FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

Similar documents
copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) )

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

) DEFENDANT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ) PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT. ) Trial Date: None

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

)

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 5:08-cv JLQ -OP Document 75 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:2561

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

RIiD 51 PX. Fairfax, Virginia (703) [CONVENIENCE OF DEFENDANTS EMPLOYEES AS WITNESSES]

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G. DISTRIBUTING, INC.

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:08-cv JLQ -OP Document 74 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:2539

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Request for Publication

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

LE] Judgment after jury trial

23 vs. UtiliuiÍLi:xl Civil Case. 2 NANCY BAl~RON Bar No R

DAVID GENTRY, JAMES PARKER, MARK MID LAM, JAMES BASS, and CALGUNS SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION,

Case 2:13-bk ER Doc 245 Filed 03/12/15 Entered 03/12/15 14:35:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

nee eaven JAN 0 5%018 SAN MATEO COUNTY Joanna Ghosh (SBN

a. Name of person served:

Transcription:

MCllL&ASS0C. ljoo3 1 3 4 5 6. CD. Michel SBN 1448 W. Le Sniith SBN 6115 Scott M. Franiclin SBN 04 MTCIfEL & A.SSOCIAThS, P.C. 180 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Bcach CA 9080 Telephone: (56 6-4444 Facsimile: (56 6-4445 Attorneys for Defendant San.Qabrie Valley Gun Club 7 IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia 1. ii 1 14 INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES CALMAT CO. dba VIJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DiVISION> a Delaware corporiton, Plaintiff, vs. EAST li$trict... CASE NO: t(c068 FAX STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MEDIATION CUTOFF AND POST MEDIATION STATUS CONFERENCE; LPROPOSEDJ ORDER 15 16 18 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY GUN CLUB, a uon-protit California corporation; and DOES 1-1000, inclusive, Defendants. >c- LU L( Cl The parties to this action, throurh th&r respeetive couns6l, heby stipultc ai4 agree to 0 the following. AVMiN1S WHEREAS, at the case management conference held in this mailer on April 10. 01. Plaintiff CalMat Co. dba Vulcan Materials Company, Wcstern Division (Vu1can requested an early mediation dcadline be set by ihe Caurt and Defendant San Gabriel Valley Gun Club ( SGVGC did not object to the request; WHEREAS, in light of the abovernentcncd request, the Court set a mcdi ttion completion deedline Of July 10, 01, and a post-mediatioo status conference or July 1 8, 01; STIIFULATION RE MEDIATION CUfOIF AND POST-MEDIATION STkTtTS CONEIiRIiNCE, IPROPOSFDJ ORDER jii

SBN SBN 1.3 4 5 6 C.D. Michel 1448 W.LeeSmith SBN 6115 Scott M. Franklin 04 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 180 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Beach, CA 9080 Telephone: (56 6-4444 Facsimile: (56 6-4445 Attorneys for Defendant San Gabriel Valley Gun Club 7 8 9 10 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES EAST DISTRICT 11 1 14 15 16 18 CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY GUThJ CLUB, a non-profit California corporation; and DOES 1-1000, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO: KC068J STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MEDIATION CUTOFF AND POST- MEDIATION STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 0 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the following. AVERMENTS WHEREAS, at the case management conference held in this matter on April 10, 01, Plaintiff CalMat Co. dba Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division ( Vulcan requested an early mediation deadline be set by the Court, and Defendant San Gabriel Valley Gun Club ( SGVGC did not object to the request; WHEREAS, in light of the abovementioned request, the Court set a mediation completion deadline of July 10, 01, and a post-mediation status conference for July 18, 01; 1 CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 WHEREAS, the parties scheduled mediation for June, 01, in light of the July 10, 01, deadline; 3 WHEREAS, as a result of a scheduling conflict, Vulcan has requested that the mediation 4 set for June, 01, be rescheduled; 5 WHEREAS, SGVGC does not object to the rescheduling of mediation if the rescheduled 6 mediation is to occur after July 14, 01 (SGVGC s counsel has a conflict for the entire period of 7 time between the currently scheduled mediation date and July 14, 01; 8 WHEREAS, the parties agree in the interests ofjustice and professional courtesy to 9 reschedule the mediation and to jointly request that the Court continue certain mediation-related 10 dates. 11 STIPULATION 1 THEREFORE, based on the foregoing facts, the parties hereby stipulate the relevant mediation completion date and hearing date shall be extended as follows to allow mediation to be 14 rescheduled: 15 -Mediation completion deadline will be extended from July 10, 01, to August 10, 01; 16 and -Post-mediation status conference will be extended from July 14, 01, to August 15, 18 01, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court s schedule will allow. 0 Dated: June/5, 01 MIC L & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Acott M.ranklin Attorneys for Defendant San Gabriel Valley Gun Club Dated: June, 01 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP Elizabeth A. Culley Attorney for Plaintiff CalMat Co. dba Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division CONFERENCE; IPROPOSEDI ORDER

