Interested Parties From: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. To: November 9, 2011

Similar documents
Kansas: Sam Brownback s Focus on Restricting Reproductive Health Care Access Can Cost Him in The Race for Governor

Obama Builds Real Lead in Presidential Contest

The real mandate and looking forward after this election. November 15, 2012

The Urgent Policy Agenda for Unmarried Women Unmarried women focused on critical economic issues

Obama and Democrats have clear advantage in 2012 election. July 30, 2012

Breakthrough Economic Message Results of major web survey on the economy. July 18, 2011

Women s Economic Agenda Powerful impact on vote and turnout in Democracy Corps/WVWVAF & VPC National Survey April 8, 2014

Voters Push Back Against Big Money Politics. November 13, 2012

How unmarried women, youth and people of color defined this election. November 8, 2012

A Pivotal Political Moment on Health Care. July 31, 2012

Voters Show Senators a Way Out of a Bad Vote Findings from surveys in Alaska, Arizona, New Hampshire, Nevada, and North Dakota

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

Broad Support for Protecting Victims by Keeping Guns Out of the Hands of Domestic Abusers Support holds despite opposition arguments

The Budget Battle and AIG

The Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions

Democracy Corps June Survey: Grim Stability Will Require Race-by-Race Fight

Politics: big yellow flag

More out of touch and more vulnerable: The Republican House Battleground. December 9, 2011

The 2014 Election and Looking Ahead National Survey of 2016 Likely Voters November 7, 2014

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

Healthcare and the 2012 Election. October 17 th, 2012

Latino Decisions / America's Voice June State Latino Battleground Survey

A Winning Middle Class Reform Government & Politics Message. December 16, 2015

It s the Democrats Turn National Voter Survey of Likely 2016 Voters. January 16, 2015

Creating a Mandate to Rewrite the Rules of the Economy July 2016

National Public Radio The Final Weeks of the Campaign

Obama, Democrats Well Positioned For Budget Debate

The Path to 270 Revisited

MEMORANDUM. Independent Voter Preferences

Consolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority

Inside Trump s GOP: Not what you think July National Phone Survey & Factor Analysis from April Battleground Phone Survey.

Public anger about corporate power dominant factor in views on trade & TPP. July 2016

FINAL RESULTS: National Voter Survey Total Sample Size: 2428, Margin of Error: ±2.0% Interview Dates: November 1-4, 2018

How Women Changed the Outcome of the Election

Landslide election Potential for Democratic Gains. October 2016

ANOTHER CONGRESSIONAL WAVE ELECTION?

Framing the 2010 election

The perception of corporate bias is underscored by broad disagreement with many recent Supreme Court decisions, the Citizens United case among them.

America s Voice/LD 2016 National and Battleground State Poll (Field Dates August 19-30)

Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps

The Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground

YG Network Congressional District Poll: December Topline Results

NPR/Democracy Corps/Resurgent Republic Frequency Questionnaire

Campaign Shifts the Trade Debate. October 2016

LAUTENBERG SUBSTITUTION REVIVES DEMOCRATS CHANCES EVEN WHILE ENERGIZING REPUBLICANS

Winning with a middle class reform politics and government message Report on a new national survey

America s Voice/Latino Decisions Congressional Battleground Poll - July 2013 Released July 24, 2013

THE WORKMEN S CIRCLE SURVEY OF AMERICAN JEWS. Jews, Economic Justice & the Vote in Steven M. Cohen and Samuel Abrams

THE TARRANCE GROUP. BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties. From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber. Date: November 7, 2006

Democracy Corps National/Presidential Battleground Frequency Questionnaire

Independent Women s Voice

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

Charlie Cook s Tour of American Politics

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

Economic Agenda for Working Women and Men

FAU Poll: Hispanics backing Clinton in Key Battleground States of Ohio, Colorado Nevada, North Carolina and Florida.

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps. Mark Feierstein and Al Quinlan, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

The Path to 270 In 2016, Revisited

Catholic voters presidential preference, issue priorities, and opinion of certain church policies

Greenberg Quinlan Rosner/Democracy Corps

Will Democrats be brave enough to get to bluest wave?

National Public Radio The Campaign on the Eve of the Conventions

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION CONTESTS May 18-23, 2007

The number of Americans identifying as Independents has

The President, Congress and Deficit Battles April 15-20, 2011

2012 Weekly Political Tracking Poll August 27-November 5, 2012

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

The Evolving Landscape of Crime and Incarceration

Update on OFA Grassroots Organizing: Voter Registration and Early Voting

Survey on EPA Carbon Regulations in 9 Key 2014 Senate Battleground States

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

Friends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future. It s Jobs, Stupid

The Role of the Rising American Electorate in the 2012 Election

NATIONAL VOTER SURVEY. November 30 December 3, 2017 N = 1,200 respondents (1/3 Landline, 1/3 Cell, 1/3 Internet) margin of error: +/- 2.

