Political Activity and Lobbying Report 2017

Similar documents
Political Activity and Lobbying Report 2016

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

If you have questions, please or call

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

2016 us election results

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

CenturyLink Political Contributions Report. July 1, 2017 December 31, 2017

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Understanding UCC Article 9 Foreclosures. CEU Information

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Economic Nexus Standards in State Taxation. CEU Information

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

Report of Lobbying and Political Contributions For Fiscal Year 2015

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

Lobbying: 10 Answers you need to know Venable LLP

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Gun Laws Matter. A Comparison of State Firearms Laws and Statistics

Election Year Corporate Political Activity: Legal Risks and Strategic Opportunities

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

Instructions for Completing the Trustee Certification/Affidavit for a Securities-Backed Line of Credit

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

VOL. XV No. 12 Dec. 3, 2018

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Presentation Outline

Records on David McIntosh Deputy Director of the Council on Competitiveness

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

The Great Immigration Turnaround

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

Key Recent Changes To Lobbying, Campaign Finance Rules

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle. PAC Candidate Contributions. Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

Governing Board Roster

Repository Survey - Electronic Disposition Reporting

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

RULE 7.5: FIRM NAMES AND LETTERHEADS

Fundamentals of the U.S. Transportation Construction Market

Incarcerated Women and Girls

Briefing ELECTION REFORM. Ready for Reform? After a day of chaos, a month of uncertainty and nearly two years of INSIDE. electionline.

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

STATE ADULT GUARDIANSHIP LEGISLATION: DIRECTIONS OF REFORM Commission on Law and Aging American Bar Association

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR FINGERPRINT CARDS (see attachment 1 for sample card)

State and Local Immigration Laws: Recap of 2013 and Outlook for November 22, 2013

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

State Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

State Campaign Finance Disclosure Requirements Election Cycle

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Regional CLE Program:

Table 1. Comparison of Creditor s Rights Provisions Of the Uniform LP Act and the Uniform LLC Act

Bylaws. of the. Notre Dame Law Association. Amended September ARTICLE I Name

Washington, D.C. Update

State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List

Update on State Judicial Issues. William E. Raftery KIS Analyst Williamsburg, VA

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

HAVA Implementation in the 50 States: A Summary of State Implementation Plans

TODAY S TOPICS COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW. Corporate Political Activity: Compliance Tips for the 2014 Election Year

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

GUIDING PRINCIPLES THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ELECTRICITY POLICY (NCEP)

Meredith Nethercutt. SHRM Advocacy Team Webinar Series. Senior Associate, Member Advocacy. A-Team Program Director.

Transcription:

and Lobbying Transparency is a critical part of the relationships we have with our government partners and the taxpayers we ultimately serve, as well as our shareholders, and we are committed to transparency regarding our government relations and political efforts. In addition to complying with applicable disclosure laws, CoreCivic is going a step further to produce this annual report, which we believe will bring further clarity to our activities. We believe it is the right thing to do for our business, our partners and our shareholders. CoreCivic s political and government relations activities are designed to educate federal, state and local officials on the benefits of partnership corrections, CoreCivic s ability to assist them in meeting their needs and our track record of success. Our company does not, under longstanding policy, lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for or duration of an individual s incarceration or detention. Page 1

