Case 2:08-md GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
Case 2:08-md GP Document 1159 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:08-md GP Document 1144 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:08-md GEKP Document 1537 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 2

Case: 1:10-md JZ Doc #: 323 Filed: 01/23/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 5190 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:12-md SLR Document 173 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 3530

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv PD Document 296 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA O R D E R

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1292 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 5:08-cv PD Document 185 Filed 02/07/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 86 Filed: 07/13/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 840 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 824 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv DLC-MHD Document 540 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 125 Filed 07/02/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1876

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, for which the Court granted final approval on June 21, 2013.

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 107 Filed 11/12/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1470

Case 1:10-cv BMC Document 286 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 7346 : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC., USG CORPORATION AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 351 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 14

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 91 Filed 05/16/14 Pg 1 of 22 Pg ID 1109

Case 3:14-md WHO Document 1054 Filed 09/20/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:10-cv CW Document75 Filed03/08/12 Page1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION, AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv PD Document Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 105 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 915

THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

Case 5:14-cv EGS Document 75 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 320 Filed 10/21/16 Pg 1 of 25 Pg ID 5946

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

The Civil Practice & Procedure Committee s Young Lawyers Advisory Panel: Perspectives in Antitrust

Case 2:18-cv GEKP Document 52 Filed 03/22/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv PD Document 120 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA O R D E R

Case 8:16-cv CEH-TGW Document 208 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID 14949

Case 3:07-cv JST Document 5040 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv MAS-TJB Document 402 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 5808 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:19-cv-582-T-36AEP ORDER

Case 9:12-cv JIC Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2014 Page 1 of 13 ` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 106 Filed 10/22/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1242

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court for the Central District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER

Case 1:14-cv CMA-KMT Document 1191 Filed 01/23/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 2:12-cv JD Document 50 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 372 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 5

Case: 2:10 cv EAS TPK Doc #: 28 Filed: 10/10/11 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 162

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:14-cv JD Document 2229 Filed 11/09/18 Page 1 of 23

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

DEFENDANT TIME WARNER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:14-cv JD Document Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2260 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 8:14-cv JSM-CPT Document 313 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 5935

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

FIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 2:09-md AB Document 268 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM

Case 2:16-cv JAD-VCF Document 29 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ORDER

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Kinross Gold Corporation et al v. Wollant et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I.

Case CAC/2:12-cv Document 11 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:16-cv JG Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2017 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 85 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2104 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 50

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv ER Document 81 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:06-md JG-VVP Document 2370 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:

Transcription:

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: PROCESSED EGG PRODUCTS : MULTIDISTRICT ANTITRUST LITIGATION : LITIGATION : : : THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO : No. 08-md-2002 ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS : ORDER (1) GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS AND MICHAEL FOODS, INC.; (2) GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION(S) FOR FEES AND EXPENSES; and (3) APPROVING DISSEMINATION OF THE COMBINED CLASS NOTICE OF: (A) CERTIFICATION OF THE SHELL EGG LITIGATION CLASS; (B) THE PRELIMINARILY APPROVED MICHAEL FOODS, INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; AND (C) THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH UNITED STATES EGG MARKETERS, UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, HILLANDALE FARMS OF PA., INC., HILLANDALE-GETTYSBURG, L.P., MIDWEST POULTRY SERVICES, L.P., NATIONAL FOOD CORPORATION, AND NUCAL FOODS, INC. AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and Defendant Michael Foods, Inc. and Leave to File Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses from the Michael Foods, Inc. Settlement Fund (Doc. No. 1481) and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of a Combined Notice Plan for: (A) Certification of the Shell Egg Litigation Class; (B) The Proposed Michael Foods, Inc. Settlement Agreement; and (C) The Claims Process for Settlement Agreements with United States Egg Marketers, United Egg Producers, Hillandale Farms of Pa., Inc., Hillandale- 1

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 9 Gettysburg, L.P., Midwest Poultry Services, L.P., National Food Corporation, and Nucal Foods, Inc. (Doc. No. 1499), the Court HEREBY ORDERS and DECREES that: 1. Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and Defendant Michael Foods, Inc. and for Leave to File Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses from the Michael Foods, Inc. Settlement Fund (Doc. No. 1481) is hereby GRANTED. 2. The background of this consolidated multidistrict litigation has been extensively recounted elsewhere. Defendants, some of the nation s largest egg producers, including Michael Foods, Inc., allegedly conspired to reduce egg output and thus fix, raise, maintain, and/or stabilize the prices of eggs and egg products in the United States. Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs allegedly paid higher prices as a result of this conspiracy, and they now seek treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneys fees, and costs. Earlier in this litigation, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs reached settlements with the Moark Defendants, Sparboe Farms, Inc., Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., National Food Corporation, Midwest Poultry Services, L.P., United Egg Producers, United States Egg Marketers, NuCal Foods, Inc., Hillandale Farms of Pa., Inc., and Hillandale- Gettysburg, L.P.. See generally, e.g., In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig., 284 F.R.D. 249 (E.D. Pa. 2012) (Moark); In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig., 284 F.R.D. 278 (E.D. Pa. 2012) (Sparboe); In re Processed Egg Prod. Antitrust Litig., 302 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 2014) (Cal-Maine); In re: Processed Egg Prod. Antitrust Litig., No. 08-MD-2002, 2016 WL 3584632, at *1 (E.D. Pa. June 30, 2016) (National Food, Midwest, UEP, USEM, NuCal, Hillandale Farms, and Hillandale-Gettysburg). 2