Grim Views of the Economy, the President and Congress September 10-15, 2011

CONSOLIDATING THE HISPANIC VOTE

WEEKLY LATINO TRACKING POLL 2018: WAVE 1 9/05/18

National Public Radio: Presidential Battleground Frequency Questionnaire

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

Before the Storm: The Presidential Race October 25-28, 2012

STATISTICAL GRAPHICS FOR VISUALIZING DATA

R E P ORT TO «LATE MAY EARLY JUNE 2009 SWING DISTRICT SURVEY OF LIKELY VOTERS» Pete Brodnitz BSG June 9, 2009

Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008

Ritter at risk in 2010

Democracy Corps National/Presidential Battleground Frequency Questionnaire

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

These are the highlights of the latest Field Poll completed among a random sample of 997 California registered voters.

U.S. Abortion Attitudes Closely Divided

America s Voice/LD 2016 National and Battleground State Poll (Field Dates August 19-30)

Asian American Survey

Not so fast 2014 Congressional Battleground very competitive

Trump, Populism and the Economy

The POLITICO GW Battleground Poll September 2010

Post-mortem survey: the historic 2010 election

American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, November

February 23, 2012 Anzalone Liszt Research National Polling Summary

Catholic Voters and Religious Exemption Policies

LATINO VOTERS IN COMPETITIVE GOP HOUSE DISTRICTS

National Security and the 2008 Election

Transcription:

November 9, 2011 Choice Can Help President Obama Win Back Women Defectors Key Findings From a Survey of Women in Battleground States Who Voted for President Obama in 2008 But Are Not Supporting Him or Are Not Certain to Support Him Now To: Interested Parties From: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research There is a group of women voters who supported the President Obama in 2008 but are not currently voting for him bringing them back into the fold can be an important element of his reelection. By injecting the choice issue into the debate among these women defectors 1, NARAL Pro-Choice America is uniquely suited to help accomplish this goal. A recent survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner on behalf of NARAL Pro-Choice America 2 shows that choice provides an opening for President Obama and other Democrats to create a sharp contrast with anti-choice Republicans and demonstrate a clear sense of advocacy that works to bring many of these women defectors home: 1. Being anti-choice is a deal breaker for a big bloc of women defectors. Right off the bat, 40 percent of these women defectors report that I would never vote for anyone running for president who opposes a woman's right to have a legal abortion, no matter how much I agree with them on other issues. 2. Women defectors trust Obama more on choice than on economic issues. Women defectors say Obama will do a better job than Republicans on protecting a woman s right to have a legal abortion by a wider margin (49 percentage points) than they do on the economy and jobs (30 points) or on government spending (5 points). I think he s willing to help women more than Republicans and it s a woman s right to choose. 4 Just based on the issue of abortion. I don t agree with anything else he s done. 1 In this survey, women defectors are defined as having voted for President Obama in 2008 but are at least one of a) currently not voting for him, b) weakly supporting him, or c) holding back from turning out in 2012. 2 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner conducted a survey among 600 women defectors from Sept. 6-18, 2011. Interviews were conducted in CO, FL, IA, MI, MN, MO, NC, NH, NM, NV, OH, PA, VA, and WI, with the sample proportional to the expected composition of the 2012 electorate within those 14 states. The sample is subject to a margin of error of +/-4.0 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence interval; margin of error is higher among subgroups. WORLD HEADQUARTERS 10 G Street, NE, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20002 EUROPEAN HEADQUARTERS 405 Carrington House 6 Hertford Street London UK W1J 7SU LATIN AMERICAN HEADQUARTERS Cabrera 6060, 7 D C1414 BHN Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina www.gqrr.com www.greenbergresearch.com

2 3. Choice adds real value to the broader campaign by increasing the number of pro-choice defectors Obama can win. NARAL Pro-Choice America understands that abortion will not be the defining issue of the 2012 presidential election. Choice can, however, help the president win an even greater percentage of the pro-choice true defector women voters 59 percent of all defectors who are not currently voting for him 3. In order to better simulate an election in which the economy will be the dominant issue, we conducted an experiment where the full sample heard each candidate s economic positioning, while only half the sample heard their abortion positioning in addition to the economic message (see Appendix A). After a revote, we then introduced largely negative information strictly on choice about the Republican candidate. The following chart highlights two key points: Among the pro-choice true defectors that heard only short, balanced economic messages from each candidate, Obama goes from winning 0 percent of their vote to winning 36 percent of them. Among the pro-choice true defectors that heard short balanced economic and abortion positioning from each candidate, Obama does even better, winning 43 percent of their vote. Introducing an anti-choice critique of the Republican candidate earns Obama another 10 percent of the true pro-choice women defectors vote. Among the pro-choice true defectors who heard the choice message at all stages, Obama goes from winning none of them to winning 53 percent of them. ½ Sample: Heard Initial Choice Positioning 0 +43 43 +10 ½ Sample: Did NOT Hear Initial Choice Positioning +36 +10 36 0 Initial Vote % After Split Exercise After Anti-Choice Critique If the election for president were held today and the candidates were - Democrat Barack Obama and the Republican candidate, for whom would you vote - Democrat Barack Obama or the Republican candidate? 53 46 An anti choice critique earns Obama another 10%. Percentage of Pro- Choice True Defector Women Supporting Obama 3 True defectors are defined as women in the battleground states who voted for President Obama in 2008 but are not voting for him now they are either supporting the Republican candidate, another candidate, are undecided, or refused to answer the question. True defectors account for 50 percent of the total defector sample. 4 Verbatim responses to the question Please tell me in your own words the best reason to support Barack Obama over the Republican candidate for president. (Post-messaging)

