Senate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated

Similar documents
TEXT OBTAINED BY WEB PAGE STATE.AZ.US; 25th APRIL 2003.

TEXT OBTAINED BY WORLD WIDE WEB PAGE: STATE.MN.US; 29th APRIL 2003.

CANON 1 A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Recommends Modification of Canons of Judicial Ethics

Florida A&M University Student Government Association

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT FOR THE COMMONWEALTH JUDICIARY AND PROCEDURE FOR FILING GRIEVANCES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY

California Code of Judicial Ethics

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 10 VERMONT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. Vt. A.O. 10 PREAMBLE (2012) PREAMBLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct

JUDICIAL CONDUCT IN THE 21 st CENTURY

lb Ðat? COOK COI]NTY ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS GENERAL ORDER NO. 2OO9-2

Senate Statutes - Title IV (Legislative Branch) - Updated

Supreme Court of Florida

Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct. (2013 Revision)

Covering Iowa Law and Courts: A Guide for Journalists

ARIZONA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Senate Rules of Procedure - Updated

Code of Administrative Law Judge Ethics

Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges 2014

July 2004 PRELIMINARY DRAFT

Claims of violation of this Rule shall be filed with and considered by the Judicial Standards Commission.

Superior Court of California, County of Orange. Judicial Arbitration Program Guidelines

Code of Judicial Conduct

CANON 4. A judge shall conduct all of the judge s extra-judicial activities so that they 2

Part I Arbitrator Qualifications

a. The Judicial Branch is dedicated to the interpretation and enforcement of all the governing documents and legislation of ASSOU.

GEORGIA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

ILLINOIS CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

TEXT OBTAINED BY WORLD WIDE WEB PAGE: STATE.IL.US; 28th APRIL 2003.

Ethics in Judicial Elections

JUDICIAL ETHICS FOR NEW MUNICIPAL COURT CLERKS

The Uganda Code of Judicial Conduct

Russian Judicial Department (January, 2006 version) Rules of Conduct for Judicial Court Employees. Introduction

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct

Introducing the Code of Judicial Conduct The Ethics of Ex Parte Communications, Judicial Demeanor and other ethical considerations

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

A Model Code of Judicial Conduct for State Administrative Law Judges - National Conference of Administrative Law Judges - American Bar Association

February I. Conduct Inside the Courtroom. Generally

Senate Statutes - Title I (Definitions) - Updated

OKLAHOMA. Comparison of Oklahoma Revised Code of Judicial Conduct to ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (2007) Effective April 15, 2011

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 43. (Originally issued: February 5, 1994) (Revised: August 1996)

IBRD/IDA/IFC/MIGA Policy

Ethics and Professionalism In DWI Cases

Arizona Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee

(A) A magisterial district judge shall perform the duties of judicial office, including administrative duties, without bias or prejudice.

Table of Contents CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON APPLICABILITY...

TITLE 26. JUDICIAL BRANCH/COURTS VHAKV FVTCECVLKE/FVTCECKV CUKO

IN RE LOZANO, S.Ct. No. 29,264 (Filed June 8, 2010) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Constitution of the Undergraduate Student Government of The Ohio State University

Board of Trustees Bylaws

2018 SPRING JUDGES CONFERENCE

A.M. No SC Adopting the New Code of Judicial Conduct for the Philippine Judiciary Supreme Court of the Philippines 2004

POLITICAL OR CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY, AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY.

The Supreme Court of Ohio

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

Florida Atlantic University Student Government Student Body Statutes

Guide to Judiciary Policy

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR THE JUDGES OF THE MECHANISM

Association of Women Attorneys of Lake County

CONSTITUTION STUDENT BAR ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW CONSTITUTION 1 ARTICLE I. NAME 2 ARTICLE II.

ABA MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT PREAMBLE

AMENDED BYLAWS OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HISTORICAL SOCIETY (a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation) SECTION 1 NAME AND OFFICES

Section 1: Section 2: Section 3: Section 4: Section 1: Section 2:

By Laws. United Students of the University of Alaska Southeast Ketchikan campus

LAMOILLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS. Article I. Name

Constitution of the Student Body of the University of South Florida at Tampa ARTICLE I: MEMBERSHIP AND RIGHTS OF STUDENTS

STUDENT BODY STATUTES DEFINITIONS, INTERPRETATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION OF AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATUTES.

ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA CONSTITUTION. Preamble. ARTICLE I- Name and Membership

BYLAWS THE SOCIETY FOR NEUROECONOMICS. (A Not-For-Profit Corporation) ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP

BY-LAWS OF FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE LABOR COMMITTEE Jerrard F. Young Lodge D.C. #1 Updated 7 July 2005

BY-LAWS of the EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA RUGBY UNION As Amended on February 18, 2009

Georgia Southern Student Government Association Constitution Updated Spring 2016

Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to ethics in government.

National Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct

DRAFT Proposed Changes February Constitution.

BY-LAWS OF THE BLACK YOUNG DEMOCRATS of SAN FRANCISCO

University of Central Florida Fiftieth Student Body Senate Constitutional Amendment 50-01

BYLAWS STUDENT GOVERNMENT

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS. Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia. A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation

Last Reviewed/Revised: 12/16/2013 Revised Original Author: MATES Board

University of South Florida Student Government Statutes

Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters

Maryland State Laws Applicable to Harford Community College Updated 11/12/2017

BYLAWS WESTERN DRESSAGE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA. July 26, 2010

The Professional Staff Association of Boise State University

Effingham Public Library By-Laws of the Board of Directors. Updated September 2015

2016 Bylaws of the Lancaster County Democratic Party

Financial Oversight And Management Board For Puerto Rico. Bylaws

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY SENATE OF FAIRMONT STATE UNIVERSITY. ARTICLE I. Name, Purpose, and Jurisdiction

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

STUDENT BAR ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SHEPARD BROAD COLLEGE OF LAW (Last Updated, Fall 2016)

CENTRAL FLORIDA SOFTBALL LEAGUE BYLAWS

COMPENDIUM OF TEXTS RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF ELECTED OFFICERS OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AND THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND

IN RE RAMIREZ, S.Ct. No. 31,664 (Filed June 26, 2009) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FORMAL REPRIMAND FORMAL REPRIMAND

The Judicial Ethics Committee of the California Judges Association has issued the following formal opinions:

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE STUDENT ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION

TITLE IV: THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Constitution. And. By-Laws. Local Health Professionals and Allied Employees AFT/AFL-CIO

Transcription:

University of South Florida Scholar Commons Legislative Branch Publications Student Government 12-31-2012 Senate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated 04-29-13 Adam Aldridge University of South Florida, Student Government Senate, aldridge1@usf.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sg_leg_pubs Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Scholar Commons Citation Aldridge, Adam, "Senate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated 04-29-13" (2012). Legislative Branch Publications. Paper 398. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sg_leg_pubs/398 This Senate Governing Document is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Government at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Legislative Branch Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact scholarcommons@usf.edu.

Title 5 The Judicial Branch Page 1 of 10

Chapter 500 Judicial Branch Composition and Authority 500.1 The composition and authority of the Judicial Branch shall be as contained in the Student Body Constitution. Page 2 of 10

Chapter 501 Duties and Responsibilities of the Supreme Court 501.1 The Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction over: 501.1.1 All cases and controversies involving Student Government. 501.1.2 All cases and controversies involving judicial review of Senate legislation. 501.1.3 All cases and controversies involving a contest of elections. 501.1.4 All cases of impeachment except for the impeachment of members of the Supreme Court. 501.2 The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction over: 501.2.1 All cases and controversies involving the Election Rules Commission. 501.2.2 All cases and controversies involving ASMB. 501.2.3 Final student appeals of USF Parking and Transportation Services violations. 1 501.3 The Supreme Court shall draw up its respective Rules of Procedure which may be amended by a supermajority vote, as defined in statutes, of the Supreme Court. The Rules of Procedure may not conflict with Student Government Statutes or the Student Body Constitution. 501.4 All cases and controversies shall be handled according to guidelines outlined in the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. 501.5 A majority vote of the Supreme Court may decide any case pending before the court. 501.6 The Supreme Court shall have quorum in order for any official opinion pertaining to any issue brought forth to the court 2 to be rendered. Quorum shall be as follows: Justices Currently on Bench Quorum 9 7 8 6 7 or less 5 501.7 Exceptions to quorum regarding final student appeals of Parking and Transportation Services violations shall be made in the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. 501.8 The court may have regular meetings for the purpose of discussing general administrative issues, as they pertain to the court. These meetings shall require a simple majority of active justices present in order to satisfy the requirement for quorum. 3 1 SB 47-084, Revises 501.1-501.2.4 2 SB [S] 51-018 Revises 501.6 3 SB [S] 51-018 Adds clause 501.8 Page 3 of 10

501.9 For a Supreme Court decision to be official and recognized, the majority opinion must be made public, in writing, within one calendar week of the verdict. The dissenting opinion shall appoint a Justice to write a brief which shall be made public with the majority opinion. 501.10 Each opinion shall be signed by the justices that wrote or supported it. 4 4 SB 47-004, inserts 501.7.1 Page 4 of 10

