4DIJMS-Vol-9,Issue

Similar documents
Chapter 6: Women-Owned and Minority-Owned Businesses

U.S. immigrant population continues to grow

THE COLOR OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP Why the Racial Gap among Firms Costs the U.S. Billions

APPENDIX H. Success of Businesses in the Dane County Construction Industry

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER. City Services Auditor 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report

Demographic Changes, Health Disparities, and Tuberculosis

Our Shared Future: U N D E R S T A N D I N G B O S T O N. #SharedFuture. Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Political Landscape

Labor Force Characteristics by Race and Ethnicity, 2015

FY Purdue University Minority-Owned and Women-Owned Business Enterprise Utilization. Office of Supplier Diversity Development

FY Purdue University Minority-Owned and Women-Owned Business Enterprise Utilization. Office of Supplier Diversity Development

Immigrant Entrepreneurship: Trends and Contributions

BIG PICTURE: CHANGING POVERTY AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES IN SEATTLE

DATA PROFILES OF IMMIGRANTS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Immigrants are playing an increasingly

A Regional Comparison Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

CÉSAR M. MELGOZA / FOUNDER & CEO

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

Returns from Self-Employment: Using Human Capital Theory to Compare U.S. Natives and Immigrants

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

HMDA Race and Ethnicity Reporting Appendix B - Revised as of August 24, 2017

Chapter 1: The Demographics of McLennan County

Older Immigrants in the United States By Aaron Terrazas Migration Policy Institute

Briefing Book- Labor Market Trends in Metro Boston

FROM ELLIS ISLAND TO THE QUEEN CITY: IMMIGRATION GEOGRAPHY AND CHARLOTTE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY

The Foreign-Born Population of Southeastern Pennsylvania. By Randy Capps

NBER Volume on International Differences in Entrepreneurship

An Equity Assessment of the. St. Louis Region

These socioeconomic indicators characterize the ROI. Community treatment by the Army; Greater public participation and public opinion;

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Indian Migration to the U.S.

New public charge rules issued by the Trump administration expand the list of programs that are considered

LEFT BEHIND: WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN A CHANGING LOS ANGELES. Revised September 27, A Publication of the California Budget Project

Patrick Adler and Chris Tilly Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA. Ben Zipperer University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Nebraska s Foreign-Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

New data from the Census Bureau show that the nation s immigrant population (legal and illegal), also

Latinos and the Economics of Immigration. By Paul McDaniel and Guillermo Cantor American Immigration Council

Dominicans in New York City

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

California s Congressional District 37 Demographic Sketch

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2011: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Asian Pacific American Heritage Month: May 2004

Population Estimates

Regional Data Snapshot

Selected National Demographic Trends

Unauthorized Immigrants Today: A Demographic Profile Immigration P...

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

We know that the Latinx community still faces many challenges, in particular the unresolved immigration status of so many in our community.

Socio-Economic Mobility Among Foreign-Born Latin American and Caribbean Nationalities in New York City,

The Racial Dimension of New York s Income Inequality

America s Changing Classrooms and Communities Data and Projections

LATINOS IN AMERICA: A Demographic Profile

Where U.S. Immigrants Were Born 1960

Astrid S. Rodríguez Fellow, Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies. Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies

The State of. Working Wisconsin. Update September Center on Wisconsin Strategy

Understanding the Immigrant Experience Lessons and themes for economic opportunity. Owen J. Furuseth and Laura Simmons UNC Charlotte Urban Institute

Backgrounder. This report finds that immigrants have been hit somewhat harder by the current recession than have nativeborn

Regional Data Snapshot

February 18, Presented by Margaret Berthoff-Fernandes

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Queens Community District 3: East Elmhurst, Jackson Heights, and North Corona,

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Union Membership In The United States

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for North Carolina s Health and Competitiveness

Minority-Owned Businesses By: Chuck Vollmer 10 January 2014

Executive Director. Gender Analysis of San Francisco Commissions and Boards

Youth at High Risk of Disconnection

Geographic Mobility of New Jersey Residents. Migration affects the number and characteristics of our resident population

