Find the winner of the election using majority rule given the results below: Choices (ABC) (ACB) (BAC) (BCA) (CAB) (CBA) Number of Votes

Similar documents
Name Chapter 14 Apportionment. 1. What was the Great Compromise in 1787? Populations of 15 states in 1790 as in your book on page 506:

Rounding decimals or fractions to whole numbers might seem to be one of the most boring subjects ever.

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Proportional (Mis)representation: The Mathematics of Apportionment

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

12.2 Defects in Voting Methods

1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Chapter 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment

Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate.

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

n(n 1) 2 C = total population total number of seats amount of increase original amount

Presidential Election Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison. ************************************ Difference of 100,456

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

People Come and People Go

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

The Impossibilities of Voting

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

Head-to-Head Winner. To decide if a Head-to-Head winner exists: Every candidate is matched on a one-on-one basis with every other candidate.

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

Voting Criteria: Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion Monotonicity Criterion Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion

Components of Population Change by State

Redistricting in Michigan

Exercises For DATA AND DECISIONS. Part I Voting

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Section 3: The Borda Count Method. Example 4: Using the preference schedule from Example 3, identify the Borda candidate.

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2012

Oklahoma, Maine, Migration and Right to Work : A Confused and Misleading Analysis. By the Bureau of Labor Education, University of Maine (Spring 2012)

US History, Ms. Brown Website: dph7history.weebly.com

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

1. According to Washington, what is needed to prevent an uprising like Shays Rebellion? [1]

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued. Voting II 1/27

Fairness Criteria. Majority Criterion: If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, that candidate should win the election.

In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion.

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

State Complaint Information

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Today s plan: Section : Plurality with Elimination Method and a second Fairness Criterion: The Monotocity Criterion.

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Louis M. Edwards Mathematics Super Bowl Valencia Community College -- April 30, 2004

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

CRS Report for Congress

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Practice TEST: Chapter 14

The Electoral College And

2018 Constituent Society Delegate Apportionment

SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM

Background Information on Redistricting

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA

The Congressional Apportionment Problem Based on the Census : Basic Divisor Methods

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Judicial Selection in the States

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

American Government. Workbook

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Reality Math Sam Kaplan, The University of North Carolina at Asheville Dot Sulock, The University of North Carolina at Asheville

Major Problem. Could not tax, regulate trade or enforce its laws because the states held more power than the National Government.

HOW TO ELIMINATE GERRYMANDERING

Ratification of the Constitution. Issues

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Lesson 2.3. Apportionment Models

The search for a perfect voting system. MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics. University of Louisville. October 31, 2017

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

US History, Ms. Brown Website: dph7history.weebly.com

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan

*************************************

Transcription:

Voting Theory Majority Rule n If the number of votes n is even, then a majority is 1 2 + n +1 If the number of votes n is odd, then a majority is 2 Example 1 Consider an election with 3 alternatives Candidate A Candidate Candidate C There 6 possible rankings AC, AC, AC, CA, CA, CA Find the winner of the election using majority rule given the results below: Choices (AC) (AC) (AC) (CA) (CA) (CA) Number of Votes 5 0 2 1 0 4 To find the winner of the election, consider only the first choice. Candidate A received 5+0 = 5 first place votes Candidate received 2+1 = 3 first place votes Candidate C received 0+4 = 4 first place votes n 12 Total number of votes n = 12 which is even so use the formula + 1 = + 1 = 6 + 1 = 7 2 2 Thus, the candidate needs to get 7 votes to win. In this example, all three candidates failed to get seven votes. Therefore, no one won this election.

Plurality Method Each voter votes for one candidate. The candidate receiving the most votes is declared the winner. Example 2 Using the voting results form example 1. Who is the winner using the Plurality method? Choices (AC) (AC) (AC) (CA) (CA) (CA) Number of Votes 5 0 2 1 0 4 Solution Candidate A received 5+0 = 5 votes Candidate received 2+1 = 3 votes Candidate C received 0+4 = 4 votes Candidate A received the most votes, therefore candidate A is the winner. orda Count Each voter ranks the candidates. If there are n candidates then n points are assigned to the first choice for each voter, with n-1 points for the next choice, and so on. The points are added together for candidate, and the candidate with the most points is declared the winner.

