IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS. W.P. No. of 2007

Similar documents
THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. M.A. No. 35 of 2013(SZ) in Appeal No. 31 of 2012

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No. 153 of 2014 (SZ)

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras. (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

Bar & Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : CORAM

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

BEFORE THE NATONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI Application No.79 of 2016 (SZ) & Appeal No.120 of 2016 (SZ) APPLICATION NO.

Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013

Bar & Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Villupuram 11 th December, 2018

THE ANDHRA PRADESH REORGANISATION BILL, 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN. W.P.No.35881/2016 & WMP.No.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil)

108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9382 of 2015

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2014 HON BLE SHRI JUSTICE V.R. KINGAONKAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No. 131 of 2015 (SZ) AND

Bar&Bench (

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL

Madras High Court Madras High Court All India Association Of vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 November, 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. W.P.Nos.46210/2014 & /2014(GM-CPC)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:

Suyambulingam Primary School vs The District Elementary... on 18 September, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

FORUM FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Contempt Jurisdiction)

ORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH ORDER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2004

JUDGMENT. (Hon ble R. Sudhakar, J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO

W.P.No.32054/2014 (GM-RES) ORDER. In Prakash Singh Vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 1, Apex Court issued several directions in the matter of police

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. I.A. Nos of 2005 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202 OF 1995 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 267 of The State of Jharkhand and another Vrs.

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1988

SESSION 7: PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES. Public Interest Litigation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA THE CHAIRMAN POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

THE RAILWAYS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

Order in D.Dis.R.P.301/2016 D2 dated:

THE TAMIL NADU GROUNDWATER (DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) ACT, 2003

The Kerala Land Conservancy Act, Keyword(s): Property of Government, Unauthorised Occupation, Government Lands

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No.5740 OF 2007 (LA-BDA)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. W.P. No & W.P.Nos /2012(T-RES)

LatestLaws.com LatestLaws.com. Bare Acts & Rules. Free Downloadable Formats. Hello Good People! LaLas

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF G. Sundarrajan.

THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986

Standing Counsel for TNPSC

Case No. 02 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri S. B. Kulkarni, Member Shri V. L. Sonavane, Member

The parties to the present dispute are married to each other and the said marriage was solemnized on 17 th February, 2000.

PRESTIGE BELLA VISTA FLAT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION - PBVFOWA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8700 OF Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association W I T H

ABSTRACT. G.O.(Ms) No.234 Dated: The appended Notification shall be published in the next issue of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

CERTIFICATE OF URGENCY

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Dated: Coram:

Date: Legal Notice. 1. The Vice Chancellor, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO /2015

Thiru R. Santhanam, I.A.S., Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration CIRCULAR

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 16/2014 (CZ) (THC)

Irrigation Rules, 2056 (2000)

ii) The respondent did not furnish a Bank Guarantee for the amount of Rs crores and also did not pay the service tax payable on the said amount

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.

AND 1. The Chaiman Appellate Authority Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Krishna Vilas No. 51, Gangadheeswarar Koil Street Purasawalkam Chennai

CIRCULAR No.31/2004. Disaster Management and Mitigation Department, Ezhilaglam, Chennai-5. Dated CIRCULAR No.31/2004

Association (in short TNAKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

The above Revision Petition was filed under Section 21 of the Act. against the order dated of the Joint Commissioner, Tirunelveli

Bare Acts & Rules. Hello Good People! Free Downloadable Formats. LaLas

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

...Respondents In the matter of Arulmighu Thanthondreeswarar Temple,

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. WRIT PETITION Nos /2015 (T-RES)

THE KERALA STAMP (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010

Bar & Bench (

The Tamil Nadu Presevation of Private Forest Act, 1949

Transcription:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS W.P. No. of 2007 1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post Thirukovillur Villupuram Page No. 1 / Corrns.

8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602-2 - -Vs- Petitioners 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents AFFIDAVIT OF K. BALAMURUGAN I, K. Balamurugan, S/o. Kaasinathan, aged about 31 years, residing at No. Page No. 2 / Corrns.