Overview Corporate funds are used to make political contributions where allowed by law and where management has determined that such contributions will be an effective use of the funds. CoreCivic also sponsors a political action committee (PAC)* that makes contributions to federal candidates and to candidates in certain jurisdictions where contributions with corporate funds are not allowed. CoreCivic s political contributions and lobbying activities are subject to robust oversight, approval and compliance procedures. contributions using corporate funds require approval by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Development Officer or a Vice President Partnership Relations and, for compliance purposes, the Office of General Counsel. Government relations engagements and expenditures require Vice President-level or above approval. The Office of General Counsel and external compliance experts provide support for the company s reporting and other compliance obligations, as well as periodic compliance training for internal partnership development personnel and contract government relations professionals. The Risk Committee of CoreCivic s Board of Directors provides Board-level oversight of the Company s political and government relations activities and compliance procedures. Compliance policies and procedures are addressed in CoreCivic s Code of Ethics and in greater detail in our Government Relations policy.** Our government relations activities focus on legislative, regulatory and executive actions that may impact the construction, operation and leasing of privately owned or managed prisons, detention facilities, and residential reentry centers. We also advocate for a wide range of innovative, cost-saving government real estate solutions through our CoreCivic Properties business offering. The disclosures in the lobbying reports filed by the company under the Federal Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 ( LDA ), are representative of the types of matters on which the company lobbies. As stated in our most recent LDA report,*** and as a matter of longstanding corporate policy and practice, CoreCivic does not lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for an individual s incarceration or detention. This policy is included in our Code of Ethics and our Government Relations Policy. * CoreCivic Action Committee ** http://www.corecivic.com/media/default/documents/misc/policy-3-28.pdf *** Available at https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/ Page 2

Contributions Table A-1 Totals by Source of Funds Combined Corporate and CoreCivic PAC................... $829,100.00 Corporate....................................... $714,100.00 CoreCivic PAC.................................... $115,000.00 Totals by Recipient Category (Source in Parenthesis) Federal Candidates, Parties & Committees (CoreCivic PAC)......... $110,500.00 State/Local Candidates, Parties & Committees (Combined)......... $271,100.00 National 527 (Corporate).............................. $447,500.00 Table A-2 (Continued on following page) State Type CoreCivic PAC Corporate AL Candidate $2,000.00 $2,500.00 AL Total $2,000.00 $2,500.00 AZ Candidate $5,000.00 AZ Total $5,000.00 CA Candidate $50,500.00 Committee $17,500.00 Party $40,000.00 CA Total $108,000.00 CO Committee $32,300.00 CO Total $32,300.00 FL Candidate Committee $20,000.00 Party FL Total $20,000.00 GA Candidate $22,000.00 Committee $2,500.00 $1,500.00 GA Total $2,500.00 $23,500.00 ID Candidate $5,000.00 ID Total $5,000.00 IN Candidate $2,500.00 IN Total $2,500.00 KY Candidate $2,500.00 Party $2,500.00 KY Total $5,000.00 MS Candidate $5,000.00 $1,000.00 MS Total $5,000.00 $1,000.00 MT Candidate $3,500.00 Party $2,000.00 MT Total $5,500.00 ND Candidate $3,000.00 ND Total $3,000.00 NE Candidate $5,000.00 NE Total $5,000.00 Page 3

State Type CoreCivic PAC Corporate NH Candidate $5,000.00 NH Total $5,000.00 NM Candidate $2,500.00 $2,950.00 Committee $1,000.00 NM Total $2,500.00 $3,950.00 SC Committee $2,500.00 SC Total $2,500.00 TN Candidate $26,350.00 Committee $5,000.00 $27,500.00 Party $5,000.00 $10,000.00 TN Total $10,000.00 $63,850.00 TX Candidate $9,000.00 Committee $5,000.00 TX Total $14,000.00 UT Candidate $2,500.00 UT Total $2,500.00 VA Candidate $1,500.00 VA Total $1,500.00 VT Committee $500.00 Party $1,000.00 VT Total $1,500.00 WV Committee $2,500.00 WV Total $2,500.00 National Parties $30,000.00 National 527's $447,500.00 Federal Committees $10,000.00 Operating Expense $120.84 GRAND TOTAL $115,120.84 $714,100.00 527 Organizations CoreCivic contributed to the following national 527 organizations in : Democratic Governors Association Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee Midwestern Governors Association National Governors Association Republican Governors Association Republican State Leadership Committee Western Governors Association The aggregate total of contributions to these organizations is included in the summary data listed above. Page 4

