Prisoner Research and the IRB. Bertha delanda Research Compliance Office November 2010

Similar documents
Children s Findings Assent and Permission. Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office April 2012

Human Research Protection Program Policies & Procedures

University of California, Irvine Human Research Protections Standard Operating Policies and Procedures

Waiver of Documentation of Consent & Waiver of Consent

Suite Dupont Circle, N.W. Washington, D.C Tel: (202) Fax: (202)

Free Executive Summary

Copies: M. Caldwell, J. Lazo-Uy, R. Roquemore, V. Salcido, H. Riggio, J. Underwood, J. Shiotsugu

Consent. Informed Consent: Federal Regulations, Institutional Policy & Good Practice. Belmont Report 1/24/2011

Avenues of Consent. Options available under 45 CFR (d) &

IRB Amendments and Buck-IRB. Sarah Hersch, MA, CIP Meliha Rahmani, MPH, CCRC, CIP Office of Responsible Research Practices

The New Common Rule Changes to the regulations for human subjects research

Policy and Procedures

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

11 Obtaining Informed Consent from Research Subjects

Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedure. ... University of Missouri-Columbia.. AMENDMENTS. Amendments

LSHTM Research Ethics Committees Terms of Reference and Procedures

SUMMARY: This proposed rule provides various changes and updates to the. Department of State passport rules. The proposed rule incorporates statutory

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

Federalwide Assurance (FWA) for the Protection of Human Subjects

Thinking Points: The Pros and Cons of Implementing the Three Less-Burdensome Provisions

August 29, VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) FAQ: 2018 Reauthorization Public Law ; 88 Stat. 1109

Visas: Visa Information Update Requirements under the Electronic Visa Update. SUMMARY: The Department of State is coordinating with the Department of

Informed Consent Process for Research

IC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA

Testimony of JAMES E. FELMAN. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION. for the hearing on

Case 1:09-cv PBS Document 34 Filed 03/09/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS 25, 2008, P.L.

CCPR/C/USA/Q/4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents

San Joaquin County Grand Jury SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY. JAIL GRIEVENCES Denied or Not Denied Case No. 0913

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Criminal Records Checks for Prospective Foster and Adoptive Families

HRP-103-SOP-Appendix A-3: Additional Requirements for Clinical Trials (ICH-GCP)

FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER (N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2a)

GAO. HOMELAND SECURITY Challenges to Implementing the Immigration Interior Enforcement Strategy

The Superior Court GRAND JURY RELEASES REPORT ON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL GRIEVANCES

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 369 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17

No. 110,150 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, AMANDA GROTTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Definitions. Misconduct in Research

Health Care Compliance Association

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 545 SENATE BILL 53

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

The Informed Consent Process. Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland USA

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

IC Repealed (As added by P.L , SEC.244. Repealed by P.L , SEC.15.)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,988. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, AARON ISREAL SALINAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Case 2:12-cr TJS Document 11 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

1.2 Explanatory notes not forming part of the JAR text appear in an smaller typeface. Subheadings are in italic typeface.

Background: Focus on Public Safety Outcomes in Sentencing

the following definitions shall apply:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO

IACUC POLICIES, PROCEDURES, and GUIDELINES DOCUMENTATION OF IACUC ACTIVITIES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

Guidance on Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Clarification of Eligibility of Fleeing Felons Final Rule Questions and Answers March 2016

3 3/3&l MAR~ DEi ARTMENT OF IX&XlX & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service. via Federal Express

Barbados. POLICE 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

FINAL RULES: Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program 1

Minimum Standards for Local Detention Facilities in South Carolina HOME DETENTION STANDARDS HOME DETENTION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,850 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JAMES E. TACKETT, JR., Appellant, MEMORANDUM OPINION

Sanctions as a Legal Deterrence Mean in the National Physical Protection Regime (CN ) FATHI ELSISI

Procedures governing chemical analyses; admissibility; evidentiary provisions; controlled-drinking programs. (a) Chemical Analysis

APPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER

NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1381 OR

2015 Session (78th) CA SB53 R2 CA12. Conference Committee Amendment to (BDR 3-156) Senate Bill No. 53 Second Reprint

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is reinstating the provision

ABOUT GRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Regulatory Requirements for Hearing Aid Devices and Personal Sound Amplification Products;

Alternatives to imprisonment

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 64

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

Pre-PC 1368 Competency Assessments. Sonoma Superior Court

Amendments to Regulations on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO:III-07-I-1 IN RE:

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

Privatization of Prisons: Costs and Consequences

SOP Number: 1101 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

SUBJECT: SPECIAL CONDITION X (SEX OFFENDER CONDITION)

March 12, Request for comment on criteria for sentence reduction under USSG 1B1.13. Dear Judge Hinojosa:

Submitted December 21, 2016 Decided. Before Judges Simonelli and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the New Jersey State Parole Board.

