THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA

Similar documents
Procedures for Receiving, Investigating & Remediating Complaints of Employment Discrimination

District 2 Public Health

Jefferson County Commission Anti-Harassment Complaint Resolution Procedures

SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Policy Code: 1720/4015/7225

Anti-Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying Policy

Office of Equal Opportunity Procedures I. PURPOSE

Community-Law Enforcement Mediation Program Standard Operating Procedures

PERSONNEL-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS EMPLOYEE COMPLAINTS/GRIEVANCES

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

Student and Employee Grievance Policy

DERBY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

Service issues not associated with employee misconduct should be directed to the Office of the Chief of Police for a performance review.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

City of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY

NO , Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedure Manual

2. During the complaint intake process, no questions shall be asked of a complainant regarding their immigration status.

DATE ISSUED: 5/18/ of 6 LDU DGBA(LOCAL)-X

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)

Appendix A. Ethics Compliance. Address. Name. Telephone Number. Department and Title. (for employees) National Origin

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

CLINTON COUNTY NON-DISCRIMINATION AND ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY Revised: December 2014

Peralta Community College District Office of Employee Relations th Street, Oakland CA (510)

Investigations of Employees for Sexual Harassment & Sexual & Interpersonal Violence

IBSA Harassment Policy

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual

BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

FORM 1. Complaint Handling Policy & Procedures

POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE

WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Notification Regarding UNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. Revised

POLICY HARASSMENT/ DISCRIMINATION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

SEXUAL HARASSMENT. Policy Statement of Policy

Windsor Police Department General Order

PROHIBITED HARASSMENT AND/OR DISCRIMINATION POLICY

C-451 Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act

RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)

Complaint refers to an allegation by an individual that any Department employee has misused authority, acted illegally or unethically.

External. Complaints. Purpose. Filing of. to File. discrimination. to file. Revised 12/10

CHAPTER XV PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT

OFFICE OF EQUITY & DIVERSITY

DATE ISSUED: 2/9/ of 8 LDU DGBA(LOCAL)-X

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE

Coppin State University Complaint Form

MIDDLETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

DATE ISSUED: 5/9/ of 9 LDU DGBA(LOCAL)-X

HUMAN RIGHTS #2-08 Discrimination Harassment

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Ventura USD Administrative Regulation Uniform Complaint Procedures

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Discrimination Complaint Procedure

Transit Authority of River City (TARC) TITLE VI Complaint Procedure

Discrimination and Harassment

Saddleback Valley Unified School District AR

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Prepared by the Office of the President. This replaces Administrative Procedure A9.920 dated December 1990.

UNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

CITRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT STUDENT SERVICES

ETH/PI/POL/3 Original: English UNESCO ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY DISRIMINATION CLAIMS PROCEDURE 609 BUENA VISTA NE (505) oeo.unm.edu

RULES OF PROCEDURES IN STUDENT AND FACULTY GRIEVANCE

HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT

Policy Against Harassment and Discrimination

DATE ISSUED: 10/4/ of 7 LDU FLD(LOCAL)-X

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

CORRECTIVE ACTION/DISCIPLINARY-GRIEVANCE ACTION POLICY Volunteer Personnel

PACE UNIVERSITY POLICY AND PROCEDURE - DISCRIMINATION, NON SEX- BASED 1 HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Rugby Ontario Policy Manual

DISCIPLINARY & COMPLAINTS POLICY

CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT

Southwestern Community College District Procedure Human Resources

G-19: Administrative Procedures Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Prohibited

ARTICLE 11 GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

Disciplinary procedures for all employees

Changes Implemented in the JMU Student Handbook. Provided to the Community Members of James Madison University

PERSONNEL-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS EMPLOYEE COMPLAINTS/GRIEVANCES

Superintendent Procedure 3210SP.B Discrimination Complaint Process Approved by: s/ Larry Nyland Date: 3/8/18 Dr. Larry Nyland, Superintendent

Mineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 726

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

City and County of Denver CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE PROCEDURAL GUIDE. Published and Distributed by:

The procedures shall include, but not be limited to, grievances regarding:

Solely for purposes of this policy, the term "employee " includes former employees, applicants for employment, and unpaid interns.

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual

WILKES-BARRE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines

Adopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

Transcription:

THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA WRITTEN PROCEDURE FOR RECEIVING, INVESTIGATING, AND REMEDIATING COMPLAINTS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION Who is the Affirmative Action Officer? The federal court Consent Decree requires Jefferson County to employ an Affirmative Action Officer and specifies certain roles and duties that he or she is to perform. One of the Affirmative Action Officer s major functions is to receive, investigate, conciliate, and remedy complaints of workplace discrimination. As used in this document, the term discrimination includes unlawful discrimination in all its forms, including harassment and retaliation, as well as any conduct that violates the County s Equal Employment Opportunity Policy (June 10, 2014, updated September 30, 2014) ( EEO Policy ). The Affirmative Action Officer is a neutral party, and is available as a resource to all Jefferson County employees, regardless of race or sex. The County s Affirmative Action Officer is: Lourie A. Bradley Affirmative Action Officer 716 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North Suite A640 Birmingham, AL 35203 (205) 583-8330 The office hours of the Affirmative Action Officer are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 1