Additional information regarding recipient candidate and political committees, as well as the laws, rules and regulations applicable to political contributions by corporations and corporate affiliated political action committees, is available publicly through Internet sites maintained by the relevant Federal (e.g. the Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service websites, www.fec.gov and www.irs.gov) and state agencies (e.g., www.sos.ca.gov). Lobbying Information CoreCivic retains the services of consultant government relations professionals in jurisdictions where it does or may in the future do business. CoreCivic employees also register as lobbyists in jurisdictions where their activities meet the statutory definition. The list below shows CoreCivic s consultant registered lobbyists in by jurisdiction. Table B-1 Jurisdiction Federal Alabama Arizona California Colorado Florida Georgia Hawaii Kentucky Minnesota Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico Oklahoma South Carolina Tennessee Texas Vermont Wisconsin Wyoming Firm Name Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Greenberg Traurig, LLP Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC Simmons Russel Group Capitol Resources LLC Policy Development Group Inc. Molera Alvarez LLC Bell McAndrews & Hiltachk LLP Capitol Advocacy Stutzman Public Affairs Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Smith, Bryan & Myers Troutman Sanders Strategies Ashford & Wriston (Slovin & Itto) Ashford & Wriston (SanHi Government Strategies) Carlsmith Ball McBrayer McGinnis Leslie & Kirkland Hill Capitol Strategies Ferrari Public Affairs Advantage Government Affairs, LLC Edwin T. Mahr Fried Kilpatrick Guinn LLC Scott Adkins Consulting, Inc. The Ozmint Firm Johnson Poss Government Relations Greenberg Traurig, LLP MacLean, Meehan and Rice (MMR) Wiscon Capitol Solutions LLC Wyoming Group, LLC CoreCivic s contracts with its outside government relations professionals contain strict conflict of interest clauses that permit CoreCivic to terminate the relationship if the professional or his or her firm engages in activities that conflict with CoreCivic s commitment not to lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for or duration of an individual s incarceration or detention. Page 5

Lobbying Related Expenses In, CoreCivic expended approximately $1.5 million in fees and other payments relating to lobbying at the Federal, state, and local levels. Of this amount, approximately $678,329 was attributable to Federal lobbying-related activities and the remainder (approximately $871,293) to state and local activities. None of this amount is related to grassroots lobbying communications (communications directed to the general public that refer to specific legislation or regulation, reflects a view on such legislation, or regulation or encourages the recipients to take action with respect to such legislation or regulation). CoreCivic works with a number of consultant lobbyists to ensure that public officials are made aware of the issues impacting our industry. CoreCivic and its consultant lobbyists file disclosure reports at the Federal, state, and local level to comply with the various rules of all jurisdictions in which we have a presence. Trade and Membership Associations, Chambers of Commerce, and Other Groups CoreCivic, its facilities and employees also are members of certain trade and membership associations, chambers of commerce and other groups. Below is a list of such organizations to which CoreCivic paid dues or fees of $25,000 or more in, of which a portion were not tax deductible as a result of being used by the organization for lobbying purposes: Table B-2 Trade Association, Membership Association & Chamber Total Paid % Non-Deductible for Lobbying Non-Deductible Portion Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce $45,500.00 5% $2,275.00 US Chamber of Commerce $62,500.00 40% $25,000.00 National Association of Real $55,600.00 25% $13,900.00 Estate Investment Trusts Combined Other State & Local $12,432.50 10% $1,243.25 Chambers of Commerce TOTAL $176,032.50 $42,418.25 CoreCivic contributes or pays dues to other tax exempt organizations that engage in advocacy or educational efforts on behalf of their constituencies. CoreCivic has not been made aware that any amounts paid or contributed by CoreCivic are used for lobbying or other political activities. In, CoreCivic was not a member of any partnership corrections-related or similar trade association that engages in political activities on behalf of its members. Many CoreCivic employees are members of the American Correctional Association ( ACA ), which is a 501(c) (3) charitable organization. CoreCivic also pays audit and accreditation related fees to the ACA. 501(c)(3) organizations are subject to strict limitations on political activities, and CoreCivic has not been made aware that any dues or fees paid by CoreCivic or its member employees are used for lobbying. This report is not a supplement to any other report filed or required to be filed by the company with any governmental agency. To the extent the report contains information about PAC, it is not intended as a solicitation for contributions to PAC from any person. The report has not been audited and the company undertakes no obligation to issue any updates or corrections. Page 6