Chapter 502 Duties and Responsibilities of Justices of the Supreme Court 502.1 The Supreme Court shall be composed of nine Justices appointed by the Student Body President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Supreme Court shall elect from its body the positions of Senior Justice, Ranking Justice and Committee Chairs as per Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. All Supreme Court Officers, excluding Committee Chairs, must be elected by a majority of the Supreme Court and there must be a minimum of 5 Justices appointed to the Supreme Court at the time of selection. 502.2 The Chief Justice 502.2.1 The duties of the Chief Justice shall include, but are not limited to: 502.2.1.1 To preside over all meetings and proceedings of the Judiciary. 502.2.1.2 To administer the Oath of Office to the President and Vice President of the Student Body, and all incoming Justices. 502.2.1.3 To run meetings and arrange dockets and agendas for said meetings. 502.2.1.4 To have first speaking rights on issues. 502.2.1.5 To assign opinions of majority and minority. 502.2.1.6 To rule on objections during trials. 502.2.1.7 To appoint committee members. 502.2.1.8 To receive and review all complaints and appeals first. 502.2.1.9 Shall be the accountable financial officer for the Supreme Court, and shall ultimately be responsible for all fiscal records. 502.2.1.10 Shall have the power to initiate ad-hoc committees, with the advice and consent of the other Supreme Court Officers. 502.2.1.11 Preside over the annual ERC ROP Revision ad-hoc committee, and present a report to the Supreme Court on the committee s findings. 502.2.1.12 Prepare and screen all press related materials and supervise the Supreme Court Public Relations Coordinator in relaying such materials to the Public. 502.2.1.13 Any duties deemed necessary by a majority of the Supreme Court. 502.3 The Senior Justice 502.3.1 The duties of the Senior Justice shall include, but are not limited to: 502.3.1.1 Preside over all meetings in the absence of the Chief Justice. 502.3.1.2 Preside over at least one meeting per semester. 502.3.1.3 Have second speaking rights on all issues. 502.3.1.4 Oversee the activities of all committees under his/her authority. 502.3.1.5 Prepare and present a report of his/her activities. 502.3.1.6 Review all complaints and appeals with the Chief Justice. Page 5 of 10

502.3.1.7 Review all Justice absence excuse forms. 502.3.1.8 Any duties deemed necessary by a majority of the Supreme Court. 502.4 The Ranking Justice 502.4.1 The duties of the Ranking Justice shall include, but are not limited to: 502.4.1.1 Preside over all meetings, in the absence of both the Chief and Senior Justices. 502.4.1.2 Preside over at least one meeting per semester. 502.4.1.3 Have third speaking rights on all issues. 502.4.1.4 Any duties deemed necessary by a majority of the Supreme Court. Page 6 of 10

Chapter 503 Judicial Ethics Act 503.1 Legislative Intent: The Judicial system is based on the Principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary shall interpret and apply the laws that govern, and the role of the judiciary is central to the American concepts of Justice and Rule of Law. Intrinsic to this concept are the precepts that justices, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in the legal system. The Justice is an arbiter of facts and law for the resolution of disputes and a highly visible member of Student Government under the Rule of Law. 503.2 The Judicial Ethics Act, hereafter the Act, established standards for the ethical conduct of the Supreme Court Justices on and off the bench. The statutes below should be read together as a whole and each provision should be construed in context and consistent with every other provision. Nothing in the Act shall either impair the essential independence of Justices in making decision or provide a separate basis for civil liability. 503.3 The Act governs the conduct of Justices and is binding upon them, whether disciplinary action is appropriate and the degree of discipline to be imposed requires a reasoned application of the text and consideration of such factors as the seriousness of the transgression, whether there is a plan of improper activity, and the effect of the improper activity on others or on the judicial system. 503.4 A Justice shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. A justice shall participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing high standards of conduct and shall personally observe those standards so that the integrity and independence of the Judiciary shall be preserved. The provisions of the act are to be applied to further this objective. A Judicial decision or administrative act later determined to be incorrect legally is not itself a violation of the Act. 503.5 A Justice shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of his or her activities through following the measures prescribed below: 503.5.1 A Justice shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner the promoted public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the Judiciary. 503.5.2 A Justice shall not allow family, social, political, or other relationships to influence their conduct or judgment, nor shall a Justice convey, or permit others to convey, the impression that any individual is in a position to influence a Justice. 503.5.3 A Justice shall not lend the prestige of Judicial Office to advance the pecuniary or personal interests of the Justices or others, nor shall a Justice testify voluntarily as a material witness before the Student Government Supreme Court. 503.6 A Justice shall perform the duties of the Judicial Office impartially and diligently, following the measures prescribed below: Page 7 of 10