How do I make a report of discrimination to the Affirmative Action Officer? Employees may make a formal complaint of discrimination, or may simply visit the Affirmative Action Officer for an informal consultation seeking advice or information. More information about how to take advantage of the services of the Affirmative Action Officer is provided below. Formal Complaint and Investigation Process: Employees or former employees who believe they have been subjected to discrimination or harassment of any kind are encouraged to bring the matter to the attention of the Affirmative Action Officer. Complainants may walk in between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, to report a complaint of discrimination. The complainant will be asked to complete and sign an Employment Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Form. A staff member will conduct a cursory review of the form to be sure that all required fields are complete. After the cursory review, each page will be time/date stamped received and initialed by the staff member accepting the form. A copy will be made and provided to the complainant. The Employment Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Form is also available via the internet at http://jeffconline.jccal.org/aao, and complainants may also submit a complaint via e-mail or regular mail. Under the County s EEO Policy, supervisors have an affirmative obligation to report any actual or suspected violations of that Policy to the Affirmative Action Officer. A supervisor who receives or becomes aware of actual or suspected violations of the EEO Policy must document, in writing, all known information about the complaint, and forward that information to the Affirmative Action Officer without delay. The supervisor may e-mail the information to the Affirmative Action 2

Officer at: affirmative_action@jccal.org, place it in interoffice mail for delivery, or hand deliver it at the office location set out above. A supervisor who fails to report discrimination to the Affirmative Action Officer is in violation of the EEO Policy, and may be subject to disciplinary action. Informal Consultation Process: Sometimes, employees just have questions and just want to talk or learn more about workplace EEO issues. If you have questions or concerns about discrimination or other issues arising in the workplace, but do not wish to initiate a formal investigation, you are encouraged to contact the Affirmative Action Officer to arrange for a private consultation. Starting the informal consultation process does not prevent you from escalating the matter to a formal complaint later on. What happens after the Affirmative Action Officer receives a complaint of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment? A letter will be generated and mailed to the complainant acknowledging receipt of the complaint, explaining the steps in the investigation process, and requesting any missing or additional information within ten (10) business days of receiving the complaint of discrimination. If missing or additional information is requested, the complainant will be asked to provide the information within ten (10) business days of the date of the letter. Upon receipt of any requested information, a letter will be generated and mailed to the complainant confirming receipt of the submitted information. If the requested information is not provided, an additional written request for information will be mailed to the complainant advising that the file will be closed if no response is received within ten (10) business days. 3

Depending on the facts alleged in the complaint, the head of the department within which the complaint originated may be notified of the complaint, and may also be asked to provide information, normally within ten (10) business days. Initial Screening: Upon receipt of the formal complaint and any information received in response to initial information requests, the Affirmative Action Officer or the assigned analyst will perform an Initial Screening review solely for the purpose of determining whether the complaint alleges discrimination, harassment, or retaliation within the scope of the Affirmative Action Officer s responsibility. At the Initial Screening phase, the Affirmative Action Officer does not consider the truth or falsity of the allegations, nor whether the allegations are likely to be supported by evidence. Rather, the only issue to be considered during Initial Screening is whether the complainant has alleged discrimination on the basis of race, sex, age, religion, national origin, or retaliation for protected activity. If the Affirmative Action Officer concludes that the complaint does not fall within the scope of the Affirmative Action Officer s responsibility, a letter will be generated to the complainant explaining why, and inviting the complainant to provide further information or clarification. If no further information or clarification is received, processing of the complaint will conclude at this point with a memorandum to the file documenting this decision. Even after processing of the formal complaint is concluded, the complainant may still utilize the Affirmative Action Officer s informal consultation process, as outlined above. If the Affirmative Action Officer concludes that the complaint falls within the scope of the Affirmative Action Officer s responsibility, The Affirmative Action Officer will conduct an investigation. Investigations conducted by the Affirmative 4

Action Officer are divided into three phases: Fact Gathering, Analysis and Discussion, and the Report of Factual Findings and Determination. Fact Gathering: In the Fact Gathering stage, the assigned analyst will make every reasonable effort to learn all relevant facts. The assigned analyst should begin by carefully reviewing the Employment Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Form and all documents in the file, and determining if there are any other documents that should be obtained and reviewed before formally interviewing the complainant. During this initial file review, the analyst should identify key issues and questions that need to be addressed through interviews. Next, the assigned analyst should generally conduct a thorough interview of the complainant and/or persons who brought the alleged misconduct to the attention of the Affirmative Action Officer. During the initial interview, the analyst should ask questions to clarify any issues or reconcile any discrepancies identified in the documents in the file. The analyst should seek to determine who was involved; what occurred; when and where it took place; the identity of any witnesses; whether this was an isolated incident or part of a pattern; what impact, if any, the alleged discriminatory conduct might have had; the identities of all persons with whom the alleged discriminatory conduct has been discussed; and whether there are any additional relevant notes, recordings, photographs, or other documents in existence and the location of the documentation. Next, the analyst should interview other persons who may have witnessed the alleged misconduct, who may have been identified as having been subjected to similar conduct or who have information concerning any aspect of the alleged discriminatory conduct. Careful and clear notes should be taken of all interviews. Analysts notes should memorialize the facts uncovered in the investigation, and not the analysts impressions or judgments about the facts. The analyst may take formal 5

