Domestic Violence Advocates as Expert Witnesses

Similar documents
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

Qualifying a Witness as an Expert Using the Daubert Standard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

Evidentiary Standards in the State of Illinois: The Interpretation and Implementation of Supreme Court Opinions

Reporting Animal Cruelty for Veterinarians

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv RBS -DEM Document 94 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2118

Daubert and Rule 702: Effectively Presenting and Challenging Experts in Federal Court

COUNTY. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) MOTION TO EXCLUDE vs. ) TESTIMONY REGARDING ) FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS, ) Defendant. ) I.

Case 1:06-cv Document 695 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case4:07-cv PJH Document833-1 Filed09/09/10 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES. Senior Airman ROBERT P. WALLS United States Air Force ACM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ORDER

The Royalty Owners file this Response to Gertrude Petroleum Corporation s ( GPC )

BATTLE OF THE EXPERTS: HOW TO EFFECTIVELY MANAGE AND LEVERAGE EXPERTS FOR OPTIMAL RESULTS

FlLED SUPERIQR CGURT CF GUAM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

William Ray William Ray Consulting, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL NO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 16-CV-1396 DECISION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO CHERAMIE MARINE, LLC SECTION R (2) ORDER AND REASONS

28a USC 702. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 5, 2009 (see

Presenters 10/13/2015. Effective Use of Evidence and Expert Witnesses in Immigration Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Changes to Rule 702(a): Has North Carolina Codified Daubert and Does It Matter? During the past legislative session, the General Assembly changed Rule

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and MOORE *, District Judge.

Preparing for Daubert Through the Life of a Case

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IMPERIAL TRADING CO., INC., ET AL. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CAS. CO. OF AMERICA ORDER AND REASONS

Give a brief description of case, particularly the. confession at issue and the pertinent circumstances surrounding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO ORDER AND REASONS

EXPERT WITNESS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE EMPHASIS

Case4:09-cv CW Document75 Filed06/11/09 Page1 of 6

Daubert Issues For Footwear Examiners

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) ID No: ) BRADFORD JONES )

Case 1:15-cv MEH Document 58 Filed 05/10/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

US Supreme Court. Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. 14 State Appellate Courts

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

DAUBERT & THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD/EXPERT TESTIMONY IN CRIMINAL CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael. Case Background

2:12-cr SFC-MKM Doc # 227 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1213 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Expert Witnesses in Capital Cases. by W. Erwin Spainhour Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Judicial District 19-A May 10, 2012

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WOOD COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. // Case No. 02-F-131 (Thomas C Evans, III, Judge)

OF FLORIDA. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles D. Edelstein, Judge.

Rumberger KIRK & CALDWELL

Neil Feldscher, CIH, CSP, Esq. and Chip Darius, MA, OHST

O'Hara: Tasks of an Expert Witness Page 1 of 9

Misinterpretation and Misapplication of Kumho Tire to Business Valuation

BEGELMAN & ORLOW, P.C. Attorneys at Law

JUNK SCIENCE OR. EXPERT TESTIMONY? Clinical Professor Kate Mewhinney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Being an Expert Witness

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. v. Civ. No SCY/KK MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Delaware Avenue P.O. Box 876 P.O. Box 2165 Georgetown, DE Wilmington, DE 19899

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

SERVING AS A RETAINED EXPERT WITNESS THE SUCCESSFUL EXPERT EXPERIENCE: PRACTICAL TIPS FOR SERVING WELL AND GETTING PAID

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

EXPERT WITNESS RULES, RULES AND MORE RULES. PHILIP LEVI, CFE, FCPA, FCA, CPA/CFF, CA-IFA Partner Levi & Sinclair, LLP Quebec, Quebec Canada

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. 09SC708, People v. Rector, Criminal Law -- admission of expert testimony. The supreme court reverses the court of appeals judgment

Case 1:15-cv JCH-LF Document 60 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

scc Doc 860 Filed 03/06/12 Entered 03/06/12 16:37:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 14

JUNK SCIENCE OR. EXPERT TESTIMONY? Clinical Professor Kate Mewhinney

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI EMMA WOMACK, ET AL.

Case 1:15-cv WJM-KLM Document 136 Filed 05/12/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:12-cv GAG-CVR Document 266 Filed 12/19/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

New Expert Rules under HB 153 and other Expert tips

ROY L. REARDON AND MARY ELIZABETH MCGARRY * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION. CITY OF FINDLAY, et al.l, Defendant.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

Case: 2:11-cv JCH Doc. #: 66 Filed: 12/05/12 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 2505

James McNamara v. Kmart Corp

Opinion Evidence. Penny J. White May 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:09-CV-29-O ORDER

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS

Salvatore A. Gaetani, for appellant. Maria I. Wager, for respondent. We held in People v Huertas (75 NY2d 487 [1990]) that a

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GEARY COUNTY, KANSAS BACKGROUND

EFiled: Nov :25PM EST Transaction ID Case No. K14C WLW IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ALABAMA S NEW RULE 702 DAUBERT BASED ADMISSIBILITY STANDARD FOR EXPERTS

Transcription:

Domestic Violence Advocates as Expert Witnesses NDCAWS/CASAND Advanced Legal Issues Training August 27-28, 2009 Bismarck, ND Presented by Robin Runge, Assistant Professor, University of North Dakota School of Law

What is expert testimony and when is it permissible? What qualifies as an expert for the purposes of provision of testimony in a case and who qualifies as an expert have been defined by case law and court rules: Section 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence states, If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.

What is expert testimony and when is it permissible? In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Phermaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) the Supreme Court held the trial court must determine whether the proposed scientific expert evidence will assist the trier of fact in determining a fact at issue in the case, and whether the evidence is relevant, ad whether the testimony is reliable. In Kumbo Tire Co v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the court clarified that Daubert not only applied to hard science but also to soft sciences which has been interpretered as including testimony about phsychology, sociology, the behavioral sciences and cultural issues.

What is expert testimony and when is it permissible? Finally, North Dakota has its own interpretations of these standards which determine what you may be asked to testify about and what questions you may be asked to establish that you are an expert, that your testimony is relevant, and it is more probative than prejudicial.

What expertise could you be asked to provide in a case through expert testimony about domestic violence? As an expert on the dynamics and impacts of domestic violence to educate the judge/jury about: the definition of domestic violence what is it, how does it differ from a squabble or fight, power and control dynamics, the non-physical aspects of the violence impacts of the offender's abuse on the victim, why a victim stays with a perpetrator, returns to a perpetrator, fails to report or delays in reporting abuse, does not wish to participate in the prosecution What else have you been asked to testify about regarding domestic violence?

Preparation to serve as an expert witness An up to date resume/cv Talk with and if possible, meet with the attorney to discuss the case and go over your testimony in detail determine what kind of case it is civil, criminal determine what stage of the litigation it is determine what aspect of domestic violence you are being asked to testify about Ensure that there is no conflict Determine if you have ever provided services to the victim

Consider the questions that you may be asked on the stand to establish that you are an expert present employment and duration of job duties and responsibilities prior jobs related to domestic violence your experience and training that qualifies you to hold your current position your experience working directly with victims of domestic violence the number of victims whom you have assisted certifications, licensing, etc., if any membership in related professional groups research and writing on domestic violence prior expert testimony given

Other possible uses of domestic violence experts Help evaluate the case and develop trial strategy Draft questions for potential jurors Assist with jury selection Conduct a clinical assessment of the victim (who is NOT your client) and write an expert report to outline issues and arguments to be made Help prepare the victim for trial

Fact Witnesses v. Expert Witnesses Important to distinguish between expert witnesses and fact witnesses Which is which?