3 The Women Defectors Two key characteristics of the women defectors align with the fact that they voted for him once before a majority call themselves Democrats and they are largely pro-choice. 10 Democratic 28 33 53 66 Independent Republican Abortion Should be Legal in All or Most Cases Abortion Should be Illegal in All or Most Cases In addition, the women defectors in these states tend to be somewhat older (65 percent are over age 50; 34 percent are seniors), white (84 percent), and non-college educated (54 percent vs. 40 percent college graduates). In addition to identifying heavily as pro-choice, the following chart shows that this is a group of women that is looking for President Obama to seize the opportunity choice provides by standing up and fighting hard to protect abortion rights, even at the expense of economic gains. 80% 60% Fight Strongly Fight Somewhat 56% Consensus Strongly Consensus Somewhat 40% 20% 0% 31% Even if it sometimes makes it harder to build consensus and...get the economy going, I want Barack Obama to fight to protect a woman s right to have a legal abortion by standing firm against attacks from elected officials who oppose abortion rights. 25% 7% In order to help reduce the deficit and get the economy going, I want Barack Obama to build consensus with elected officials who oppose abortion rights, even if that means compromising on protecting a woman s right to have a legal abortion.

4 The Anti-Choice Critique The top negatives on an anti-choice candidate feature two key elements: 1) a clear linkage to a woman s health and wellbeing, and 2) a directness on abortion that embraces the issue. The following table shows the top tier messages among these defectors: The Republican candidate thinks it's okay for hospitals to refuse emergency abortion care to women who would otherwise die without it. The Republican candidate supported a bill redefining rape to be limited to "forcible rape," which would make it harder for many rape survivors to get the medical care they need. The Republican candidate wants to cut off funding for clinics that provide more than 5 million American women with breast cancer screenings, access to birth control, and H-I-V / AIDS and S-T-I testing. Very Serious Doubts Total Serious Doubts 50 81 48 82 48 77 The Republican candidate wants to outlaw abortion in almost all cases, even in cases of rape, incest or when a woman's health is in danger. 46 79 Now let me read you another series of statements that could be used to describe the Republican candidate for president. For each statement, please tell me whether this description raises very serious doubts, serious doubts, minor doubts or no real doubts in your own mind about the Republican candidate for president. Pro-choice groups like NARAL Pro-Choice America are in a solid position to deliver this message. Among the defectors, pro-choice, abortion rights groups receive a 44 28 net positive favorable-unfavorable rating, while pro-life, anti-abortion groups fare much more poorly, 22 51 percent favorable-unfavorable. The Bottom Line There is a group of women who voted for President Obama in 2008 but are not currently supporting him, and this data suggests many of them should be in his camp. Choice provides an opening for President Obama and other Democrats to create a sharp contrast with antichoice Republicans and demonstrate a clear sense of advocacy. As the political leader of the pro-choice movement, NARAL Pro-Choice America is uniquely positioned to drive this contrast and prove to the women defectors that Obama is on their side and will fight for them, while the anti-choice candidate is misaligned with their values. While this campaign will be about the economy, NARAL Pro-Choice America s plan can add value to the president s effort by effectively expanding the number of women defectors Obama can win back.

5 Appendix A: Abortion and Economic Positioning Statements Abortion Positioning Barack Obama believes that there are many reasons a woman may consider abortion and that this profoundly difficult decision is personal, between a woman, her family, her God, and her doctor, without interference by the government. As president, Obama has signed laws to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and he has taken strong action to protect a woman's right to have a legal abortion. But the Republican candidate takes a different position, and wants to outlaw abortion in almost all cases, even in cases of rape, incest or when a woman's health is in danger. The Republican candidate believes abortion is ending a life, plain and simple, and that every life is equal, has potential and deserves respect. The Republican candidate strongly supports taking action to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies in the first place, and is pushing for alternatives to abortion, such as adoption. The Republican candidate says abortion is an issue that each state should decide for itself. But President Obama wants to spend taxpayer dollars on abortion, which the Republican will strongly oppose as president. Economic Positioning Barack Obama says that to get the economy going, we must start by cutting waste. The best way to reduce the deficit is to grow the economy and create jobs, and we need to encourage people to spend money by spurring growth. We need to get our priorities right -- instead of giving tax breaks to big oil companies and multi-millionaires, we need to cut taxes for the middle class, fight against cuts to Social Security and Medicare, and invest in education for long term growth. And we need to provide small businesses with incentives that help them create jobs now. The Republican candidate says that to get the economy going, we need to cut government spending, get the deficit under control, and reduce taxes on people and businesses. That will lift a weight on the economy, make us more globally competitive, raise consumer confidence and give large and small businesses the confidence to create new jobs. The problem isn't that government taxes too little, but that it spends too much, and the way to a strong economy is less wasteful spending, less debt, and fewer job-killing taxes.