statements from the complainant and other witnesses, but this is not always necessary. As part of the Fact Gathering phase, the analyst will seek to determine whether the complainant has missed any work days, incurred any non-reimbursable medical expenses or had any monetary loss as a result of the alleged discriminatory conduct. Analysis and Discussion: Upon completion of the Fact Gathering Phase, the assigned analyst will meet in person with the Affirmative Action Officer to discuss all steps taken by the analyst during the Fact Gathering Phase, the outcome of each step, and the analyst s preliminary factual findings and impressions based upon the information gathered. Based upon the information provided by the analyst, the Affirmative Action Officer may determine that there is sufficient information to move the file into the Determination Phase, or that more fact gathering is needed before the file may be moved on to the Determination Phase, or that some other documented disposition of the file is appropriate. Determination Phase/Report of Factual Findings and Determination: When the file is moved into the Determination Phase, the Affirmative Action Officer will prepare and/or direct the analyst to draft, for the Affirmative Action Officer s ultimate approval and signature, a Report of Factual Findings and Determination ( Report ). The Report shall include the following sections: (1) Factual Findings, (2) Determinations, and (3) Recommendations. 1. Factual Findings: The Factual Findings section of the Report will carefully detail all relevant factual findings made during the Fact Gathering phase, including the name(s) of each interviewee, dates of each 6

interview, a detailed account of each interviewee s statement, and all documents reviewed. 2. Determinations: The Determinations section of the Report may include one or more of the following determinations: (a) that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a probable violation of County policy; (b) that there is sufficient evidence to indicate probable discrimination; (c) that there is not sufficient evidence to indicate a probable violation of County policy; (d) that there is not sufficient evidence to indicate probable discrimination; (e) that inappropriate behavior occurred, not constituting probable discrimination nor any probable violation of County policy; or (f) a determination that the complaint is not supported by the evidence. To reach the Determination(s), the Affirmative Action Officer need not take a legalistic approach nor necessarily rely upon the applicable legal standard(s) that would be used by a court in the course of formal legal proceedings to determine whether discrimination has occurred. Rather, in reaching his or her Determinations with regard to whether discrimination has occurred, the Affirmative Action Officer should consider the totality of the evidence and facts uncovered during the Fact Gathering phase, viewed in the light of his or her human experience. In reaching his or her Determinations with regard to whether a violation of County policy occurred, the Affirmative action Officer should compare the Factual Findings with the language of the applicable County policies. The appropriate County policies or standards will be cited in the Report. The Determinations section of the Report shall also specify whether the Receiver has authority to resolve and remediate the claim pursuant to 7

Paragraph 2(i) or only to review the claim pursuant to Paragraph 2(h) of the Receiver s Order, and/or whether monetary relief may be awarded from the monetary fund created by the Court s Order of March 14, 2014. 3. Recommendations: The Recommendations section of the Report will set forth the Affirmative Action Officer s recommended disposition of the complaint. During the Receivership imposed by the Court in its order of October 25, 2013, the Recommendation shall be in the form of a recommendation from the Affirmative Action Officer to the Receiver. The Affirmative Action Officer may make one or more of the following recommendations: (a) That the parties conciliate the complaint through formal or informal mediation; (b) That corrective/disciplinary action be taken, ranging from informal or written counseling, written reprimand, suspension, demotion, or other action up to and including termination; (c) training; That certain individuals be required to attend specific (d) that the Receiver award relief to the complaining party, including monetary relief, non-monetary relief, such as preferential hiring and promotion, retroactive Merit System service credit, or remedial/corrective training, or any other relief as deemed appropriate pursuant to the Receiver s authority as assigned by the Court; (e) (f) That the file be closed with no further action; Any other proper course of action. If corrective actions are recommended, the Office of the Affirmative Action Officer will conduct follow-up activities with the appropriate department head or Jefferson County personnel, as necessary, to ensure that the situation has been corrected. 8

Normally, investigation of the complaint and preparation of the Report of Factual Findings and Determination shall be completed no later than ninety (90) days from the date the complaint is received by the Office of the Affirmative Action Officer or the date on which any requested documents are received from the complainant and/or department within which the complaint initiated, whichever date is latest, absent holidays, inclement weather, or extenuating circumstances. What recordkeeping obligations does the Affirmative Action Officer have? During the duration of the Consent Decree, the Affirmative Action Officer will maintain complainant files indefinitely (including complaint intake forms, analyst notes, witness statements, other documents received and reviewed as part of the investigation, the Report of Factual Findings and Determination, and the Determination Letter). After conclusion of the Consent Decree, all such records will be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years. 9