DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

Similar documents
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: CATHY EGERTON, Public Member Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DECISION AND REASONS

College of Massage Therapists of Ontario By-Law No. 8. The Register and Registrant Information

Fair Play Policy and Procedures

Social Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by. 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

CSO s Operating Protocol

Information about the Complaint Process at CPA Nova Scotia

ALABAMA REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 780 X 14 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Discipline Committee Guidelines

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO

IBADCC Ethics Disciplinary Procedures

TITLE 27 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING SERIES 12 CONTESTED CASE HEARING PROCEDURE FOR MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

The Registered Psychiatric Nurses Act

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

College of Massage Therapists of Ontario By-Law No. 8. The Register and Registrant Information

COLLEGE OF NATUROPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Professional Engineers Act Amended

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - ALLEN PHILLIP DENYS

Discipline Committee Rules

10 A BILL to amend and reenact , , , , , , , , ,

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION DISCIPLINARY AND JUDICIAL MATTERS REGULATIONS

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 29, 2011, it is hereby

MIDWIFERY. The Midwifery Act. being

Tennessee Athlete Agent Application for Registration or Renewal

Council of the Law Society of New South Wales Approval Date December 2017 Effective Date December 2017 Version 3.0 Date of this version 28 February

The Engineering Profession Amendment Act

MODEL CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GUIDELINES FOR ENFORCEMENT

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NEW ZEALAND BILL

THE KENTUCKY PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

The Registered Music Teachers Act, 2002

ALABAMA BOARD OF ATHLETIC TRAINERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 140 X 6 COMPLIANCE AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Saskatchewan Applied Science Technologists and Technicians Act

HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION/ ASSOCIATION DES PROFESSIONNELS EN RESSOURCES HUMAINES

The Canadian Information Processing Society of Saskatchewan Act

REGULATED HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT

MEDICAL STAFF FAIR HEARING PLAN

The Assessment Appraisers Act

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS FEDERATIONS (IAAF) CONSTITUTION. Effective 1 January ( 2019 Constitution )

BYLAWS THE MEDICAL STAFF SHAWANO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. VOLUME II CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND FAIR HEARING PLAN ADDENDUM

The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request

Inquiry Guidelines prescribed pursuant to section 33BD of the Central Bank Act 1942

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines

CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONSTITUTION OF FITNESS AUSTRALIA LIMITED

LeGaL Lawyer Referral Network Rules for Network Membership*

The Social Workers Act

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c.6, Sched. B;

TITLE 8 LEGISLATIVE RULE BOARD OF HEARING-AID DEALERS SERIES 2 CONTESTED CASE HEARING PROCEDURE

PARAMEDICS. The Paramedics Act. being

POLICE BOARD CITY OF CHICAGO. DISCIPLINARY CASES QUARTERLY REPORT March 31, 2015

BYLAWS CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ALBERTA. (effective September 20, 2016)

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION DISCIPLINARY AND JUDICIAL MATTERS REGULATIONS

AGROLOGISTS, The Agrologists Act. being

THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED

The Optometry Act, 1985

CHILD CARE CENTER Regulations GENERAL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS (Cont.) Article 4. ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

Rules for Disciplinary Procedures Season 2017

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE (ARTICLE 116(1)) PUBLIC SERVICE (DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS) REGULATIONS REVISED EDITION Ed.

The Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists Act

REGULATION SOMERSET HILLS BOARD OF EDUCATION. TEACHING STAFF MEMBERS R 3144/Page 1 of 8 CERTIFICATION OF TENURE CHARGES

The Medical Radiation Technologists Act, 2006

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE: NON-ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT

Rule 8200 Enforcement Proceedings Introduction Definitions PART A - GENERAL Hearings

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by Respondent and the Committee that

Discipline How does it work? February 15, 2017

Professional Discipline Procedural Handbook

Engineers Registration Bill 2018

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

HEALTH RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGERS ACT

Ethics Training Wisconsin Asphalt Pavement Association December 2, 2014

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2086

CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF TAXATION OF NIGERIA ACT

The Urban Municipal Administrators Act

ARTICLE X: STUDENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Section 2. Policy on Student Conduct. Policy 2.1: Grievance Procedures Issued: May 1, 2001

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, Statutes of Ontario 2010, C.6, Schedule B;

Amendments to IIROC Rule 20 Corporation Hearing Processes to Eliminate IIROC s Appeal Panels and Response to Public Comment RULE 20

BYLAWS OF THE COLLEGE OF DIETITIANS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA [includes amendments up to May 7, 2016] TABLE OF CONTENTS

