Memorandum Updated: March 27, 2003

Similar documents
CRS Report for Congress

WikiLeaks Document Release

NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE RECOGNIZING WAR IN THE UNITED STATES VIA THE INTERAGENCY PROCESS

U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AND STRATEGY,

War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress

Citizenship Just the Facts.Civics Learning Goals for the 4th Nine Weeks.

United States Foreign Policy

OVERVIEW CHAPTER OUTLINE WITH KEYED-IN RESOURCES

Submission of the President s Budget in Transition Years

CRS Report for Congress

Investigating the Geology and Geography of Oil

Federal Funding Gaps: A Brief Overview

SS7H3e Brain Wrinkles

Course Description and Objectives. Course Requirements

WORKING PAPER THE NEVER-ENDING EMERGENCY: TRENDS IN SUPPLEMENTAL SPENDING. By Veronique de Rugy and Allison Kasic. No.

The President, Congress, and the Balance of Power

Submission of the President s Budget in Transition Years


Lessons of Vietnam/Recent International Relations Pacing Guide

Teacher s Guide. Foreign Policy: War, Peace, and Everything In-between STEP BY STEP

National Security Policy. National Security Policy. Begs four questions: safeguarding America s national interests from external and internal threats

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Domestic policy WWI. Foreign Policy. Balance of Power

School of Professional Studies Course: HIST 208 IDDL2, AMERICAN HISTORY SINCE 1877

CRS Report for Congress

U.S. Periods of War. Barbara Salazar Torreon Information Research Specialist. January 7, 2010

CLINTON FOREIGN POLICY

2. The State Department asked the American Embassy in Moscow to explain Soviet behavior.

In Brief: Highlights of FY2018 Defense Appropriations Actions

WikiLeaks Document Release

WW II Homework Packet #3 Honors (Ch ) Life under a dictator or totalitarian can be difficult. Describe life under this form of government

Guided Reading Activity 32-1

CRS Report for Congress

When a presidential transition occurs, the incoming President usually submits the budget for the upcoming fiscal year (under current practices) or rev

Harvard Law School. Briefing Paper No. 9 WAR & APPROPRIATIONS

Across-the-Board Rescissions in Appropriations Acts: Overview and Recent Practices

Analyze the political cartoon by writing:

FY2014 Continuing Resolutions: Overview of Components

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 31, 1998 IRAQ LIBERATION ACT OF 1998

The Americans (Survey)

The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction

Urban Search and Rescue Task Forces: Facts and Issues

It is only Americans who say that our freedoms and prosperity are the reason foreigners hate us. If you ask the foreigners, they make it clear that

Past Government Shutdowns: Key Resources

CRS Report for Congress

IRAQ AFGHANISTAN WAR SUPPLEMENTAL SPENDING FISCAL YEAR 2008 (October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008)

United Nations System Funding: Congressional Issues

Bell Work. Describe Truman s plan for. Europe. How will his plan help prevent the spread of communism?

CONFLICT BY THE NUMBERS:

nations united with another for some common purpose such as assistance and protection

CRS Report for Congress

5th Grade Social Studies Test

CRS Report for Congress

The Big Four and America In The World WAR REVIEW

NATO AND PEACEKEEPING

10 Defining Moments of

Do Crisis Response Operations Affect Political and Economic Stability?

Congressional Restrictions on U.S. Military Operations in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Somalia, and Kosovo: Funding and Non-Funding Approaches

America after WWII. The 1946 through the 1950 s

United Nations General Assembly 1st

Unit 4 Take-Home Test Answer Sheet

ASHTON UNDER-LYNE SIXTH FORM COLLEGE BTEC EXTENDED DIPLOMA PUBLIC SERVICES

War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance

Memorandum January 26, 2006

The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force

5. Base your answer on the map below and on your knowledge of social studies.

THE EARLY COLD WAR YEARS. US HISTORY Chapter 15 Section 2

ffiwpxs)gu to töte BKS M1(I

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

The War in Kosovo: Failed Lessons of Incrementalism

Mesquite ISD Curriculum Sequence High School Social Studies - World Geography

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

NSC MEETINGS GEORGE H.W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION ( )

Spanish- American War. Key Players. Results. Causes. President of the United States during the war with Spain

CRS Report for Congress

1. Base your answer to the following question on the cartoon below and on your knowledge of social studies.

NASA Appropriations and Authorizations: A Fact Sheet

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appropriations Process: A Brief Explanation

History 380: American Foreign Relations Since 1917

The War in Iraq. The War on Terror

CRS Resources on the FY2014 Funding Gap, Shutdown, and Status of Appropriations

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appropriations Process: A Brief Explanation

Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense

Legislative Branch Revolving Funds

A More Perfect Union The Three Branches of the Federal Government

5.1d- Presidential Roles

U.S. History & Government Unit 12 WWII Do Now

CRS Issue Brief for Congress

ISSUE BRIEF. This week, the Senate will begin the procedural. Senate Defense Appropriations: The Battle over Budget Priorities Continues.

The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction

TEACHING DEMOCRACY. Cal Humanities & The California History-Social Science Project

Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. Agency Operations In the Event of a Funding Lapse FY 2016

Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations for FY2019: In Brief

5th Grade History and Government

Note on the Security Component of the 2004 CDI. Michael O Hanlon Adriana Lins de Albuquerque The Brookings Institution April 2004

Obama, the Presidency, and Diversity: The Historic, the Ordinary

Transcription:

Memorandum Updated: March 27, 2003 SUBJECT: FROM: Budgeting for wars in the past Stephen Daggett Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division This is in response to congressional requests for a memo briefly reviewing how the United States has budgeted for wars in the past. Requesters have asked specifically whether, since World War II, the United States has ever provided funds for wars or for some other recent military operations before the operations have started. Based on an examination of previous CRS reviews of funding for wars and for other major military operations, it appears, with one possible exception, that Presidents have not requested and Congress has not provided funding for wars in advance of the start of operations. Rather, Administrations have requested funding after operations have begun, and Congress has subsequently appropriated money to meet specific documented budget requirements. 1 One possible exception to this pattern occurred in 1965, when the Johnson Administration requested supplemental appropriations for military operations in Southeast Asia. According to the Congressional Quarterly Almanac, in May 1965, the Administration requested supplemental appropriations for FY1965 for operations in Southeast Asia in part as a means of affirming congressional support for the buildup of forces in Vietnam, even though sufficient funds appeared to be available through the end of the fiscal year. I have not, however, done sufficient research based on primary sources to be able to affirm this interpretation independently. All of this, of course, came after Congress approved the 1 It is important to note, however, that Congress has provided the Executive Branch with considerable flexibility in financing military operations in advance of specific congressional action on appropriations. In regular defense appropriations bills, money for operation and maintenance, for example, is typically appropriated in very broad categories, which has allowed Administrations to deploy forces into regions of potential conflict without advance funding approval from the Congress. The Feed and Forage Act (41 U.S.C. 11) also allows the Defense Department to incur obligations for certain purposes in advance of appropriations, and a number of other provisions of law and Defense Department regulations allow additional funding flexibility.

CRS-2 Tonkin Gulf Resolution in August, 1964, which might be taken as the official start of major U.S. involvement in the conflict. What follows is a very brief overview of initial Administration and congressional action on funding for World War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam conflict, and the Persian Gulf War of 1991. It is followed by a brief discussion of funding for some recent military contingency operations.! World War II: The United States declared war on Japan on December 8, 1941, and on Germany and Italy on December 11. Subsequently, on January 5, 1942, in its regular budget message for FY1943, the Administration requested what it described as an initial war appropriation of $13.6 billion for FY1943. On January 30, 1942, the President signed into law supplemental appropriations of $10.5 billion for the Army. And on February 7, the President signed the regular FY1943 appropriations for the Navy, which included supplemental appropriations for FY1942. In these and in other subsequent war-related funding measures, the Administration requested and Congress provided funds in the form it had followed in the past i.e., as specific amounts for specific, traditional budget accounts. While funding specifically for the war followed the start of the conflict, it is worth noting that the Administration requested and Congress provided funding for a substantial buildup of U.S. military forces and armaments before the attack on Pearl Harbor, and that substantial unobligated funds were available when war was declared. The Administration s FY1943 budget message notes that The defense program... was 29 billion dollars on January 3, 1941. During the past 12 months 45 billion dollars have been added to the program. Of this total of 75 billion dollars there remains 24 billion dollars for future obligation. 2! Korean War: North Korean forces invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. President Truman subsequently ordered U.S. forces to defend South Korea and on July 19, in an address to Congress, estimated that $10 billion would be needed immediately to prosecute the war and build up U.S. forces. Subsequently, on August 28, Congress approved regular FY1951 defense appropriations as part of an omnibus appropriations measure (the fiscal year began on July 1). The bill provided $14.7 billion for defense, about the amount the Administration had requested in its regular defense budget request in January 1950 it did not include additional funds for Korea. Meanwhile, the Administration requested an additional $11.6 billion in FY1951 supplemental appropriations for defense, plus $4 billion for military assistance. Congress approved a measure providing $11.7 billion for the Defense Department and $4 billion for military aid on September 22. These funds were for increasing U.S. military forces as well as for operations in 2 This discussion is drawn from Robert Keith, Initial Federal Budget Response to the 1941 Attack on Pearl Harbor, CRS Report RS21010, September 13, 2001.

