Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Similar documents
Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURIAA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JBW-LB Document 116 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: CV-1 199

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 8

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 127 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 98 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No CIV-HUCK/O SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case4:09-cv CW Document69 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 5

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER. into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated March 11, 2016, as amended on June 13,

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 5:13-cv ATB Document 67 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 1:14-cv JL Document 193 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

Case 4:16-cv O Document 137 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 5982

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 212 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 10

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case 1:11-cv VM Document 509 Filed 07/03/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

~/

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON IN RE GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, Case No. 3:14-cv-00367-SI FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE WHEREAS, Class Representatives Kisuk Cho, Anthony Kim, Pantelis Lavidas, and Joseph Buscema (collectively, Class Representatives ), on behalf of themselves and the class and Defendants The DreamTeam Group, LLC, together with MissionIR and all of their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, current or former directors, officers, owners, members, employees, attorneys, accountants, insurers, agents, representatives, principals, assigns, subrogees, stockholders, partners, trustees, heirs, beneficiaries, servants, all persons claiming rights derivatively from them, and all other persons or entities otherwise affiliated with or related to DreamTeam Group LLC or MissionIR ( DreamTeam ), Michael McCarthy ( McCarthy ), Lidingo Holdings, LLC ( Lidingo ) and Kamilla Bjorlin ( Bjorlin, and with DreamTeam, McCarthy, and Lidingo, Settling Defendants and together with the Class Representatives, the Settling Parties ) have entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May 17, 2017 (the Stipulation ) that provides for a complete dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted against the Settling Defendants in the above-referenced litigation (the Action ) on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation, subject to the approval of this Court (the Remaining Defendants Settlement ); WHEREAS, this Final Order and Judgment (the Final Order and Judgment ) hereby incorporates by reference the definitions in the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation, and unless otherwise indicated herein, the capitalized words and terms shall have the same 1

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 10 meaning as they have in the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation (certain of which are repeated herein for ease of reference only); WHEREAS, by Order dated June 27, 2017 (the Preliminary Approval Order ), this Court: (a) preliminarily approved the Settlement; (b) ordered that notice of the proposed Settlement be provided to potential Class Members; (c) provided Class Members with the opportunity to object to the proposed Remaining Defendants Settlement; and (d) scheduled a hearing to consider the Remaining Defendants Settlement; WHEREAS, due, adequate and sufficient notice of the Remaining Defendants Settlement and the hearing has been given to the Settlement Class, which notice complied in all respects with requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause) and all other applicable law and rules; WHEREAS, the respective Settling Parties have appeared through their attorneys of record and the opportunity to be heard has been given to all other persons requesting to be heard in accordance with the notice procedures set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order; WHEREAS, the Settlement Class has been adequately represented by Plaintiffs and Co- Class Counsel in connection with the claims asserted against the Settling Defendants in the Action; WHEREAS, this Court conducted a hearing on November 17, 2017 to consider, among other things, whether the terms and conditions of the Remaining Defendants Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate and should therefore be approved, and whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice as against the Remaining Defendants and providing for the resolution, discharge, dismissal and settlement of each of the Released Plaintiffs Claims 2

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 10 and Released Remaining Defendants Claims as against each of the Released Persons (the Settlement Hearing ); and WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed and considered the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held herein in connection with the Remaining Defendants Settlement, all oral and written comments received regarding the proposed Remaining Defendants Settlement, and the record in the Action, and good cause appearing therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and all matters relating to the Remaining Defendants Settlement, as well as jurisdiction over all parties to the Action, including the Settling Parties and each of the Settlement Class Members. 2. This Final Order and Judgment incorporates and makes a part hereof the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation filed with the Court on May 17, 2017. 3. The Court finds that the dissemination of the Notice and publication of the Summary Notice: (a) were implemented in accordance with the Court s Preliminary Approval Order; (b) constituted the best notice reasonably practicable under the circumstances; (c) constituted notice that was reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise the Class Members of: (i) the pendency of the Action, (ii) the effect of the Remaining Defendants Settlement (including the Releases provided for therein), (iii) the request for reimbursement of litigation expenses to Co-Class Counsel, (iv) their right to object to the Remaining Defendants Settlement and/or the request for reimbursement of litigation expenses to Co-Class Counsel, and (vii) their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (d) constituted due, adequate and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled to receive notice of the proposed Remaining Defendants Settlement; 3