Working with Children Amendment Act 2010

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED CHEMISTS OF NIGERIA ACT

The Justices of the Peace Act, 1988

TITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS

MARIE LOUISE COLEIRO PRECA President

HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION/ ASSOCIATION DES PROFESSIONNELS EN RESSOURCES HUMAINES

CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF NIGERIA ACT

CONSTITUTION OF Northside Community Forum Limited

PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1- PRELIMINARY

AMERICAN BOARD OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE (ABIH) ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES

STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY

California Code of Ethics and

DISCIPLINARY & COMPLAINTS POLICY

The Psychologists Act, 1997

2016 No. 41 POLICE. The Police (Conduct) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016

Transcription:

Agenda Item: 4.7.3 ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 The Discipline Committee ( the Committee ) holds hearings at which panels of up to five Committee members (three nurses and two public members) adjudicate allegations of professional misconduct and/or incompetence. These allegations are referred by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC). Panels of the Committee also preside over prehearing conferences, pre-hearing motions and requests for reinstatement from individuals whose certificates of registration have been revoked. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES A. Panel Activities 1. Completed Matters (Table 1) Disciplinary matters are resolved by way of contested hearings or through non-contested hearings. Allegations are resolved or disposed of when: They are withdrawn or dismissed; No findings of professional misconduct and/or incompetence are made by a panel; or Findings of professional misconduct and/or incompetence are made and a penalty is ordered. In 2016, 43 matters involving 43 members were resolved. Between January and December 2016, findings of professional misconduct were made in 40 matters. In one matter, a panel granted the parties request to withdraw allegations of professional misconduct against a member. In two matters, all allegations were dismissed by panels. (a) Non-contested Matters (Table 2 and Table 3) Twenty-nine matters were resolved by panels accepting agreed statements of facts and/or joint penalty submissions presented by the College and the member. This represents 69.0% of all completed matters. On average, 0.78 hearing days 1 were required per matter. (b) Contested Matters (Table 2 and Table 3) Twelve contested matters, involving a total of 20.25 hearing days, were resolved. The number of hearing days for contested matters ranged from 0.5 to 6.0 days with an average of 1.69 hearing days per matter. 1 A hearing day is approximately seven hours. Page 1 of 10

(c) Penalty Orders (Table 4) Table 4 Penalty orders were made in all of the 39 matters where findings of professional misconduct were made. Each penalty included an order of one or more of the following: 12 revocations; 20 suspensions; 23 terms, conditions and limitations; 34 reprimands; and 1 fine Terms, conditions and limitations ordered included monitoring or supervising of members practices and member education/remediation. 2. Hearing and Deliberation/Decision-Writing (Table 5) In 2016, panels completed 55.25 days of hearing, deliberation and decision-writing across 44 matters. 48.25 days were hearing days, 0.25 for one removal of information request hearing and 6.25 days were deliberation/decision-writing days. The administration of reprimands commonly occurs immediately following hearings, and the time spent on this administration is included in the calculation of hearing days. In 2016, 0.50 days were spent administering reprimands at proceedings specifically convened for that purpose. 3. Release of Decision and Reasons (Table 6) For agreement hearings, decisions may be released verbally the same day or within 24 hours after the presentation of the evidence and the parties conclude their submissions. Written decisions and reasons may take longer to prepare and release. The period between the conclusion of the hearing and the release of written decision and reasons can be impacted by the complexity of legal and evidentiary issues raised in the matter. Other factors that can impact this period are logistical issues related to the availability of panel members and/or issues related to the electronic file sharing used during the decision-writing process. Thirty-two written decision and reasons were released between January 1 and December 31, 2016. This number includes some matters that were heard in 2015. The Discipline Committee Guidelines set out that, in the absence of written approval of the Chair of the Committee, decisions and reasons of Discipline panels will be issued within 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. In 16 matters, written decisions and reasons were released within 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. In 16 matters, the 60-day guideline was exceeded. Page 2 of 10

