From: DRO Taskings Sent: Monday, February 22, :05 AM Subject: Removal Goals

Similar documents
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. The Performance of 287(g) Agreements FY 2011 Update

Department of Homeland Security

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Secure Communities (SC)

Office of Inspector General

Delegation of Immigration Authority Section 287(g)

SUMMARY OF LEAKED, DRAFT REPORT DETAILING DHS PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF BORDER ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. The Performance of 287(g) Agreements Report Update

Deportation of Parents of U.S.-Born Citizens

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF DHS MEMORANDUM Implementing the President s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies

GAO IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT. ICE Could Improve Controls to Help Guide Alien Removal Decision Making. Report to Congressional Requesters

February 3, National Records Center (NRC) Freedom of Information Act division P.O. Box Lee's Summit, MO

Immigration Violations

Executive Actions Relating to Immigration

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY IN ALIGNMENT WITH FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

March 30, 2004 INFORMATION. Michael J. Garcia, Assistant Secretary U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

ffite llf f~e 1\ttllrtttt? Qieuernl

Law Enforcement Sensitive For Official Use Only

S To provide for enhanced Federal, State, and local enforcement of the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ALBUQUERQUE ICE/DRO*** LIAISON MEETING WITH AILA/NEW MEXICO MEMBERS JUNE 15, 2010

ICE Scheduled Departure

Streamline: Measuring Its Effect on Illegal Border Crossing

Q&A: DHS Implementation of the Executive Order on Border Security and Immigration Enforcement

TRAC. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse Syracuse University. May 17, 2010

The President s Budget Request: Fiscal Year (FY) 2019

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

Executive Actions on Immigration

GAO. HOMELAND SECURITY Challenges to Implementing the Immigration Interior Enforcement Strategy

GAO IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT. DHS Has Incorporated Immigration Enforcement Objectives and Is Addressing Future Planning Requirements

LOCAL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION : GENERAL GUIDELINES

Deportations and Detentions

The ICE 287(g) Program: A Law Enforcement Partnership

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON:

23 illegal alien workers for The Sun Valley Group arrested in. Enforcement action at Arcata flower grower is part of ongoing ICE investigation

GAO. IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT Controls over Program Authorizing State and Local Enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws Should Be Strengthened

ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY

April 25, More specifically, we are requesting alien-by-alien anonymous data containing the following information:

Immigration Enforcement Benchmarks

Background on the Trump Administration Executive Orders on Immigration

November 20, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. R. Gil Kerlikowske Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT. Immigration Detention Overview and Recommendations

Immigration 101. USCIS overview. AIFC Prescott, Arizona

Office of Investigations

February 17, Kevin McAleenan Acting Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS

: Facilitating Parental Interests in the Course of Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities

Sanctuary Jurisdictions and Criminal Aliens: In Brief

Office of the Inspector of Prisons 24 Cecil Walk Kenyon Street Nenagh Co. Tipperary

LOCAL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: GENERAL GUIDELINES

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC HQDOMO 70/23.1-P AD06-07

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

BORDER SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION. Initial Executive Order Actions and Resource Implications

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.17

Overcrowding Alternatives

U.S. Immigratio and Customs Enforcement

Immigration Violations

Case 1:12-cv M-LDA Document 177 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 37 PageID #: 3203 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

The REAL ID Act of 2005 (H.R. 418): Summary and Selected Analysis of Provisions as Passed by the House

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND THE DETENTION SYSTEM A Growing Concern

Case 1:18-cv EGS Document 29 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Immigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal

and Customs U.S. Immigration Enforcement Re: Participation in MCAC's License Plate Recognition (LPR) System Dear Mr.

IC Chapter 13. Registration and Voting Requirements; General Provisions

Summary of Emergency Supplemental Funding Bill

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 ( HUMAN RIGHTS ) OF THE OAK PARK VILLAGE CODE BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 7 ( WELCOMING VILLAGE )

ST. FRANCES CABRINI CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT LEGAL ASSISTANCE Presenter: Wafa Abdin, Esq.