- 3-32, Old Gingee Road, (Behind Mariamman Koil), Villupuram 605 602 now temporarily come down to Chennai, do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows. 1. I am the first petitioner herein and as such am well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. I am filing this Writ Petition in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Direction from this Hon ble Court restraining the Respondents from interfering with the natural resources namely the Mundiyambakkam Lake in Villupuram District and from disturbing the lake by putting up any construction or from altering the landscape in Survey No. 144-1, Mundiyambakkam Village, 3.I am the Coordinator of the Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement hereinafter referred to as Movement - which is a consortium of many organizations, networks, professionals, human rights activists, educationists, individuals and community based organizations. The said movement was formed on 05-01-07, with an objective to protect and prevent the degradation of the natural water sources like the lakes, ponds and other water resources throughout the state. The Second Petitioner is a retired College Lecturer and a renowned human rights activist. He is also the Secretary of Tindivanam Town and Rural Education Improvement Trust. He is also the Organiser of Makkal Kalvi Iyakkam. The Third Petitioner is the Tindivanam Town Secretary of the Tamizh Desa Podhuvudamai Katchi, President of Town Education Improvement Committee and also the President of the Tindivanam Town and Rural Education Improvement Trust. The Fourth Petitioner is the Villupuram District Principal Organiser, Human Rights Organisation working for the past 20 years on various human rights issues. The Fifth Petitioner is the State Treasurer of Pazhangudi Irullar Padugappu Sangam working for the welfare and the rights of the Irula Triabals. The Sixth Petitioner is an advocate and also women s rights and tribal rights activist. The Seventh Petitioner is District Secretary, Marxist Periyar Podhuvudamai Katchi. Page No. 3 / Corrns.

- 4 - and a senior activist working towards abolition of social evils and rights of people. The Eighth Petitioner is a child rights activist working towards the promotion and protection of the rights of children. 4. We came to know that the Government of Tamil Nadu was planning to start a Medical College in Villupuram District and the same was announced on 22-06- 06 during the Budget session of the Legislative Assembly of Tamilnadu for the year 2006-2007. Following the said announcement, the Director of Medical Education had sent necessary proposals to the government for starting a new Medical College at The government, based on the said proposal, issued orders vide G.O.Ms. No. 161, Health and Family Welfare (MCA1) department, dated 30.08.2006, stating that a new Medical college shall be established at Villupuram district with an intake of hundred students from the academic year 2007-2008. 5. We welcomed the decision to start a Medical College in Villupuram District. Based on the said government order, a committee comprising of the Fifth Respondent and the other concerned authorities started looking out for the appropriate place for the construction of the Medical college building. We came to know from News Paper reports dated 27-12-2006 that the Hon ble Health Minister and Education Minister of Tamilnadu visited Villupuram to select the site for construction of Medical College; that they inspected the four lakes in and around Villupuram, viz., the Virattikuppam Lake, the Mundiampakkam Lake, the Vikkiravaandi Lake and the Muthaampalayam Lake; that the final decision will be announced later. 6. Knowing that the officials are considering only the lakes for construction of Medical College, there were widespread oppositions from the general public that the lakes should be protected and Medical College should not be constructed in any of the lakes mentioned above. Prof. K. Dhanaraj, the Member of Parliament, Tindivanam Constituency also addressed a letter to the District Revenue Officer Page No. 4 / Corrns.

- 5 - seeking clarification about the site chosen for construction of Medical College. In response to these oppositions from the general public, the Minister for Education Department issued a statement on 10-01-07 that though water catchment areas were visited to select the land for the Medical college, the agricultural lands will not be taken for construction of Medical college and that the District Collector was asked to identify alternate sites. 7. Despite the oppositions and the clarification issued by the Minister for Higher Education, it was reported in the news papers on 07-02-07 that a meeting on the development activities of Villupuram Town was held at the Office of Villupuram Municipality on 06-02-07 which was presided over by the Minister of Education in the presence of the District Collector. In the said meeting the Minister for Education announced that 25 acres of land is needed for construction of Medical College; that there is no other land available in the District and hence it was decided to construct the Medical College building at Mundiyambakkam Lake. The same was reiterated by the 5th Respondent in his response to Prof. K. Dhanaraj, Member of Parliament in his letter dated 12-02-07. 8. Prof. Dhanraj, Member of Parliament, on the same day, i.e., on 12-02-07, addressed another letter to the District Revenue Officer registering his objection in choosing the Mundiyambakkam Lake for construction of the Medical College. He has stated in that letter that the general public has given complaints to him that no construction activity should be initiated at the lake site. On hearing the decision that Mundiyambakkam Lake has been chosen as the site for the construction of Medical College, a protest demonstration was held on 02-03-07 by the Movement stating that the lakes should not be used for any construction activities. In the protest The Movement also condemned the effort of Tindivanam Municipaoity to bring the Bus stand in Tindivanam Lake. 9. As soon as the decision of the authorities was known to the people, Page No. 5 / Corrns.

