Honing Your Deposition Skills 2014 Practice Pointers

Similar documents
PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

13 ADVANCED TRIAL TIPS. Gary K. Burger BURGER LAW BurgerLaw.com

Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls in the Deposition Process

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT. Courtroom Testimony & Demeanor. Clinical Coordinator Training

FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.

KH 48 LLC v Muniak 2015 NY Slip Op 32330(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Joan A.

Ortega v Rockefeller Ctr. N. Inc NY Slip Op 33667(U) October 1, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Donna M.

Dupiton v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 33234(U) November 26, 2018 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Ernest F.

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

CONTENTS. vii. Acknowledgments

Drafting New York Civil-Ligation Documents: Part XXXI Subpoenas Continued

Amy Lynn Pludwin, an attorney duly admitted to practice law. before the Courts of New York State, hereby affirms under the

Deposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour

4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/03/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 379 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/03/2014. Exhibit C

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

Upon reading and filing the sworn narrative of Dr. Inna Khval, sworn to July 25, 2018;

Case 1:13-cv EGB Document 120 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Masters of the Courtroom SM

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Caeser v Harlem USA Stores, Inc NY Slip Op 30722(U) April 18, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Anil C.

Consider Hearsay Issues Before A Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Drafting New York Civil-Litigation Documents: Part XXIII Summary-Judgment Motions Continued

V.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

PREPARATION OF THE DEFENDANT FOR DEPOSITION: A PRACTICAL GUIDE. Bruce M. Brady, Esq. Koster, Brady & Nagler, LLP

Preparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases

CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Matter of Demetriou (Aliano) 2016 NY Slip Op 32031(U) June 29, 2016 Surrogate's Court, Nassau County Docket Number: C Judge: Margaret C.

Law Day 2016 Courtroom Vocabulary Grades 3-5

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 29.0 ARBITRATION

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

by Robert J. Permutt, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Lead, Nationwide Insurance Company Mirna M. Santiago, Esq.

WHAT IS A DEPOSITION?

6/5/2018 THE RULE AND THE NOTICE THE STANDARD NOTICE ATTACKING THE NOTICE, PREPARING FOR AND DEFENDING THE RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION

Derezeas v New York Road Runners, Inc NY Slip Op 31201(U) April 23, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Louis

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/20/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/20/2018

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

Purpose of a Deposition

Sri McCam ri Q. August 16, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

Jeulin v P.C. Richard & Son, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 32479(U) October 3, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Adam

NC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3A 1

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

DEQUAN SHAKEITH SAPP OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

#6792 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

Due Process Hearings in California An Overview

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

Eddie Wayne Davis v. State of Florida

California Bar Examination

Deposition Skills and Strategies (CLE)

THE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

Case 1:13-cv MCA-LF Document 152 Filed 10/22/16 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Case 2:05-cv ER Document 49 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR APPEAL APPLICATION UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION CODE APPEALS BOARD

VIA ECF and HAND DELIVERY

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

Ethical Limits in Witness Preparation. Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016

Table of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.

THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST JUDGE

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents starting on page xi.

Case 3:16-cv HZ Document 24 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 10

Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /04 Judge: Sherry Klein

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR APPEAL APPLICATION UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION CODE APPEALS BOARD

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge:

Waldron v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 32283(U) November 9, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Michael

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW

The 30.02(6), or 30(b)(6), Witness: Proper Notice, Preparation, and Deposition Techniques

USE OF DEPOSITIONS. Maryland Rule Deposition Use. (a) When may be used.

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Punwaney v Punwaney 2016 NY Slip Op 31178(U) June 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Manuel J.

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOW TO TAKE A PERCIPIENT WITNESS DEPOSITION I. UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THE DEPOSITION YOU ARE TAKING

By notice to parties MCR 2.313(D) Timing

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/06/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario

Betties v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 30753(U) April 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /14 Judge: Lynn R.

Transcription:

www.goldbergsegalla.com NEW YORK ILLINOIS NEW JERSEY PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT UNITED KINGDOM Honing Your Deposition Skills 2014 Practice Pointers Paul S. Devine 516.281.9850 pdevine@goldbergsegalla.com Theodore W. Ucinski 516.281.9860 tucinski@goldbergsegalla.com Robert W. Berbenich 516.281.9838 rberbenich@goldbergsegalla.com Introduction The use of oral questions presented to a witness sworn to tell the truth has been employed for centuries by various cultures in differing forms. This procedure eventually evolved into what we know today as a deposition. 1

