UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Court File No Defendant. /

Similar documents
Case 1:15-cv PLM-PJG Doc #1 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Treaty of July 31, Stat., 621. Proclaimed Sept. 10, Ratified, April 15, 1856.

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Case 1:05-cv TLL -CEB Document 274 Filed 11/10/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

CASE 0:17-cv SRN-LIB Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:15-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 66 filed 05/20/16 PageID.685 Page 1 of 27

Case 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 150 Filed 01/30/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:05-cv JZ Document 12-1 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 11

American Legal History Russell

Case 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 154 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:13-cv GJQ ECF No. 58 filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID.1293 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

3D Michigan Treaties in Action Lesson Plan. Materials needed

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE, MYTON,

Case 6:11-cv CJS Document 76 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv DB Document 13 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 8

No In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Enacting and Enforcing Tribal Law to Protect and Restore Natural Resources Part 1: Tribal Law and How it Works RICHARD A. DU BEY

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS

Case 5:15-cv RDR-KGS Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS

1836 Treaty Time Line re: Reserved Usufruct Rights

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff

Funds Provided to American Indians/Alaska Natives that are Excluded by Law

Case 1:15-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 335 filed 04/25/18 PageID.3645 Page 1 of 32

H. R. 356 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. MAY 16, 2013 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources AN ACT


By John Petoskey, General Counsel Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians. Great Lakes Tribal Economic Development Symposium

Carpenter v. Murphy. KU Tribal Law & Government Conference: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Future of Federal Indian Law

Case 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

TIGER V. WESTERN INV. CO. 221 U.S. 286 (1911)

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit F.3d 960. Argued: March 10, 2004 Decided and Filed: May 24, 2004

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Case 1:11-cv RWR Document 58 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff,

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

Public Law as Amended by the Tribal Law and Order Act July 29, 2010

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Case 2:17-cv DN Document 47 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv JTN-ESC ECF No. 45 filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 30 PageID.417

UNITED STATES V. FORTY-THREE GALLONS OF WHISKY. [19 Int. Rev. Rec. 158.] District Court, D. Minnesota. May,

GRAND TRAVERSE BAND CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPELLANT S BRIEF

Case 4:15-cv JED-FHM Document 2 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/17/15 Page 1 of 11

RESPONSE REGARDING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND JOIN ADDITIONAL PARTIES

JAMESTOWN S KLALLAM TRIBE TRIBAL CODE TITLE 24 TRIBAL LIQUOR CONTROL

Case 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 133 Filed 11/03/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

In the Supreme Court of the United States

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA

Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians, 466 U.S. 765 (1984)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Model Public Water, Public Justice Act

Public Law Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 3:13-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Circuit Court, N. D. New York. November 12, 1890.

FOOD TRUCKS. Lauren Trible-Laucht MAMA & PCLS Annual Summer Conference June 23, 2017

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

Disposal and Taxation of Public Lands Act

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT

Case 1:17-cv ABJ Document 1 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Attorneys for Vernal City and Uintah County, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:18-at Document 1 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY DIVISION

OLSON BZDOK & HOWARD

The Implications of Permitting and Development on Indian Reservations

Florida Senate Bill No. SB 788 Ì230330_Î230330

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION. v. Case No. 16-CV-1217

Scott Bulgrin, Pueblo of Sandia

Due Diligence in Business Transactions with Tribal Governments and Enterprises

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. RIVER WATCH, non-profit

Agreement and Hold Harmless For Use of State Bar of Michigan Mailing List

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISIONS. Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes Debtor.

Interpretation. Outline. Permit & Approval Extension Act 46 of 2010 (SB 1042) Act 87 of 2012 (SB 1263) Act 54 of 2013 (HB 784)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV-876 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

Supreme Court of the Unitel~ Statee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

AN OVERVIEW OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT'S LAKE BEULAH DECISION

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. MADISON COUNTY and ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK, v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK,

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. BILLY JO LARA, Respondent.

Jamestown S Klallam Tribe

This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS. ----ooooo----

Case 5:17-cv GTS-ATB Document 17 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MOTION TO REMAND

The Indian Reorganization (W'heeler-Howard Act) June 18, 1934

US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ****************************************

Jackson Rancheria Tribal Council Ordinance No Sale, Consumption &

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Transcription:

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian tribe, UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Court File No. 15-850 RICK SNYDER, Governor of the State of Michigan Defendant. / Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1

2

The Tribe s Public Comments on the Lawsuit There s been some false information that has been released out there that has people quite concerned; but a lot of it is not true. It will not affect the cities or townships with.. their zoning or laws but our tribal citizen who live within the reservation would have to follow tribal law and regulation. Regina Gasco-Bentley, Tribal Chair, Detroit Free Press, December 25, 2016 In addition to bringing clarity to other issues, affirming the reservation boundary will cement our ability to protect our children, families, elder and ancestral remains and confirm exclusive jurisdiction over our children so that the tribe can make decisions about how our children are cared for, not the State of Michigan. Petoskey News Review, February 21, 2017. 3

The Tribe s Demand for Relief WHEREFORE, the Tribe respectfully asks this Court to enter judgment in its favor and to: I. Issue a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 and other applicable law, against the Defendant Governor of Michigan declaring that the Little Traverse Reservation as established by the Executive Order of 1855 and the 1855 Treaty of Detroit exists today, and that all lands within the Reservation are Indian country under federal law. 4