Overview of HB David Blatt Director of Public Policy Oklahoma Policy Institute

This section covers coordination of services between agencies and the youth correctional system. STANDARDS

Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

Good afternoon, AILA Doc. No (Posted 4/3/18)

You may request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals if you:

NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

STRIKING AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED ORDINANCE , VERSION. On page 1, beginning on line 15, strike everything through page 19, line 451, and insert:

GAO. CRIMINAL ALIENS INS Efforts to Remove Imprisoned Aliens Continue to Need Improvement

PRESIDENT TRUMP S EXECUTIVE ORDERS ON IMMIGRATION

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT 4.48 PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT Rev. 08/2013 PAGE 1

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS: The Los Angeles Sheriff s Proposed Implementation of ICE s Priority Enforcement Program. September 29, 2015

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know

Summary of the Reid-Schumer-Menendez Amnesty Proposal

COR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Revised 05/2017 Page 1 of 5 CHAPTER CORRECTIONS SUBJECT ARREST AND DETENTION OF FOREIGN NATIONALS

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 42 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Presidential Documents

Chester County Swift Alternative Violation Enforcement Supervision SAVE

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

National Disability Rights Network

(b)(6), (b)(7)c. (b)(6), (b)(7)c, (b)(7)e ICE 2012FOIA

BUILDING TRUST WITH COMMUNITIES, UPHOLDING DUE PROCESS SUPERVISING ATTORNEY IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER SEPTEMBER 2015

Do Lawyers Pay for Themselves?

AN ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENT OBAMA S EXECUTIVE ACTION ON IMMIGRATION ANNOUNCED NOVEMBER 20, 2014

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF ELEANOR ACER. Director, Refugee Protection Program HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST

SECRETARY NAPOLITANO AND ICE ASSISTANT SECRETARY MORTON ANNOUNCE NEW IMMIGRATION DETENTION REFORM INITIATIVES

An Introduction to Federal Immigration Law for North Carolina Government Officials

NACo analysis: potential county impacts of the executive order on Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States

RUNAWAYS FROM OUT OF COUNTY INTAKE

STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD. An Administration-Made Disaster: The South Texas Border Surge of Unaccompanied Minors. Submitted to the

Sample Non-Immigrant Response *** LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE *** IAQ RECEIVED: 04/10/ :20:43 AM

WHEN IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS ARRIVE AT YOUR WORKPLACE: A Know Your Rights Toolkit for Public Sector Workers

Transcription:

From: DRO Taskings Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:05 AM Subject: Removal Goals The following message is sent on behalf of James M. Chaparro, Director: To: Field Office Directors and Deputy Field Office Directors: Keep up the Good Work on Criminal Alien Removals I want to thank each of you for your efforts as we began this fiscal year and your continuing focus on ICE's enforcement priorities for increasing our identification, arrest and removal of criminal aliens. We asked you to step up to the plate on criminal aliens and you have. Through your efforts, ICE has removed 56, 853 criminal aliens as of February 15, 2010. With every field office maintaining this level of activity we anticipate achieving the Agency goal of 150,000 criminal alien removals in FY10. DRO must now look at the other critical Agency goal of achieving 400,000 removals and returns overall without relaxing our increased efforts in criminal removals. Non-criminal Removals are Falling Short of our Goal Current non-criminal removal projections put is well short of our FY10 goal. As of February 15, 2010, DRO removed or returned 60,397 non-criminal aliens which is an average of 437 removals/returns per day. The current non-criminal removal rate projections will result in 159,740 removals at the close of the fiscal year. Coupling this with the projections in criminal removals only gives us a total of just over 310,000 overall removals -- well under the Agency's goal of 400,000. Here is What I Need You to Do There a number of activities that DRO will take to increase our overall removals and move us into position to meet or exceed the fiscal year goals. Within 30 days we will increase our national ADP by 3,000 bringing our national overall ADP to approximately 32,600. This will require each and every field office to maximize the use of the funded beds in your field office or the reallocation of funds from those field offices that maximized this as much as possible to those with detention needs that are in excess of the funding currently available to them. This increase in overall ADP alone has the potential to provide DRO with an additional 21,000 removals during the remainder of the fiscal year, but we must move quickly to raise the ADP.

