The lost green Conservative

Similar documents
Tories Keep Lead, But Liberal-NDP Merger Could Change Status Quo

NDP maintains strong lead

Belief in climate change eroding

NDP leads in first post-writ poll

Alberta Carbon Levy and Rebate Program Lethbridge Public Opinion Study Winter 2018

Canadians Divided on Assuming Non-Combat Role in Afghanistan

Vote Compass Methodology

Progressives in Alberta

Alberta Provincial Politics Carbon Levy and Rebate Program. Alberta Public Opinion Study October 2017

Ohio State University

NDP on track for majority government

Electoral Reform Questionnaire Field Dates: October 12-18, 2016

Liberals open up lead, Conservatives lag

Canadians Call for New Election

Most Believe Kinder Morgan Pipeline will have a Positive Economic Effect, But a Negative Environmental One

Liberals lead across GTA, Toronto

PC Delegates Survey Orchard Faction as Socialistic Island in a Semi-Conservative Party Companion to General Public Unite-the-Right Poll

Motivations and Barriers: Exploring Voting Behaviour in British Columbia

Post-election round-up: New Zealand voters attitudes to the current voting system

Telephone Survey. Contents *

NDP Leads Going Into the Final Week, but the Gap is Narrowing

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Liberals 41, Conservatives 31, NDP 15, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Conservatives 35, Liberals 34, NDP 16, Green 8, People s 1 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Liberals With Half the Vote

NANOS. Gap between Liberals and Conservatives narrows to seven points in Nanos tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 19, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 34, NDP 20, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Poll Results: Electoral Reform & Political Cooperation

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 34, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 40, Conservatives 31, NDP 17, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

At a glance. Ottawa: (613) x 237

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 35, NDP 18, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 35, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 33, NDP 22, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 20, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Vermonters Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Sprawl Development in 2002

CONSERVATIVES OPEN UP THEIR LEAD CANADIANS SAY THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN PARTY PLATFORMS THAN CANDIDATES OR

Half of Ontarians Believe Government to Blame for Rising Hydro Rates

Ideas powered by world-class data

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Liberals 39 Conservatives 28, NDP 20, Green 6, People s 1 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 42, Conservatives 29, NDP 19, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 2 REVIEW

What criteria should guide electoral system choice?

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in preferred PM on Nanos tracking for first time in four months (Released 11/12/2014)

Saskatchewan Ministry of Municipal Affairs. Daylight Saving Time Opinion Survey Results

REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011

TORIES HEADED FOR WIN; NDP A STRONG SECOND

Divergences in Abortion Opinions across Demographics. its divisiveness preceded the sweeping 1973 Roe v. Wade decision protecting abortion rights

Political Participation

Election 2015: Liberals edge Conservatives as volatile electorate mulls final choice before last campaign weekend

2017 NATIONAL OPINION POLL

BACKGROUNDER The Common Good: Who Decides? A National Survey of Canadians

Trudeau approval soars

TransMountain troubles: Alberta-B.C. pipeline battle splits Canadians down the middle

Asylum Seekers Should Enter the Country Legally: Plurality

35% 34% 34% 32% METHODOLOGY:

November 2018 Hidden Tribes: Midterms Report

STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE NEW CONGRESS: What Americans Think

Federal Liberals score highest on Nanos Party Power Index Trudeau and Harper trending up on qualities of a good leader (Released 08/27/2014)

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CAMPAIGN AND A REASONED GUESS

Election 2015: Conservatives edge forward leaving NDP and Liberals in second-place tie

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in weekly Nanos tracking for first time since early June (Released 07/16/2014)

Explaining Aboriginal Turnout in Federal Elections: Evidence from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba

LANDSCAPE FROZEN AS WE ENTER ELECTION YEAR

BY Amy Mitchell, Katie Simmons, Katerina Eva Matsa and Laura Silver. FOR RELEASE JANUARY 11, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Practices

POLLING THE GREEN NEW DEAL

IT IS NECK AND NECK AS WE HEAD INTO ELECTION YEAR

Scheer s delight? If an election were held tomorrow, CPC could have a shot at majority government

Elections Alberta Survey of Voters and Non-Voters

campaign spending, which may raise the profile of an election and lead to a wider distribution of political information;

- Bill Bishop, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart, 2008.