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 3 of 9 3. After several months of arm s-length negotiations between experienced counsel, mature fact discovery of over one million documents, and dozens of depositions, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and Michael Foods, Inc. have reached a Settlement Agreement ( Michael Foods Settlement Agreement, Doc No. 1481-2, Ex. A) for which they now seek the Court s preliminary approval. follows: 4. The Michael Foods Settlement Agreement defines the Settlement Class as All individuals and entities that purchased shell eggs from caged birds in the United States directly from Defendants during the Class Period from September 24, 2004 through December 31, 2008. Excluded from the Class are the Defendants, their co-conspirators, and their respective parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as any government entities. Also excluded from the Class are purchasers of specialty shell eggs (such as organic, certified organic, free range, cage free, nutritionally enhanced, or vegetarian fed ) and purchasers of hatching eggs, which are used by poultry breeders to produce breeder stock or growing stock for laying hens or meat. 5. The Michael Foods Settlement Agreement establishes $75 million as the Settlement Amount. Class members will receive pro-rata distributions from the Settlement Amount based on each Class member s purchases of shell eggs. Any award of attorneys fees and litigation expenses will be paid from the Settlement Amount, subject to proper motion to, and approval by, the Court. 6. The Michael Foods Settlement Agreement also requires Michael Foods to cooperate with Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs prosecution of the case by authenticating documents. Further, should a trial occur in this Action, Michael Foods must comply with subpoenas to produce up to four witnesses at trial. 3

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 4 of 9 7. In exchange for the Settlement Amount, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs release Michael Foods from any and all claims they raised or could have raised regarding (i) an agreement or understanding among Defendant Producers; (ii) the reduction or restraint of supply and the reduction or restriction on production capacity; or (iii) the pricing, selling, discounting, marketing, or distributing of Shell Eggs in the United States or elsewhere up to December 31, 2008. 8. The preliminary approval determination requires the Court to consider whether (1) the negotiations occurred at arm s length; (2) there was sufficient discovery; (3) the proponents of the settlement are experienced in similar litigation; and (4) only a small fraction of the class objected. In re Linerboard Antitrust Litig., 292 F. Supp. 2d 631, 638 (E.D. Pa. 2003) (citing In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Prods. Liab. Litig., 55 F.3d 768, 785-86 (3d Cir. 1995)); see also In re Cendant Corp. Litig., 264 F.3d 201, 233 n.18 (3d Cir. 2001). If, after consideration of those factors, a court concludes that the settlement should be preliminarily approved, an initial presumption of fairness is established. In re Linerboard, 292 F. Supp. 2d at 638 (citing In re Gen. Motors Corp., 55 F.3d at 785). Here, based on these factors, the Court concludes that the Proposed Michael Foods Settlement Agreement falls within the range of reasonableness for settlement of claims such as these, including the context of other settlements heretofore reached with this litigation and as to which these Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Classes can, will, and may participate. 9. The Court previously certified a Shell Egg litigation class, finding it fully complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. See Feb. 3, 2016 Order (Doc. No. 1372). The class defined in the proposed Michael Foods Settlement Agreement is identical to the litigation class approved by the Court. Therefore, the Court need not make 4

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 5 of 9 additional Rule 23 findings regarding the class defined in the Michael Foods Settlement Agreement. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litig., 135 F. Supp. 3d 679, 684 (N.D. Ohio 2015) (concluding that the settlement classes satisfied Rule 23 because they were nearly identical to a previously-certified litigation class). 10. Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs request for leave to file a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Litigation Expenses is hereby GRANTED. The Motion for Attorneys Fees and Litigation Expenses for the Michael Foods Settlement must be filed by September 8, 2017. Co- Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Class shall include in the text of the Direct Mail Notice and Publication Notice of the Settlement Agreement the deadline by which Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs must file their motion for an award of attorneys fees and litigation expenses and a statement that Class Members may review the motion at the www.eggproductssettlement.com website prior to the objection and opt-out deadlines set forth below, and may object to the motion. 11. Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of Combined Notice Plan for (A) Certification of the Shell Egg Litigation Class; (B) the Proposed Michael Foods, Inc. Settlement Agreement; and (C) the Claims Process for Settlement Agreements between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and United States Egg Marketers, United Egg Producers, Hillandale Farms of Pa., Inc. and Hillandale-Gettysburg, L.P., Midwest Poultry Services L.P., National Food Corporation, and NuCal Foods, Inc. (Doc. No. 1499) is hereby GRANTED and APPROVED. The Notice Plan proposed by Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs includes Direct Mail Notice, Publication Notice, an internet advertising campaign, a website, and a toll-free hotline, and is the best notice that is practicable under the circumstances, as required 5