(a) Released decisions and reasons for non-contested matters (Table 7) The decision and reasons for 13 non-contested matters (52.0%) were released within 60 days from the conclusion of the hearing. (b) Released decisions and reasons for contested matters (Table 7) The decision and reasons for four contested matters (57.0%) were released within 60 days. In the remaining three contested matters (43.0%), the decision and reasons were released 61 days or more from the last hearing date. B. Committee Activities 1. Matters in Progress (Table 8) The number of matters in progress varies in relation to: The number of matters referred; Requests for postponements of hearings and pre-hearings; Adjournments granted; and The length of time required for decision writing. On December 31, 2016, four pre-hearings and 20 hearings were scheduled for 2016. Discussions were underway for scheduling an additional six pre-hearings and three hearings. At that time, there were two hearings in progress, and decision-writing was occurring for eight matters. Three matters were adjourned in 2016 and held in abeyance, awaiting resolution in other jurisdictions. 2. Length of Time from Referral to Pre-Hearing/Hearing The Committee guidelines for matters moving through the discipline process require prehearings to be scheduled within four months and hearings to commence within nine months of referral from the ICRC. The length of time from referral to a pre-hearing and hearing is affected by several factors, including: Holding a matter in abeyance until the conclusion of related matters within the criminal justice system or other jurisdiction; Communication and logistical matters with self-represented members; and Accommodating scheduling issues of legal counsel, for one or both parties. (a) Referral to Pre-Hearing (Table 9) Of the 33 matters where pre-hearings were held in 2016, 18 matters (54.5%) had pre-hearing conferences held within four months or less from the date of referral. Page 3 of 10

(b) Referral to Commencement of Hearing (Table 10) Of the 44 hearings that commenced in 2016, 27 hearings (61.4 %) commenced in nine months or less from the date of referral from the ICRC. Nine hearings (20.4 %) began between 10 and 12 months from the referral date. Eight hearings (18.2%) commenced 13 months or more from the referral date. (c) Referral to Conclusion of Hearing (Table 11) The average number of months from the ICRC s referral to the conclusion of a hearing for matters resolved by agreement between the parties was 8.9 months, with a range of four to 24 months. The average number of months from referral to the conclusion of a hearing for contested matters was 8.4 months, with a range of seven and 14 months. C. Discipline Committee Meetings The Committee held meetings to discuss procedural and administrative items on May 10-12, 2016 and on October 5, 2016. Pre-hearing chairs and panel chairs also attended a workshop on February 11-12, 2016. A pilot decision writing workshop was held on October 31, 2016. Page 4 of 10

COMMITTEE MEMBERS June 2016 to December 2016 Michael Hogard, RPN, Chairperson Dawn Cutler, RN Renate Davidson, Public Member Samantha Diceman, RPN Spencer Dickson, RN Tanya Dion, RN David Edwards, RPN Catherine Egerton, Public Member Cheryl Evans, RN Grace Fox, NP Carly Gilchrist, RPN Tammy Hedge, RPN Terry Holland, RPN Shiraz Irani, RN Lina Kiskunas, RN Karen Laforet, RN Rob MacKay, Public Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson, Public Member Ashleigh Molloy, Public Member Winsome Plummer, RN Desiree-Ann Prillo, RPN Susan Roger, RN Donna Rothwell, RN George Rudanycz, RN Heather Stevanka, RN Margaret Tuomi, Public Member Devinder Walia, Public Member Cathy Ward, Public Member Chuck Williams, Public Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN January 2016 to June 2016 Michael Hogard, RPN, Chairperson Jim Attwood, RN Sarah Corkey, RN Renate Davidson, Public Member Samantha Diceman, RPN Spencer Dickson, RN Catherine Egerton, Public Member Cheryl Evans, RN Grace Fox, NP Tammy Hedge, RPN Zahir Hirji, RN Lindsay Hyslop, NP Shiraz Irani, RN Lina Kiskunas, RN Karen Laforet, RN Susannah McGeachy, NP Rob MacKay, Public Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson, Public Member Ashleigh Molloy, Public Member (from Sept. 2015) Winsome Plummer, RN April Plumton, RPN Susan Roger, RN Donna Rothwell, RN George Rudanycz, RN Laura Sanderson, RPN Carleen Shipley, RPN Barbara Titley, RPN Margaret Tuomi, Public Member Devinder Walia, Public Member Cathy Ward, Public Member Chuck Williams, Public Member STAFF CONTACTS Ravi Prathivathi, Manager, Finance and Administration, Corporate Services Department. Lesley Wright, Hearings Administrator, Corporate Services Department. Kurt Maben, Hearings Administrator, Corporate Services Department. Prudence Morton, Hearings Administrator, Corporate Services Department. Page 5 of 10

STATISTICAL TABLES A. Panel Activities Table 1. Completed matters Matters with: Findings 39 86.7 23 92.0 26 86.6 13 76.5 40 93.0 All allegations withdrawn 6 13.3 1 4.0 2 6.7 1 5.9 1 2.3 All allegations dismissed 0 0.0 1 4.0 2 6.7 3 17.6 2 4.7 Total 45 100 25 100 30 100 17 100 43 100 Table 2. Types of completed matters 1 Completed cases Non-contested matters 24 53.4 15 60.0 19 63.3 8 47.1 29 69.0 Contested matters 15 33.3 9 36.0 9 30.0 8 47.1 12 28.6 All allegations withdrawn 6 13.3 1 4.0 2 6.7 1 5.8 1 2.4 Total 45 100 25 100 30 100 17 100 42 100 1 For one matter, a panel of the Discipline Committee made findings on the liability portion of the allegations however the penalty hearing will be scheduled in 2017. Page 6 of 10

