Israeli Public Opinion Toward the US: Divided Along Party Lines

Similar documents
APOI American Public Opinion toward Israel

The Peace Index February /03/2015 (N=600)

ASSESSMENT REPORT Policy Analysis Unit - ACRPS Mar 2015

American Public Support for Israel: Assessing the Cracks

Amnon Cavari CURRICULUM VITAE

Peace Index May 2016

The 2014 Jewish Vote National Post-Election Jewish Survey. November 5, 2014

THE ARAB AMERICAN VOTE AMMU S

Pessimism about Fiscal Cliff Deal, Republicans Still Get More Blame

Peace Index December 2016

Most think Trudeau resume ad will prompt liberal votes

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2015, More Approve Than Disapprove of Iran Talks, But Most Think Iranians Are Not Serious

AMERICAN MUSLIM VOTERS AND THE 2012 ELECTION A Demographic Profile and Survey of Attitudes

J Street National Post-Election Survey

NDI Albania National Survey. July 2007

The Hall of Mirrors: Perceptions and Misperceptions in the Congressional Foreign Policy Process

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2017, In Trump Era, What Partisans Want From Their Congressional Leaders

The 2017 Israeli Foreign Policy Index of the Mitvim Institute

American Attitudes the Muslim Brotherhood

America First? American National Identity Declines Over Last Two Years Among Both Republicans and Democrats

American Public Attitudes Toward ISIS and Syria

PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION / ANWAR SADAT CHAIR

The 2005 Ohio Ballot Initiatives: Public Opinion on Issues 1-5. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron.

OPEN NEIGHBOURHOOD. Communicating for a stronger partnership: connecting with citizens across the Southern Neighbourhood

PIPA-Knowledge Networks Poll: Americans on the War with Iraq. Questionnaire

Nonvoters in America 2012

The Washington Poll King County Exit Poll, November 7, 2006

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Negative Views of Supreme Court at Record High, Driven by Republican Dissatisfaction

Support for Restoring U.S.-Cuba Relations March 11-15, 2016

The American Public and the Arab Awakening

Illinois Top Political Leaders Draw Mixed Reviews from the Voters

Americans on the Middle East

C-SPAN SUPREME COURT SURVEY March 23, 2012

FOR RELEASE MARCH 20, 2018

Case study: Israel. Leveraging the state s checks and balances to achieve optimal conditions for gas licences. Laury Haytayan and Kaisa Toroskainen

Asylum Seekers Should Enter the Country Legally: Plurality

(N=600) 27-29/01/2015. Jews 29.4% 29.8% 16.7% 19.0% 5.1% 100.0% Jews 25.5% 22.2% 26.0% 44.3% 2.1% 100.0%

PRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008

Diplomacy in the 21 st Century - Syllabus

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: MOST NEW JERSEYANS SUPPORT DREAM ACT

Defining the Arab American Vote

Israel s Elections are nowhere near are complicated as people would have you believe.

UndecidedVotersinthe NovemberPresidential Election. anationalsurvey

The Middle East and Russia: American attitudes on Trump s foreign policy

Arab American Voters in 2010: Their Identity and Political Concerns

It's Still the Economy

Young Voters in the 2010 Elections

North Carolina and the Federal Budget Crisis

WDSU TV & The University of New Orleans Survey Research Center Jefferson Parish Sheriff s Election Survey

Wide and growing divides in views of racial discrimination

These are the highlights of the latest Field Poll completed among a random sample of 997 California registered voters.

US Public Divides along Party Lines on Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Practices

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist

Hatch Opens Narrow Lead Over Pawlenty

Statewide Survey on Job Approval of President Donald Trump

Opinion of North Carolina Voters on State Issues TABLE OF CONTENTS

BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY

Executive Summary of Texans Attitudes toward Immigrants, Immigration, Border Security, Trump s Policy Proposals, and the Political Environment

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE NEW CONGRESS: What Americans Think

November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey

PRRI/The Atlantic 2016 Post- election White Working Class Survey Total = 1,162 (540 Landline, 622 Cell phone) November 9 20, 2016

Doubts About China, Concerns About Jobs POST-SEATTLE SUPPORT FOR WTO

From: John Halpin, Center for American Progress Karl Agne, GBA Strategies

Union Voters and Democrats

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.

REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011

Flash Poll of Cuban Americans. Reaction to President Obama s Change in U.S.-Cuba Policy

North Carolina Races Tighten as Election Day Approaches

Public Remains Supportive of Israel, Wary of Iran

Views of Non-Formal Education among Syrian Refugees in Lebanon

The American Public on the 9/11 Decade

Wednesday, March 7 th

Job approval in North Carolina N=770 / +/-3.53%

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Six in 10 Say Ban Assault Weapons, Up Sharply in Parkland s Aftermath

World Public Favors Globalization and Trade but Wants to Protect Environment and Jobs

NATIONAL: PUBLIC BALKS AT TRUMP MUSLIM PROPOSAL

CONTACT: TIM VERCELLOTTI, Ph.D., (732) , EXT. 285; (919) (cell) CRANKY ELECTORATE STILL GIVES DEMOCRATS THE EDGE

Red Oak Strategic Presidential Poll

Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues

1. In general, do you think things in this country are heading in the right direction or the wrong direction? Strongly approve. Somewhat approve Net

Poll Results: Electoral Reform & Political Cooperation

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, June, 2015, Broad Public Support for Legal Status for Undocumented Immigrants

PUBLIC VERDICT ON DEMOCRACY Based on a nationally-representative Survey

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

J Street Florida Post-Election Survey

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

PPIC STATEWIDE SURVEY

FOR RELEASE MAY 10, 2018

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

Eagleton Institute of Politics Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 191 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, New Jersey

Most Say Immigration Policy Needs Big Changes

FOR RELEASE October 1, 2018

IPS Survey of Iranian Public Opinion on its Nuclear Program, Recognition of Israel, Relations with the US, and the Removal of Sanctions

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, 2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction

Jim Justice Leads in Race for West Virginia Governor

Americans Say U.S.- German Relations Are in Good Shape, but Germans Disagree

Transcription:

APOI American Public Opinion toward Israel Report #2 Israeli Public Opinion Toward the US: Divided Along Party Lines Amnon Cavari Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy IDC, Herzliya cavari@idc.ac.il Guy Freedman Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy IDC, Herzliya freedman.guy@post.idc.ac.il EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this report we present some of the findings from the IDC Election survey, conducted in Israel on February 18, 2015. Our findings suggest that for the most part, Israelis tend to reciprocate Americans favorable outlook: Demonstrating favorable views that are divided along political lines. Left and center party voters tend to view the US in favorable terms, more so than right party voters or ultra- Orthodox voters. Arab party voters seem to exhibit mixed feelings toward the US. This partisan divide extends to other issues regarding the US-Israeli relations. Right wing voters blame President Obama for the deterioration of the US-Israeli relations and believe that the US is trying to influence the Israeli elections. Recommended citation: Cavari, A. & Freedman, G. (2015). Israeli Public Opinion toward the US: Divided Along Party Lines. Available online from the American Public Opinion toward Israel Project (http://portal.idc.ac.il/en/main/research/apoi/publishedwork/documents/israel_opinion. pdf). [Date last visited]. http://apoi.idc.ac.il 1

INTRODUCTION The special relationship between the US and Israel has many facets: From mutual interests to strategic alliances and for some, even religious motivations. This relationship would not have been attainable without a supportive public opinion, on both sides. Public opinion polls have shown major support for Israel among Americans. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Americans sympathize more with Israel than with the Palestinians. They also see Israel in favorable terms, consider it a vital American interest and as a close ally (Cavari, 2013, 2014 ; Gilboa, 2009). 1 While there are differences in the strength of support, the majority of Americans across most conventional demographic groups, express more support for Israel than for the Palestinian side (Cavari, 2014). To a great extent, these levels of support have remained relatively unchanged for more than four decades. An important exception in recent years is the growing divide between the parties. Since the late 1990s, support for Israel among Republicans has risen from 40-50% to nearly 80% in 2014, whereas democrats have since remained at 40-50%. What about Israelis? Are the favorable feelings mutual? Do most Israelis see the US in favorable terms? And, does the partisan divide in the US parallel a similar divide in Israel? We answer these questions using a survey conducted at the Lauder School of Government at the IDC Herzliya. 2. Our findings suggest that for the most part, Israelis tend to reciprocate Americans favorable outlook though they do differ in strength along political lines. 1 See also public opinion trends on the APOI website http://portal.idc.ac.il/en/main/research/apoi/publicopinion/pages/public-opinion.aspx 2 The Survey is conducted by the Midgam Project under the supervision of Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler, Amnon Cavari, Guy Freedman and Maoz Rosenthal with the support and advice of Boaz Ganor and Rafi Ventura all of the Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at the IDC, Herzliya, Israel. http://apoi.idc.ac.il 2

ISRAELI FEELINGS TOWARD THE US All respondents in the survey were asked to rate their feelings about the US on a thermometer scale (from 1 to 100). The responses are illustrated in the density curve in Figure 1. Sixty-four percent 3 of Israelis expressed positive feelings toward Americans (51 or higher on the scale) and 41% express very positive feelings toward the US (76 or higher on the scale). Figure 1: Density Curve of Israelis Feelings toward the US In figure 2, Israeli s feelings are broken down by five party blocs, based on the respondents report on which party they would vote for if the elections were held today (February 18, 2015): (1) Left party voters (Meretz and Hamahaneh Hatzioni); (2) Center party voters (Yesh Atid and Kulanu); (3) Right party voters (Likud, Israel Beitenu and Habait Hayehudi); (4) Arab party voters (joint Arab list); and (5) Ultra- Orthodox party voters (Shas, Ha am Itanu and Yahadut Hatora). Going from left to right on the political scale indicates highest feelings toward the US among left party voters (80% express positive feelings over 50 and 60% over 75 on the scale). Center party voters show similar feelings: 79% over 50 and 50% over 75. Right party voters 3 Data in the survey were weighted using a raking method, based on religion, religiosity, age group and residential area. http://apoi.idc.ac.il 3

still exhibit positive feelings toward the US, though less than the previous two: 60% over 50 and 34% over 75. These results resemble that of the ultra-orthodox party voters (52% over 50 and 34% over 75). Finally, the Arab party voters in fact display mostly negative feelings toward the US with 72% of the voters under 50 and 52% under 25 on the scale. Figure 2: Density Curves of Israelis Feelings toward the US, by Party Bloc ATTITUDES ABOUT PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU S SPEECH BEFORE CONGRESS A major issue in the past few weeks has been Speaker Boehner s invitation of the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to deliver a speech before Congress in early March 2015. President Obama denounced the invitation and refused to meet with Netanyahu during his trip, noting a protocol of not meeting with foreign leaders during elections. This speech is the latest of many examples of the problematic relationship between Netanyahu and Obama. Some argue that the relationship between the US and Israel has somewhat declined and most recently, Susan Rice, the National Security Advisor, raised concern of turning relations with Israel into a partisan issue and criticized Netanyahu for damaging relations between the two countries (The New York Times, 2015). http://apoi.idc.ac.il 4

We did not directly ask respondents what they think of Netanyahu s speech in this context, but we did ask whether they agreed with the statement that the relationship between the two countries has declined in recent years. Seventy-six percent agreed with the statement and only 24% disagreed. Those who agreed with the statement, were asked an additional question: Who do you feel is most responsible for the decline in the relationship between Israel and the US. Fifty-one percent of the sample laid most of the responsibility on Netanyahu. Obama was second with 41% (the rest chose Secretary of State Kerry, Secretary of Defense Hagel, Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Leiberman or Israeli Defense Minister Ya alon). Here too, there are sharp differences between voters by party preferences. Figure 3 shows who respondents saw as most responsible based on their party-bloc. Ninety-three percent of left party voters lay the responsibility on Netanyahu, compared to only 16% of right party voters who see Netanyahu as responsible. Center party voters present a more balanced picture, with 59% holding Netanyahu responsible. Not displayed in figure 3 are Arab party voters who resemble left party voters (99% see Netanyahu as responsible) and ultra-orthodox voters who resemble the right (77% holding Obama responsible). Clearly, positions on this issue are influenced by one s political views. Figure 3: Responsibility for Decline in US-Israel Relations http://apoi.idc.ac.il 5

INFLUENCING THE ELECTIONS In light of controversy surrounding Netanyahu s speech, we asked respondents how much they feel the US is trying to influence the 2015 elections in Israel. Fifty-three percent chose either very much or quite a lot. Twenty-four percent chose somewhat and 23% chose either a little or not at all. The data suggest that most Israeli s feel that the US is trying to affect the results of the elections. Once again, breaking these down by party affiliation shows the partisan divide. Seventy percent of right party voters feel the US is very much trying to influence the election results. This is the largest category for center party voters as well, though it comprises of only 42% of the center party voters. Left party voters display an opposite trend: 39%, the largest category, feel that the US is only trying to influence the elections a little, or not at all. Here too, ultra-orthodox voters exhibit similar trends to that of right party voters. In contrast, the Arab party voters are split: 44% argue that the US is very much trying to influence the elections, but 41% argue it is not (leaving 15% in the middle). Figure 4: Is the US Trying to Influence the 2015 Elections for Knesset? AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL Finally, we wanted to see if Israelis recognize a partisan split in the US. Respondents were asked whether they see a difference in the level of support for Israel amongst http://apoi.idc.ac.il 6

Republicans and Democrats. A plurality 49% feel that Republicans support Israel more than Democrats, 32% feel that both sides support Israel equally and 19% that Democrats support Israel more. Even this question is subject to political differences as can be seen in figure 5. The majority of center party voters, right party voters and ultra-orthodox party voters, all feel that Republicans are more supportive than democrats (63%, 57% and 65% respectively). However, the majority of left party voters and Arab party voters do not see major differences (44% and 56% respectively). In addition, of the first two options ( Republicans support more and Democrats support more ), voters in all five blocs agree that Republicans tend to support Israel more than Democrats. Figure 5: American Support Partisan or Bipartisan? http://apoi.idc.ac.il 7

CONCLUSION Generally, Israelis have a favorable opinion of the US. Most exhibit warm feelings toward the US and the majority tends to hold Prime Minister Netanyahu responsible for the decline in relations between Israel and the US, over President Obama. At the same time, the majority also feels that the US is trying to influence the election results in Israel and sees American support as divided along party lines. However, breaking down these trends into political groups indicates that Israelis are not homogenous in their views toward the US. In almost all of the questions tested above, there were no major differences in results when tested across age groups, levels of education or gender (see Appendix A.), but there are differences, along political lines, namely based on the five party-blocs in Israel. These blocs, somewhat account for religious cleavages, as well as ethnic and social ones. As we displayed here, the left wing parties and to some degree, the center parties view the US in favorable terms much more so than right wing parties and ultra-orthodox parties. In fact, the last two often exhibit outright negative views of the US (for instance, holding Obama accountable for the decline in relations and attributing the US with attempts to influence the results of the elections). The Arab party voters are somewhat mixed: While they show similar trends to those of the left wing parties, they don t necessarily view the US in positive terms (as we saw in the thermometer question). http://apoi.idc.ac.il 8

REFERENCES Cavari, A. (2014). American Public Support for Israel: Assessing the Cracks in a Unique Bond. Retrieved February 28, 2015, from American Public Opinion toward Israel Project: http://portal.idc.ac.il/en/main/research/apoi/publishedwork/documents/cra cks2014apoi.pdf Cavari, A. (2013). Religious Beliefs, Elite Polarization, and Public Opinion on Foreign Policy: The Partisan Gap in American Public Opinion toward Israel. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25 (1), 1-22. Gilboa, E. (2009). The Public Dimension of American-Israeli Relations: A Comparative Analysis. In E. Gilboa, & E. Inbar (Eds.), US-Israel Relations in a New Era: Issues and Challenges after 9/11 (pp. 53-75). London: Routledge. The New York Times. (2015, February 25). Obama Aide Calls Netanyahu s Planned Visit Destructive to U.S.-Israel Ties. Retrieved February 25, 2015, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/26/us/politics/susanrice-calls-netanyahus-planned-visit-destructive-to-us-israel-ties.html?_r=0 http://apoi.idc.ac.il 9

APPENDIX: DIFFERENCES ACROSS DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS Table 1 presents the average rating on the thermometer scale by various demographic groups. There is a significant difference between men and women: Men have more favorable feelings toward the US (M=65) than women do (M=56). There is no difference between various levels of education positive feelings toward the US with an average of roughly 60 for all three groups. The average rating across all age groups is also positive. The only significant difference is between the average rating of ages 55-64 (72) and the two youngest age groups 18-24 (51) and 25-34 (55). Table 1: Israeli Feelings toward the US (Thermometer) Average Gender Male 65 Female 56 t(699)=2.22* Education Less than high school 63 High school graduate 62 College graduate or more 60 F(2,699)=0.25 Age 18-24 51 25-34 55 35-44 61 45-54 62 55-64 72 65 and over 65 F(5,696)=5.83*** * p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 In table 2, both gender and education have no effect on one s answer to the question whether relations between Israel and the US have declined in the past few years 75-77% of all groups agree that they have declined. The majority of all age groups also agree with this statement, though the youngest age group, ages 18-24, http://apoi.idc.ac.il 10

have a relatively small majority (64%) in comparison to all other age groups, and especially compared to ages 24-35 with the highest percent (81%). Table 2: Decline in relations between Israel and the US Yes No Total (%) Gender Male 77 23 100 Female 75 25 100 Education Less than high school 76 24 100 High school graduate 77 23 100 College graduate or 76 24 100 more Age 18-24 64 36 100 25-34 81 19 100 35-44 75 25 100 45-54 74 26 100 55-64 79 21 100 65 and over 78 22 100 The question of who is responsible for the decline in relations between the two countries (table 3) seems to be more complex and variance here is higher than in other questions. In this question, there are even opposing feelings between the various groups. Men for instance tend to lay the responsibility on Netanyahu (62%) whereas women lay it on Obama (54%). Education also influences respondents opinion: Israelis with no high school education lay most of the responsibility on Obama (63%), Israelis with higher education however lay most of the responsibility on Netanyahu (62%) and high school graduates are split right down the middle (50%- 50%). Almost all age groups lay the responsibility on Netanyahu. Ages 65 and over are unique in that 74% lay the responsibility on Netanyahu compared to 52-55% in ages 18-44 and 55-64. The only age group that lays more responsibility on Obama is ages 45-54 (56%). http://apoi.idc.ac.il 11

Table 3: Responsibility for Decline in Relations between Israel and US Obama Netanyahu Total (%) Gender Male 38 62 100 Female 54 46 100 Education Less than high school 63 37 100 High school graduate 50 50 100 College graduate or 38 62 100 more Age 18-24 46 54 100 25-34 47 53 100 35-44 48 52 100 45-54 56 44 100 55-64 45 55 100 65 and over 26 74 100 In table 4 (next page), we find hardly any differences between gender, education or age groups regarding whether the US is trying to influence the elections. While there is some variation in the first two categories ( very much/quite a lot and somewhat ), the largest category across all groups and all variables is the third one ( a little or not at all ). http://apoi.idc.ac.il 12

Table 4: Is the US trying to Influence the Results of the Elections? Very much/ Quite a lot Somewhat Very little/ Not at all Gender Male 24 26 50 100 Female 21 22 57 100 Total (%) Education Less than high school 18 37 45 100 High school graduate 18 25 57 100 College graduate or more 27 21 52 100 Age 18-24 24 16 60 100 25-34 24 27 49 100 35-44 20 25 55 100 45-54 17 15 68 100 55-64 22 27 51 100 65 and over 29 30 41 100 Finally, there are hardly any differences between gender, levels of education and age groups on the question of who supports Israel more Republicans or Democrats (table 5, see next page). The largest category in almost all groups, and by a large margin, is that the Republicans show more support for Israel. The only group showing a different pattern is ages 65 and over, with a majority of 57% arguing that the two show equal support (though of the remaining 43%, 31% feel the Republicans show more support). http://apoi.idc.ac.il 13

Table 5: Partisan Differences in Support for Israel Republicans support more Democrats support more Both equal Total (%) Gender Male 52 12 36 100 Female 44 31 25 100 Education Less than high school 60 22 18 100 High school graduate 44 27 29 100 College graduate or 51 14 35 100 more Age 18-24 47 31 22 100 25-34 63 13 24 100 35-44 53 12 35 100 45-54 56 28 16 100 55-64 42 27 31 100 65 and over 31 12 57 100 http://apoi.idc.ac.il 14