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 4 of 10 and (e) satisfied the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 78u-4, et seq.) (the PSLRA ), and all other applicable law and rules. 4. Pursuant to, and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby fully and finally approves the Remaining Defendants Settlement set forth in the Stipulation in all respects (including, without limitation, the amount of the Remaining Defendants Settlement, the Releases provided for therein and the dismissal with prejudice of each and every one of the Released Plaintiffs Claims and Released Remaining Defendants Claims (the Released Claims ) against the Released Parties). The Court further finds that the Remaining Defendants Settlement is: (a) in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate and is in the best interests of Plaintiffs and the other Class Members; and (b) is the result of arm s-length negotiations between experienced counsel representing the interests of the respective Settling Parties. 5. As of the Effective Date, all of the claims asserted against the Remaining Defendants by the Plaintiffs and each and every one of the other Class Members are hereby dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. 6. The Settling Parties and their counsel are hereby authorized and directed to consummate the Remaining Defendants Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation and this Judgment. The Settling Parties shall bear their own costs and expenses, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Stipulation. 7. The terms of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation and of this Final Order and Judgment shall forever be binding on Plaintiffs and each and every one of the other 4

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 5 of 10 Plaintiffs Released Parties (regardless of whether or not any individual Class Member submitted a Claim Form). 8. The Released Parties set forth in Sections 1 of the Stipulation, together with the definitions contained in Section 1 of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation relating thereto (certain of which are repeated herein below), are expressly incorporated herein in all respects. The Released Parties are effective as of the Effective Date. 9. This Court orders that, as of the Effective Date: (a) each and every one of the Released Claims as against each and every one of the Released Parties by each and every one of the Released Parties is hereby completely, fully, finally and forever dismissed, compromised, settled, released, relinquished and discharged with prejudice by virtue of this Final Order and Judgment; (b) each and every one of the Plaintiffs Released Parties (regardless of whether or not that person actually submits a Claim Form, seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund), is entitled to receive such a distribution under the Plan of Allocation or has objected to the Settlement or the application for litigation expenses to Co-Class Counsel shall: (i) have, and by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment be deemed to have, completely, fully, finally, and forever dismissed, released, relinquished and discharged with prejudice each and every one of the Remaining Defendants Released Parties from each and every one of the Released Plaintiff Claims; (ii) forever and permanently be barred and enjoined by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment from filing, commencing, intervening in, participating in (as a class member or otherwise), instituting, maintaining, prosecuting, seeking relief in (including filing an application or motion for preliminary or permanent injunctive relief) or receiving any recovery, remedy, benefits or other relief from, any other lawsuit, action, 5

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 6 of 10 arbitration, other proceeding or order in any jurisdiction that asserts, is based on, arises from or relates in any way to any or all of the Released Plaintiffs Claims against any or all of the Settling Defendants Released Parties; and (iii) have, and by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment be deemed to have, covenanted not to sue any or all of the Settling Defendants Released Parties with respect to each and every one of the Released Plaintiffs Claims; and (c) each and every one of the Remaining Defendants Released Parties shall: (i) have, and by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment be deemed to have, completely, fully, finally, and forever dismissed, released, relinquished and discharged with prejudice each and every one of the Plaintiffs Released Parties from each and every one of the Released Remaining Defendants Claims; (ii) forever and permanently be barred and enjoined by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment from filing, commencing, intervening in, participating in (as a class member or otherwise), instituting, maintaining, prosecuting, seeking relief in (including filing an application or motion for preliminary or permanent injunctive relief) or receiving any recovery, remedy, benefits or other relief from, any other lawsuit, action, arbitration, other proceeding or order in any jurisdiction that asserts, is based on, arises from or relates in any way to any or all of the Released Remaining Defendants Claims against any or all of the Plaintiffs Released Parties; and (iii) have, and by operation of law and this Final Order and Judgment be deemed to have, covenanted not to sue any or all of the Plaintiffs Released Parties with respect to each and every one of the Released Remaining Defendants Claims. 10. The effectiveness of the provisions of this Final Order and Judgment and the rights and obligations of the Settling Parties under the Remaining Defendants Settlement (including without limitation the Releases contained herein) shall not depend on, or be 6