Racial Inequities in Fairfax County

Immigrant Employment by Field of Study. In Waterloo Region

A Demographic Profile of Mexican Immigrants in the United States

THE EMPLOYABILITY AND WELFARE OF FEMALE LABOR MIGRANTS IN INDONESIAN CITIES

City of Elk Grove Application for Appointment

Immigrant Contributions to U.S. Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Latest Immigration Data

Name Home Phone( ) LAST FIRST MIDDLE Cell Phone( ) Address: Address NO STREET CITY STATE ZIP

Asian Americans in New York City. A Decade of Dynamic Change Presented on April 20, 2012 Report from

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

US Undocumented Population Drops Below 11 Million in 2014, with Continued Declines in the Mexican Undocumented Population

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

Immigrant Remittances: Trends and Impacts, Here and Abroad

New Americans in Houston

Characteristics of Poverty in Minnesota

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

Hispanics. A People in Motion

WALTON COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER S OFFICE APPLICATION FOR AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT

Facts & Figures in this issue: income employment growth trends baby boomers millennials immigration

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Skagit County, Washington. Prepared by: Skagit Council of Governments 204 West Montgomery Street, Mount Vernon, WA 98273

Washington Area Economy: Performance and Outlook

Visi n. Imperative 6: A Prosperous Economy

2016 Appointed Boards and Commissions Diversity Survey Report

Update on Diversity in the Independent Agency System: Ownership, Employment & Marketing

Minority Business Economic Development Act 1222

The Polling Institute Saint Leo University Florida Primary Poll / August 2016 FINAL See end for margins of error, sample sizes

Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Outcomes in New Mexico

OVERVIEW. Demographic Trends. Challenges & Opportunities. Discussion

Backgrounder. Immigrants in the United States, 2007 A Profile of America s Foreign-Born Population. Center for Immigration Studies November 2007

The Benefits of Immigration: Addressing Key Myths

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Latinos in Saratoga County. Trudi Renwick Senior Economist Fiscal Policy Institute April 26, 2008

Asian American and Pacific Islander Workers Today

Last Name First Name M.I. Name You Prefer. City State Zip Address. Daytime Phone Evening Phone Best Time to Call. City State If yes, where?

Transcription:

4D International Journal of Management and Science ISSN No: 2250-0669 www.4dinternationaljournal.com Vol. 9, Issue1,-2018 MINORITIES, WOMEN AND IMMIGRANTS IN THE NORTH CAROLINA: BUSINESS OWNED, CHALLENGES AND POTENTIALS I. ABSTRACT Author Dr. Nisha Singh* Relative to the civil right era, minorities, women and immigrants in the United States have made a giant stride in all spectrums of human endeavors in the United States. The main objective of this research paper is to study the business ownership of minority, women and immigrant in the North Carolina and to find out the cause of failures and opportunities for future growth in real estate businesses, manufacturing business, transportation and service business. This article takes a comprehensive look at how minority women and immigrant are faring in the business environment within the state of North Carolina. The author believes that, the chosen state is a microcosm of most of the remaining Southern states, and the analysis herein is essentially true to what is obtainable in those other states. KEYWORDS: MINORITIES, BLACK, ASIAN, LATINOS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, BUSINESS SUCCESS, FUNDING *Dr. Nisha Singh-Chair-Person(Business),Livingstone College, NC,USA 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 8

II. INTRODUCTION The State of North Carolina is the tenth largest state in the nation, with its largest city of Charlotte, being, until recently, the second financial hub in the nation, only after New York City. Charlotte effectively lost that position in the wake of the last recession with its attendant havoc on the economy, and subsequently the acquisition by, the California based,wells Fargo Bank, N.A. According to the data culled from the United States Census Bureau, the total nonfarm private establishments nationwide was more than 7 million, while in North Carolina, that number was approximately 218 thousand. Women shares both nationally and in the Tar-Heel State statistically tied at 28 percent; essentially leaving men with the lion shares of the national corporate ownership. Among this, black owned constitutes about 10.5% in the State of North Carolina, while that figure is even smaller on the national scale, at 7.1%, (United States Census Bureau, 2013).A minority owned business is understood to be one in which a person or a group of persons of Blacks, Native Americans, Asians, Native Hawaiians and or Hispanic background own a 51 percent or more shares or interests. (Robb & Fairlie, 2008). There were about 4 million minority people who received certification by Minority Business Entrepreneurship(MBEs) in 2002 which was up from just over 3 million in 1997. The number of Women Business Entrepreneurship (WBEs) increased from 5.4 million in 1997 to 6.5 million in 2002 with the average number of WBEs lower in 2002 than in 1997. In 2002, all MBEs market share was 2.9% while their population share was 26% which was lower than white men market sale share of 29.0% and white women market sale share of 3.7%. All MBEs national market sale share was lower than the white women market sale share (Table-1, state policies and programs for minority- and women-business development). III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 9