CAP surges will be planned and implemented in every field office over the course of the fiscal year. I ask you to coordinate with prison systems to identify all aliens that are scheduled to be released within 90-120 days and begin travel document processing and coordination. The sooner we do this in the fiscal year, the more comfortable I will be that we can reach our goals. For those with Rapid REPAT agreements, work closely with corrections officials to increase identifications of eligible participants and expedite removal. For those without agreements, reengage State correction officials to develop a program if possible. Increase the number of Tier One Non-Criminal Fugitive alien arrests along with Tier Two arrests (Re-Entry/Reinstatement) in every field office. An example would be 30-60 day Tier One/Tier Two Non-Criminal surge operations. Maximize our participation in the 2010 Mexican Interior Repatriation Program (MIRP), which may generate approximately 18,000 24,000 returns over the course of the FY 2010 program. Being successful in meeting these two broad goals will require every Field Office and each Field Office Director to fully support these initiatives and to look at individual initiatives within their field office that could increase our effectiveness. Our program is challenged this year in many areas including both budget and staffing. Our case and detention management activities are important in both detained and non-detained but we understand that field offices may see a need to temporarily shift staffing resources from one to the other in order to maximize our effectiveness at maintaining our criminal removal activities as they are today while increasing the overall removals in each field office. These Efforts Must Be Sustained and Will be Closely Monitored This will be a key topic in our next Field Office Director's teleconference and I will ensure that we are reporting out to you where we are in our overall progress on these teleconferences during the remainder of the fiscal year. In addition, I will encourage you to raise opportunities that might benefit others or impediments or obstacles that I or the staff here in HQ can work to mitigate in order to increase your successes and effectiveness. I thank you for your continued hard work and patience as we have worked to define our standing in these goal areas. We have a tremendously energetic and tenacious workforce in DRO and I am confident that we will rise to the challenge and meet our goals.

Office of Detention and Removal Operations U.S. Department of Homeland Security Dallas Field Office 8101 N. Stemmons Freeway Dallas, TX 75247 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement January 4, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR: Immigration Enforcement Agent FROM: on and Deportation Officer SUBJECT: erformance Appraisal Element #2 This memorandum serves to clarify the requirements and expectations of GS-5 and GS-7 Immigration Enforcement Agents as they relate to Element 2 Institutional Removal Program (IRP) and Alien Criminal Apprehension Program (ACAP) in your Performance Work Plan (PWP) served on January 4, 2010. Element #2 will be evaluated as follows: GS-7 30 cases per month and below- 31-40 cases per month- 41-45 cases per month- 46 + cases per month- Unacceptable Minimally Successful Fully Successful Excellent GS-5 24 cases per month and below- 25-35 cases per month- 36-39 cases per month- 40 + cases per month- Unacceptable Minimally Successful Fully Successful Excellent WWW. ice.gov