- 6 - opposition started pouring in from all sections against the decision of choosing the Mundiampakkam Lake for construction of the Medical college. Apart from the common people, the activists, people belonging to various political parties and even the Member of Parliament from Tindivanam constituency had also raised serious objections over the decision of the officials concerned to construct the Medical college building in the Mundiampakkam Lake. By a letter dated 31-03- 07, Mr. Dhanaraj, Member of Parliament, has addressed a letter to the Minister of Public health and Family welfare, stating that the general public and people from different walks of life are opposing the construction of Medical College at the Mundiyambakkam Lake and that the same should be taken into consideration to review the site for construction of Medical College. 10. It is pertinent to note here that the Minister for Public Works Department announced on 04-04-07, that a new legislation would be enacted in order to protect the lakes, which have been affected by encroachments and pollution. But only two days later i.e., on 06-04-07, the same minister who had announced about the enactment of the new legislation to protect the lakes, visited the Mundiampakkam Lake and informed the media that the Government Medical college would indeed be built in the Mundiampakkam Lake. 11. The announcement by the Minister for Public Works Department enraged the people and activists alike as everyone were expecting that the proposal would be revised since the said Minister had announced about the new Legislation to protect the lakes and water bodies. Hence an emergency meeting of the Movement was convened on 08.04.07. Based on the discussions that emerged during the meeting, a Representation dated 09-04-07 was sent to various Officials including the Chief Minister s Special Cell and the First Respondent herein. 12. The said representation was forwarded by the Chief Minister Special Cell to the 4 th Respondent. Thereafter the Revenue Divisional Officer by a letter dated Page No. 6 / Corrns.

- 7-23-05-07 invited me to participate in an enquiry in this regard. Accordingly I met the 5 th Respondent along with few other members on 29-05-07 and gave our explanations about our opposition to construct the Medical College in Mundiyambakkam Lake. On 08-06-07, we received a letter dated 29-05-07 from the Revenue Divisional Officer informing us that he had sent a report to the 4 th respondent about the explanations given by us. But the Respondents have neither informed us about the contents of the report nor about the action taken by him based on the said report. 13. In spite of the mounting opposition against the building of Medical college in the Mundiampakkam Lake, the officials concerned did not seem to heed to the demands and requests of the people, but went ahead with the proposal. The 4 th Respondent organised a grand ceremony to lay the foundation stone for Villupuram Government Medical College on 19-05-07, by printing invitations. On 19-05-07, foundation stone was laid to begin the construction of the building for the Medical college in the Mundiampakkam Lake by the Minister for Local Administration Department. The said function was attended by the Ministers of Education Department, Health Department, the 4 th Respondent and several other officials. To organise the said function the lake area was levelled by filling debris. 14. Certain basic facts about the water bodies in Tamilnadu will be helpful to appreciate the opposition of the general public against the construction of Medical College in the Lake. There are more than 10 thousands lakes in Tamilnadu. In the past as soon as the Lakes reached its fullest level there used to be a system by which the sluices of the lakes will be opened and the water will be diverted to the next lake. Around 15 lakes used to be connected like this through water channels. More than 100 hectares of cultivable lands used to benefit from these lakes. The maintenance of the lakes was always with the people or the local panchayats. The lakes were not filled every year. On an average in a period of every 5 years the lakes remain full for three years. Accordingly the farmers planned their cultivation. In the year 1960, 880 thousand hectares of land (36%) were under Page No. 7 / Corrns.

