United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS

Similar documents
ANDERSON & OLSON. Plaintiffs, Defendant. 24 I, Charles S. Paul, being duly sworn, do depose and

Robert L. Ebe Daniel M. Wall Three Embarcadero San Francisco, CA Telephone: (415)

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

Pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys,

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

RELIBIT LABS MUTUAL NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

NON-COMMERCIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AND LICENSEE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RESEARCH AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AND (SPONSOR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AUTONOMIE COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

GLOBAL-ROAM SOFTWARE LICENCE AGREEMENT 1) LICENCE

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Sample Licensing Agreement

Valhalla Adventure Game License Agreement. Last Updated: September 12, 2014

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Economic Damages in IP Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV

AUBURN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INNOVATION ADVANCEMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION. Ready To Sign non-exclusive licensing program

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

EasyVote grants you the following rights provided that you comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement:

Terms of Use for the REDCap Non-Profit End-User License Agreement

SEW EURODRIVE LTD: STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WORK FOR OTHERS AGREEMENT WITH A NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR. Strategic Partnership Project Agreement (SPP) No.

This Agreement is effective on the date of the last signature herein executing this Agreement ("Effective Date"). RECITALS

Conditions of Contract for Purchase of Goods and Services

UCSC GENOME BROWSER INTERNAL USE LICENSE

ABC-CLIO Database License Agreement

Scope of Work. In general, the Contractor should be familiar with all current conditions and circumstances which may affect the work progress.

COTTA TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC VERSION 1.03 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SOFTWARE SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

NITRO READER END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

ADVANCED ACCESS CONTENT SYSTEM ( AACS ) RESELLER AGREEMENT

Direct Phone Number: Last Name: Title: Alliance Primary Contact (if different than authorized signatory contact): First Name:

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

VISITING SCIENTIST AGREEMENT

ETHERCAT SLAVE STACK CODE LICENSE

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

BASIC FACTS ABOUT REGISTERING A TRADEMARK

U E R N T BERMUDA 1930 : 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - PRELIMINARY

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IxANVL Binary License Agreement

H. R. ll. To amend title 35, United States Code, to add procedural requirements for patent infringement suits, and for other purposes.

Independent Contractor Agreement Accountant

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. Patent and Copyright Agreement ( Agreement )

prototyped TEAM Inc. o/a MadeMill

EX EXHIBIT LICENSE AGREEMENT

LICENCE AGREEMENT. enable the Licensee to optimise utilisation of the Licensed IP in support of its commercial, business and strategic aims.

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

WEBSITE TERMS OF USE VERSION 1.0 LAST REVISED ON: JULY [25], 2014

ISSUING OFFICE: Procurement Unit UNDP-South Sudan Juba, Sudan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES

SUPPLY AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE (INFLIGHT SERVICES) SELLER IS ADVISED TO READ THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS CAREFULLY

Georgia State University Standard Purchase Order Terms & Conditions for Goods and Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO.

STREETBLAST MEDIA, LLC. PO BOX 176 FAIRDALE, KENTUCKY 40118

Annex III. General Terms and Conditions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF THE DTS TECHNOLOGY IN THE MANUFACTURE OF DVD-VIDEO PLAYERS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch

RESEARCH AGREEMENT. Rochester, through the Department in the School of, has valuable experience, and skill, and ability in.

About The Beta Participant Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION C.A. NO. 1:16-CV TCB

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

LICENSEE CORNELL UNIVERSITY

EDUCATIONAL COURSE MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

LICENSE AGREEMENT RECITALS

"Commercial Use" means distribution or otherwise making the Covered Code available to a third party.