Example 3 Consider the following election for candidates A,, C, and D Voter Ranking 1,D,C,A 2 D,C,A, 3,A,C,D 4,A,D,C 5 D,A,,C 6 A,,C,D Part 1: Determine the winner by majority rule. First place votes A had 1 had 3 C had none D had 2 6 Note: y Majority Rule you would need + 1 = 3 + 1 = 4 votes to declare a winner. 2 There is no winner using the majority rule. Part 2: Determine winner by the orda Count Point values for each ranking 1 st place (4 points) 2 nd place (3 points) 3 rd place (2 points) 4 th place (1 point) Use a table to tally the total points for each candidate Candidate Voter 1 Voter 2 Voter 3 Voter 4 Voter 5 Voter 6 Total A 1 2 3 3 3 4 16 4 1 4 4 2 3 18 C 2 3 2 1 1 2 11 D 3 4 1 2 4 1 15 Since candidate had the highest total points (18), Candidate would be the winner.

Pair wise comparison method The votes rank the candidates by making series of comparisons in which each candidate is compared the other candidates. If a candidate receives more votes than the other candidate then that candidate receives one point. If the candidates receive the same number of votes then they each receive half a point. Example 4 Pair wise comparison method Using the same results from the election in examples 1 and 2, determine the winner with pair wise comparison method. Choices (AC) (AC) (AC) (CA) (CA) (CA) Number of Votes 5 0 2 1 0 4 Compare A to A over : 5+0+0 = 5 over A: 2+1+4 = 7 wins over A gets 1 point Compare to C over C: 5+2+1 = 8 C over : 0+0+4 = 4 wins over C gets 1 point Compare A to C A over C: 5+0+2 = 7 C over A: 1+0+4 = 5 A wins of C A gets 1 point

Total A has 1 point has 2 points C has 0 points wins Tournament Method Use the tournament method to find a winner. Choices (AC) (AC) (AC) (CA) (CA) (CA) Number of Votes 5 0 3 0 0 4 Compare each candidate by using brackets A C 7:5 8:4 A A C 8:4 7:5 C A 8:4 7:5 is the winner

Voting Dilemmas Fair Voting Principles 1) Majority Criterion 2) Condorcet Criterion 3) Monotonicity Criterion 4) Irrelevant Alternatives Majority Criterion If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, then that candidate should be declared the winner. Example 1 The South Davis Faculty Association is using the orda Method to vote for their collective bargaining representative. Candidate A (All Faculty Association) Candidate (American Federation of Teachers) Candidate C (California Teacher Association) AC AC AC CA CA CA Votes 16 0 0 8 0 7 a) Which organization is selected for collective bargaining? Determined the winner using the orda Count A C (AC) 16 3 2 1 (CA) 8 1 3 2 (CA) 7 1 2 3 Totals A C AC(16) 3(16) = 48 2(16) = 32 1(16) = 16 CA(8) 1(8) = 8 3(8) = 24 2(8) = 16 CA(7) 1(7) = 7 2(7) = 14 3(7) = 21 Total 63 70 53 The highest orda Count is from candidate Thus, the winner from the orda Count is candidate.