A survey of 1,005 Canadians Conducted on February 23, 2011 Released: February 24,

Party loyalty in Saskatchewan: A research brief. February 2012

Tax Cut Welcomed in BC, But No Bounce for Campbell Before Exit

How s Life in Canada?

Majority Approve of CETA, Two Thirds Approve of NAFTA

Would you say your overall opinion of the Supreme Court is favourable or unfavourable? For Immediate Release Canadian Public Opinion Poll

U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.

POLL RESULTS. Page 1 of 6

Why are there only two major parties in US? [party attachments below]

LIBERALS PADDING LEAD IN ADVANCE OF DEBATES

All tied up in New Brunswick

Attitudes Toward Changes to CBC Regional Programming in Atlantic Canada

UNDERSTANDING KEY TERMS:

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

Canadians Agree with Key Points in Manley Report on Afghan Mission

CONSERVATIVES SWING INTO LEAD IDEA OF COALITION GOVERNMENT REMAINS POPULAR EVERYWHERE OUTSIDE CONSERVATIVE

Refugees crossing Canadian border from U.S. NANOS SURVEY

No consensus and no public interest in electoral reform

2008 Annual Ottawa Conference Poll. Canada and the United States: What Does it Mean to be Good Neighbours. Table of Contents

Colorado 2014: Comparisons of Predicted and Actual Turnout

The 2014 Election in Aiken County: The Sales Tax Proposal for Public Schools

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: ARMENIA

Notes for remarks by Deborah Coyne. on the occasion of her nomination as the federal Liberal candidate for the riding of Toronto Danforth

Canadians Attitudes to Internet Voting. Jon H. Pammett Distinguished Research Professor Department of Political Science Carleton University

Nonvoters in America 2012

TORIES ENJOY CLEAR BUT MODEST LEAD AS ELECTION LOOMS UNDERSTANDING WHERE VOTERS ARE COMING AND GOING

CONSERVATIVES PULLING AWAY FROM MORIBUND LIBERALS SOME NOTABLE CHANGES IN BROADER OUTLOOK

POLL EMBARGOED UNTIL 14TH NOVEMBER 2018, 6 AM EST. Canada - National UltraPoll 14th November 2018

Transcription:

The lost green Conservative voter A study of voter opinions and choices in the 2011 and 2015 elections, produced by Canadians for Clean Prosperity based on analysis from Vox Pop Labs. By Mark Cameron and Tom Chervinsky cleanprosperity.ca 416.777.2327 info@cleanprosperity.ca

highlights A substantial majority of the Canadian electorate (56.4%) cares about climate issues, wants to see action to reduce GHGs and supports pricing carbon emissions. Any political party would find it difficult to form a majority government without appealing to some share of these voters. Of this important electorate (FOOTNOTE 1), 26% percent voted for Conservatives in 2011, but only 15% of them voted Conservative in 2015, representing a substantial loss of votes. While 33% of 2011 Conservative voters would be categorized today as climate voters, more than half of them (53%) voted for another party in 2015. This underscores both the massive impact of vote-switching among this demographic and the substantial segment of the Conservative voting coalition that continues to support climate action. 53% of voters the Conservative Party lost between the 2011 and 2015 elections support climate action, and 8% of those lost rated the environment as their top issue. 1 It is important to note that this study was able to measure support for action to reduce GHGs and price carbon in 2015, but cannot accurately determine what position voters held on these issues in 2011. All references to climate voters represent currently held attitudes rather than historic beliefs. That said, other polling has long recognized a large and growing segment of the Canadian electorate that supports these policies. These issues are explored in full later in the article.