Connectivity Services Information Document

Independent Contractor Agreement Real Estate Agent

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT


RECORD OF INVENTION. VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE Lexington, VA

CSI WORKSHOP LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR INTERNAL USE

PHILIPPINES RULES & REGULATIONS ON VOLUNTARY LICENSING October 02, 1998

Transcription:

1 PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO ROBERT P. TAYLOR 2 225 Bush Street Mailing Address P. 0. Box 7880 3 San Francisco, CA 94120 Telephone: (415 983-1000 4 NEUMAN, WILLIAMS, ANDERSON & OLSON 5 THEODORE W. ANDERSON JAMES T. WILLIAMS 6 77 West Washington Street Chicago, IL 60602 7 Telephone: (312 346-1200 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Magnavox Company and 9 Sanders Associates, Inc. 10 11 12 United States District Court for the Northern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 1 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 THE MAGNAVOX COMPANY, a Corporation, and SANDERS ASSOCIATES, INC., a Corporation, vs. Plaintiffs, ACTIVISION, INC., a Corporation, Defendant. No. C 82 50 TEH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS Plaintiffs, The Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc., hereby request that defendant produce the documents and things listed by categories bel ow for inspection and copying at 10:00 a. m. on Wednesday, March 30, 1983 at the offices of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, 225 Bush Street, San Francisco, California 94120.

1 DEFINITIONS 2 (a The term "document 11 is used herein as defined in 3 Rule 34(a (1, F.R.Civ.P., and thus includes but is not limited 4 to any letter, intra- company communication, note, memorandum, 5 report, record, minutes of meetings, patent, patent 6 application, printed publication, article, instruction, work 7 assignment, notebook, draft, worksheet, drawing, sketch, 8 photograph, chart, advertisement, catalog, brochure, news 9 release, trade publication, invoice, and any other written, 10 recorded or graphic material however produced or reproduced 11 and, in the absence of the original, a copy thereof and any copy 12 bearing markings thereon not present in the original or other 13 copy thereof. 14 (b When the word "identify" is used in connection 1 5 with documents it is understood to mean the identification of 16 documents by: 1 7 (l title; 18 19 2 0 21 22 (2 date; ( 3 name, address and position of the author(s or originator(s; ( 4 name, address and position of the recipient(s; 23 24 (5 name, address and addressee ( s, distributee ( s position of the and any other 25 26 person( s to whom copies were directed; contents; ( 6 description of the subject matter and -2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ( 7 location of the present depository or depositories of the document; (8 name and address of the present custodian( s of the document; ( 9 description of the circumstances under which the document was received or prepared; and (10 location where it was received or prepared. (c The word "defendant 11, as used herein, includes 10 the party named as a defendant in this action and responding to 11 this request, any corporation, company or entity which has been 12 or is now owned by or owns the named defendant, in whole or in 13 part, all officers, employees, counsel, agents, 14 representatives, inventors, assignors, independent 15 contractors, principals, and consultants of any such 1 6 defendant, corporation, company, or entity, together with any 17 party in privity with such defendant, corporation, company, or 18 entity, and other parties controlled by such defendant. 19 (d The phrase "the patent in suit", as used 20 herein, includes United States Patent Re., 507 and its 21 original Patent 3, 659,4. 22 (e The phrase "prior art", as used herein, 23 includes any knowledge or use by others in this country, 24 patenting or description in a printed publication in this or a 25 foreign country, public use or on sale in this country, 26 description in a patent granted on an application for patent by another other than the inventor named in the patent in suit -3-

1 filed in the United States Patent Office, invention in this 2 country by another other than the inventor named in the patent 3 in suit who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it, and 4 any patenting, publication, act, fact, or occurrence which 5 defendant contends renders the patent in suit or any claim 6 thereof, either when considered by itself or in combination 7 with any other item(s of prior art, invalid under 35 U.S.C. 8 102 andjor 103. 9 (f The term "television game product" as used 10 herein includes (1 television games, (2 any apparatus useful 11 in any one or more modes of operation as a television game, and 12 (3 television game cartridges or cassettes or other devices or 13 accessories for use in combination with such television games 14 or apparatus. 15 16 CATEGORIES OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS REQUESTED 17 1. Copies of all schematic diagrams, circuit 1 8 diagrams, wiring diagrams and descriptions of the operation of 1 9 all television game products or television game product models 20 or types made, used, or sold by defendant since August 25, 21 1972. 22 2. Copies of all instruction manuals, assembly 23 manuals and assembly instructions, alignment or service 24 manuals and alignment or service instructions, qual ity control 25 standards and quality control specifications, set-up manuals 26 and set-up instructions, installation manuals and installation instructions for all television game products or television -4-

