OVERVIEW OF REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

Similar documents
REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

ALI-ABA Course of Study Immigration Law: Basics and More

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...ix Table of Decisions Index...367

OVERVIEW of Topics. Understanding a Notice to Appear. Pleadings to the Notice to Appear (or Other Charging Documents) and Contesting Removal

Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief. By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1

Asylum and Refugee Provisions

ABA Pro Bono Training: The Essentials of Immigration Court Representation Introduction to Immigration Court Proceedings

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

Immigration Issues in New Mexico. Rebecca Kitson, Esq

IMMIGRATION UPDATES. Presented by Rose Mary Valencia Executive Director Office of International Affairs

ICE. I.C.E. Under D.H.S. Customs and INS Investigations DRO

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends

Interoffice Memorandum

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Agency No. A versus

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS

Glossary, Forms, And Abbreviations Abbreviation or Form

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

BIA and Circuit Court Appeals Pro Bono Immigration Training San Francisco, CA August 8, 2013

Copyright American Immigration Council, Reprinted with permission

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION Legal Action Center 918 F Street, N.W. Washington, D.C (202)

Administrative Removal Proceedings Manual (M-430, Rev. June 4, 1999)

The NTA: Notice to Appear Kerry Bretz Bretz & Coven

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No BIA No. A versus

These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12, 2017.

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

INDEX Alphabetization is word-by-word (e.g., R visas precedes REAL ID Act )

Credible & Reasonable Fear Interviews

Gaffar v. Atty Gen USA

Case 1:07-cv RGS Document 24 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document Filed 09/12/18 PageID.3439 Page 1 of 7

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHEP Conference /19/2014. Manner of Entry. Cuban/Haitian Entrants typically arrive to the US by one of three modes:

Immigration Relief for Unaccompanied Minors

December 31, Office of Management and Budget USCIS Desk Officer

5 Motions before the Immigration Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Representing Clients in Immigration Court, 5th Ed. Acknowledgments... ix Table of Decisions Index

Mariana s Story. Unaccompanied Children: The Journey from Home to Appearing before the Immigration Court in the United States

Immigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal

Practical Considerations for the Pro Bono Asylum Practitioner

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES ANALYSIS

JTIP Handout:Lesson 34 Immigration Consequences

Final BIA Decision Overturning Removal Order Based on One Theory Precludes New NTA Based on Different Ground of Removal.

Current Immigration Issues in Higher Education under the New Administration

Questions and Answers January 14, 2010

Flor Bermudez, Esq. Transgender Law Center P.O. Box Oakland, CA (510)

REOPENING A CASE FOR THE MENTALLY INCOMPETENT IN LIGHT OF FRANCO- GONZALEZ V. HOLDER 1 (November 2015)

5107 leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia Date of this notice: 12/31/2013

Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA

Asylum in the Context of Expedited Removal

IMMIGRATING THROUGH MARRIAGE

If 2nd Level review Required: List of additional documentation that may be required

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION DHS ANNOUNCES UNPRECEDENTED EXPANSION OF EXPEDITED REMOVAL TO THE INTERIOR

Immigration, Crimes, Deportability, Waivers

Status Eligibility Definition SAVE Code Documentation Card Documentation

Bond/Custody. I. Overview. A. Application Before an Immigration Judge. B. Time. C. Subsequent Hearing. D. While a Bond Appeal is Pending

Termination of the Central American Minors Parole Program

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

BILLING CODE: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Executive Office for Immigration Review. 8 CFR Parts 1003, 1103, 1208, 1211, 1212, 1215, 1216, 1235

CHILDREN AND IMMIGRATION

Immigration Law Overview

Office of the State Public Defender

Policy Memorandum. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. May 10,2018 PM Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants

Overview of the Permanent Residence Process and Adjustment of Status

INDEX Alphabetization is word-by-word (e.g., R visas precedes REAL ID Act )

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What Is Parole?

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): Frequently Asked Questions

TABLE OF CONTENTS LITIGATING IMMIGRATION CASES IN FEDERAL COURT

Immigration Law's Catch-22: The Case for Removing the Three and Ten-Year Bars

Presentation for CVLS Seminar 5/17/17 Ericka A. McFee McFee Law Offices, P.C.

Back To School: Immigration Issues for Students and Universities,

IMMIGRATION RELIEF FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT SURVIVORS

United States Court of Appeals

NATURALIZATION & US CITIZENSHIP: THE ESSENTIAL LEGAL GUIDE 15 TH EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Department of Homeland Security Delegation Number: Issue Date: 06/05/2003 DELEGATION TO THE BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES

Immigration-Related Document Fraud: Overview of Civil, Criminal, and Immigration Consequences

Losseny Dosso v. Attorney General United States

The REAL ID Act of 2005 (H.R. 418): Summary and Selected Analysis of Provisions as Passed by the House

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT BUFFALO & BATAVIA, NEW YORK

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC HQDOMO 70/23.1-P AD06-07

J-1 Exchange Visitor Program Information For Academic Departments

Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Interoffice Memorandum

617 POLICY Immigration Status and Secondary Confirmation Documentation

CRIMMIGRATION. The Intersection of Criminal and Immigration Law. John Gihon Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon

Overview of Immigration and the Law

Rules and Regulations

Aggravated Felonies: An Overview

9 FAM 40.6 EXHIBIT I GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY AVAILABLE WAIVERS

Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum. Practice Advisory 1. June 14, 2018

The Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law

Adjustment of Status for T Nonimmigrants By Sarah Bronstein

FALSE CLAIMS TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP: CONSEQUENCES AND POSSIBLE DEFENSES 1 (July 2014) by Jessica Chicco and Zahava Stern 2