Validation of Findings Vox Pop Labs has reviewed the findings presented in this report and affirms that they are a true and accurate representation of the findings derived from its study commissioned by Canadians for Clean Prosperity investigating the correlation between Conservative vote intention and support for progressive environmental policies (i.e. greenhouse gas emission reductions and carbon pricing) during the 2015 Canadian federal election campaign. Clifton van der Linden CEO & Founder, Vox Pop Labs

Introduction and methodology Contrary to recent stereotypes, there is a long tradition of conservatives being ardent supporters of conservation and the environment. Conservative political leaders have long been linked to efforts to steward our ecological heritage and to underline our shared responsibilities to one another and to future generations. Both in the US and in Canada, conservative politicians have been at the genesis of many important environmental programs, from the establishment of national parks by Sir John A. Macdonald and Teddy Roosevelt to the effort to tackle acid rain under Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan. While many conservatives remain committed to environmental causes, recent years have seen sharp debate over climate policies, with political conservatives often portrayed as resistant to action. As the 2015 election neared, we sought to understand how these issues were viewed by the conservative voter coalition, how support for climate action was interacting with party choices, and whether conservatives can construct a winning voter coalition in the absence of climate action supporters. To that end, Vox Pop Labs were asked to analyze their extensive and unique data set to provide in depth analysis of these issues. Vox Pop Labs operate a national voluntary survey via the popular Vote Compass application. With a sample size of 108,932, and substantial demographic and psychographic data, they are able to accurately weight their sample to reflect Canada s geography, gender, age, education level, language, religion, religiosity, and civic engagement to reflect the population of Canada according to census data and other population estimates. By segmenting and weighing this data, Vox Pop Labs are able to accurately describe the shifting patterns of the electorate between the 2011 and 2015 election, and inform our conversations.

Defining support for climate action As a part of Vox Pop Lab s survey, participants were asked to (1) rate their support for action to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) and (2) rate their support for pricing carbon emissions in particular. Climate action supporters were defined as those having somewhat or strong support for both measures. It is important to note that this survey, while taking into account past voting behaviour, does not have data on environmental views in 2011. As such, we must be cautious about determining causal relationships relating to these data. It should however be noted that the annual Focus Canada report by the Environics Institute has demonstrated that Canadian support for climate action has been relatively consistent since 2011 2. That said, whether climate voters held pro-climate action views in 2011 or developed them between the 2011 and 2015 election, the importance of these voters remains relevant to our understanding of how the Conservative vote evolved in that time. 2 http://www.environicsinstitute.org/uploads/institute-projects/ environicsinstitute-dsf%20focus%20canada%202015%20-%20climate%20 change%20survey%20-%20final%20report%20-%20english.pdf

Findings Vote switching and support for climate action These data demonstrate that during the 2015 election a substantial 56.4% of Canadian voters were pro climate-action voters (i.e. supported action to reduce greenhouse gases and the implementation of carbon pricing). Given this massive support, it would be very difficult for Conservatives, or any party, to form a majority government without securing the support of a sizable portion of this group. Even if climate questions are not ballot questions (the defining issue which upon which voters make their choice), voters confidence and support for a party is sure to be impacted by its stance on climate action. It should come as no surprise then, that when the Conservative Party secured a majority government in 2011, it managed to secure the support of 26% of climate action voters. However, in the 2015 election, the number of climate action voters who supported Conservatives fell to 15%. Framed another way - 33% of 2011 Conservative voters would be categorized today as climate voters. In 2015, more than half of those voters (53%) voted for another party. These numbers tell an important story about the real impact of vote-switching within this demographic, and the importance they play in electing Conservative governments. At the same time, these numbers can obscure a second important storyline: A substantial segment of the Conservative voting coalition more than 1 in every 4 Conservative voters (27.6%) - support climate action and expect government action on this file. Given the overall results of the election, one might be tempted to attribute the loss of voters concerned about climate change to a more overall loss of support. To understand the degree to which a change in vote was affiliated with support for climate action we conducted a regression analysis and found that among all 2011 Conservative voters, support for greenhouse gas reductions and for carbon pricing had a statistically significant association with voting for another party in 2015, even after controlling for demographic variables like age and gender. Specifically, we found that support for carbon pricing was associated, among 2011 Conservatives, with a 23% greater likelihood of voting for another party, and support for government action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions was associated with a 30% greater likelihood of supporting another party.