The findings in this research study are supported by the historical data. The major data sources have been US census 1997-2014, US Government Data, authentic websites and published research studies. The data sources are reviewed and analyzed to draw conclusion using graphs and tables IV. LITERATURE REVIEW Minorities, women and immigrants in US economy have been widely discussed. There could be varying opinions in this area, but it has been a matter of constant evaluation. There are number of research studies and updates on this topic. Immigrants are nearly 30 percent more likely to start a business as compared to non-immigrants, and they represent 16.7 percent of all business owners in the United States. Immigrant business owners make significant contribution to business income, generating $ 67 billion of the $577 billion in US business income, as estimated from 2000-2011 US census data. Ten high-tech companies started by immigrants earned 831 billion in revenue during 2002. According to the American Immigration Council, there are more than 20 million immigrant women and girls in the United States today, and they are a formidable presence in U.S. society and the U.S. economy (Lalit,2014). Immigrant women come from every corner of the globe and slightly outnumber immigrant men. They are more likely than men to come to the United States through the family-based immigration system, and nearly half are naturalized U.S. citizens (Lalit, 2014). More than a quarter of immigrant women have a bachelor s degree or more education, with women from India being the most highly educated, followed by those from the Philippines and China. Foreign-born women account for 15 percent of all employed women over the age of 16 in the United States. In fact, women from the Philippines, El Salvador, Vietnam, the Dominican Republic, and Guatemala have higher rates of participation in the labor force than 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 10

native-born women. Immigrant women work in every occupation, with one-third being in management and professional occupations, while nearly a third work in service occupations and under a quarter in sales and office occupations. Despite their hard work and educational achievements, immigrant women earn less than foreign-born men, and less than native-born men or women. Given their numbers and diversity, the scale of their economic contributions cannot be denied. There were 20.9 million female immigrants in the United States in 2012, accounting for just over half (51.3 percent) of the total foreign-born population. Similarly, females accounted for roughly half (50.7 percent) of the native-born population. Data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicate that female immigrants are more likely than male immigrants to come to the United States through the family-based class of admissions, rather than through employment. American Immigration Council also specifies that Immigrant women in the labor force earn comparatively less income than the native women as well as the immigrant men.the possible reasons could be lack of professional skills and appropriate training. Many scholars have studied the economic activities of immigrants in the United States of America. Immigrant population is approximately 11% of overall population and 10% of the total businesses in the United States are owned by immigrants. (Borjas, 1986; Schuetze & Antecol, 2007; Fairlie & Robb, 2008 and others). In North Carolina immigrant population share is 7.9%, minority population is 26.33% of total population. While total minority owned firm is 10.79% of total firm and annual sales of minority-owned firms in North Carolina is 1.29% (US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, 2005 March Supplement).According to the United States Census Bureau statistics released in 2005, black-owned businesses grew by 45 percent between 1997 and 2002; Asian-owned businesses grew by 24 percent, and Hispanic-owned businesses tripled the national average growing by 31 percent during the same time. As at 2007, 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 11