Defending Non-Citizens in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin by Maria Theresa Baldini-Potermin

Perpetual Finality: In Immigration Removal Proceedings, Motions to Reopen Create More Problems Than They Solve

Transcription:

5 OVERVIEW OF REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

How do aliens get placed in removal proceedings? Controlling unauthorized migration Where and how Enforcement authority of immigration officers INA 287 6

REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS IN IMMIGRATION COURT A removal proceeding is a hearing to decide a charge of inadmissibility or deportability. INA 240 7

Who is subject to a charge of inadmissibility? These grounds apply to aliens seeking admission, and to aliens present in the U.S. after entering without inspection. Example: Jose entered the U.S. without t inspection in March 2000. Even though he has now lived in the U.S. for 8 years, if Jose is placed in removal proceedings, he will be charged with a ground of inadmissibility because he was never inspected and admitted when he first entered the U.S. 8

Who is subject to a charge of deportability? These grounds apply to aliens who are in the U.S. after inspection by an immigration i officer Example: Jolie entered the U.S. in March 2004 as a student authorized to stay in the United States for the duration of her status as a student. When she graduated from Princeton University in 2009, Jolie never left. If Jolie is placed in removal proceedings, she will be charged with a ground of deportability because she was inspected and admitted 9

Inadmissibility vs. Deportability Distinction Of Consequence Charge of Inadmissibility Burden Falls On Alien Charge of deportgability Burden Falls On DHS 10

INA ' 212(a) & INA ' 237(a) 1. Health related grounds 2. Criminal grounds 3. National security grounds 4. Likely to become public charge 5. Labor protection grounds 6. Fraud and unlawful entry 7. Lack of proper p documentation 8. Prior immigration violations 1. Inadmissible at time of entry or adjustment t 2. Criminal grounds 3. Failure to register and falsification of documents 4. Security, terrorism, and related grounds 5. Becoming a public charge 6. Unlawful voters 11

Commencement of Removal Proceedings DHS Has Ultimate Discretion, Which Is Not Subject To Judicial i Review Notice To Appear Issuing Serving Filing 12

BASIC ELEMENTS OF NTA Explain Nature Of Proceedings Identify Legal Authority For Proceedings Identify Acts Or Conduct That Violate Law Identify Charges Of Inadmissibility Or Deportability Explain Alien s Right To Counsel 13

BASIC ELEMENTS OF NTA Explain Obligation To Immediately Provide Written Record Of Address And Telephone Number Provide Address Of Immigration Court Where DHS Will File NTA Explain Obligation Of Alien To Notify The Immigration Court Of Any Change In Address Explain The Consequences Of Failing To Update Address Or Failing To Appear As Ordered 14

SERVICE OF NTA [S]hall be In Person, If Practicable May Be Mailed To Alien Or Counsel Of Record Regular Mail Is Sufficient In Absentia Proceedings 15

BURDEN OF PROOF ICE charges Jolie Student with being a student visa violator. Who has the burden to prove it? ICE charges Giovanni Salamone with entering the U.S. without papers. Who has the burden? 16

BURDEN OF PROOF cont. Inadmissibility Proceedings Burden Falls On Alien If Seeking Admission - INA 240(c)(2)(A) Clearly l And Beyond Doubt Entitled To Be Admitted dand Not Inadmissible ABOUT AN LPR WHO IS RETURNING TO U.S.? If Present In The United States - INA 240(c)(2)(B) By Clear And Convincing Evidence That the Alien Is Lawfully Present Pursuant To A Prior Admission 17

BURDEN OF PROOF cont. Deportation Proceedings The DHS Must Establish By Clear And Convincing Evidence That An Admitted Alien Or LPR Is Deportable. INA 240(c)(3)(A) In Absentia Proceedings - INA 240(b)(5)(A) Burden Always On DHS To Show By Clear, Unequivocal, And Convincing Evidence 18

Hearings before IJ Authority Of Immigration Judges Removal Determinations Asylum/Withholding/CAT Relief From Removal /Adjustment of Status Voluntary Departure 19

MASTER CALENDAR HEARING This is a preliminary hearing for pleading and scheduling, where the alien respondent answers charges against him Alien Must Be Advised Of Right To Representation 20

MERITS HEARINGS This is the hearing on the substance of the respondent s case. This may involve challenges to the underlying charge or pursuing a remedy to avoid or delay removal. The merits hearing is also where the IJ considers requests for relief from removal. 21

ELEMENTS OF MERITS HEARING Documentary Evidence Charging Document Notice to Appear Conviction Documents Immigrant Visa Passports Rules of Evidence Generally Do Not Apply 22

ELEMENTS OF MERITS HEARING Witnesses Government DHS/ICE/USCIS Investigator or adjudicator Alien Family members Friends Alien 23

IJ DECISION Memorandum Of Oral Decision Right to Appeal To Board Of Immigration Appeals Alien Department Of Homeland Security 24

APPEALS TO BIA The Right To Appeal Exists As An Exercise Of The Authority Given The Attorney General lover Immigration Matters. 8CFR C.F.R. 1003.1(b)(3). 1(b)(3) Types Of Review: Single Board Member Affirmance Without Opinion Full-Panel 25

Right to Counsel INA 292 Aguilera-Enriquez (p. 1029) Saakian (p. 1065) Lozada (p.1068) Anin (p. 1069) Compean (Supp) 26

MOTIONS TO REOPEN The end is the beginning i General Rules Limited To One Motion Must Be Filed Within 90 Days Of Final Order Special Rules Asylum And Withholding And CAT In Absentia 27