How to preserve your record for a motion 1. [I]n an examination before trial unless a question is clearly violative of the witness s constitutional rights, or of some privilege recognized in law, or is palpably irrelevant, questions should be freely permitted and answered, since all objections other than as to form are preserved for the trial and may be raised at that time. Freedco Products, Inc. v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 47 A.D.2d 654, 655, 366 N.Y.S.2d 401, 402 (2d Dep t 1975). See also CPLR 3115(d); Johnson v. N.Y.C. Health & Hospitals Corp., 49 A.D.2d 234, 374 N.Y.S.2d 343 (2d Dep t 1975). 2. Practical Application: A court reporter may only go off the record if all parties consent. If you refuse to go off the record, then everything that is said will be included in the transcript. How to handle a hostile witness 1. Keep asking questions until you get an answer that is appropriate. Often times, it is not what you ask but how you ask it. 2. Be very polite on the record, allow the witness to appear foolish with his or her aggression. Never raise your voice. 3. Use your intellect and common sense. Do not allow a witness to outwit you with their answers. 2

How to handle hostile defense counsel To deal with the issue of hostile defense counsel, and other problems that arise at depositions, the Office of Court Administration adopted three rules that went into effect on October 1, 2006, the Uniform Rules for the Conduct of Depositions. See Siegel, David D., New York Practice, Fifth Ed., West Pub., 2011, pg. 601. Attacking I don t know or I don t remember when you know they do 1. Refresh their recollection. 2. Use documentary evidence. 3

Deposing the corporate party New York does not have a Corporate Designee rule like in Federal Practice or our neighboring state of New Jersey. As a result, we are often times presented with a witness who is an officer of the corporation with little or no knowledge of the facts and circumstances surrounding the litigation. Under these circumstances, an attorney needs to seek a second deposition of a person with knowledge. Deposing the non-party witness [I]n order to depose a nonparty witness, relevancy is not the only showing needed; the additional requirements of paragraph 3 or 4 of CPLR 3101(a) must be met. Since only the court can ultimately determine whether they have been met, the question arises whether the deposing of a witness requires a preliminary order in which the court would make the determination, or may be allowed to proceed by mere stipulation or notice. The latter is the practice. Siegel, David D., New York Practice, Fifth Ed., West Pub., 2011, pg. 590. 4

Dos and Don ts of deposing the non- English speaking witness 1. When the party being deposed does not speak English, the noticing party must provide and pay for a translation of the questions and answers pursuant to CPLR 3114. 2. The trial court may shift the burden of paying an interpreter's cost from the examining party to the party examined, even though the statute provides that if the witness does not understand English, the examining party must provide the translation. 3. Where the court settles questions, it may settle them in the foreign language and in English, and it may use the services of one or more experts, whose compensation is required to be paid by the party seeking the examination, who may tax them as a disbursement. 4. A party's failure to object to the deposition proceeding in the absence of an interpreter operates as a waiver of his or her claim that he or she did not understand the questions he or she was asked. When to call the deposition off An important consideration is always consider the implication of calling off a deposition as you may risk the possibility of waiving your right to depose that party. 5

What you need to make a good record 1. When can a deposition be read in at trial? A deposition may be used for any purpose by an adverse party If the party against whom it will be used was properly noticed 2. Why is a good record so important? Wojas v. Fifth Avenue Coach Corp 23 A.D.2d 685, 257 N.Y.S.2d 404: Defendant Williams was unable to testify at trial due to medically determined illness. His attorney was able to read his testimony at the time of trial pursuant to CPLR 3117. The art of boxing in your witness 1. The Funnel Approach 2. Reductio Ad Absurdum 6

Getting a ruling on preserved objections at the time of trial White v. Martins, 100 A.D.2d 805, 806, 474 N.Y.S.2d 733, 735 (1st Dep't 1984) Objectant is entitled to rulings based upon the particular questions asked and the objections thereto; these rulings may be either on the merits of the objections, or on consideration of the particular questions and objections, that the defendant answer the questions reserving the objections for the trial court on the ground that there will be no substantial prejudice in answering the questions subject to such objections. When you can re-depose a witness 1. An allegation of new or further injuries or damages should afford an attorney the opportunity to re-depose a witness. 2. If an attorney feels that he or she is entitled to a further deposition, they may make a motion to compel disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3124 seeking that further deposition 7

Amendment to CPCR 3113 (c) Non- party deponent s counsel may participate in the deposition and make objections on behalf of his or her client in the same manner as counsel for a party Excerpts from actual court cases Lawyer: Did you blow your horn or anything? Witness: After the accident? Lawyer: Before the accident. Witness: Sure, I played for ten years. I even went to school for it. Lawyer: Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people? Witness: All my autopsies are performed on dead people. Lawyer: Do you recall the time that you examined the body? Witness: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m. Lawyer: And Mr. Johnson was dead at the time? Witness: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy. 8

Lawyer: You say the stairs went down to the basement? Witness: Yes. Lawyer: And these stairs, did they go up also? Lawyer: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning? Lawyer: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in the voodoo or occult? Witness: We both do. Lawyer: Voodoo? Witness: Yes we do. Lawyer: You do? Witness: Yes, voodoo. Lawyer: Sir why didn t you tell the Police how the incident occurred? Witness: Street Policy Lawyer: What do you believe street policy requires regarding an incident like this? Witness: Street Policy. Snitches get stitches where we from. People die for less than this. 9