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 7 of 10 conditioned on or subject in any way to, the resolution of any orders, proceedings, rulings, consideration, appeals or other matters concerning, relating to, based upon or arising out of: (a) the application for reimbursement of litigation expenses to Co-Class Counsel in connection with the Settlement (including the allocation of such fees among counsel); (b) the Plan of Allocation; and/or (c) the Galena Settlement. 11. Nothing contained in this Final Order and Judgment shall preclude any action to enforce the terms of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation or this Final Order and Judgment, including, without limitation, the Released Parties provided for herein. 12. The Court finds and concludes that the Settling Parties and their respective counsel have complied in all respects with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in connection with the commencement, maintenance, prosecution, defense and/or settlement of the Action. The Court further finds that Plaintiffs and Co-Class Counsel adequately represented the Class Members for purposes of entering into and implementing the Remaining Defendants Settlement. 13. This Final Order and Judgment, the facts and terms of the Remaining Defendants Settlement and Stipulation (including all exhibits thereto) as well as all negotiations, discussions, acts performed, agreements, drafts, documents signed and proceedings in connection with the Remaining Defendants Settlement: (a) shall not be described as, construed as, interpreted as, or offered or received against any of the Remaining Defendants Released Parties as evidence of and/or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession or admission by any of the Remaining Defendants Released Parties as to: (i) the truth of any fact alleged in the Complaint; (ii) the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any other litigation; (iii) the 7

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 8 of 10 deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any other litigation; and/or (iv) any liability, negligence, misconduct, inaction, fault, or wrongdoing of any sort on their part as alleged in the Complaint; (b) shall not be described as, construed as, interpreted as or offered or received against Plaintiffs or any other Class Member as evidence of any infirmity in the claims of said person or that damages recoverable from the Remaining Defendants would not have exceeded the Settlement Amount; (c) shall not be described as, construed as, interpreted as, offered or received against any of the Settling Parties as an admission or concession that the consideration to be given in the Remaining Defendants Settlement represents the amount which could be or would have been awarded to any Class Member after trial; (d) shall not be construed, offered, interpreted, denied or received in evidence or otherwise against any of the Settling Parties in any other civil, criminal, regulatory or administrative action, litigation or proceeding, except in connection with any action, litigation or proceeding to enforce the terms of the Stipulation, the Remaining Defendants Settlement and/or this Final Order and Judgment; and (e) shall not be deemed or construed to create any inferences of any damages, or lack of damages, suffered by Plaintiffs or any of the other Class Members. 14. Notwithstanding anything in Paragraph 13 above, any of the Released Persons may file, offer, cite, refer to or otherwise employ the Stipulation, this Final Order and Judgment and/or the Remaining Defendants Settlement in the Action (or any other action or proceeding that may be brought against them): (a) to enforce the terms of this Final Order and Judgment, the Remaining Defendants Settlement, and/or the Stipulation; (b) to enforce or effectuate the 8

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 9 of 10 Releases provided under this Final Order and Judgment and the Stipulation; and/or (c) to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release and discharge, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 15. Without affecting the finality of this Final Order and Judgment in any way, this Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over: (a) the Settling Parties for purposes of the administration, interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the Remaining Defendants Settlement; (b) the disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) Class Members for all matters relating to the Action; and (d) any motion to approve the Class Distribution Order. 16. Without further approval from the Court, Plaintiffs and the Remaining Defendants are hereby authorized to agree to and adopt such amendments and modifications of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation or any exhibits attached thereto to effectuate this Remaining Defendants Settlement that: (a) are not materially inconsistent with this Final Order and Judgment; and (b) do not materially limit the rights of Settlement Class Members in connection with the Remaining Defendants Settlement. Without further order of the Court, Plaintiffs and the Remaining Defendants may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any provisions of the Remaining Defendants Settlement. 17. The Remaining Defendants Settlement resolves all claims against all remaining defendants in this case. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment in this case. 18. In the event that the Remaining Defendants Settlement is terminated pursuant to the terms of the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation or the Effective Date otherwise 9

Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 10 of 10 does not occur: (a) the Remaining Defendants Settlement and the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation shall be null and void and without prejudice to, or force and effect to or upon, the rights of the Settling Parties, and none of their terms shall be effective or enforceable except as provided in the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation; (b) the Settling Parties shall be deemed to have reverted to their respective litigation positions in the Action immediately as of May 17, 2017; (c) except as otherwise expressly provided in the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation and this Final Order and Judgment, the Settling Parties shall proceed in all respects as if the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation, this Final Order and Judgment, the Preliminary Approval Order and any other orders of the Court relating to the Remaining Defendants Settlement had not been entered, except as otherwise provided by the Stipulation; and (e) this Final Order and Judgment shall be vacated, rendered null and void and be of no further force or effect, except as otherwise provided by the Remaining Defendants Settlement Stipulation. SO ORDERED this 21st day of. November, 2017 /s/ Michael H. Simon The Honorable Michael H. Simon United States District Judge 10