minority owned firms numbered 5.8 million, up from 4.0 million in 2002, an increase of 45.5 percent, and more than double the 17.9 percent increase for all U.S. businesses, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2007 Survey of Business Owners. Receipts of minority owned firms increased 55.0 percent to $1.0 trillion over the five-year period, compared with the 32.9 percent increase for all businesses nationwide. In 2007, about 21.3 percent of the nation's 27.1 million firms were minority-owned.congress amended section 8(a) of the Minority Small Business and Capital Ownership Development Program (1978), Business Opportunity Development Reform Act of 1988 (1988), and President Reagan executive order 12432 (1983), so many different programs been started to increase the minority business ownership.in spite of all the growth minority owned firms sale percent is still very low in manufacturing industries, service industries, transportation, wholesale trading, financing etc. (US department of commerce, MBDA, Minority business development agencies https://www.mbda.gov). V. BUSINESS OWNERSHIP, CHALLENGES AND POTENTIALS: The center for American Progress Action Fund declared in its 2013 report that 61 percent ofwomen are on managerial positions in the U.S. and still get paid 77 cents less for every dollar paid to their male counterpart for the same position. While several research have shown that minorities, especially Black entrepreneurs are more likely than their white counterparts to attempt a new business, they, however, are more likely to fail, (Sullivan, 2007). While the trend continues until today despite this common knowledge, this research is therefore compelled to investigate the reasons behind such occurrence with the probable aim of offering lasting solutions to the problem. 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 12

Table 1-North Carolina Population 2012-2013 Male Female Total % Total Population 4,645,492 4,889,991 9,535,483 100 White 3,196,032 3,332,918 6,528,950 68.470 Black or African American 958,903 1,089,725 2,048,628 21.484 Hispanic or Latino 427,735 372,385 800,120 8.391 Some other race 226,730 187,300 414,030 4.342 Asian 99,858 109,104 208,962 2.191 Two or More Races 100,782 105,417 206,199 2.162 American Indian 59,752 62,358 122,110 1.281 Three or more races 7,310 9,045 16,355 0.172 Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander 3,435 3,169 6,604 0.069 Native Hawaiian 694 695 1,389 0.015 Alaska Native tribes 130 165 295 0.003 Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2012-2013 As seen clearly from the table1, whites constitute over 68 percent of the total population, in North Carolna whereas, the African American population stands at a little over 21 percent. Latino population comes a distant third at about 8 percent of the total population. Total of women population in North Carolina as at 2013 was slighly more than half at over 51 percent, out of this white women take 68.2 percent, consistent with the overall white population in the entire North Carolina. Black women among all women population in the state takes about 22 percent and Latino women population constitutes about 7.6 percent. Interestingly, each of these women demographic seems to represent the exact total composition of their races in the cummulative north carolina population. Table 2-North Carolina and The United States Population Statistics Business Categories NC USA Population, 2014 9.944 million 318.9 million Black or African American 22.1% 13.2% White Population 71.5% 77.4% American Indian and Alaska Native 1.6% 1.2% Asian 2.7% 5.4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.1%.2% Hispanic or Latino 9.0% 17.4%% 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 13

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Survey of Business Owners Table 3- Race and their firms ownership in NC 1997 in % Total Population 7,428,672 Total Firms: 570,484 Annual sales of all firms in the State $518.6 billion 1997 Total Minority Population: 1956013 26.33058776 Total Minority-Owned Firms 61551 10.78925965 Annual sales of Minority-owned firms in State $6.7 billion 1.291939838 Total African American-owned firms 39901 6.994236473 Annual sales from African American-owned firms $2.3 billion 0.443501735 Asian & Pacific Islander-owned firms 8050 1.411082519 Annual sales of Asian & Pacific Islander-owned firms $2.5 billion 0.482067104 Hispanic-owned Firms 7270 1.274356511 Annual sales of Hispanic-owned firms $1.1 billion 0.212109526 American Indian & Alaska Natives-owned firms 7148 1.252971161 Annual sales of American Indian & Alaska Nativesowned firms $911.9 million 0.175838797 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Survey of Business Owners As shown in table2& table 3, African American population is 22.1% population of North Carolina which is higher than the national rate 13.2% (table-3), their firms ownership is 6.99% and their annual sale is.44% of overall firms sale in North Carolina. This statistic clearly shows that N.C. need, some good policies to improve this. North Carolina Asian papulation is 2.7% which is lower than national rate 5.4%, their firms ownership is 1.41 % and their annual sale is.48% which is higher than African American sale percentage (Table- 3). Above information indicate that N.C. need to work on immigration to support the N.C. economy. 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 14