Table 3. Hearing days 2 for 2016 Completed matters Matters Total days Min. Max. Average days/case days/case days/case Non-contested matters 29 22.75 0.50 3.0 0.78 Contested matters 12 20.25 0.50 6.0 1.69 All allegations withdrawn matters 1 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Total 42.0 43.25 - - - Table 4. Penalty orders Penalty Types Reprimand 35 34.7 17 30.4 24 34.8 11 38.0 34 37.8 Suspension 29 28.7 16 28.6 19 27.5 8 27.6 20 22.2 Terms, conditions, limitations 31 30.7 18 32.1 19 27.5 9 31.0 23 25.6 Revocation 6.0 5.9 5 8.9 7 10.2 1 3.4 12 13.3 Fine 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 Total 101 100 56 100 69 100 29 100 90 100 # of matters with penalty orders 41 23 26 13 39 2 A hearing day is approximately seven hours, measured in 0.25 day increments. Page 7 of 10

Table 5. Hearing and deliberation/decision-writing days DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE Activity days Hearings 34.5 56.1 56.3 83.3 39.3 72.0 20.3 63.2 48.25 87.3 Hearing - Removal of Information Request Reinstatement hearings Deliberation/decisionwriting Administering Reprimands 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.25 3 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 3.1 0 0.0 25.5 41.5 10.8 16.0 14.5 26.5 9.5 29.7 6.25 11.3 1.5 2.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.5 1.3 4.0 0.50 4 0.9 Total 61.5 100 67.6 100 54.6 100 32.0 100 55.25 100 # of matters 47 30 33 18 44 Table 6. Time from conclusion of hearing to release of decision and reasons Time 60 days or fewer 25 71.4 21 58.3 18 62.1 11 64.7 16 50.0 61 days or more 10 28.6 15 41.7 11 37.9 6 35.3 16 50.0 Total 35 100 36 100 29 100 17 100 32 100 Table 7. Time from conclusion of hearing to release of decision and reasons in matters with agreements and contested matters Time Matters with agreements Contested matters # % # % 60 days or fewer 13 52.0 4 57.1 61 days or more 12 48.0 3 42.9 Total 25 100 7 100 3 A panel of the Discipline Committee heard a removal of information request. This matter was not referred from the ICRC. 4 In addition to the reprimands issued immediately following hearings, two reprimands were issued for older penalty orders. Page 8 of 10

B. Committee Activities Table 8. Matters in progress on December 31, 2016 Matter Status Pre-hearing to be set 10 27.8 11 31.4 9 29.0 9 25.7 6 13.0 Pre-hearing scheduled 5 13.9 5 14.3 5 16.1 3 8.6 4 8.7 Hearing to be set 0 0.0 3 8.6 1 3.2 2 5.7 3 6.5 Hearing scheduled 9 25.0 10 28.6 9 29.0 13 37.1 20 43.5 Hearing in progress 0 0.0 4 11.4 1 3.2 2 5.7 2 4.3 Deliberation 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Decision-writing 11 30.6 1 2.9 4 12.9 2 5.7 8 17.4 Hold 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Adjournment 1 2.7 1 2.8 2 6.6 4 11.4 3 6.5 Total 36 100 35 100 31 100 35 100 46 100 Table 9. Time from referral to pre-hearing 5 Time 2015 2016 # % # % 4 months or less 4 20.0 18 54.5 5-9 months 13 65.0 13 39.4 10-12 months 3 15.0 0 0.0 13 months or more 0 0.0 2 6.1 Total 20 100 33 100 5 One reinstatement pre-hearing conference was held which was not referred by the ICRC. Page 9 of 10

Table 10. Time from referral to commencement of hearing 6 Time 9 months or less 31 68.9 21 70.0 13 44.8 5 29.4 27 61.4 10-12 months 3 6.7 4 13.3 13 44.8 6 35.3 9 20.4 13 months or more 11 24.4 5 16.7 3 10.4 6 35.3 8 18.2 Total 45 100 30 100 29 100 17 100 44 100 Table 11. Time from referral to conclusion of hearing Minimum months/case Maximum months/case Average months/case Matters with agreements 4 24 7 8.9 Contested matters 7 14 8.4 6 Two separate matters for two members which were adjourned previously were merged with new referrals from the ICRC. 7 There was one agreement hearing outlier. The matter was very complicated and took some time to schedule. Page 10 of 10