Majority Criterion n + 1 31+ 1 32 Since n = 31, majority of the votes would be = = = 16 2 2 2 Thus, candidate A had a majority of the votes. Therefore, the orda Count violates the majority criterion. Condorcet Criterion If a candidate is favored when compared one-to-one with every other candidate, then that candidate should be declared the winner. Example 2 The seniors at Radford High School are voting on where to go on their senior camping trip. They are deciding on Mountain Lake (A), Mount Rodgers (), Cascade Falls (C), or isset Park (D). The results for preferences are: (DAC) (ACD) (CAD) (CDA) (CAD) 120 100 90 80 45 a) Who is the Condorcet candidate? b) Is there a majority winner? If not is there a plurality winner? Does this violate the Condorcet criterion? c) Who wins the orda count? Does this violate the Condorcet criterion? Solution: a) Use the Condorcet criterion to find a winner. Compare A to (ACD) (DAC) A wins (CAD) (CDA) (CAD) wins 120+100 = 220 votes for A 90+80+45 = 215 votes for Thus, A wins over

Similarly, we compare the rest of the match ups using one-to-one match ups. A with C: A: 120+100 = 220 C: 90+80+45 = 215: A wins A with D: A: 100+90+45 = 235 D: 120+80 = 200: A wins with C: : 120+90 = 210 C: 100+80+45 = 225: C wins with D: : 100+90+80+45 = 315 D: 120: wins C with D: C: 100+90+80+45 = 315 D: 120: C wins Complete a chart for these results: A C D A * A A A A * C C A C * C D A C * Since the column and row headed with A wins in all situations, we can conclude by the Condorcet criterion that A (Mountain Lake) is the winner. b) Next, use the majority rule. The first place votes go as follows: A: 100 : 90 C: 80+45 = 125 D: 120 In order to get a majority of the vote a candidate would need the following votes. n = 435 total voters 435 + 1 = 2 436 = 218votes 2 for a majority Thus, we can conclude that none of the candidates where able to get a majority of the vote. Therefore, this does violate the Condorcet criterion. Since the choice C (Cascade Falls) had the most votes, this choice would win the plurality vote. This would be in violation of the Condorcet criterion,

c) Use the orda count Table 1 (Point Distribution) A C D 120 3 2 1 4 100 4 2 3 1 90 2 4 3 1 80 1 3 4 2 45 2 3 4 1 Table 2 (Point Totals) A C D 3(120) = 360 2(120) = 240 1(120) = 120 4(120) = 480 4(100) = 400 2(100) = 200 3(100) = 300 1(100) = 100 2(90) = 180 4(90) = 360 3(90) = 270 1(90) = 90 1(80) = 80 3(80) = 240 4(80) = 320 2(80) = 160 2(45) = 90 3(45) = 135 4(45) = 180 1(45) = 45 1110 1175 1190 875 Using the orda count, the winner would be C (Mount Rodgers) This would violate the Condorcet criterion. Apportionment The standard divisor total population d = number of seats Standard Quota state q = population d

Use the data from the 1790 U. S. Census to compute the following values. a) The standard divisor. b) The standard quota for each of the U. S states. Number of seats N = 105 State 1790 population Connecticut 237,655 Delaware 59,096 Georgia 82,548 Kentucky 72,677 Maryland 319,728 Massachusetts 475,199 New Hampshire 141,899 New Jersey 184,139 New York 340,241 North Carolina 395,005 Pennsylvania 433,611 Rhode Island 69,112 South Carolina 249,073 Vermont 85,341 Virginia 747,550 Total 3,895,874 a) total population d = number of seats 3,895,874 = = 105 37103.56

b) Solution State 1790 population Standard Quota Connecticut 237,655 237,655 q = = 6.41 Delaware 59,096 59,096 q = = 1.59 37103.56 Georgia 82,548 82,548 q = = 2.22 Kentucky 72,677 73,677 q = = 1.99 Maryland 319,728 319,728 q = = 8.62 Massachusetts 475,199 475,199 q = = 12.81 New Hampshire 141,899 141,899 q = = 3.83 New Jersey 184,139 184,139 q = = 4.97 New York 340,241 340,241 q = = 9.17 North Carolina 395,005 395,005 q = = 10.65 Pennsylvania 433,611 433,611 q = = 11.69 Rhode Island 69,112 69,112 q = = 1.86 South Carolina 249,073 249,073 q = = 6.72 Vermont 85,341 85,341 q = = 2.3 Virginia 747,550 747,550 q = = 20.16 Total 3,895,874