduction or review of sentence) and any other rule of law by virtue of which an offender may receive a discounted sentence in consequence of assistance given (or offered) to the prosecutor or investigator. STEP FOUR Reduction for guilty pleas The court should take account of any potential reduction for a guilty plea in accordance with section 144 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the Guilty Plea guideline. ROBBERY DWELLING STEP FIVE Dangerousness The court should consider whether having regard to the criteria contained in Chapter 5 of Part 12 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 it would be appropriate to impose a life sentence (section 224A or section 225) or an extended sentence (section 226A). When sentencing offenders to a life sentence under these provisions, the notional determinate sentence should be used as the basis for the setting of a minimum term. STEP SIX Totality principle If sentencing an offender for more than one offence, or where the offender is already serving a sentence, consider whether the total sentence is just and proportionate to the overall offending behaviour in accordance with the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. STEP SEVEN Compensation and ancillary orders In all cases the court should consider whether to make compensation and/or other ancillary orders. Where the offence involves a firearm, an imitation firearm or an offensive weapon the court may consider the criteria in section 19 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 for the imposition of a Serious Crime Prevention Order. STEP EIGHT Reasons Section 174 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 imposes a duty to give reasons for, and explain the effect of, the sentence. STEP NINE Consideration for time spent on bail The court must consider whether to give credit for time spent on bail in accordance with section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

20 Robbery Definitive Guideline Blank page

DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk