NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Similar documents
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Searches Without a Warrant

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force STOP AND FRISK

Maryland-National Capital Park Police Prince George s County Division DIVISION DIRECTIVE DISTRIBUTION EFFECTIVE DATE

.3 Before being presented to a judge, all applications for search warrants are to be reviewed by the State's Attorney s Office for approval.

POCOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT

5. Pursuit... 2:25 6. High Speed Chases... 2:26 III. IDENTIFICATIONS... 3:1 A. In-Person Identifications... 3:1 1. Right to Have Counsel Present...

OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MD

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

a) The entry is limited in purpose and scope to discovery of a number as to which there is no reasonable expectation of privacy;

Public Copy CASPER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Investigative Procedure: Search & Seizure. 4 - Operations 03C -

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

California Supreme Court Creates a New Exception to the Search Warrant Requirement: People v. Sirhan

I. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8

Search Warrant Exceptions. Coach Presnell

MINNESOTA V. DICKERSON United States Supreme Court 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993)

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING

MINNESOTA v. DICKERSON 113 S.Ct (1993) United States Supreme Court

Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence

Rule 318D - STRIP SEARCH, VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH, AND BODY CAVITY SEARCH PROCEDURES

1 of 5 9/16/2014 2:02 PM

ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT. Policy and Procedure General Order: 1.06 Order Title: Strip and Body Cavity Searches

THURMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

Introduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam

Suspects Who Refuse to Identify Themselves By Jeff Bray, Senior Legal Advisor, Plano, Texas, Police Department

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

FOR IMMIGRATION OFFICERS M-69

Warrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,576 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, TRAE D. REED, Appellee.

2018 PA Super 183 : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

GENERAL ORDER OAK BROOK POLICE DEPARTMENT OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS

CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Arrest, Search, and Seizure

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

CHAPTER 3 SECTION VI 10/01/16 Vehicle Searches

Detentions And Photographing Detainees

Section 1. Section 2. Section 3

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1973 SESSION CHAPTER 1286 HOUSE BILL 256 AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAWS RELATING TO PRETRIAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Laws of Arrest, Search, & Seizure. Instructor: Judge Mark Arnold (310) Fall, Course Outline

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

I. Introduction. fact that most people carry a cell phone, there has been relatively little litigation deciding

Constitutional Law - Search and Seizure - Hot Pursuit

NEWARK POLICE DIVISION GENERAL ORDER

DEFINITIONS. Accuse To bring a formal charge against a person, to the effect that he is guilty of a crime or punishable offense.

Chapter 10 WHERE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DOES NOT APPLY

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION

This policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed by members when making an arrest.

DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.1 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

The Hackers Guide to Search and Arrest. by Steve Dunker J.D. It is legal for an Officer at any time to Ask a person to stop and talk.

Criminal Justice 100

From the Attorneys at the Legacy Counsel James Publishing

When used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meanings designated:

This General Order contains the following numbered sections:

STATE V. GANT: DEPARTING FROM THE BRIGHT-LINE BELTON RULE IN AUTOMOBILE SEARCHES INCIDENT TO ARREST

STANDARDS GOVERNING THE USE OF SECURE DETENTION UNDER THE JUVENILE ACT 42 Pa.C.S et seq.

No. 42,089-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * * * * * *

Criminal Procedure Outline

23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence

OPINION BY CIRILLO, P.J.E.: Filed: January 19, Derrick Guillespie appeals from his judgment of sentence entered in the

Issue presented: application of statute regarding warrantless blood draws. November 2014

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June

RESTRAINTS ON PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE: Arizona v. Hicks* HISTORY OF THE PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL. Fifth Edition JEROLD H. ISRAEL

Warrantless Searches

Section: 2.310, Page 1 of 10 Effective: August 5, 2011 Reissued: 08/25/16. Towson University Police Department Manual of General Directives

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

POLICE AMENDMENT ACT 2003 BERMUDA 2003 : 7 POLICE AMENDMENT ACT 2003

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE ADULT UNDOCUMENTED PERSONS

5 Officer Schenk also testified that, after he brought Heaven to the office, the loss prevention officer immediately returned to Heaven s shopping

THE LAW PROFESSOR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAW. By Hon. Barry Kamins. Kings County Criminal Bar Association March 31, 2010

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION

Mental Illness Commitments

POLICE SERVICES. Presented By: JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY OF LONDON AND DISTRICT

Subject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

{2} Officers John Ahlm and Michael Graff stopped Defendant's vehicle because his vehicle

NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,324. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, FRANCISCO ESTRADA-VITAL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Model Penal Code, No-Knock Search Warrants, and Robbery

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,451 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant,

Search and Seizure - Warrantless Search- Allowable Extent Incident to Arrest; United States v. Robinson

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,900 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOSEPH E. THAYER, Appellant.

SEARCH AND SEIZURE: CAN THEY DO THAT?

STATE V. GUTIERREZ, 2004-NMCA-081, 136 N.M. 18, 94 P.3d 18 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEMETRIO DANIEL GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Victoria Police Manual

Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016

Criminal Law: Constitutional Search

Transcription:

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: O-411 SUBJECT: Searches Without A Warrant REVISED: February 9, 2010 Review EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2009 DISTRIBUTION: Sworn Personnel APPROVED: Director Eddie Edwards I. Discussion a. This policy sets forth the conditions under which an investigator of this department may make a warrantless search. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines, responsibilities and procedures for searches without a warrant. II. Procedures a. Searches Without A Warrant i. General Rule 1. Under the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution and Part 1, Article 19 of the N. H. Constitution, all searches are per se unreasonable unless they are conducted pursuant to a warrant, or one of the following exceptions to the warrant requirement. ii. Probable Cause Requirement 1. Searches with or without a warrant, except for those delineated under "stop and frisk" below shall only be conducted with consent, or where there is probable cause to believe that the objects of the search are fruits of a crime, instrumentalities, evidence of a crime, implements of escape or contraband, and will be presently found in the place or places to be sought. O-411: 1

iii. Scope of the Search 1. The scope of a search is generally limited to those places where the items sought could reasonably be located. One cannot search "for an elephant in a Division drawer". iv. Search Incident to Arrest 1. The person of an individual who is arrested can be searched without a warrant, if the search occurs contemporaneously with a valid arrest. The purpose and scope of the search is to protect the investigator and others from harm, to avoid the destruction of evidence and to remove means of escape. The scope of the search can include the body of the arrested person and the immediate area from which he might reasonably gain possession of a weapon, means of escape or destructible evidence. v. Protective Custody Detentions 1. If the person is not being formally arrested, but rather is being placed in protective custody for intoxication, the authority to search is limited. You may search the detainee for weapons if you have reasonable suspicion that the detainee may be armed, and you may search for identification if you do not know the identity of the detainee. You may seize any contraband you discover through "plain view" or "plain feel" while searching for weapons or identification. vi. Inventory Searches of Arrested Persons 1. During the booking process of an arrested person at the police station or county jail, an inventory search of the person and items in his possession at the time of his arrest shall be conducted to protect the property of the arrested person, to protect the authorities against later allegations of lost or stolen property, and to protect the custodians and other prisoners from possible danger. A record shall be kept of all items seized, and the prisoner shall be required to sign a receipt upon the return of his property. vii. Mobile Vehicles 1. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has departed from the U. S. Supreme Court decisions relative to searches of a mobile vehicle for contraband based on probable cause. In State v. Sterndale (1995), the N. H. Supreme Court declared that it does not O-411: 2

recognize the so-called "automobile exception" and that the mere mobility of a motor vehicle is not sufficient justification for a warrantless search - it requires probable cause plus exigent circumstances, otherwise the vehicle should be detained until a warrant can be obtained. 2. For example, where a police investigator about to stop a vehicle that was weaving on the road observed the driver reach under the seat and discard a suspicious object, and the driver was later in custody outside the vehicle with a second investigator present at the scene, the court ruled that there were no exigent circumstances justifying a search without a warrant, and that when the investigator entered the vehicle, reached under the seat and seized the discarded object, which turned out to be contraband, the seized object was the fruit of an illegal search, and therefore inadmissible in court. viii. Exigent Circumstances 1. Police may always conduct a search based on probable cause plus exigent circumstances. Exigent circumstances are those, which present a compelling need for immediate official action and a risk that the delay inherent in obtaining a warrant will present a substantial risk of imminent danger to life or public safety. 2. For example, where several people accosted two women on the street and fired shots at them and fled, and a police dog followed the scent of the suspects to an apartment, this information, coupled with calls from neighbors reporting overhearing the persons in this apartment discussing a shooting, plus a name on the apartment mailbox that corresponded with a name the women had overheard one of the suspects call the other, justified an immediate, warrantless search of the apartment for the suspects because a sniper might be on the loose and, if not immediately apprehended, might attack someone else. ix. Fire and Crime Scenes 1. Police investigators do not need to obtain a warrant to enter a structure to rescue individuals from harm, such as where a criminal attack is taking place or to rescue someone from a fire. However, once the emergency is over, the premises should be secured and consent or a warrant obtained before continuing with the investigation. O-411: 3

x. Plain View 1. An investigator may seize evidence that is in plain view at any time when the initial intrusion, which afforded the view, was lawful, the discovery of the evidence was inadvertent and the incriminating nature of the evidence was immediately apparent. Once again, the N. H. Constitution is interpreted by our Supreme Court as setting a stricter standard for plain view searches than that which exists under the U. S. Constitution. xi. Consent Searches 1. A search warrant is unnecessary if consent to the search is given by the owner or person who has custody or joint custody of the premises to be searched. While it is good policy to inform the individual of his right to refuse the search, it is not required. A consent, which is obtained by trick, duress or misrepresentation, is invalid. A person who gives consent to search may give partial consent (limiting the scope of the search) and may revoke his consent at any time, in which case the search must cease, but any evidence discovered and seized prior to the revocation of consent may be retained by the police. Oral consent to search is valid, but wherever possible, investigators shall seek written consent on a standard departmental form. See Appendix A. xii. Abandonment xiii. Open Fields 1. When property is abandoned, it is assumed that the former owner or custodian has given up his interest in it, and the property may be searched or seized without a warrant. Examples would be garbage put out in the street for collection or a motel room vacated by the tenants. In determining whether the property is abandoned, the courts will consider the length of time that has elapsed and the actions and intent of the person as he discarded the property. 1. Generally, no warrant is required to search open fields outside the curtilage of a residence, even if the property is posted against trespassing, however a warrant may be advisable before seizing any evidence discovered. xiv. Stop and Frisk 1. Where a police investigator observes unusual conduct which O-411: 4

leads the investigator to reasonably conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom the investigator is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous, and where in the course of investigating this behavior the investigator identifies himself as a police investigator and makes reasonable inquiries, and where nothing in the initial stages of this encounter serves to dispel the investigator's reasons to fear for his own safety and that of others in the area, the investigator is entitled to conduct a carefully limited protective frisk of the outer clothing of such persons in an attempt to discover weapons which might be used to assault the investigator. Any item that is obviously contraband that is discovered by "plain feel" during such a search may be seized, along with any weapons. If the person is not subsequently arrested, any items discovered in the frisk that are not illegal to possess must be returned to the person. xv. Knock and Announce 1. Prior to entering a dwelling with or without a warrant, investigators should knock, announce their identity and purpose, and demand admission, unless they have reason to believe that to do so would place them in danger or lead to escape of the wanted persons or destruction of evidence. It is not necessary to knock and announce when conducting a search of a house that is equipped with normal residential plumbing and the purpose of the search is to seize street-level qualities of illegal drugs. O-411: 5