Table 4-Race and their firms ownership in USA and NC 2007 Firms NC USA Total number of firms, 2007 798,791 27,092,908 Black-owned firms, percent, 2007 10.5% (1.3)7.1% White owned firms 72% (90.7%)79.2% American Indian- and Alaska Native-owned firms, percent, 2007 1.0% 0.9% Asian-owned firms, percent, 2007 2.5% (6.6)5.7% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander-owned firms, percent, 2007 0.1% 0.1% Hispanic-owned firms, percent, 2007 2.7% (3.6)8.3% Women-owned firms, percent, 2007 28.2% (11.3)36.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Survey of Business Owners As shown in table 3 and table 4;the minorities, immigrants and women population increased in North Corolina and their holding of firm ownership also increased. The Africa Americn holding the firm ownership (10.5%) in north carolina is higher than national rate7.1%. Inspite of these fact, their firms annual sale is comparabily very low (table 5). Total minority-owned firms share is only 10% of total firms annual sales of Minority-owned firms in U>S while inn.c. it is only 1.29%. Findings Table 5 Minority Owned Businesses by Sector Asian %of all Industry Total # Minority African & American sales of % Description of firm firm American Pacific Hispanic Indian all firm minority All industries 570,48 61,551 39,901 Island 8,050 7,270 7,148 88.39 11.61 Agricultural 18,148 1,806 1,218 130 207 269 0.33 0.44 services, Construction 86,488 7,289 3,721 266 1342 2026 5.86 3.29 Manufacturin 20,454 945 478 154 169 163 32.24 0.26 g Transportatio 22,979 3,867 3,221 126 297 271 5.01 0.44 Wholesale 22,440 870 419 213 153 97 20.14 0.16 trade Retail trade 84,107 8,805 4,737 2416 843 892 14.84 1.45 Service 220,99 28,217 20,567 3912 2108 1945 10.65 3.16 industries Finance, 56,3864 2,834 1,905 429 266 247 10.03 0.4 insurance and real 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type estate text] Page 15 industries

Industries not 6,952 3,652 422 1880 1239 0.76 2.01 Source: Classified U.S. Census 39,266 Bureau, 2012 Survey of Business Owners, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012 (131st Edition) Our findings are directed to few important areas whichplay a vital role to improve minorities, women and immigrant business ownership and improve sailing share of their business. These areas arereal state, wholesale trade, transportation and manufacturing industries (table-5). Hispanic dominate agriculture and construction business; whereas African American hold most transportation business. Still their share size is very small in the comparison of another race. Conclusion: Minorities, women and immigrant contribute a great deal to the US economythrough the agriculture industries, construction businesses. In 2016 the United States total population was 318 million and total immigrant population was 47 million and in 2006, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, North Carolina Papulation was 9,535,483 and hometo 614,198 foreign-born people, making up 6.9 percent of the N.C. s total population. Total Immigrant school going population is only 79845.74 (13%). They are contributing in the U.S. economic growth without burdening public services. Table-6 National Market Share, 1997-2002 in $ Ownership 1997 2002 African Americans or Blacks $97,000 $74,000 Hispanics or Latinos $174,000 $141,000 American Indian or Alaska Native $195,000 $133,000 Asian $380,000 $296,000 Hawaiian or Pacific Islander $239,000 $148,000 Women $169,000 145,000 sources: State policies and programs for minority- and women-business development To help the minorities and women in business in North Carolina the government or Small Business Administration (SBA) introduced several programs such as the Small Business and Technology Development Centers (SBTDC), Women s Business Centers (WBC) and North 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 16

Carolina Institute of Minority Economic Development. These programsare partially funded by the Small Business Administration, to provide free counseling and technical assistance for minorities and women. The SBA has a variety of loan programs that promoteminority business growth, which may be a more effective method of reducing minority unemployment than overall economic and employment growth (Bates 1993, Boston 1999, 2006, and U.S. Census Bureau 1997). My research study suggests that rather than to focus onincreases the number of people for certificate program the government need to review their financial impact. My finding shows some of the important areas where North Carolina government policies need to be liberalized for minority to boost up their income. The area of consideration is North Carolina government need to form better immigrant policy to increase immigrant population. Nearly half of foreign born workers in America work in white color jobs, including management, sales, technology and administration. Almost in last decade s 64% of innovation in the United States were made by immigrant (Economic Contribution of Immigrant, August 2013). In North Carolina immigrant population percentage is 2.5% while the national percentage is 5.7% in 2007 (table-4). The real estate business where minority do not seem to be very much interested. However, real estate business can be converted as a source of good income for minorities and immigrant, enabling them to contribute to the economic growth. We recommend that a further research is needed in this area. 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 17