The Tribe s Demand for Relief (Continued) II. Issue a permanent injunction, pursuant to the Court s equity jurisdiction, 42 U.S.C. 1983, and other applicable law, forever barring the current and future Defendant Governor of Michigan, as well as the State s agents, servants, employees, officers and attorneys, municipalities, and anyone acting in concert with them: 1. From asserting jurisdiction over the Tribe or Tribal citizens in any way inconsistent with the Reservation s status as Indian country; and 2. From taking any actions that would interfere with the rights of the Tribe and its citizens under federal law to be otherwise free of state law and regulation within the Little Traverse Reservation. 5

Government Intervenors Counties: Emmet Charlevoix Cities: Charlevoix Harbor Springs Petoskey Townships: Bliss Center Charlevoix Cross Village Friendship Little Traverse Pleasantview Readmond Resort West Traverse 6

Non-Government Intervenors Emmet County Lakeshore Association Protection of Rights Alliance 7

1855 Treaty Extracts Article I. The United States will withdraw from sale for the benefit of said Indians as hereinafter provided; all the unsold public lands within the State of Michigan embraced in the following description to wit: The United States will give to each Ottawa and Chippewa Indian being the head of a family, 80 acres of land, and to each single person over 21 years of age, 40 acres of land, and to each family of orphan children under 21 years of age containing two or more persons, 80 acres of land, and to each single orphan child under 21 years of age, 40 acres of land to be selected and located within the several tracts of land hereinbefore described under the following rules and regulations: -- All the land embraced within the tracts hereinbefore described, that shall not have been appropriated or selected within five years, shall remain the property of the United States, and the same shall thereafter, for the further term of five years, be subject to entry in the usual manner and at the same rate per acre as other adjacent public lands are then held, by Indians only; and all lands, so purchased by Indians, shall be sold without restriction, and certificates and patents shall be issued for the same in the usual form as in ordinary cases; and all lands remaining unappropriated by or unsold to the Indians after the expiration of the last-mentioned term, may be sold or disposed of by the United States as in the case of all other public lands. 8

LTBB Constitution, Adopted February 1, 2005 "Reservation" means all lands within the boundaries of the reservations for the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians as set out in Article I, paragraphs third and fourth of the Treaty of 1855, 11 Stat. 621, plus any lands set out in Articles Second and Third of the Treaty of March 28, 1836, 7 Stat. 491, in the event that the 1836 reservation is determined to include lands which are not included within the 1855 reservation, plus any lands outside of those boundaries which are now or in the future declared to be Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians reservation by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The jurisdiction of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians shall extend to all territory set forth in Section (A) of this Article and to any and all persons or activities therein based upon the inherent sovereign authority of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and Federal law. The jurisdiction includes but is not limited to air, water, surface, subsurface, natural and cultural resources, and any interests therein. 9

Case Schedule Phase I Did 1855 Treaty establish a reservation? If so, was it later diminished or disestablished? 97 witnesses 15 experts 82 lay witnesses Early 2019 trial expected expert reports 8/15/17 rebuttal reports 11/14/2017 discovery ends 5/22/2018 motions 8/20/2018 Phase II Injunctive relief if reservation exists 10

Impacts: Exemption from Local and State Zoning Laws and Regulations Business regulation (signage, parking, local licensure) Highway signage Property taxes Law enforcement Tribally authorized gaming 11

Impacts: Tribal Authority Over Non-Indians Liquor licenses, including taxation EPA authority that is presently delegated to State (Clean Water and Clean Air Acts; i.e., standards and permitting for WWTP s, stormwater discharge for construction, etc.) Regulate conduct involving transactions with tribal members (employment, contract and tort claims, etc.) 12

Impacts: Tribal Court Jurisdiction Transactions between tribal member and nonmember: Employment medical malpractice product liability Conduct that threatens the Tribe high standard, but groundwater? 13

The Tribe s Clean Water Act Addresses discharges of pollutants into LTBB Waters from point and non-point sources damages to wetlands, [and] the disposal of sewage sludge. LTTB Waters defined as all ground water and surface waters that are in or border the Reservation. 14

15

Impacts: Real World Examples No property taxes or state criminal jurisdiction: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, 1854 Treaty No state regulation; tribe can allow gaming machines in non-indian businesses: White Earth Nation, 1867 Treaty Non-Indians subject to tribal liquor law/tax: Village of Pender Nebraska, 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision No state income tax: Stockbridge-Munsee, 1856 Treaty Product liability claim in tribal court: Cherokee Nation suit against pharma s Tribal regulation of groundwater use by farm: must challenge jurisdiction in tribal court, 7/26/2017 U.S. District Court decision in 10-year-old case (Rincon Band of Mission Indians) Suit in tribal court against non-indian police by Tribe and tribal member s estate: must challenge jurisdiction in tribal court, 7/11/2017 U.S. Court of Appeals decision (Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah and Ouray Reservation) 16

Tax Deductible Contributions to the Alliance Protection of Rights Alliance Foundation P.O. Box 28 Harbor Springs, MI 49740 17