CRS-3 Korea. On December 1, after Chinese forces intervened, the Administration requested an additional $16.8 billion in supplemental FY1951 appropriations for the Defense Department and $1 billion for the Atomic Energy Commission. On January 2, 1952, Congress approved $16.8 billion for the Defense Department, $1 billion for the AEC, and $1.8 billion for stockpiling. 3! Vietnam War: There is no official date on which U.S. military involvement in Vietnam began. The Vietnam Veterans Memorial includes casualties from as early as 1959, but that date was established by a private organization. For certain official purposes, casualties from 1961 through 1975 are recognized as related to the conflicts in Southeast Asia. Congress approved the Tonkin Gulf Resolution in August 1964, but the large scale U.S. buildup of forces for ground combat began only in 1965. In any case, the first formal request for funds directly related to operations in Southeast Asia was a May 4, 1965, Administration request for $700 million in supplemental appropriations for FY1965. The House approved the measure on May 5, the Senate on May 6, and the President signed the measure into law on May 7. Later in 1965, as Congress was considering the FY1966 defense appropriations bill, the Administration requested an additional $1.7 billion for costs of the Vietnam buildup. Congress approved the additional funds in a conference agreement on the bill in September. In the following years, funding for operations in Southeast Asia was provided both in supplemental appropriations bills and in regular annual defense appropriations bills in FY1966-FY1969. From FY1970 on, funding was provided only in regular annual defense appropriations bills. 4! Persian Gulf War of 1991: In response to Iraq s invasion of Kuwait, the United States began a buildup of forces in Saudi Arabia and other nations in the region in August 1990. The buildup, Operation Desert Shield, continued through the beginning of the war, Operation Desert Storm, in January 1991. On September 30, 1990, in H.J. Res. 655, the first continuing resolution for FY1991, Congress provided $2 billion in supplemental appropriations for Desert Shield expenses in FY1990. The measure also authorized the Treasury Department to accept contributions from allies and established the Defense Cooperation Account as a depository for the funds from which money would later be transferred subject to appropriations. Later, the regular FY1991 defense appropriations bill, passed on October 27, provided an additional $1 billion for Operation Desert Shield expenses. On September 7, DOD provided a formal estimate of costs of the operation if 3 Congressional Quarterly Service, Congress and the Nation: 1945-1964, (Washington: Congressional Quarterly, 1965), pp. 259-260. See also a CRS memo of January 10, 1991, entitled Congressional Funding for the Vietnam and Korean Conflicts, which is attached. 4 This discussion is drawn from a CRS memo of December 28, 1990, entitled Congressional Funding for the Vietnam Conflict, which was sent to you earlier.

CRS-4 the then-planned deployment of about 210,000 troops were continued through FY2001. DOD said it would cost about $15 billion to maintain forces in the region in the absence of combat. In November, the Administration announced an increase of about 200,000 in the number of troops to be deployed to the region, and in December, news media reported that DOD estimated it would cost about $30 billion to maintain a force of the increased size through the end of the fiscal year, also without hostilities. The Administration never provided an official estimate of costs, however, until after the conflict was over. On February 22, the Administration submitted a request for supplemental appropriations for costs of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm, although it did not specify an amount. Instead, the Administration estimated total costs, including combat, of $45-60 billion. Later, as the Administration provided more detailed cost estimates and budget justification material, Congress provided funds for specific costs of the operation in supplemental appropriations acts for FY1991 and FY1992.! Recent contingency operations: In recent years, Administrations have generally provided estimates of the costs of military contingency operations along with supplemental appropriations requests shortly after operations have begun. There are, however, some cases in which the Clinton Administration, in particular, provided estimates of costs, though not formal requests for funding, in advance of the deployment of U.S. forces. In Somalia, the Bush Administration deployed forces in December 1992 and subsequently submitted an estimate of costs and a request to reprogram funds to meet the costs in January 1993. Operations Northern Watch and Southern Watch were initially funded through supplemental appropriations. Later, however, at the insistence of the Appropriations Committees, the Administration requested funds as part of regular annual defense appropriations bills. The Clinton Administration did not provide an advance estimate of costs, or an advance request for funds, for Haiti, for the preemptive buildup of forces in Southwest Asia at the end of FY1994, for the bombing campaign in Bosnia in August and September 1995, or for operations in Kosovo. The Administration did, however, provide a rough estimate of costs of peacekeeping operations in Bosnia in November 1995, shortly before the Dayton Peace Accords were signed in December 1995 and before U.S. peacekeeping forces were deployed. Later, as troops were being deployed in January 1996, it provided a revised, more detailed projection of costs, along with a reprogramming request and a projection of subsequent supplemental appropriations requirements. One final note. Administrations have occasionally requested that Congress provide either (1) unallocated contingency funds in advance of military operations or (2) general authority for the Defense Department to spend funds, beyond those permitted under the Feed and Forage Act, in advance of specific congressional appropriations. As part of the FY1997 defense budget request, for example, the Clinton Administration asked Congress to establish a Readiness Preservation Authority that would allow obligation of substantial funds in

CRS-5 operation and maintenance accounts in advance of appropriations. And the current Bush Administration asked for $10 billion in unallocated contingency funds for the Global War Against Terrorism in its FY2003 budget request. Congress has not responded favorably to these requests. If CRS can be of any further assistance, please call me at 707-7642.