References: 1. Astebro Thomas and Irwin Bernhardt., 2003. Start-Up Financing, Owner Characteristics andsurvival, Journal of Economics and Business, 55(4), 303-320 2. Bates, Timothy. (1993) Banking on Black Enterprise. Washington, D.C.: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. 3. Bates, Timothy, and Darrell Williams. (1996) Do Preferential Procurement Programs Benefit Minority Business? American Economic Review, 86(2): 294-97 4. Borjas, G., 1986, The self-employment experience of immigrants, Journal of Human Resources, 21 (1986) 487-506 5. Bates, Timothy, and David Howell. 1997. "The Declining Status of African American Men inthe New York City Construction Industry. In Race, Markets, and Social outcomes, edited by Patrick Mason and Rhonda Williams. Boston: Kluwer 6. Black, Jane, David de Meza, and David Jeffreys., 1996. "House Prices, The Supply of Collateral and the Enterprise Economy." The Economic Journal. 106 (434):60-75 7. Bates, T. (2006). The Urban Development Potential of Black-Owned Businesses. Journal Of The American Planning Association, 72(2), 227-237 8. Robert W. Fairlie (2008) Estimating the Contribution of Immigrant Business Owners to the U.S. Economy https://www.immigrationresearch-info.org 9. Fairlie, R & Robb, (2008) Race and entrepreneurial success: Black, Asian-, & White-owned businesses in the United States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10. Fairlie, Robert W., 2008. Estimating the Contribution of Immigrant Business Owners to the U.S. Economy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, Washington, D.C. 11. Fiscal Policy Institute analysis of American community Survey 2010 five year estimate. 12. Harris, M.L., Grubb III, W., & Hebert, F. J. (2005). Critical Problems of Rural Small Business: Comparison of African -American and white-owned formation and early growth firms. Journal of development entrepreneurship, 10(3), 223-238. 13. Jason Richwine (02.24.09, )- National Research Initiative fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 18

14. KamleshJain,Robert H. Smith &Vinod Jain-http://www.iaccindia.com/userfiles/, The Economics of Immigration: Theory and Policy by Orn B Bodvarsson, Henric Van Den (Chapter9,page221) 15. Lalit Sharma (2015) Impact of Regional Differences within State on the Factors Influencing Youth Entrepreneurship A Case of Garhwal and Kumaun Regions of Uttarakhand DOI: 10.1177/2347631115584123 16. National Research Council, The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration, ed. James P. Smith and Barry Edmonston (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1997), p. 337.) 17. Nisha Singh, 2014, Economic Contribution of Immigrant Conference: 4th Annual International Business Conference at Saint Leo University, Florida, Feb. 13th -15th. Published: Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN 2155-7950, USA, Volume: 4, Volume: 4 18..Schuetze, H.J. and H. Antecol, Immigration, entrepreneurship and the mixture start up process, the life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures: International handbook series on entrepreneurship, Vol. 3, Parker, ed., Springer, New York (2007). 19. US Department of Homeland Security office of Immigration Statistics 2010-year book of immigration Statistics. 20. Wadhwa, Vivek, AnnaLee Saxenian, Ben Rissing, and Gary Gereffi. 2007. "America s NewImmigrant Entrepreneurs," Duke University Report 21. Sources: US department of commerce, MBDA, Minority business development agencies https://www.mbda.gov 22. Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, 2005 March Supplement 23. Robb, A. M., & Fairlie, R. W. (2009). Determinants of business success: an examination of Asian-owned businesses in the USA. Journal of Population Economics, 22(4), 827-858. doi:10.1007/s00148-008-0193-8 24. Valdez, Z. (2008). The Effect of Social Capital on White, Korean, Mexican and Black Business Owners' Earnings in the US. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 34(6), 955-973. doi:10.1080/13691830802211265 4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 19

4DIJMS-Vol.9,Issue-1,2018[Type text] Page 20