- 8 - river and water channels irrigation, 936 thousand hectares of land (38%) under lake irrigation, 597 thousand hectares (24%) under well irrigation and 46 thousand hectares (2%) by other sources. Totally 2462 thousand hectares were under cultivation. According to the Department of Statistics even by the year 2003 the same extent of land was under cultivation. But 38% of Lake irrigation came down by 18%, Channel irrigation came down by 26% and well irrigation went up from 24% to 54%. Because of the raise of 30% cultivation depending on well irrigation the demand on ground water has gone up and this has also led to the consumption of electricity by bore-wells and pump-sets. The ground water level has gone from 20ft to the range of 200 to 2000 ft in various parts of the State. 15. The area of Mundiyambakkam Lake isabout of 42 acres. It is situated near the Villupuram Town. Many acres of land are being irrigated with this water source. It is pertinent to note that the Villupuram Poonthottam Lake was earlier taken over by the Government of Tamilnadu to construct Villupuram Bus stand and various other Government offices. That was one of the biggest lakes of Villupuram with an extent of 48.39 acres. That lake was the source of drinking water for the people of Villupuram Town and has now disappeared for the needs of the Government. Another big lake of Villupuram District has been ignored without any attention or measures to repair the feeder channels for natural flow of water into the lake during the rainy season. The same is now being identified for construction of a Medical College. Further it has been stated by the people that there are vast stretch of lands available arround Villupuram town which can be utilized for construction of Medical college. Hence the chosen site is not appropriate for the benefit of the people of 16. It is pertinent note that before laying the foundation stone for building the Medical college in Mundiampakkam Lake, no environment impact assessment was done by the concerned department. Further, if the lake is covered up by the Medical college buildings, it would diminish the chances of water storage in and Page No. 8 / Corrns.

- 9 - around the area and hence there would be further reduction in the ground water table, which is now below 200ft. I am constrained to state that in the last few years, the ground water table which was at 20ft. surged below 200ft. due to various encroachments leading to the permanent destruction of many lakes in Villupuram district. 17. I state that the Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department issued a circular to all the Government Officials on 26.11.2004 stating that considering the importance of the Poramboke Water bodies, Poramboke Burial Grounds and Poramboke green-lands, the State Government has prohibited any Transaction with regard to the above mentioned lands. The Prohibition was also extended to include the use of these lands for Government Departments as well as Government corporations. The Collectors as well as the District Revenue Officers were advised not to recommend or to give preference to the use of these lands, even in situations of utmost importance. The District Collectors and the Revenue Development Officers were instructed to adhere to this notification strictly even in future. While so, the act of the Respondents in identifying the Mundiyambakkam Lake for construction of the Medical College is highly arbitrary and against the Policy of the Government. 18. I state that in-spite of various Representations sent to the Respondents and other concerned officials, no action has been initiated by the concerned authorities as well as the Respondents. The Respondents have started digging the soil in the Mundiyambakkam Lake for the purpose of testing the same to check if it would suit the needs of the Respondents to construct the buildings for the Medical College. The Respondents did not even bother to look into other options like the poramboke lands along the stretch of the National Highway from Villupuram towards Chennai. 19. The activities of the Respondents in finalizing the Mundiyambakkam Lake for the construction of the buildings for Medical College are highly unreasonable. Page No. 9 / Corrns.

- 10 - The Respondents have failed to take into consideration the existence of a Sugar Factory nearby, the effluents of which would affect the hygiene of the patients when a hospital is going to be situated near it. 20. The Respondents have failed to consider the fact that the Mundiyambakkam Lake is the lifeline of the Farmers in and around it. If the Lake is closed for the purpose of constructing the buildings for the Medical College, it would wreak havoc to the lives of the farmers who are dependent on the storage of rain water in the said Lake for replenishing the ground water during and after the rainy season. But all these reasons have failed to appeal to the Respondents who are bent upon destroying the Lake along with the lives and livelihoods of thousands of people living in and around the Lake. In these circumstances, as I am left with no other alternate and equally efficacious remedy, I am constrained to approach this Hon ble Court by way of this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following among other GROUNDS A. The act of the Respondents in choosing the Mundiampakkam Lake for construction of Medical college in Villupuram District is arbitrary, unreasonable and in violation of Art 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. B. The impugned order is violative of provisions of S.O.1533 dated 14-09- 2006 issued by the Environment and Forest Department of the Union Government under Rule %(3) of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. Page No. 10 / Corrns.