1 WHEREAS, the parties scheduled mediation for June, 01, in light of the July 10, 01, deadline; 3 WHEREAS, as a result of a scheduling conflict, Vulcan has requested that the mediation 4 set for June, 01, be rescheduled; 5 WI-IEREAS, SGVGC does not object to the rescheduling of mediation if the rescheduled 6 mediation is to occur after July 14, 01 (SGVGC s counsel has a conflict for the entire period of 7 time between the currently scheduled mediation date and July 14, 01; 8 WHEREAS, the parties agree in the interests of justice and professional courtesy to 9 reschedule the mediation and to jointly request that the Court continue certain mediation-related 10 dates. 11 STIPULATION 1 THEREFORE, based on the foregoing facts, the patties hereby stipulate the relevant mediation completion date and hearing date shall be extended as follows to allow mediation to be 14 rescheduled: 15 -Mediation completion deadline will he extended from July 10, 01, to August 10, 01; 16 and -Post-mediation status conference will be extended from July 14, 01, to August 15, 18 01, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court s schedule will allow. 0 Dated: June, 01 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Dated: June 15, 01 Scott M. Franklin Attorneys for Defendant San Gabriel Valley Gun Club JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MI HELL, LLP $zabejr-(uhey Atmy for Plaintiff CalMat Co. dba Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED ORDER

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause having been shown, it is the 3 ORDER of this Court that the following dates are continued: 4 1. The mediation completion deadline herein will be continued from July 10, 01, to 5 Augustl0,01 6. The post-mediation status conference will be continued from July 18, 01, to 7 August 15, 01, at 8:30 a.rn. [or] 8 ITISSOORDERED. 9 10 Date: 11 Hon. R. Bruce Minto 1 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 14 15 16 18 0 3 CONFERENCE [PROPOSED1 ORDER

(VIA 1 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, Christina Sanchez, am employed in the City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, 4 California. I am over the age eighteen (18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 180 E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00, Long Beach, California 9080. 5 On June 15, 01, I served the foregoing document(s described as 6 7 CONFERENCE; [PROPOSEDJ ORDER 8 on the interested parties in this action by placing [ ] the original 9 [X] a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s addressed as follows: 10 Kemeth A. Ehrlich Elizabeth A. Culley 1 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP 00 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 X (BY MAIL As follows: I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and 14 processing correspondence for mailing. Under the practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, 15 California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date is more than one day after 16 date of deposit for mailing an affidavit. Executed on June 15, 01, at Long Beach, California. OVERNIGHT MAIL As follows: I am readily familiar with the. firm s practice of 18 collection and processing correspondence for overnight delivery by UPS/FED-EX. Under the practice it would be deposited with a facility regularly maintained by UPS/FED-EX for receipt on the same day in the ordinary course of business. Such envelope was sealed and placed for collection and delivery by UPS/FED-EX with delivery fees paid or provided for 0 in accordance with ordinary business practices. Executed on June 15, 01, at Long Beach, California. X (PERSONAL SERVICE I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee. Executed on June 15, 01, at Long Beach, California. X (STATE I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. (FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office of the member oft ar of this court at whose direction the service was made. CONFERENCE: [PROPOSED] ORDER