1 game product models or types made, used, or sold by defendant 2 since August 25, 1972. 3 3. (a Copies of all schematic diagrams, circuit 4 diagrams, wiring diagrams, program listings, and descriptions 5 of the function andjor peration of all television game consoles 6 useful with any television game product or television game 7 product model or type made, used, or sold by defendant since 8 April 25, 1972. 9 (b Copies of all documents provided or otherwise 10 made available by defendant to its employees or programmers 11 which, in any way, describe the function and/ or operation of 12 any television game console, or component thereof, useful with 13 any television game product or television game product model or 14 type made, used, or sold by defendant since April 25, 1972, or 15 the manner of programming such television game product or 16 television game product model or type. 17 4. (a Copies of all program listings in any 18 language (specifically including, but not limited to, source 19 language programs for all television game products or 20 television game product models or types made, used, or sold by 21 defendant since August 25, 1972. 22 (b Copies of all documents which describe, show, 23 or explain the operation of any program, or portion thereof, 24 for all television game products or television game product 25 models or types made, used, or sold by defendant since 26 August 25, 1972. -5-

1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Copies of all player or participant instructions for all television game products or television game product models or types made, used, or sold by defendant since August 25, 1972. 6. Copies of all advertising or promotional materials including, but not limited to, brochures, pamphlets, 7 handouts, fliers, leaflets, mailers, information sheets, 8 advertisements, movies, television tapes, slides, and catalog 9 sheets relating to all television game products or television 10 game product models or types made, used, or sold by defendant 11 sinceaugust25, 1972. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7. All documents and things relating to the conception, design, andj or development of all television game products or television game product models or types made, used, or sold by defendant since August 25, 1972. 8. All documents which refer or relate to the patent in suit, the subject matter of the patent in suit, the applications for the patent in suit, the validity or enforceability of the patent in suit or any claim or claims thereof, or defendant's consideration of any of the aforementioned matters or the offer or offers to defendant of a license under the patent in suit. 9. Documents showing by type or model and month the number of television game products sold by defendant. 10. Documents showing by type or model and month the 26 dollar value of television game products sold by defendant. -6-

1 11. All documents relating or referring to any 2 consideration by defendant of the possibility of commencing 3 and the decision of defendant to manufacture or to sell any 4 television game product. 5 12. All documents relating or referring to any 6 consideration by defendant or its customers or potential 7 customers or its suppliers or potential suppliers of any 8 television game or television game product as a product or 9 potential product of defendant and concerning or referring to 10 the specifications of any such television game or television 11 game product, the features to be included within any such 12 television game or television game product, the nature of the 13 games to be played with any such television game or television 14 game product, the manner of play of any such television game or 15 television game product, or the games to be played with any 16 such television game or television game product. 17 13. All documents relating or referring to any 18 consideration by defendant or its customers or potential 19 customers or its suppliers or potential suppliers of the 20 specifications desired of a television game product, of the 21 features desired to be included within a television game 22 product, the nature of the games desirably included within a 23 television game product, the desired manner of play of a 24 television game product, or the games desired to be played with 25 a television game product. 26 14. All documents consisting, relating, or referring to market surveys or market studies concerning television game products. -7-