EMPLOYEE: 41111111111110110 PAGE NO. 3 PART I - PERFORMANCE WORK PLAN (PWP) A. JOB ELEMENT NUMBER AND TITLE (CHECK ONE: Critical q Non-critical and indicate Weighting, if Appropriate) Element # 2 Criminal Alien Program (CAP) B. PERFORMANCE STANDARD(S): The Agent periodically visits local, municipal and state law enforcement holding and correctional facilities, courts, parole and probation offices, and state and federal prisons, and identifies violators of Immigration and Nationality laws and regulations who are subject to removal. The Agent conducts personal interviews and questioning of aliens and others, reviews documents and files, to establish the alienage and removability of these individuals and coordinates with the Office of Chief Counsel in appropriate cases. The Agent assists other law enforcement agencies and personnel in identifying criminal aliens in their custody. The Agent prepares the required documents to initiate removal proceedings, and arrests and processes for removal aliens encountered that are not authorized to be in or work in the United States. The Agent completes extensive database inquiries (e.g.) IAFIS, IBIS, NCIC, (DENT, etc.) to 'determine criminal history. and/or any links to terrorist activities, interprets this information using a thorough knowledge of immigration law and prepares any necessary charging documents (this may require obtaining Judgment and Conviction records to support criminal charges). ELEMENT IS EVALUATED AS FOLLOWS: Excellent when: In addition to meeting the Fully Successful level, the Immigration Enforcement Agent demonstrates initiative and requires minimal supervisory guidance in the management of his/her assigned caseload. The LEA averages 51 or more processed cases per month with all cases completed timely with no noted deficiencies in casework ** Fully Successful when: The Immigration Enforcement Agent demonstrates the capacity to work independently but requires occasional guidance relating to the management of his/her assigned caseload. In addition, the agent averages 46 to 50 processed cases per month with no more than 10 cases per rating year processed untimely due to the agent's inattentiveness to their caseload. The agent usually submits casework that is error free and is processed in accordance with regulations and consistent with outstanding instructions. ** Minimally Successful when: The Immigration Enforcement Agent requires supervisory guidance on a regular basis as he/she cannot or will not utilize initiative or otherwise work independently relating to the management of his/her assigned caseload. In addition, the LEA averages 36 to 45 processed cases per month with many cases processed outside of established timeframes due to the agent's inattentiveness to their caseload. The agent frequently submits casework that is error prone and/or processed untimely. ** NOTE: ** The term "timely" is intended to reflect a reasonable period of time and will vary according to personnel staffing and work load. NOTE: A deficiency, complaint, or inadequacy is defined as a significant error adversely affecting the job element. It will usually result in counseling by a Supervisor. Minor errors are not usually considered a deficiency, complaint, or inadequacy, however, continued minor deficiencies, complaints, or inadequacies may be considered as significant in the aggregate. Deficiencies, complaints, or inadequacies of a very serious nature may be weighted as more than one when justified and so supported by a Supervisor. Leave and other approved absences will be taken under consideration when determining an evaluation for this element. ** In addition to the noted standards of the performance element, receptiveness, willingness, cooperation and attitude will be given due consideration during the rating period.

From: Sent: Frida November 20 2009 4:52 PM To: Cc: Subject: FW: Productivity Importance: High Attn SC personnel, As you know, next week we are scheduled to begin to provide LEA support to local counties and to ensure we are successful with that venture, we need to tighten the ropes on our current program. Effective Friday, November 20 th, employees are expected to produce a minimum of 3 actual Charging Documents Issued (CDI) daily in addition to completing other DEPORT tasks (i.e. Detainers, Case Updated and No Action for BOP & CIS cases). If a member of the staff is unable to conform to this standard, you will need to provide an explanation to your shift supervisor. Since we are not currently overwhelmed with an abundance of inquiries, beginning today, employees assigned to monitor the terminals are required to complete other DEPORT tasks during downtime. If this change and we begin receiving numerous IAQs, we can revisit this topic. All employees assigned to DEPORT/SC are required to gain access to the various databases and systems needed to complete their duties and assignments no later than COB Tuesday, November 24th. We went live on November 8th and it is extremely difficult to comprehend and believe that there are employees without full system access. If everyone is not in full compliance by this deadline, a detailed explanation is required to your shift/acting supervisor Employees who require access to the databases and systems can accelerate the rocess b contactin their desi nated SCO and DHS Help Desk. As of today's date, are the SCOs. As Law Enforcement Officers (LEDs), we are equally responsible for obtaining and maintaining your systems access. All shifts are expected to be equally productive barring unique and beyond our control situations (system failures, electrical outages, etc). Management will be checking your progress on a daily basis to ensure compliance and consistency. Daily reports are to be submitted prior to the end of your work day on the share drive logs. If there are questions and or concerns, feel free to contact me or your shift supervisor. Thank You,, SDDO 312 office 312 cell Nextel