- 11 - C. Under the provisions of S.O.1533 dated 14-09-2006 issued by the Environment and Forest Department of the Union Government, no construction activity, whether preliminary or otherwise can be commenced without grant of Environmental Clearance by the Environment Impact Assessment Authority, for the projects listed in Annexure I of the said notification. D. The First Respondent has failed to see that what is involved is not a mere procedural infraction but is the question of Rule of Law and the adherence to Environmental Regulation. E. The First Respondent has failed to see that lakes and water bodies have to be preserved and any failure in this regard would have serious repercussions on the livelihood and water security for communities. F. The First Respondent has failed to see that any construction in the catchments, which cut off water flows into the lake would eventually cause the lake to dry up, leading to severe ill-effects on the farmers and other people around the lake. G. The failure of the First Respondent to enforce the law and the failure to protect a significant water body affects the rights of the citizens to clean and healthy environment, which has been recognised as part of right to life enshrined in Art. 21 of the Constitution. Page No.11 / Corrns.

- 12 - H. The construction of Medical college at Mundiyambakkam Lake is in violation of Arts. 48A and 51A of the Constitution. The Apex Court has held in various instances that these two Constitutional provisions are fundamental in the governance of the country and need to be read with Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. I. The Respondents have failed to see that the tanks, lakes and water bodies are communal property and the State authorities are trustees to hold and manage such properties for the benefits of the community and that they cannot commit any act or omission which will infringe the right of the community and alienate the property for any other purpose. The decision of the Respondents to construct Medical college in the Lake is in violation of Doctrine of Public Trust, as the State being the trustee of the natural resources and public property should maintain the traditional usage particular to that form of resources. J. The Respondents have failed to apply the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in plethora of judgements asserting the need for environmental protection and conservation of natural resources. K. The decision to construct the Medical college at the Mundiyambakkam Lake is in violation of the principle of State Responsibility for pollution emanating within one s own territories. This responsibility is clearly enunciated in the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm 1972 (Stockholm Convention) to which India is a party. In the said Declaration it is stated that Page No. 12 / Corrns.

- 13 - The natural resources of the earth, including the air, water, land, flora and fauna and especially representative samples of natural ecosystems, must be safeguarded for the benefit of present and future generation through careful planning or management, as appropriate. The responsibility bestowed upon the Government in the said Declaration is being violated by constructing Medical college in the lake. L. The decision of Respondents to construct Medical college at Mundiyambakkam Lake is in violation of the Principle of Inter Generational Equity which is enunciated in Principles 1 and 2 of the Stockholm Declaration, which has been ratified by the Government of India. The Petitioners herein are filing this Petition jointly as the cause of action and the Respondents are one and the same. It is therefore just and necessary that the Petitioners be permitted to file a Single Writ Petition as the relief sought is also common. It is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners to join together and file a Single Writ Petition and thus render justice. The Petitioners have made out a prima facie case. The Respondents are indulging in changing the landscape of the Mundiyambakkam Lake by filling with debris collected from the demolition of buildings due to expansion of the National Highway NH 45. It is therefore just and necessary that the Respondents are restrained from interfering with the landscape of Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares, failing which the general public will be put to irreparable Page No. 13 / Corrns.

- 14 - loss, hardship and injury. The Respondents will not be prejudiced by the same and the balance of convenience lies in favour of protecting the natural resources and the common property of the people. It is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Respondents from proceeding with any construction activity or from interfering with the landscape of Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares pending disposal of the writ petition and thus render justice. It is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction directing the Respondents to remove the debris filled in Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares pending disposal of the writ petition and thus render justice. It is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an Order or a Direction or a Writ particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent not to commit any act or omission which will interfere with landscape of Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares and consequentially protect and preserve the said Lake from any development and construction activities whatsoever and be maintained as a water body by restoring status quo anti prior to G.O.Ms. No.161 date 30-08-06 and pass such further or other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Solemnly affirmed at Chennai this the day of July, 2007 and affixed his signature in my presence. Before Me Advocate, Chennai

MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No. of 2007

1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post Thirukovillur Villupuram 8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602-2 - Petitioners 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, -Vs-

Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents WRIT PETITION The address for service of all notices and processes on the Petitioners are that of their Counsel M/s. D. Geetha, R. Diwakaran and S. Anbazhagan having office at No.319, II Floor, Linghi Chetty Street, George Town, Chennai - 1. - 3 - The address for service of all notices and process on the Respondent is the same as above. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Affidavit it is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an Order or a Direction or a Writ particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent not to commit any act or omission which will interfere with landscape of

Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares and consequentially protect and preserve the said Lake from any development and construction activities whatsoever and be maintained as a water body by restoring status quo anti prior to G.O.Ms. No.161 date 30-08-06 and pass such further or other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Dated at Chennai this the 26 th day of July 2007. Counsel for Petitioner. MEMORANDUM OF WRIT OF MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) M.P.No. of 2007 in W.P.No. of 2007

1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post Thirukovillur Villupuram - 2-8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602 Petitioners -Vs- 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary,

Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents INTERIM INJUNCTION PETITION For the reasons stated in the accompanying Affidavit it is therefore prayed - 3 - that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Respondents from proceeding with any construction activity or from interfering with the landscape of Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares pending disposal of the writ petition and thus render justice. Dated at Chennai this the 26 th day of July 2007.

Counsel for Petitioner. MEMORANDUM OF WRIT OF MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) M.P.No. of 2007 in W.P.No. of 2007

1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post Thirukovillur Villupuram - 2-8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602 Petitioners -Vs- 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary,

Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents DIRECTION PETITION For the reasons stated in the accompanying Affidavit it is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction directing the Respondents to remove the debris filled in Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. - 3-144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares pending disposal of the writ petition and thus render justice. Dated at Chennai this the 26 th day of July 2007.

Counsel for Petitioner. MEMORANDUM OF WRIT OF MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) M.P.No. of 2007 in

W.P.No. of 2007 1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post Thirukovillur Villupuram - 2-8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602 Petitioners -Vs-

1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents DIRECTION PETITION For the reasons stated in the accompanying Affidavit it is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction directing the Respondents to remove the debris filled in Mundiyambakkam Lake in Survey No. 144-1 at Mundiyambakkam Village, Villupuram District being an extent of 16.45 hectares pending disposal of the writ petition and thus render justice. Dated at Chennai this the 26 th day of July 2007. Counsel for Petitioner.

MEMORANDUM OF WRIT OF MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) M.P.No. of 2007 in W.P.No. of 2007 1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. 2. P. Kalyani NO.7, College Road, Bharathidasan Nagar Tinidivanam 3. M. Kanthasamy 21, Subramanya Sami Koil Street, Tindivanam. 4. P.V. Ramesh 186, Thiru. Vi. Ka. Salai, Villupuram 605 602. 5. M. Nagarajan, Siruvalai Village and Post 6. P. A. Lucia 2/833, Periyar Street, Vazhuthareddi Villupuram -605 602. 7. A. K. Kuppusamy 2/112, Yaz Kudil Periyar Street Sennakunam Post

Thirukovillur Villupuram - 2-8. V. Antony Cruz 10, Visvalingam Lay out, Villupuram 6005 602 Petitioners -Vs- 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. 2. The Secretary, Education Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009. 3. The Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram. 5. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 6. The Director of Medical Education DMS Compound, Chennai 10. 7. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Guindy Chennai.Respondents 2-B PETITION (UNDER RULE 2-B APPENDIX (4) A.S. RULES) For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this

- 3 - Hon ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to join together to file a single Writ Petition and thus render justice. Dated at Chennai on this 26th day of July of 2007. Counsel for Petitioner.

DISTRICT : : VILLUPURAM HIGH COURT : : MADRAS W.P. No. of 2007 INDEX TO THE TYPED SET OF PAPERS

M/S. D.GEETHA R.DIWAKARAN S.ANBAZHAGAN COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS W.P. No. of 2007 1. K. Balamurugan, Co-ordinator, Lake, Pond, Water Resources Protection Movement, No. 32, Old Gingee Road, Villupuram 605 602. and 7 others Petitioners

1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai 600009. -Vs- and 6 others..respondents INDEX TO THE TYPED SET OF PAPERS S.No Date Particulars Page 1. News Papers publications Certified that the above copies are true copies. Dated at Chennai this the day of July 2007. Counsel for Petitioners.