No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Similar documents
No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 26 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

(See Next Page For Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

Case: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

SEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FILING CHECKLIST

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:09-cv CAS-MAN Document 107 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1464 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 26 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case 1:17-cv LMB-TCB Document 116 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1407

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

National Insecurity: The Plenary Power Doctrine from FDR to Trump

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document 180 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 85 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. CV T

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

(See Next Page For Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI I

Case: 2:14-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: , 02/06/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 26-1, Page 1 of 9. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DECISION AND ORDER

Case: Document: 24-1 Filed: 11/17/2016 Pages: 9. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Case3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Motions

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8

Case: , 08/27/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 126-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUSAN L. VAUGHAN, ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv RC Document 23 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Current Immigration Issues in Higher Education under the New Administration

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Daily Update on Litigation Challenging the Travel Ban and Sanctuary City Executive Orders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case: Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,

Case 1:05-cv WMN Document 88 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv ABJ Document 12 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 121 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 6

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ALEXIS DEGELMANN, et al., ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC.,

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case: , 07/03/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 12-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump Doc. 55 No. 17-1351 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al. Defendants-Appellants On Appeal from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Chuang, J.) Civil Action No. TDC-17-0361 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF T.A. AS AMICUS CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING EXPEDITED APPEAL Date: March 31, 2017 WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP rbernstein@willkie.com 1875 K Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20006-1238 Telephone: (202) 303-1000 Facsimile: (202) 303-2000 Counsel for Amicus Curiae T.A. Dockets.Justia.com

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF T.A. AS AMICUS CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING EXPEDITED APPEAL Pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, amicus curiae T.A., 1 by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves for leave to file a 2,563-word amicus curiae brief in opposition to Appellants Motion for a Stay Pending Expedited Appeal. Amicus states as follows: 1. T.A. is a Muslim and United States citizen who was raised in Yemen. T.A. s father and many members of T.A. s extended family hold Yemeni passports and reside abroad. T.A. is affected by the Amended Executive Order issued on March 6, 2017, entitled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States (the Amended Executive Order ). Under the Amended Order, much of T.A. s extended family including his father, aunts, uncles, and cousins are barred from entering the United States. Accordingly, T.A. has a direct interest in the outcome of this case. 1 This brief uses initials, rather than T.A. s full name, to reduce the risk of potential reprisals to T.A. or his family members. Doe v. Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 273 (4th Cir. 2014) (use of pseudonym may be appropriate, even for a party, when identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or even more critically, to innocent non-parties ) (quoting James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993)). - 1 -

2. T.A. was granted leave and filed an amicus brief in the District of Hawaii in Hawaii v. Trump, No. 1:17-CV-00050 (D. Haw. Mar. 13, 2017), ECF. No. 169. District Judge Derrick K. Watson cited T.A. s brief in his Memorandum Opinion, dated March 15, 2017, restraining enforcement of Sections 2 and 6 of the Amended Order. Hawaii v. Trump, No. 1:17-CV-00050 (D. Haw. Mar. 15, 2017) ECF. No. 219, at *37 n.16, *42. 3. The proposed amicus brief, filed herewith, is helpful to the Court. It shows how lack of irreparable injury to national security during the expedited appeal before this Court provides one dispositive ground for denying the Government s motion to stay the District Court s preliminary injunction. In particular, the proposed amicus brief shows how the unrebutted evidence establishes the absence of any harm from a continuation of the current, successful vetting procedures of the United States during the brief period that the expedited appeal will be pending before this Court. 4. All parties have consented to T.A. s filing of the proposed amicus brief. 5. The proposed amicus brief contains 2,563 words. Neither the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure nor the Local Rules for the Fourth Circuit address the length of an amicus brief filed in opposition to a motion for a stay. One analogue is the 2,600-word limit for amicus briefs filed concerning petitions for panel rehearing. - 2 -

2,600 words is also half of the 5,200 words permitted for the Government s Motion to Stay. CONCLUSION Amicus respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion for leave to file, and accept for filing, the amicus curiae brief attached as Exhibit A. Dated: March 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP (202) 303-1000 rbernstein@willkie.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae T.A. - 3 -

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for the parties in this case, all of whom consent to the filing of the proposed amicus brief. Executed March 31, 2017. s/ Attorney for Amicus Curiae T.A. - 4 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 31st day of March 2017, I served the foregoing Motion for Leave to File Brief of T.A. as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees via the Court s ECF system upon all counsel. s/ Attorney for Amicus Curiae T.A. - 5 -

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(a)(7)(C), the undersigned counsel certifies that this motion: (i) complies with the typeface requirements of Rule 32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Rule 32(a)(6) because it has been prepared using Microsoft Office Word and is set in Times New Roman font in a size equivalent to 14 points or larger and, (ii) complies with the length requirement of Rule 27(d)(2) because it is 2,563 words. Dated: March 31, 2017 /s/ WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP - 6 -