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

National Research Council Canada (NRC)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 49

SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Reducing Prison Overcrowding in California

Transcription:

Prisoner Research and the IRB Bertha delanda Research Compliance Office November 2010

Against historical background, Prisoners in Research the selection of research subjects need to be scrutinized in order to determine whether a class is being systematically selected because of their: Easy availability Compromised position Ability to be manipulated rather than for reasons directly related to the problem being studied 2 Research Compliance Office Belmont Report, 1979

OHRP Guidance : 45 CFR 46, Subpart C May 23, 2003 Regs developed as a result of the exploitation of prisoners to test drugs and medical devices 90% of all pharmaceutical research was conducted on prisoners,who also were subjected to biochemical research From 1962 to 1966, for example, 33 pharmaceutical companies tested 153 experimental drugs at Holmesburg Prison in Philadelphia Our laminate contains sections A-I 3 Research Compliance Office

A. General Regulatory Background Additional protections are provided Preamble notes: most testimony before the Commission opposed the use of prisoners in any form of medical research not intended to benefit the individual prisoner Different from our understanding that there must be a societal benefit to research, and not necessarily a benefit to the individual Limited research would be permissible 4 Research Compliance Office

B. Subpart C applies where any subject is or becomes a prisoner. Applies: - to any research conducted or supported by HHS - whether the research involves individuals who are prisoners at the time of enrollment or who become prisoners after enrollment Note : when someone becomes incarcerated during a study, this is a reportable event to the IRB (when the PD feels continued participation is necessary). 5 Research Compliance Office

C. Definition of Prisoner any individual - involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution - detained in other facilities which provide alternatives to criminal prosecution or incarceration to a penal institution - detained pending arraignment, trial or sentencing Note: for International research, we follow the regulations as a guidance this category can include political prisoners, people incarcerated for religious beliefs and POWs 6 Research Compliance Office

D. Special Composition of the IRB - A majority of the board shall have no association to the prison institution - When reviewing prisoner research, at least one panel member must be: - a prisoner - a former prisoner - a prisoner representative with appropriate background and experience has a close working knowledge, understanding or appreciation of prison conditions from the perspective of the prisoner 45 CFR 46.304 7 Research Compliance Office

E. Additional Duties of the IRB The IRB must make seven additional findings 1. Research under review represents one of four categories of permissible research Under 45 CFR 46.306(a)(2) 8 Research Compliance Office

E. Additional Duties, cont. 2. Any advantages when compared to the general living conditions, are not of such a magnitude that they impair the subjects ability to weigh risks/benefits 3. Risks are commensurate with risks that would be accepted by non-prisoner volunteers 9 Research Compliance Office

E. Additional Duties, cont. 4. Procedures for subject selection within the prison are fair and immune from arbitrary intervention by prison authorities or prisoners Control subjects must be selected randomly UNLESS the investigator provides justification to the IRB in writing 10 Research Compliance Office

E. Additional Duties, cont. 5. Information is presented in language understandable to the subject population 6. Adequate assurance that parole board will not take participation into account (when) making decisions regarding parole Prisoners are made aware of this fact 7. Adequate provisions for follow up procedures 11 Research Compliance Office

F. Permitted Research Involving Prisoners 1 - IRB must certify to the Secretary of DHHS that the research was reviewed/approved 2 Secretary must ascertain that it falls under certain categories (4): 12 Research Compliance Office

F.2 - Categories of Permissible Research (4) (i) studies causes, effects, and processes of incarceration and of criminal behavior (ii) studying prison as institutional structure or of prisoners as incarcerated persons Both these categories present no more than minimal risk and minimal inconvenience (iii) condition under study particularly affects prisoners (iv) research has the intent and reasonable probability of improving health/well-being of the subject 13 Research Compliance Office

G. Documentation of IRB Findings The IRB must prepare and maintain adequate documentation of IRB activities. - must make specific findings required under 45 CFR 46.305(a) (documented in the minutes) 14 Research Compliance Office

H. Responsibilities of Institutions - IRB maintains a record of the determination of the additional seven findings - Required to send OHRP a certification letter Research may not proceed until OHRP issues its approval in writing I. Responsibilities of OHRP - OHRP makes the determination which category the research falls under, and consults with appropriate experts 15 Research Compliance Office