Another way of understanding the role of climate action in the election is to specifically focus on the people who switched their votes away from the Conservative party. These data shows that fully 53% of voters the Conservatives lost between the 2011 and 2015 elections support climate action, and 8% of those lost voters rated the environment as their top issue There are multiple possible explanations for this shift. These voters may have become stronger proponents of climate action between elections; they may have interpreted government actions as hostile to their personal beliefs; or they may have supported the changed positions of rival parties. That said, the data suggest that support for climate action had a substantial influence on the loss of these voters and undoubtedly dealt a substantial blow to the government s reelection campaign. 3 Climate action voters were defined base on their 2015 responses. Please see the Defining support for climate action above to understand how this group was defined.

Who are climate Conservatives? It is helpful to consider the difference between conservative voters who support climate action and those who don t. These data show that a greater proportion of climate Conservatives are women (48%) than among non-climate Conservatives (35%). Climate Conservatives also tend to be younger (18-29 years old) than non-climate Conservatives. A greater proportion of climate Conservatives have a university degree vs. a college degree or no post-secondary diploma than do non-climate Conservatives. Discrepancies in income are nearly non-existent, while the greatest regional variation is observed in Quebec, where 13% of climate Conservatives reside vs. 10% of non-climate Conservatives. Thus, while we can say that generally speaking climate Conservatives tend to be younger, more highly educated, and more likely to be female when compared with their non-green counterparts, these differences are relatively minor. This suggests that climate Conservatism is primarily attitudinal rather than a demographic trend within the general Conservative population. education gender age

Conclusion For years, Canadian conservatism and environmental action were not just compatible, but deeply intertwined, but over recent past that relationship has eroded, and has caused a significant part of the electorate and the conservative coalition to abandon their support for conservative parties. Given the importance of climate action for past and current Conservative voters, it is critical for the Conservative party to address these issues in a way that both engages this significant swath of the electorate and respects the ideological roots and principles of the party. This is not an issue that can be simply ignored. Across the world, and here in Canada, there are conservative governments and parties that are leading with smart, market-based policies to tackle the growing threat of climate change, while ensuring economic prosperity and smaller government. The challenge to Canadian Conservatives is whether or not they will re-embrace their long history of environmental action and give Canadians a credible, conservative action plan to address the threat of climate change. Failure to do so could mean the continued decline of the Conservative vote share; however, meaningful plans for action could be the turning-point that lays the foundation for Canada s next strong, stable, Conservative majority government.

about clean prosperity Canadians for Clean Prosperity seeks to build enduring political support for market-based policies that generate growth while conserving our environment. We educate and influence governments, legislators, political, business and other thought leaders, and give Canadians who share our vision the tools to influence their leaders and representatives. Mark Cameron Mark Cameron is the Executive Director of Canadians for Clean Prosperity. He has worked in public policy roles in government, business and consulting for over 20 years, including five years with Prime Minister Stephen Harper as Senior Policy Advisor and Director of Policy and Research. He has also worked for Ontario Power Generation, BlackBerry, and as a consultant on energy and environmental issues. Tom Chervinsky Tom Chervinsky is the Vice-President Operations of Canadians for Clean Prosperity. He is a marketing, strategy and political professional with over 10 years experience working with parties, campaigns, elected officials, and issue groups. He holds degrees in social psychology and business with a focus on strategy and marketing. About Vox Pop Labs Vox Pop Labs is a civic tech and data initiative founded and operated by a team of statisticians and social scientists. Its digital products have engaged millions of users worldwide. Its analytics services draw on unique data and methods to generate exceptional insights for media, government, commercial, and non-profit institutions.

Appendix A Probability of vote switching, political activity and demographics breakdown of 2011 Conservative voters across climate action suppporters ( Green ) and non-climate action supporters ( Non-Green ).

appendix b Multivariate regression measuring the effect of support for greenhouse gas reduction and carbon pricing on the likelihood of a 2011 Conservative voter supporting another party in the 2015 election. support for carbon pricing support for gas emission reductions

cleanprosperity.ca 416.777.2327 info@cleanprosperity.ca