1 15. All documents and things which support each 2 allegation, contention, reason, ground or basis stated in 3 paragraphs 13 through 19 of defendant 1 s "Affirmative Defenses" 4 included in defendant 1 s "Answer and Counterclaims" that the 5 patent in suit and each of the claims thereof are invalid, void 6 and unenforceable including, without lirni tation, (a all i terns 7 of prior art which defendant presently relies upon in support 8 of the contention that any of claims 25, 26, 44, 45, 51, 52, 60, 9 61 and 62 of the patent in suit is invalid, v oid, or 1 0 unenforceable for any reason under 35 U.S. C. 102 or 103 and 11 (b all items of prior art defendant relied upon in making the 12 pleading of said paragraphs 13 through 19. 13 16. All documents and things which support each 14 all egation, contention, reason, ground or basis stated in 15 paragraph of defendant 1 s "Affirmative Defenses" included in 16 defendant's 11 Answer and Counterc lairns 11 that defendant has not 17 infringed the patent in suit including, without limitation, 1 8 (a all such documents and things which defendant presently 19 relies upon in support of those allegations, contentions, 20 reasons, grounds, or bases with respect to any of claims 25, 2 1 26, 44, 45, 51, 52, 60, 61 or 62 of the patent in suit and (b 22 all such documents and things defendant relied upon i n making 23 the pleading of said paragraph. 24 17. All licenses which defendant has ente red into, 25 either as licensor or licensee or otherwise, under patents, 2 6 copyrights, trade secrets, or any other form of intellectual 2 7 property, and relating to television games or television game -a-

1 products and all correspondence or other documents relating 2 to, recording or reporting communications with other parties 3 to such licenses which correspondence or communications relate 4 either to the entry into such license or any actual or proposed 5 modification or termination of such license. 6 18. A sample of each and every television game 7 product or television game product model or type defendant has 8 manufactured and/or sold since August 25, 1972. 9 19. All documents and things which refer to or 10 relate in any manner to the alleged infringement (direct, 11 contributory, and/ or induced by defendant of the patent in 12 suit, o r to the charge that defendant or the television games 13 or television game products it manufactures and/or sells 14 infringes in any manner the patent in suit. 15 20. All documents and things which constitute, 16 refer to, or relate in any manner to communications between 17 plaintiffs, or either of them, and defendant, its e mployees, 18 agents, or counsel, which relate in any manner to the patent in 19 suit, to the television games or television game products 20 manufactured and/ or sold by defendant, or to the charge of 21 infringement against defendants. 22 21. All documents and things which refer or relate 23 in any manner to the patent in suit and any relationship or 24 application of the patent in suit to the television games or 25 television game products manufactured and/or sold by 26 defendant. -9-

1 22. All documents and things which refer or relate 2 in any manner to any consideration by defendant of either the 3 patent in suit or any other patent owned by either of 4 plaintiffs and relating to television games, or to any 5 consideration by defendant of the activities of plaintiffs or 6 either of them to enforce either the patent in suit or any other 7 patent owned by either of plaintiffs and relating to television 8 games against defendant or others. 9 23. All documents and things which constitute, 10 refer or relate in any manner to any communication between 11 defendant and any other party and relating to either the patent 12 in suit or any other patent owned by either of plaintiffs and 13 relating to television games or the activities of plaintiffs or 14 either of them to enforce either the patent in suit or any other 1 5 patent owned by either of plaintiffs and relating to television 16 games against defendant or others. 17 24. All documents and things which refer or relate 18 in any manner to or evidence in any manner any loss or damage 19 to, or threatened loss or damage to, or injury to the business 20 or property of, or threatened injury to the business or 21 property of defendant as a result of any of the purported acts 22 of plaintiffs or either of them referred to in any of 23 paragraphs 13 through 23 and 37 through 40 of defendant's Third 24 Counterclaim included in defendant's "Answer and 25 Counterclaims." 26 25. All documents and things requested to be 2 7 identified in plaintiffs' "Interrogatories to Defendant" being served herewith. -10-

1 REQUEST FOR IDENTIFICATION 2 Identify any documents or things defendant refuses 3 to produce in response to this request on the grounds that the 4 document is subject to a claim of privilege or attorney work 5 product or constitutes trial preparation materials or is 6 otherwise immune from discovery, and as to each such document 7 state on what ground or grounds defendant refuses to produce 8 that document. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: February 23, 1983 PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO ROBERT P. TAYLOR By ~~--------~--~~~~~------- Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc. 225 Bush Street Mailing Address P.O. Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120 17 OF COUNSEL: 18 Theodore W. Anderson 1 9 James T. Williams NEUMAN, WILLIAMS, ANDERSON & OLSON 20 77 West Washington Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 21 22 23 24 25 26-11-