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 6 of 9 by Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B). The manner of providing notice to all class members who would be bound by the Notice Plan is reasonable, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). 12. The Notice Plan and the Proposed Michael Foods Settlement shall proceed in the following manner and on the following schedule: a. Garden City Group ( GCG ) is hereby appointed as Claims Administrator for the Michael Foods Settlement and is approved to implement the Notice Plan and to administer claims under the Michael Foods Settlement, having been previously appointed to do so for the Previously Approved Settlements. b. By July 20, 2017, GCG shall send notice of the certification of the Litigation Class, the Michael Foods Settlement Agreement, and of the claims process for the Michael Foods Settlement and for the Previously Approved Settlements, along with a claim form for those settlements, by U.S. First Class mail, postage prepaid, to all individuals and entities whose names and addresses were previously produced by Defendants to GCG (Direct Mail Notice) or which were obtained by GCG through administration of prior settlements in this Action and who are not facially ineligible under the settlements. The Direct Mail Notice and Claim Form shall be in substantially the same format as that proposed at Doc. No. 1499-3, Exs. C & D. c. By July 3, 2017, GCG shall publish the Direct Mail Notice and the Claim Form, relevant Court documents, the Michael Foods Settlement Agreement, the Court s Order regarding certification of a Shell Egg Litigation Class, the Court s Order preliminarily approving the Michael Foods Settlement, any Settlement updates, 6

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 7 of 9 and updated answers to Frequently Asked Questions at www.eggproductssettlement.com. d. By July 3, 2017, GCG will staff a toll-free hotline, (866) 881-8306, to answer any potential class members questions. e. GCG shall publish Summary Notice (or Publication Notice ) in substantially the same format that proposed at Doc. No. 1499-3, Ex. E, as follows: i. By July 17, 2017, on one occasion, in the National Edition of the Wall Street Journal, on one-eighth of one page; ii. Beginning by August 10, 2017 (or as close thereto as publication schedules permit) and completed by September 8, 2017, on one occasion, in the following industry publications: Convenience Store News, Progressive Grocer, Supermarket News, Food Service Director, Restaurant Business, Nation s Restaurant News, Food Processing, Bake, Pet Food Industry, and Egg Industry Magazine; and iii. By July 10, 2017, GCG shall issue press releases, consisting of substantially the same language of the Publication Notice, through (i) PR Newswire s US1 List and Restaurant and Food Industry Microlist; and (ii) National Hispanic Newslines. f. By July 17, 2017, GCG shall implement the keyword search advertising campaign described in Doc. No. 1499-3, on one or more leading search engines. g. Commencing by July 20, 2017 (or as close thereto as publication schedules permit) and completed by September 8, 2017, GCG shall publish internet banner 7

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 8 of 9 ads linked to the Settlement Website, in substantially the same format as attached as Doc. No. 1499-3, Ex. F, as follows: i. On the Wall Street Journal Digital Network websites for a period of four weeks; ii. On the following trade-related websites for a period of four weeks: hotelfandb.com, bakingbusiness.com, and foodprocessing.com; and iii. In the following trade e-newsletters for one-time insertion except as noted: Restaurant Business Weekly Recap, Nation s Restaurant News s NRN A.M., FoodService Director Updates, Today in Food Manufacturing, SN Daily, Stores Weekly (two insertions), and Watt Poultry Update; h. By September 25, 2017, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall file an affidavit prepared by GCG that details the process engaged in by GCG to effect the Notice Plan, and confirms that the requirements regarding Direct Mail Notice, Publication Notice, the website, the toll-free hotline, the internet banner ad campaign, and the keyword search advertising campaign have been completed in accordance with this Order. i. Requests for Exclusion from the Michael Foods Settlement must be postmarked by October 9, 2017, which date shall be inserted in the Direct Mail Notice and Publication Notice. j. Objections to the Michael Foods Settlement must be postmarked by October 9, 2017, which date shall be inserted in the Direct Mail Notice and Publication Notice. 8

Case 2:08-md-02002-GEKP Document 1523 Filed 06/26/17 Page 9 of 9 k. Motion for Final Approval of the Michael Foods Settlement must be filed by October 19, 2017. l. The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing for the Michael Foods Settlement at 10:00 a.m. on November 6, 2017, in Courtroom 10B, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106. This date shall be inserted into the Direct Mail Notice and Publication Notice. The date, time, and location of this hearing are subject to change, and Class members are advised to check www.eggsproductssettlement.com for any updates. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge 9