503.6.1 A Justice shall hear and decide all matters assigned to the Supreme Court except those in which he or she recues themselves. 503.6.2 A Justice shall be faithful to the law regardless of partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism. 503.6.3 A Justice shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to all with whom the Justice deals with in an official capacity; a Justice shall also require similar conduct of all counselors, Supreme Court staff, and personnel under the Justice s direction and control. 503.6.4 A Justice shall perform Judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A Justice shall not, in the performance of Judicial duties, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, gender, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socio-economic status. 503.6.5 A Justice shall require student counselors in proceedings before the Justice to refrain from manifesting, by words or by conduct, bias or prejudice based upon race, gender, religion, national origin, disability, age sexual orientation, or socio-economic status against parties, witnesses, counselors, or others. This rule does not preclude legitimate advocacy when such issues are involved with the proceeding. 503.6.6 A Justice shall dispose of all matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently. 503.6.7 A Justice shall not make any public comment about a pending or impending proceeding in the Supreme Court, and a Justice shall not make any non-public comment that might interfere with a fair trial or hearing. The Justice shall require a similar abstention on the part of Supreme Court personnel subject to the Justice s direction and control. 503.6.8 A Justice shall not disclose or use, for any purpose unrelated to his or her judiciary capacity, non-public information acquired in a judicial capacity. 503.6.9 A Justice with supervisory authority for the judicial performance of other Justices shall take reasonable measures to ensure the prompt disposition of matters before them and the proper performance of other judicial responsibilities. 503.7 A Justice with reliable information that another Justice has violated any provision of the Act shall initiate appropriate corrective action procedures. 503.8 A Justice shall recuse himself or herself in any proceedings in which recusal is required by Florida law. In all trial proceedings, a Justice shall disclose information that parties might consider relevant to the question of recusal, even if the Justice believes there is no actual basis for recusal. 503.9 A Justice shall so conduct extrajudicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations, following the measures prescribed below: 503.9.1 A Justice shall conduct extrajudicial activities so they do not: 503.9.1.1 Cast reasonable doubt on his or her capacity to act impartially. 503.9.1.2 Demean the judicial office. 503.9.1.3 Interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties. 503.9.2 A Justice shall not engage in financial and business dealings which: Page 8 of 10

503.9.2.1 May reasonably be perceived to exploit the Justice s position. 503.9.2.2 Involve the Justice in frequent transactions or continuing business relationships with counselors or other people likely to appear before the Supreme Court. 503.9.3 A Justice shall under no circumstances accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan if the donor or lender is a party whose interests have come or are reasonably likely to come before the Supreme Court. 503.9.4 A Justice shall not practice in the function of Student Counselor. 503.9.5 A Justice shall not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for Student Government Office. A Justice shall not personally solicit funds or make contributions for any candidate for Student Government Elections. 503.9.6 Justices shall not engage in any political activity within Student Government, other than in relation to measures concerning the improvement of the law, the judicial system, or the administration of justice. Page 9 of 10

Chapter 504 Declaratory Judgment Panel 5 504.1 The purpose of the Declaratory Judgment Panel, hereafter referred to as the Panel, shall be to offer a conclusive and legally binding opinion, with regard to the clarification of Student Government Statutes, which may not take into account circumstances specific to the request, nor mandate any further action to be taken. 504.2 The Declaratory Judgment Panel shall be comprised of the following members: 504.2.1 The Chief Justice 504.2.2 Two Justices elected by the Supreme Court to serve for the remainder of the Student Government term. 504.2.2.1 Should a Justice no longer be able to serve on the aforementioned Panel, the Court shall elect another Justice to fill the position at the next scheduled meeting. 504.2.2.2 Any Justice on the Panel, excluding the Chief Justice, may be brought up for a vote of confidence by a supermajority vote of the Supreme Court. 504.3 Should a Justice be removed from office or resign, the Supreme Court shall elect another Justice to fill the position as defined in the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. 504.4 Only Officers of Student Government may make a request for Declaratory Judgment. 504.5 The Panel must meet within 48 hours of a request being made, excluding weekends and University holidays. 504.6 The opinion of the Panel may be appealed to the entire Court and must be heard within 5 business days. 504.7 In the event that the Supreme Court should not meet the minimum required number of appointed Justices to satisfy the statutorily prescribed quorum, the Declaratory Judgment process may not be utilized. 5 SB [S] 52-005 adds this chapter Page 10 of 10